Nicox Announces Positive Pre-submission Regulatory Feedback in China Supporting NDA filing for NCX 470
Regulatory Approvals

Nicox Announces Positive Pre-submission Regulatory Feedback in China Supporting NDA filing for NCX 470

Published : 19 Jun 2026

At a Glance
IndicationOpen-angle glaucoma, Ocular hypertension
DrugNCX 470 (bimatoprost grenod)
Mechanism of ActionNitric oxide-donating bimatoprost
CompanyNicox SA
Trial PhasePhase 3
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryRegulatory Submission Filed
Regulatory AgencyChinese Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Licensee (China)Ocumension Therapeutics
Licensee (Rest of World)Kowa
Submission TypeNew Drug Application (NDA)
Expected U.S. NDA SubmissionSummer 2026
Expected China NDA SubmissionShortly after U.S. submission
Licensed Territory (Ocumension)Chinese market, South Korea, Southeast Asia
Deal StructureRegulatory and sales milestones, royalties on worldwide sales

Nicox's NCX 470 Receives Positive China CDE Pre-submission Feedback

Nicox SA announced that its exclusive licensee in China, Ocumension Therapeutics, has received positive pre-submission regulatory feedback from the Chinese Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) for NCX 470. This feedback is considered sufficient for Ocumension to proceed with the New Drug Application (NDA) submission in China. The Chinese submission is expected to follow shortly after the U.S. FDA NDA submission, which Nicox's partner Kowa anticipates filing in summer 2026. NCX 470 (bimatoprost grenod) is a novel nitric oxide-donating bimatoprost eye drop aimed at lowering intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

  • Ocumension Therapeutics, Nicox's exclusive licensee for the Chinese market, has secured positive pre-submission regulatory feedback from the Chinese Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) for NCX 470. This crucial feedback paves the way for Ocumension to proceed with the New Drug Application (NDA) submission in China, marking a significant step towards potential market approval in the region.
  • The positive CDE feedback in China follows a recently announced successful pre-New Drug Application meeting with the U.S. FDA for NCX 470. Nicox anticipates that its exclusive U.S. partner, Kowa, will submit the NDA for NCX 470 in the U.S. in summer 2026, with the Chinese submission expected to follow shortly thereafter, demonstrating a coordinated global regulatory strategy.
  • NCX 470 (bimatoprost grenod) is a novel nitric oxide-donating bimatoprost eye drop developed for lowering intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The drug is licensed globally to Kowa, with Ocumension Therapeutics holding exclusive rights for the Chinese, South Korean, and Southeast Asian markets. Nicox is set to receive regulatory and sales milestones, along with royalties on worldwide sales.

NCX 470's Profile Supporting Regulatory Submissions

NCX 470 (bimatoprost grenod) has demonstrated a consistent safety and tolerability profile across both clinical and preclinical settings. Conjunctival hyperemia represents the primary adverse event of note, a finding aligned with the known class effect of prostaglandin analogs, while no unexpected safety signals have emerged across species or dose levels studied.

  • Clinical tolerability across all tested concentrations: In a 2022 clinical trial enrolling adult patients with bilateral open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, NCX 470 was safe and well tolerated at all three evaluated concentrations — 0.021% (n=111), 0.042% (n=108), and 0.065% (n=107) — administered once daily in the evening for 4 weeks, compared against latanoprost 0.005% (n=107).

  • Primary adverse event profile: Conjunctival hyperemia was the most frequently reported adverse event across all NCX 470 concentrations in the clinical trial, consistent with the prostaglandin analog drug class; adverse events were systematically evaluated at weeks 1, 2, and 4.

  • Preclinical safety in ischemia/reperfusion models: A 2023 study employing an endothelin-1–induced ischemia/reperfusion injury model in rabbits demonstrated a favorable safety profile following repeated ocular dosing of NCX 470 0.1% twice daily, 6 days/week over multiple weeks, with findings attributable to nitric oxide– and bimatoprost-mediated mechanisms.

  • Multispecies preclinical tolerability: A 2016 preclinical study evaluated NCX 470 in New Zealand white rabbits, cynomolgus monkeys, and normotensive dogs without reported safety or tolerability concerns across any species.

  • Anticipated class-level safety alignment: A 2023 expert opinion indicated that nitric oxide–hybrid FP receptor agonists, including NCX 470, may demonstrate a safety profile broadly comparable to approved prostaglandin analogs currently used in clinical practice.

Addressing Unmet Needs in Open-Angle Glaucoma Treatment

Current treatment approaches for open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension face a complex interplay of clinical, pharmacological, and systemic barriers that collectively limit optimal disease management. The largely asymptomatic nature of OAG contributes to high rates of underdiagnosis, with the disease remaining undetected in approximately half of affected individuals, and management is further constrained by the irreversibility of pre-existing optic nerve damage — making early, accurate diagnosis essential yet persistently challenging.

  • Patient adherence and compliance: Non-compliance with therapeutic regimens is common and frequently underappreciated by clinicians, who often find it difficult to detect. Risk factors for non-compliance are multifactorial, and once-daily dosing is considered optimal for improving adherence. Education, improved physician-patient communication, compliance aids, and simplified regimens have been identified as key mitigation strategies.

  • Medication-related adverse effects and ocular surface disease: Most IOP-lowering agents are associated with local and/or systemic adverse effects, short duration of action, and chronic tolerability issues. Long-term use of topical formulations — particularly those containing the preservative benzalkonium chloride — induces ocular surface changes including inflammatory cytokine release, tear film disruption, dry eye disease, and chronic inflammation, all of which may impair quality of life and further compromise adherence over a patient's lifetime.

  • Surgical access and cost-effectiveness barriers: Early surgical intervention is gaining traction as a paradigm shift to preserve vision and quality of life, but implementation is limited by waiting lists and restricted surgical capacity. Economic analyses have shown that trabeculectomy is unlikely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (incremental cost: £45,456/QALY), presenting a significant barrier to adoption in resource-constrained healthcare systems.

  • Underutilization of laser therapy as first-line treatment: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a safe and effective alternative, with 74.2% of patients requiring no topical drops to maintain target IOP at 36 months; however, it remains rarely used as a first-line option despite strong evidence supporting a change in clinical practice and a 97% probability of cost-effectiveness over eye drops at a £20,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold.

  • Diagnostic complexity and late-stage treatment targeting: Decision-making has grown more complex with the introduction of innovative diagnostic tools and newer therapeutic agents. Current treatments predominantly target IOP reduction to slow optic nerve degeneration rather than addressing disease pathophysiology at its onset, leaving a critical gap in neuroprotective and disease-modifying strategies.

  • Limitations of alternative and complementary therapies: At least 5% of the glaucoma population uses alternative and complementary therapies (ACT); however, evidence supporting the neuroprotective effects of agents such as Ginkgo biloba, bilberry, and alcohol remains weak. Lifestyle interventions (e.g., exercise, alcohol consumption) reduce IOP by only 1–2 mmHg, producing a clinically marginal effect, and ACT cannot substitute conventional IOP-lowering treatment in current practice.

  • Holistic treatment philosophy versus current practice gaps: The overarching goal of glaucoma management is to preserve visual function and quality of life while minimizing the burden of cost, side effects, follow-up demands, and socioeconomic impact. Current approaches that focus narrowly on IOP, optic disc appearance, or visual field metrics fall short of treating the patient as a whole — a gap that continues to drive unmet need in long-term disease management.

NCX 470's Potential in the Evolving Glaucoma Landscape

Published studies spanning 2004–2025 collectively position investigational and next-generation IOP-lowering therapies within a well-characterized standard-of-care landscape dominated by prostaglandin analogs (PGAs), β-blockers, and surgical intervention. The evidence base reveals meaningful differentiation among agents across efficacy, tolerability, mechanism, and patient-specific applicability — with emerging therapies increasingly demonstrating complementary rather than replacement roles. Notably, monotherapy with any single agent fails to achieve satisfactory IOP control in 40–75% of glaucoma patients after more than two years of therapy, underscoring the need for combination strategies and novel mechanisms.

Agent / Intervention Class / Mechanism Study Type & Population Key Efficacy Findings Tolerability / Safety Notes
Travoprost PGA (FP receptor agonist) Prospective; 379 patients (220 OAG, 141 OHT) Mean IOP ↓ 6.31 mmHg (24.4%; P<0.001); greater reduction with higher baseline IOP CCT thinning of 6.9 µm (P<0.001); OAG patients with thicker baseline CCT had smaller % IOP reduction
Bimatoprost 0.03% PGA (prostamide analog) Meta-analysis (17 studies, N=2,433; 1–12 months) Greater overall IOP reduction vs. latanoprost and travoprost at 3 and 6 months Elevated risk of conjunctival hyperemia and lash growth vs. latanoprost; lower ocular tolerability overall
Latanoprost 0.005% PGA (FP receptor agonist) Meta-analysis (17 studies, N=2,433) No significant IOP difference vs. travoprost; less effective than bimatoprost at 3 and 6 months Better tolerated in POAG/OHT patients vs. bimatoprost; fewer local adverse effects
Travoprost vs. Bimatoprost PGA comparison Meta-analysis (17 studies) Travoprost significantly more effective than bimatoprost in IOP reduction at 3 months Travoprost associated with elevated conjunctival hyperemia risk vs. latanoprost
Xalatan (latanoprost) vs. Glautan (generic) PGA — originator vs. generic Crossover; N=19 (mean age 66±9 years) Both lowered IOP at 1 week (P=0.06) and 1 month (P=0.04); no statistically significant difference between brands (P=0.69 at 1 week; P=0.34 at 1 month) More ocular side effects with Glautan (21 vs. 12 events; P=0.06)
Latanoprost Polpharma (preservative-free generic) vs. Xalatan PGA — preservative-free generic vs. originator Bioequivalence study; N=47 (ITT), N=44 (PP) Mean diurnal IOP reduction: 7.29±2.53 mmHg (generic) vs. 7.43±2.78 mmHg (Xalatan) — non-inferior Equal tolerability and safety; no serious AEs; trend favoring generic on hyperemia severity and speed of ocular discomfort resolution; avoids BAC cytotoxicity
Tafluprost Preservative-free PGA Phase IV multicenter; N=285 (POAG/OHT; China, 2017–2020) IOP ↓ 4.7 mmHg (19.8%) in treatment-naïve patients at 3 months; 4.6 mmHg (20.3%) in non-PGA switch group; significant at all visits (P<0.05) Conjunctival hyperemia in 11.6% (34/293); 58 treatment-related AEs in 46 participants (15.7%); tolerable profile
Tafluprost-Timolol Fixed Combination (TTFC) Preservative-free PGA + β-blocker FC Single Phase III trial (as of 2014) Promising efficacy, tolerability, and safety in Phase III data Improved AE profile in preservative-sensitive patients; no market authorization at time of publication
Latanoprostene bunod 0.024% Nitric oxide–donating PGA (FP agonist + NO donor) Clinical trials and real-world studies (reviewed 2025) Dual mechanism: enhances outflow via trabecular meshwork and uveoscleral pathways; strong efficacy demonstrated across studies Favorable safety profile; NO component may regulate ocular blood flow and support retinal ganglion cell survival; future fixed-combination and sustained-release formulations in development
Netarsudil 0.02% vs. Bimatoprost 0.01% ROCK inhibitor vs. PGA Controlled monotherapy comparison (2024–2025) Mean treated IOP: netarsudil 17.51–18.57 mmHg vs. bimatoprost 15.80–16.46 mmHg; combination 14.00–14.87 mmHg; all groups P<0.001 vs. baseline at 4, 8, 12 weeks Netarsudil non-inferior to bimatoprost; combination superior; conjunctival hyperemia most frequent AE, predominant in netarsudil and combination arms (P<0.001)
Ripasudil (ROCK inhibitor) Rho-associated kinase inhibitor Review (2020) Expected to lower IOP across multiple glaucoma subtypes (POAG, secondary, PACG) Most common ADR: transient, mild conjunctival hyperemia; blepharitis and allergic conjunctivitis also reported; systemic ADRs rare
Novel investigational classes (2011 landscape) Latrunculin, ROCK inhibitors, adenosine analogs, AT1 antagonists, cannabinoid agonists, serotonin antagonists Early-phase clinical trials Clinical value contingent on demonstrating favorable efficacy/benefit-risk vs. PGAs and β-blockers, or complementary mechanisms of action Class-specific profiles not yet established at time of review
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs. Eye Drops Laser procedure (first-line) RCT; 36-month follow-up 93.0% of SLT eyes within target IOP vs. 91.3% in drops group; 74.2% of SLT patients required no drops at 36 months; 0 vs. 11 patients required glaucoma surgery No significant difference in HRQoL (EQ-5D: 0.89 vs. 0.90; P=0.23); 97% probability SLT more cost-effective at £20,000/QALY threshold
iStent + Phacoemulsification MIGS — trabecular micro-bypass Prospective; 232 eyes, Japanese OAG patients; 24-month follow-up IOP: 17.6±4.0 → 14.3±3.0 mmHg at 24 months (P<0.05); medications: 2.2±1.2 → 0.7±1.2 (P<0.05); treatment success: 96.7% / 95.3% / 93.7% at 6/12/24 months; 67.6% medication-free at 24 months vs. 3.2% preoperatively (P<0.0001) Favorable safety profile across 2-year period; consistent results across OAG subtypes
Xen 45 Gel Stent (ab externo) vs. Trabeculectomy MIGS vs. conventional filtration surgery Comparative study; 34 XGS AEO eyes, 82 trabeculectomy eyes 1-year success at IOP ≤21/18/15 mmHg: XGS AEO 72%/69%/31% vs. trabeculectomy 62%/61%/49%; no significant intergroup differences in IOP, % IOP change, VA, complications, or revision surgeries Higher medication use in XGS AEO group; fewer postoperative manipulations with XGS AEO vs. trabeculectomy (P=0.020); prior trabeculoplasty associated with lower failure risk in XGS AEO but higher risk in trabeculectomy
Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy (NPDS) Non-penetrating filtration surgery Retrospective; 258 eyes (179 patients); mean follow-up 54.4±17.07 months Probability of IOP <21 mmHg at 60 months: 66.46% off all medications; 80.32% with adjunctive medical/surgical treatment Microperforation in 10.5%; cataract in 2%; no endophthalmitis or choroidal detachment; 8.9% required subsequent filtration surgery

NCX 470: A Dual-Action Glaucoma Therapy Nears Global Launch

The recent positive pre-submission regulatory feedback from China's Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) for NCX 470 marks a pivotal moment for Nicox SA and its licensee Ocumension Therapeutics. This development signals an imminent New Drug Application (NDA) submission in China, potentially preceding the anticipated US FDA filing in summer 2026. For a condition as prevalent and sight-threatening as open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, the introduction of a novel, highly effective treatment could significantly impact patient care globally.

NCX 470 is a nitric oxide-donating bimatoprost, designed to leverage a dual mechanism of action by activating both prostaglandin F2α and nitric oxide/cGMP signaling pathways. This innovative approach has consistently demonstrated superior intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering compared to both bimatoprost and latanoprost in preclinical and clinical studies, including the Dolomites and MONT BLANC trials. The MONT BLANC study, for instance, showed NCX 470 0.1% lowered IOP more than latanoprost at multiple time points, suggesting a potential to redefine the standard of care.

Beyond its enhanced IOP-lowering capabilities, research indicates NCX 470 may offer additional benefits such as retinal cell protection and improved ocular hemodynamics, which could be crucial in mitigating visual field loss—a primary concern in glaucoma management. This positions NCX 470 not just as an incremental improvement but as a potentially transformative therapy.

However, as with any new ophthalmic agent, considerations remain. Conjunctival/ocular hyperemia was the most frequently reported adverse event in clinical trials, a common side effect of prostaglandin analogues that could influence patient compliance. While short-term efficacy and safety data are promising, the long-term profile of NCX 470 in chronic glaucoma management will be critical for widespread adoption. Furthermore, the competitive landscape already includes other nitric oxide-donating prostaglandin analogues, necessitating clear differentiation of NCX 470's unique advantages. Nevertheless, the strategic move to secure early regulatory traction in China underscores a global ambition for NCX 470, potentially establishing it as an important first-line therapy across diverse markets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should not use bimatoprost drops?
Bimatoprost drops are contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to bimatoprost or any component of the formulation. Caution is advised in patients with active intraocular inflammation, such as uveitis or iritis, as it may exacerbate these conditions. Additionally, patients with aphakia or pseudophakia with a torn posterior lens capsule are at increased risk of macular edema.
What were the results of the OHTS study?
The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) demonstrated that topical ocular hypotensive medication significantly reduced the incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in individuals with ocular hypertension. Over five years, the incidence of POAG was 4.4% in the treated group compared to 9.5% in the observation group, representing a 50% risk reduction. This established that lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with OHT can delay or prevent the onset of POAG.
What risk factor for glaucoma progression was confirmed in the ocular hypertension treatment study?
The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) confirmed that thin central corneal thickness (CCT) is a significant independent risk factor for the development of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in individuals with ocular hypertension. Patients with thinner corneas demonstrated a substantially higher risk of progression, irrespective of their intraocular pressure. This finding significantly impacted glaucoma risk stratification and clinical management.
How does NCX 470 differ from conventional bimatoprost in treating glaucoma?
NCX 470 is a novel bimatoprost derivative engineered to provide a dual mechanism of action for intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. While it functions as a prostaglandin F2α receptor agonist like bimatoprost, it also acts as a nitric oxide (NO) donor. This NO-donating property is designed to further relax the trabecular meshwork, enhancing aqueous humor outflow and potentially offering superior IOP lowering compared to existing prostaglandin analogs.

References

  1. [1] Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E et al.. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2019 Apr 13. 30862377
  2. [2] Golan S, Rosenfeld E et al.. Original and generic latanoprost for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: are they really the same?. Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology. 2015 Feb. 25345750
  3. [3] Hernández-Barahona Palma J, Cabanás Jiménez M et al.. Glaucoinnova study: Strategic reflection on innovation in glaucoma in Andalusia. Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia. 2026 Apr. 41734871
  4. [4] Moshegov S, Kerr NM. Prostaglandin FP receptor agonists in the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a literature review. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2023 Jul-Dec. 37929314
  5. [5] Parikh RS, Parikh SR. Alternative therapy in glaucoma management: is there any role?. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2011 Jan. 21150028
  6. [6] Ramesh PV, Pannerselvam P et al.. The SKIBI study: Comparative early outcomes of five minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries combined with cataract extraction in Indian patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2026 Mar 1. 41739116
  7. [7] Fuchsjäger-Mayrl G, Wally B et al.. Ocular blood flow and systemic blood pressure in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2004 Mar. 14985298
  8. [8] Sanfilippo P. A review of argon and selective laser trabeculoplasty as primary treatments of open-angle glaucoma. Clinical & experimental optometry. 1999 Nov-Dec. 12482268
  9. [9] Schehlein EM, Novack G et al.. New pharmacotherapy for the treatment of glaucoma. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2017 Dec. 29172818
  10. [10] Kusuhara S, Nakamura M. Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate in the Treatment of Glaucoma: Safety, Efficacy, and Patient Selection. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2020. 32440089
  11. [11] Sun X, Liu Q et al.. Effectiveness and safety of tafluprost in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a post-marketing phase IV study in China. BMC ophthalmology. 2022 Aug 5. 35932001
  12. [12] Applebaum SS, Hundito A et al.. Surgical Outcome Comparison of Open Conjunctival Ab Externo Xen 45 Gel Stent Implantation vs Trabeculectomy in Open-angle Glaucoma. Journal of current glaucoma practice. 2025 Oct-Dec. 41523177
  13. [13] Ibrahim MM, Jablonski MM. The Impact of R-801 Nanoparticles as a Long Acting Topical Glaucoma Therapy. Journal of biomedical nanotechnology. 2019 Sep 1. 31387683
  14. [14] Pose-Bazarra S, López-Valladares MJ et al.. Feasibility, efficacy and safety of early lens extraction in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: a feasibility and pilot study. Eye (London, England). 2023 Jun. 36163490
  15. [15] Lee MD, Fechtner FR et al.. Emerging perspectives on glaucoma: highlights of a roundtable discussion. American journal of ophthalmology. 2000 Oct. 11024449
  16. [16] King AJ, Fernie G et al.. Primary trabeculectomy versus primary glaucoma eye drops for newly diagnosed advanced glaucoma: TAGS RCT. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). 2021 Nov. 34854808
  17. [17] Bao J, Yu Y et al.. Effect of antioxidants on primary open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2025. 40978491
  18. [18] Dada T, Lahri B et al.. Beneficial effect of mindfulness based stress reduction on optic disc perfusion in primary open angle glaucoma: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine. 2021 Nov. 34765522
  19. [19] Koziorowska AM, Opala A et al.. Non-Contact Laser Therapy for Glaucoma: A Review of Direct Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025 Sep 28. 41095964
  20. [20] Liu Y, Mao W. Tafluprost once daily for treatment of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2013. 23293509

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts