Amid US ordeal, Moderna wins EU approval for flu/COVID-19 combo shot
Regulatory Approvals

Amid US ordeal, Moderna wins EU approval for flu/COVID-19 combo shot

Published : 23 Apr 2026

At a Glance
IndicationFlu and COVID-19
DrugmCOMBRIAX
Mechanism of ActionmRNA vaccine
CompanyModerna
Trial PhasePhase 3
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryApproval Granted
Regulatory Body (EU)European Commission
Regulatory Body (EU)Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use
Regulatory Body (US)FDA
Approved Market/Region27 European Union member states, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway
Patient Populationpeople 50 years and up
Approval Date (EU)April 22, 2026
Positive Opinion Date (EU)February
Withdrawal Date (US)May 2025
Refusal-to-File Date (US)February
Decision Date (US - mRNA-1010)August
Vaccine Efficacy (mRNA-1010)26.6% vaccine efficacy edge
Comparator (mRNA-1010)current commercial flu shot
Combination Partner (COVID-19)mNEXSPIKE
Combination Partner (Flu)mRNA-1010

Moderna's mCOMBRIAX Wins EU Approval Amid US Regulatory Hurdles

Moderna has secured the European Commission’s go-ahead for its combination flu and COVID-19 vaccine, mCOMBRIAX, for active immunization of people 50 years and up across all 27 EU member states, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. This regulatory win comes despite its investigational flu component, mRNA-1010, not yet being approved as a standalone shot in the EU, though it received a positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use in February. In stark contrast, the vaccine has faced considerable struggle in the U.S. Moderna withdrew its approval application in May 2025 after discussions with the FDA and later received a refusal-to-file letter for mRNA-1010 in February, citing insufficient data. The FDA has since accepted mRNA-1010 for review, setting a decision date in August, but the timeline for the combo shot's resubmission remains uncertain.

  • The European Commission granted approval for Moderna's mCOMBRIAX, a combination flu and COVID-19 vaccine, for individuals aged 50 and older. This approval extends across all 27 EU member states, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway. The decision followed a positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use in February, indicating a favorable regulatory environment in Europe for this novel mRNA vaccine. This marks a significant milestone for Moderna in the European market.
  • In contrast to its European success, Moderna's combo vaccine has faced substantial challenges with the U.S. FDA. The company voluntarily withdrew its approval application for the two-in-one shot in May 2025. Furthermore, the FDA issued a refusal-to-file letter for the standalone flu vaccine component, mRNA-1010, in February, citing an "inadequate and well-controlled" trial. While the FDA has since accepted mRNA-1010 for review with an August decision date, the path for the combination shot in the U.S. remains unclear.
  • The mCOMBRIAX vaccine is a combination of Moderna's next-generation COVID-19 vaccine, mNEXSPIKE, and its investigational flu vaccine, mRNA-1010. A Phase 3 readout in June demonstrated that mRNA-1010 outperformed a current commercial flu shot, showing a 26.6% vaccine efficacy edge in adults aged 50 years and older. This efficacy data for the flu component was a key factor, even though the EU approval for the combo shot came before standalone approval for mRNA-1010.

Addressing Unmet Needs in Flu and COVID-19 for Older Adults

Cancer patients represent a critical vulnerable population facing significant unmet needs for both influenza and COVID-19 protection. Despite available effective vaccines for major respiratory pathogens, vaccination uptake remains suboptimal in this high-risk group, leading to preventable morbidity and mortality. Multiple systemic challenges continue to impede optimal protection strategies across various populations globally.

Cancer patients face heightened vulnerability to severe outcomes from respiratory infections including influenza and COVID-19, with increased risk of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death even in the vaccination era, while respiratory infections can delay cancer therapy and negatively affect treatment outcomes

Vaccine hesitancy and global inequity represent major barriers to protection, driven by misinformation, political issues, and inequitable distribution especially in low- and middle-income countries, with root causes including political will limitations and profit-driven patent protection systems

Emerging viral variants and therapeutic limitations create ongoing unmet needs, as conventional treatments fall behind constant SARS-CoV-2 mutations due to long screening processes and high production costs, while vaccine efficacy wanes over time requiring booster considerations

Regulatory and delivery system gaps hinder optimal vaccine deployment, with underfunded and fragmented regulatory systems perpetuating access inequities, while delivery strategies require optimization to increase value and accessibility of improved vaccines globally

Marginalized populations encounter additional access barriers due to perceptions about system inefficiency and inflexibility, requiring vaccination systems that specifically consider vulnerable group needs and community engagement to co-create solutions for improved uptake

Next-generation therapeutic approaches are being developed to address current limitations, including functional nucleic acid-based therapeutics, broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, and AI-optimized combination therapies designed for rapid adaptation to viral variants

The FDA's Stance: Comparing mCOMBRIAX to Standard of Care

Recent studies demonstrate mixed efficacy for COVID-19 investigational therapies compared to standard care, with most failing to show significant clinical benefits. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality when added to standard treatment in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 and comorbidities (absolute risk difference 2.27; 95% CI -2.94 to 7.49). Similarly, atorvastatin effectively reduced inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein and IL-6 in critically ill patients but failed to influence clinical outcomes or disease severity. Other agents including IC14 (anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody), ruxolitinib, and fostamatinib also demonstrated no superior efficacy compared to standard care, with some trials stopped early for futility.

The landscape for established therapies shows more promising but variable results. Remdesivir represents the most successful intervention, with multiple randomized trials suggesting efficacy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients through decreased hospital length of stay, reduced progression to mechanical ventilation, and lower hospital resource utilization, though mortality benefits remain unclear. For influenza, oseltamivir demonstrated a 26% lower risk of clinical failure specifically in patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection (95% CI 3.2-48.0%), though this benefit was limited to confirmed cases rather than broader respiratory tract infections.

The evidence base reveals significant challenges in translating observational study benefits to randomized controlled trial outcomes. Hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, aspirin, molnupiravir, and tenofovir all showed statistically significant benefits in observational studies that were subsequently not confirmed in RCTs. This pattern led to regulatory approvals during the pandemic based on non-randomized evidence due to urgent treatment needs, with the notable exception that most Emergency Use Authorizations were ultimately supported by well-powered randomized controlled trials demonstrating statistically significant efficacy.

Unpacking mCOMBRIAX: Efficacy Data Supporting EU Approval

Recent clinical data demonstrates significant advances in both COVID-19 and influenza interventions across various platforms. Multiple phase 2 and 3 studies have evaluated novel vaccine technologies, therapeutic compounds, and combination strategies with promising efficacy and safety profiles.

Study Name Intervention Key Efficacy Outcomes Key Safety Outcomes
ARCT-2303 Phase 3 Study (NCT06279871) Self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (XBB.1.5 spike) with quadrivalent influenza vaccines GMR of neutralizing antibodies: 2.7 (95% CI: 2.3-3.2); Seroconversion rate difference: 28.4% (21.8-34.9); No impact on influenza vaccine immunogenicity No impact on safety of either vaccine when co-administered; Well-tolerated profile
CD388 Phase 2a Study (NCT05523089) CD388 (multivalent zanamivir-Fc conjugate) 50mg or 150mg subcutaneous VL-AUC reduction: 10.70 vs 16.09 log10 copies/mL×days (P=0.0390); Lower peak viral load (P=0.0185); Reduced RT-qPCR-confirmed infection rate (P=0.0248) Well-tolerated; Limited treatment-emergent adverse events; Rare, non-clinically relevant anti-drug antibodies
FLUmHA Phase 1 Study (NCT05446740) mRNA influenza vaccine (0.5-100 µg) vs Flu D-QIV Dose-dependent GMI: 6.2-36.7 across groups; Higher response at doses >1 µg vs comparator; Enhanced hemagglutinin-specific CD4+ T-cell response Solicited AEs: 62.5%-100% (severe: 0.0%-20.8%); No safety concerns identified
AP-HP FLUO Trial (NCT05409612) Recombinant influenza vaccine vs egg-based standard-dose vaccine in obese adults GMT ratios favoring RIV: A/H1N1 1.6 (1.1-2.3), A/H3N2 2.0 (1.3-3.2), B/Yamagata 1.3 (1.0-1.8) Similar reactogenicity and safety profiles between groups
NextCOVE Phase 3 (NCT05815498) mRNA-1283 10 μg vs mRNA-1273 50 μg bivalent vaccines rVE: 9.3% (99.4% CI -6.6 to 22.8); GMR: 1.3 for BA.4/BA.5; Seroresponse rate difference: 14.4% for BA.4/BA.5 Fewer injection-site pain reactions (68.5% vs 77.5%); Similar serious adverse events; One sudden death in comparator group
Simnotrelvir Phase Ib-III Simnotrelvir/ritonavir 750mg/100mg (3CL inhibitor) 1.5-day reduction in time to symptom resolution; Superior viral load suppression vs 300mg dose (-4.995 vs -4.236 log copies/mL, P=0.0367) No serious adverse events; Mild treatment-emergent adverse events with flat exposure-response relationship

Moderna's Combo Vaccine: EU Breakthrough, US Regulatory Challenge

Moderna's recent European Commission approval for mCOMBRIAX, its combination flu and COVID-19 vaccine for individuals aged 50 and above, marks a pivotal moment for the company and the broader mRNA vaccine landscape. This regulatory success in the EU positions Moderna as an early leader in the emerging market for multi-pathogen respiratory vaccines, offering a streamlined solution for a vulnerable population. Studies have consistently demonstrated the high effectiveness of Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine in preventing severe outcomes, including hospitalization, among older adults, reinforcing the clinical value of this combined approach. This approval not only diversifies Moderna's product portfolio beyond its foundational COVID-19 vaccine but also leverages its innovative mRNA platform for broader applications in seasonal disease prevention.

However, the path to global market penetration is not without its complexities. The stark contrast with the US regulatory experience, where the investigational flu component faced a refusal-to-file and the combo shot's resubmission remains uncertain, highlights significant challenges. This divergence underscores the varied regulatory requirements and data interpretations across different health authorities. For Moderna, this means:

  • Navigating distinct regulatory pathways: A tailored approach to clinical data presentation and regulatory engagement will be critical for securing US approval, potentially requiring additional studies or a revised submission strategy.

  • Managing market access timelines: Delays in the US could impact overall revenue projections and allow competitors to gain ground in this lucrative market.

  • Sustaining public and regulatory confidence: Transparent communication regarding the safety and efficacy of the combination vaccine, particularly concerning any rare adverse events associated with mRNA technology, will be paramount.

While the EU approval is a clear win, the company must meticulously address the US regulatory hurdles and prepare for an increasingly competitive landscape. The long-term success of mCOMBRIAX, and indeed the future of mRNA combination vaccines, will hinge on Moderna's ability to harmonize its global regulatory strategy and continue demonstrating robust safety and efficacy across diverse populations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do flu and COVID vaccine make you feel sick?
Flu and COVID-19 vaccines can induce mild, temporary systemic side effects such as fever, headache, muscle aches, and fatigue. These symptoms are a normal physiological response indicating the immune system is building protective antibodies, not an actual infection from the vaccine. Such reactions typically resolve within 24-48 hours post-vaccination.
What is the best treatment for Covid-19 and the flu?
For COVID-19, primary treatments include oral antivirals like nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) and remdesivir, particularly for high-risk individuals. For influenza, neuraminidase inhibitors such as oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil are the main antiviral options. Both conditions also rely heavily on supportive care, and treatment decisions are guided by disease severity, patient comorbidities, and timing of symptom onset.
How long does it take to recover from COVID and flu?
Uncomplicated influenza typically resolves within 3-7 days, though fatigue may persist longer. For mild-to-moderate COVID-19, recovery generally occurs within 2-4 weeks. However, severe cases of both can necessitate hospitalization and extended recovery periods, with COVID-19 also posing a risk for post-acute sequelae (Long COVID) that can last months or longer.
How do regulatory bodies evaluate novel treatments for co-occurring viral infections like flu and COVID-19?
Regulatory agencies assess novel treatments for co-occurring viral infections by scrutinizing efficacy against each pathogen, potential for drug-drug interactions, and overall safety profile in a co-infected population. They require robust clinical data demonstrating benefit in reducing disease severity, hospitalization, or transmission for both indications. The evaluation also considers the public health impact and the unmet medical need addressed by the new therapeutic.

References

  1. [1] Godinho PIC, Soengas RG et al.. Therapeutic Potential of Glycosyl Flavonoids as Anti-Coronaviral Agents. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2021 Jun 7. 34200456
  2. [2] Bonvehi P, Trejo Varon R et al.. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on influenza vaccination coverage in Latin America: Southern Cone, Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health. 2025. 41450794
  3. [3] Zhang T, Yang D et al.. Current development of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 neutralizing antibodies (Review). Molecular medicine reports. 2024 Aug. 38940338
  4. [4] Karczmarzyk K, Kęsik-Brodacka M. Challenges and Prospects in the Development of a Universal SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. Vaccines. 2026 Feb 13. 41746093
  5. [5] Nellore A, Bajema K et al.. IDSA 2025 Guidelines on the use of vaccines for the prevention of seasonal COVID-19 infections in immunocompromised patients. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2026 Feb 25. 41739597
  6. [6] Amit AML, Pepito VCF et al.. COVID-19 vaccine brand hesitancy and other challenges to vaccination in the Philippines. PLOS global public health. 2022. 36962166
  7. [7] Mabrey FL, Nian H et al.. Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-center trial of the clinical and biological effects of anti-CD14 treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. EBioMedicine. 2023 Jul. 37336058
  8. [8] Sawangjit R, Sadoyu S et al.. Effectiveness and safety of turmeric for the treatment of COVID-19: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complementary therapies in medicine. 2025 Dec. 41176175
  9. [9] McIlroy PR, Pham LTM et al.. Nanobody screening and machine learning guided identification of cross-variant anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing heavy-chain only antibodies. PLoS pathogens. 2025 Jan. 39847604
  10. [10] Iftikhar N, Ahmed AE et al.. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in an adult after Covid-19 vaccination (MIS-V): a case report and review of published literature. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2024 Oct. 39407384
  11. [11] Khorramnia S, Navidi Z et al.. Remdesivir Versus Sotrovimab in Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Health science reports. 2025 Jul. 40709071
  12. [12] Al Hashimi F, Shuaib SE et al.. COVID-19 Vaccine Timing and Co-Administration with Influenza Vaccines in Canada: A Systematic Review with Comparative Insights from G7 Countries. Vaccines. 2025 Jun 21. 40733647
  13. [13] Goodfellow L, Soble A et al.. The potential global health impact and net monetary benefit of programmatic use of improved influenza vaccines: a mathematical modelling study. Vaccine. 2025 Jul 11. 41830734
  14. [14] Tan-Koi WC, Khoo YK et al.. Regulatory Strengthening as a Pillar of Health System Resilience for Sustainable Immunization. Vaccines. 2025 Dec 26. 41600949
  15. [15] Farias DLC, Prats J et al.. Rationale and design of the "Tocilizumab in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: an open-label multicentre randomized controlled" trial (TOCIBRAS). Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. 2020 Jul-Sep. 32965395
  16. [16] Junejo Y, Ozaslan M et al.. Novel SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: Origin, pathogenesis, genes and genetic variations, immune responses and phylogenetic analysis. Gene reports. 2020 Sep. 32566803
  17. [17] Clark TW, Beard KR et al.. Clinical impact of a routine, molecular, point-of-care, test-and-treat strategy for influenza in adults admitted to hospital (FluPOC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Respiratory medicine. 2021 Apr. 33285143
  18. [18] Wang T, Yan Y et al.. Ibrutinib alternating with three cycles of interval fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in adults with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia as time-limited regimen: a single-arm, multicentre phase 2 trial in China. EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Dec. 41497516
  19. [19] Sornlorm K, Muntaphan S. Explanatory spatial modeling of COVID-19 vaccine coverage in Thailand: policy implications for equitable distribution. BMC public health. 2025 Sep 2. 40898147
  20. [20] Dansana D, Kumar R et al.. Early diagnosis of COVID-19-affected patients based on X-ray and computed tomography images using deep learning algorithm. Soft computing. 2023. 32904395

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts