Amgen’s rare disease drug Tavneos tied to 20 deaths in Japan
Regulatory Approvals

Amgen’s rare disease drug Tavneos tied to 20 deaths in Japan

Published : 21 May 2026

At a Glance
IndicationAutoimmune disease
DrugTavneos
CompanyAmgen
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryLabel Update / Expansion
Affected RegionJapan, U.S.
Number of Deaths (Japan)20
Number of Deaths (U.S.)8
Adverse EventVanishing bile duct syndrome (VBS), Drug-induced liver injury (DILI)
Japanese PartnerKissei Pharmaceutical
Patients Treated (Japan)Over 8,500
Drug Launch Year (Japan)2022
Acquisition Value$3.7 billion
Acquired CompanyChemoCentryx
Drug Approval Year (U.S.)2021

Amgen's Tavneos Linked to 20 Deaths in Japan Amid Data Manipulation Claims

Amgen's autoimmune drug Tavneos has been linked to 20 deaths in Japan since its 2022 launch, primarily due to vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBS), a complication of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Kissei Pharmaceutical, Amgen's Japanese partner, issued a safety alert discouraging new prescriptions and recommending careful assessment for existing patients. Amgen stated these deaths occurred among over 8,500 patients treated in Japan and that a causal relationship isn't always determined. This follows previous FDA concerns in the U.S., where 76 VBS cases and 8 deaths were flagged with a "reasonable evidence of causal association," and allegations of manipulated data supporting the drug's 2021 approval. The FDA had previously requested Tavneos be pulled from the market.

  • Safety Concerns in Japan: Kissei Pharmaceutical, Amgen's Japanese partner, reported 20 deaths among patients treated with Tavneos since its 2022 launch in Japan. Most mortalities were linked to vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBS), a severe form of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Kissei has advised healthcare professionals to refrain from prescribing Tavneos to new patients and to carefully evaluate continued treatment for existing ones, initiating an information campaign to communicate these risks.
  • Amgen's Context and U.S. Data: Amgen provided context, noting the 20 deaths occurred among over 8,500 patients treated with Tavneos in Japan, emphasizing that a causal relationship with the product could not always be determined. The company also stated no known Tavneos-linked deaths from serious liver injury have occurred in the U.S., despite the FDA flagging 76 VBS cases and 8 deaths with "reasonable evidence of causal association" in March.
  • FDA Allegations and Regulatory Scrutiny: The FDA has intensified its scrutiny of Tavneos, having previously requested its market withdrawal in January due to issues with the re-adjudication of the primary endpoint in its pivotal study. More recently, the agency alleged that "doctored data" were filed to support the drug's 2021 approval, claiming manipulated results made the drug appear effective when the original analysis did not support this conclusion, thus questioning the drug's demonstrated efficacy.
  • Acquisition and Franchise Challenges: Amgen acquired ChemoCentryx, the original developer of Tavneos, in 2022 for $3.7 billion. The recent safety alerts and FDA allegations pose significant challenges for the Tavneos franchise, which Amgen continues to defend as an "important and effective medicine" with a favorable benefit-risk profile, despite the ongoing controversies surrounding its safety and approval process.

The Pivotal Tavneos Trial: Design Under Scrutiny

Recent clinical trials in autoimmune diseases have employed diverse study designs to evaluate novel therapeutics across multiple disease areas. These trials have utilized standardized endpoints specific to each condition while maintaining consistent safety assessment parameters across all studies.

Study/Disease Design Sample Size Duration Primary Endpoints Key Secondary Endpoints
Adalimumab Interchangeability (2025) Phase 3, randomized, controlled 427 patients 32 weeks Pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC, Tmax) during weeks 30-32 ADA-positive samples, neutralizing antibody persistence
ULTIMATE I/II (Multiple Sclerosis) Phase 3, controlled Not specified Not specified Efficacy vs teriflunomide B-cell depletion assessment
SELECT-CHOICE (RA) Phase 3, double-blind, controlled 612 patients (303 upadacitinib, 309 abatacept) 24 weeks Change in DAS28-CRP at week 12 (noninferiority) DAS28-CRP superiority, remission rates (<2.6)
ADMYRA (RA Biosimilar) Phase 3, double-blind 353 patients 46 weeks Change in DAS28-CRP at week 12 EULAR response, Boolean remission, immunogenicity
Belimumab NEA (SLE) Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled 100 South Korean patients 52 weeks SRI-4 response rate at week 52 SLEDAI score reduction, BILAG domain assessment
Evobrutinib Integrated Safety Phase 2, randomized, double-blind 1,083 patients (MS: 213, RA: 390, SLE: 480) MS: 48 weeks, RA: 12 weeks, SLE: 52 weeks Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) Exposure-adjusted incidence rates
Tofacitinib Phase 3 (RA) Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled 399 patients 3 months ACR20 response, HAQ-DI change, DAS28<2.6 at month 3 ACR50/70 responses, radiographic progression
BLISS-52/76 (SLE) Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled Not specified 52-76 weeks SLE Responder Index (SRI) at week 52 SLEDAI improvement, time to flare

Tavneos Safety Profile: Emerging Liver Injury Concerns

Published safety and tolerability data for Tavneos (avacopan) demonstrates a generally favorable profile compared to traditional glucocorticoid-based regimens, though emerging concerns about liver injury warrant attention. Meta-analysis of clinical trials shows avacopan substantially reduces glucocorticoid-related adverse events without increasing serious infections, mortality, or treatment discontinuations, while real-world pharmacovigilance data reveals specific safety signals requiring monitoring.

Liver injury represents the most significant safety concern, occurring in 16.7-40.9% of cases in Japanese cohorts, with elevated liver enzyme levels observed in 38.1% of patients in real-world studies and Japanese patients exhibiting significantly higher risk of liver dysfunction compared to American patients (p<0.001)

Large-scale pharmacovigilance analysis identified 33 adverse event signals from 1,128 avacopan-related reports, including five new potential adverse events (alopecia, increased appetite, hyperaesthesia teeth, oesophageal disorder, and muscle atrophy) with median onset time of 86.5 days

Serious adverse events occur at comparable rates to standard therapy, with 37.3% of avacopan patients versus 39.0% of prednisone patients experiencing serious adverse events excluding worsening vasculitis in the ADVOCATE trial

Drug discontinuation rates remain substantial at 42.9% in Japanese real-world studies, though patients still achieved comparable remission rates at 6 months and sustained remission at 12 months despite early discontinuation

Infection-related safety profile shows mixed signals, with meta-analysis demonstrating no significant increase in serious infections, but real-world data revealing sepsis and pulmonary hemorrhage as newly identified adverse events, plus two serious infection-related events in diffuse alveolar hemorrhage patients

Geographic and demographic variations in safety patterns emerged from FAERS database analysis of 7,141 adverse events, showing higher adverse event rates in female patients, increased mortality in males aged ≥65 years, and population-specific adverse events like alopecia occurring exclusively in American patients

Addressing Unmet Needs in Autoimmune Disease Treatment

Current autoimmune disease treatments face significant therapeutic limitations that underscore the urgent need for more advanced approaches. Conventional immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive therapies often fail to provide cures and have restricted efficacy in symptom management, leaving many patients with progressive disability.

Limited efficacy of conventional therapies - Immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drugs used for systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis frequently fall short of providing cures and have significant limitations in symptom management

Challenges in translating research to clinical practice - A persistent gap exists between basic research findings and therapeutic trial implementation, hindering the development of evidence-based interventions

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation limitations - Despite theoretical promise for reversing or modulating autoimmune disease, this approach faces substantial barriers including economic constraints, healthcare delivery challenges, and unresolved efficacy and safety concerns

Disease-specific diagnostic requirements - For conditions like myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathies, effective treatment requires standardized diagnostic evaluation of biopsy specimens rather than clinical examination alone, and treatment efficacy depends on identifying treatable causes before irreversible myocardial injury occurs

Anti-CD20 therapy safety concerns - Monoclonal antibodies widely used for B-cell malignancies and autoimmune diseases present insufficiently characterized ocular toxicity, requiring careful monitoring particularly in multiple sclerosis patients, with over half of ocular adverse events occurring within 15 days of treatment initiation

Methodological challenges in emerging research - Microbiome research faces significant obstacles including methodological inconsistencies, limited longitudinal studies, and result heterogeneity, highlighting the need for standardized protocols and larger controlled clinical trials

AAV Treatment: Balancing Innovation with Emerging Safety Signals

Avacopan (Tavneos) emerged as a promising therapeutic option for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), offering a much-needed glucocorticoid-sparing strategy. Clinical trials demonstrated its non-inferiority to prednisone for remission and superiority for sustained remission, significantly reducing the burden of corticosteroid-related toxicities that have long plagued AAV patients. This innovation was poised to revolutionize AAV management, providing a pathway to less reliance on high-dose steroids.

However, the recent safety alert in Japan, linking Tavneos to 20 deaths primarily due to vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBS), a severe form of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), casts a significant shadow over its clinical utility. This is not an isolated concern; previous FDA reviews in the U.S. had already identified VBS cases and deaths with a "reasonable evidence of causal association," even requesting the drug be pulled from the market at one point. The literature supports these concerns, with liver damage and elevated liver enzymes frequently reported as adverse events, and real-world pharmacovigilance data specifically highlighting a higher risk of liver dysfunction in Japanese patients.

This situation underscores the critical importance of robust post-marketing surveillance, especially for novel therapies. While avacopan's mechanism targeting the C5a receptor offers a valuable alternative to traditional immunosuppression, the emergence of such severe, potentially fatal, hepatotoxicity demands immediate and thorough investigation. Companies must navigate the delicate balance of bringing innovative treatments to market while ensuring patient safety through comprehensive data collection and transparent communication. The long-term safety profile, particularly beyond the initial 52-week trial period, and optimal concomitant glucocorticoid use remain areas requiring further study. For clinicians, this necessitates heightened vigilance in monitoring liver function, especially in high-risk populations, and careful patient selection to maximize the drug's benefits while minimizing its serious risks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the controversy with TAVNEOS?
The primary controversy surrounding TAVNEOS (avacopan) centers on its cost-effectiveness and optimal integration into ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) treatment algorithms. While the ADVOCATE trial demonstrated its efficacy in reducing corticosteroid exposure and achieving remission, some debate exists regarding the clinical significance of the steroid-sparing effect relative to its high cost. This has led to discussions among clinicians and payers about its precise role compared to established steroid-sparing immunosuppressants.
How do you accept that you have an autoimmune disease?
Acceptance of an autoimmune disease typically involves a multi-stage process, beginning with processing the diagnosis and its profound implications for one's health and future. This often includes a period of grief for lost health and a re-evaluation of personal identity and capabilities. Over time, acceptance is fostered through comprehensive patient education, effective symptom management strategies, and robust psychosocial support, enabling adaptation to a new normal.
How does Tavneos (avacopan) modulate the immune response in autoimmune vasculitis?
Tavneos is a first-in-class oral selective antagonist of the complement C5a receptor (C5aR1). By blocking C5aR1, it prevents the pro-inflammatory effects of C5a, a potent anaphylatoxin, on neutrophils and other immune cells. This action reduces neutrophil activation, migration, and degranulation, which are critical drivers of inflammation and tissue damage in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Its mechanism aims to control the disease while potentially reducing the need for chronic corticosteroid use.
How does Tavneos compare to traditional immunosuppressants in managing ANCA-associated vasculitis?
Tavneos offers a distinct mechanism of action compared to traditional broad-spectrum immunosuppressants often used in ANCA-associated vasculitis. While conventional therapies like corticosteroids suppress the entire immune system, Tavneos specifically targets the C5a pathway, a key inflammatory mediator. This targeted approach aims to achieve disease control with a potentially more favorable safety profile, particularly regarding corticosteroid-related toxicities. It represents an alternative or adjunctive strategy to reduce reliance on systemic glucocorticoids.

References

  1. [1] Patel NJ, Stone JH. Expert Perspective: Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.). 2022 Aug. 35289109
  2. [2] Tourdot S, Vazquez-Abad MD et al.. Antidrug antibodies to adalimumab do not associate with immunologically related adverse events. Frontiers in immunology. 2024. 40084239
  3. [3] Montilla Morales C, Gómez-Castro S et al.. [New therapeutic targets in psoriatic arthritis]. Reumatologia clinica. 2012 Mar. 22421457
  4. [4] Alihosseini C, Kopelman H et al.. Avacopan for the Treatment of Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 2023 Dec. 36975183
  5. [5] Yousefi-Hashemabad MJ, Hashemi S et al.. From Immunization to Autoimmunity: A Deep Dive Into Post-COVID-19 Vaccine Reactions-A Narrative Review. Health science reports. 2026 Apr. 41948621
  6. [6] Chatenoud L, Warncke K et al.. Clinical immunologic interventions for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2012 Aug 1. 22908194
  7. [7] Merkel PA, Niles J et al.. Adjunctive Treatment With Avacopan, an Oral C5a Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. ACR open rheumatology. 2020 Nov. 33128347
  8. [8] Lee YH, Song GG. Efficacy and Safety of Avacopan in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pharmacology. 2026 Apr 7. 41945486
  9. [9] Raimondo MG, Biggioggero M et al.. Clinical pharmacology of filgotinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: current insights. Expert review of clinical pharmacology. 2021 Jun. 33847204
  10. [10] Lee A. Avacopan: First Approval. Drugs. 2022 Jan. 34826105
  11. [11] Tsakok T, Rispens T et al.. Immunogenicity of biologic therapies in psoriasis: Myths, facts and a suggested approach. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2021 Feb. 33030275
  12. [12] Kühl U, Schultheiss HP. Myocarditis: early biopsy allows for tailored regenerative treatment. Deutsches Arzteblatt international. 2012 May. 22685492
  13. [13] Dörner T. Therapy: Hydroxychloroquine in SLE: old drug, new perspectives. Nature reviews. Rheumatology. 2010 Jan. 20046202
  14. [14] Kakehasi AM, Radominski SC et al.. Safety of upadacitinib in Latin American patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an integrated safety analysis of the SELECT phase 3 clinical program. Clinical rheumatology. 2023 May. 36715850
  15. [15] Kettritz R. [KDIGO-Update: Treatment of ANCA vasculitis]. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946). 2025 Nov. 41151615
  16. [16] Chevet B, Boscato Sopetto G et al.. Aging in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis and Microscopic Polyangiitis: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Management. Drugs & aging. 2025 Jul. 40448791
  17. [17] Nair JR, Edwards SW et al.. Mavrilimumab, a human monoclonal GM-CSF receptor-α antibody for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: a novel approach to therapy. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2012 Dec. 23094973
  18. [18] Wiland P, Jeka S et al.. Switching to Biosimilar SDZ-ADL in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity Results From the Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind ADMYRA Study. BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy. 2020 Dec. 33119861
  19. [19] Tagami G, Yamaguchi M et al.. Efficacy and safety of avacopan in antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis: a retrospective cohort study in Japan. BMC rheumatology. 2025 Jan 23. 39844309
  20. [20] Kanda R, Miyazaki Y et al.. Effective Second-Line b/tsDMARDs for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Unresponsive to First-Line b/tsDMARDs from the FIRST Registry. Rheumatology and therapy. 2025 Apr. 40025347

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts