| Indication | Flu and COVID-19 |
| Drug | mCOMBRIAX |
| Mechanism of Action | mRNA vaccine |
| Company | Moderna |
| Trial Phase | Phase 3 |
| Category | Regulatory Milestone |
| Sub Category | Approval Granted |
| Regulatory Body (EU) | European Commission |
| Regulatory Body (EU) | Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use |
| Regulatory Body (US) | FDA |
| Approved Market/Region | 27 European Union member states, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway |
| Patient Population | people 50 years and up |
| Approval Date (EU) | April 22, 2026 |
| Positive Opinion Date (EU) | February |
| Withdrawal Date (US) | May 2025 |
| Refusal-to-File Date (US) | February |
| Decision Date (US - mRNA-1010) | August |
| Vaccine Efficacy (mRNA-1010) | 26.6% vaccine efficacy edge |
| Comparator (mRNA-1010) | current commercial flu shot |
| Combination Partner (COVID-19) | mNEXSPIKE |
| Combination Partner (Flu) | mRNA-1010 |
Moderna's mCOMBRIAX Wins EU Approval Amid US Regulatory Hurdles
Moderna has secured the European Commission’s go-ahead for its combination flu and COVID-19 vaccine, mCOMBRIAX, for active immunization of people 50 years and up across all 27 EU member states, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. This regulatory win comes despite its investigational flu component, mRNA-1010, not yet being approved as a standalone shot in the EU, though it received a positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use in February. In stark contrast, the vaccine has faced considerable struggle in the U.S. Moderna withdrew its approval application in May 2025 after discussions with the FDA and later received a refusal-to-file letter for mRNA-1010 in February, citing insufficient data. The FDA has since accepted mRNA-1010 for review, setting a decision date in August, but the timeline for the combo shot's resubmission remains uncertain.
- The European Commission granted approval for Moderna's mCOMBRIAX, a combination flu and COVID-19 vaccine, for individuals aged 50 and older. This approval extends across all 27 EU member states, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway. The decision followed a positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use in February, indicating a favorable regulatory environment in Europe for this novel mRNA vaccine. This marks a significant milestone for Moderna in the European market.
- In contrast to its European success, Moderna's combo vaccine has faced substantial challenges with the U.S. FDA. The company voluntarily withdrew its approval application for the two-in-one shot in May 2025. Furthermore, the FDA issued a refusal-to-file letter for the standalone flu vaccine component, mRNA-1010, in February, citing an "inadequate and well-controlled" trial. While the FDA has since accepted mRNA-1010 for review with an August decision date, the path for the combination shot in the U.S. remains unclear.
- The mCOMBRIAX vaccine is a combination of Moderna's next-generation COVID-19 vaccine, mNEXSPIKE, and its investigational flu vaccine, mRNA-1010. A Phase 3 readout in June demonstrated that mRNA-1010 outperformed a current commercial flu shot, showing a 26.6% vaccine efficacy edge in adults aged 50 years and older. This efficacy data for the flu component was a key factor, even though the EU approval for the combo shot came before standalone approval for mRNA-1010.
Addressing Unmet Needs in Flu and COVID-19 for Older Adults
Cancer patients represent a critical vulnerable population facing significant unmet needs for both influenza and COVID-19 protection. Despite available effective vaccines for major respiratory pathogens, vaccination uptake remains suboptimal in this high-risk group, leading to preventable morbidity and mortality. Multiple systemic challenges continue to impede optimal protection strategies across various populations globally.
• Cancer patients face heightened vulnerability to severe outcomes from respiratory infections including influenza and COVID-19, with increased risk of hospitalization, ICU admission, and death even in the vaccination era, while respiratory infections can delay cancer therapy and negatively affect treatment outcomes
• Vaccine hesitancy and global inequity represent major barriers to protection, driven by misinformation, political issues, and inequitable distribution especially in low- and middle-income countries, with root causes including political will limitations and profit-driven patent protection systems
• Emerging viral variants and therapeutic limitations create ongoing unmet needs, as conventional treatments fall behind constant SARS-CoV-2 mutations due to long screening processes and high production costs, while vaccine efficacy wanes over time requiring booster considerations
• Regulatory and delivery system gaps hinder optimal vaccine deployment, with underfunded and fragmented regulatory systems perpetuating access inequities, while delivery strategies require optimization to increase value and accessibility of improved vaccines globally
• Marginalized populations encounter additional access barriers due to perceptions about system inefficiency and inflexibility, requiring vaccination systems that specifically consider vulnerable group needs and community engagement to co-create solutions for improved uptake
• Next-generation therapeutic approaches are being developed to address current limitations, including functional nucleic acid-based therapeutics, broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, and AI-optimized combination therapies designed for rapid adaptation to viral variants
The FDA's Stance: Comparing mCOMBRIAX to Standard of Care
Recent studies demonstrate mixed efficacy for COVID-19 investigational therapies compared to standard care, with most failing to show significant clinical benefits. Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) showed no significant difference in 28-day mortality when added to standard treatment in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 and comorbidities (absolute risk difference 2.27; 95% CI -2.94 to 7.49). Similarly, atorvastatin effectively reduced inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein and IL-6 in critically ill patients but failed to influence clinical outcomes or disease severity. Other agents including IC14 (anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody), ruxolitinib, and fostamatinib also demonstrated no superior efficacy compared to standard care, with some trials stopped early for futility.
The landscape for established therapies shows more promising but variable results. Remdesivir represents the most successful intervention, with multiple randomized trials suggesting efficacy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients through decreased hospital length of stay, reduced progression to mechanical ventilation, and lower hospital resource utilization, though mortality benefits remain unclear. For influenza, oseltamivir demonstrated a 26% lower risk of clinical failure specifically in patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection (95% CI 3.2-48.0%), though this benefit was limited to confirmed cases rather than broader respiratory tract infections.
The evidence base reveals significant challenges in translating observational study benefits to randomized controlled trial outcomes. Hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, aspirin, molnupiravir, and tenofovir all showed statistically significant benefits in observational studies that were subsequently not confirmed in RCTs. This pattern led to regulatory approvals during the pandemic based on non-randomized evidence due to urgent treatment needs, with the notable exception that most Emergency Use Authorizations were ultimately supported by well-powered randomized controlled trials demonstrating statistically significant efficacy.
Unpacking mCOMBRIAX: Efficacy Data Supporting EU Approval
Recent clinical data demonstrates significant advances in both COVID-19 and influenza interventions across various platforms. Multiple phase 2 and 3 studies have evaluated novel vaccine technologies, therapeutic compounds, and combination strategies with promising efficacy and safety profiles.
| Study Name | Intervention | Key Efficacy Outcomes | Key Safety Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARCT-2303 Phase 3 Study (NCT06279871) | Self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (XBB.1.5 spike) with quadrivalent influenza vaccines | GMR of neutralizing antibodies: 2.7 (95% CI: 2.3-3.2); Seroconversion rate difference: 28.4% (21.8-34.9); No impact on influenza vaccine immunogenicity | No impact on safety of either vaccine when co-administered; Well-tolerated profile |
| CD388 Phase 2a Study (NCT05523089) | CD388 (multivalent zanamivir-Fc conjugate) 50mg or 150mg subcutaneous | VL-AUC reduction: 10.70 vs 16.09 log10 copies/mL×days (P=0.0390); Lower peak viral load (P=0.0185); Reduced RT-qPCR-confirmed infection rate (P=0.0248) | Well-tolerated; Limited treatment-emergent adverse events; Rare, non-clinically relevant anti-drug antibodies |
| FLUmHA Phase 1 Study (NCT05446740) | mRNA influenza vaccine (0.5-100 µg) vs Flu D-QIV | Dose-dependent GMI: 6.2-36.7 across groups; Higher response at doses >1 µg vs comparator; Enhanced hemagglutinin-specific CD4+ T-cell response | Solicited AEs: 62.5%-100% (severe: 0.0%-20.8%); No safety concerns identified |
| AP-HP FLUO Trial (NCT05409612) | Recombinant influenza vaccine vs egg-based standard-dose vaccine in obese adults | GMT ratios favoring RIV: A/H1N1 1.6 (1.1-2.3), A/H3N2 2.0 (1.3-3.2), B/Yamagata 1.3 (1.0-1.8) | Similar reactogenicity and safety profiles between groups |
| NextCOVE Phase 3 (NCT05815498) | mRNA-1283 10 μg vs mRNA-1273 50 μg bivalent vaccines | rVE: 9.3% (99.4% CI -6.6 to 22.8); GMR: 1.3 for BA.4/BA.5; Seroresponse rate difference: 14.4% for BA.4/BA.5 | Fewer injection-site pain reactions (68.5% vs 77.5%); Similar serious adverse events; One sudden death in comparator group |
| Simnotrelvir Phase Ib-III | Simnotrelvir/ritonavir 750mg/100mg (3CL inhibitor) | 1.5-day reduction in time to symptom resolution; Superior viral load suppression vs 300mg dose (-4.995 vs -4.236 log copies/mL, P=0.0367) | No serious adverse events; Mild treatment-emergent adverse events with flat exposure-response relationship |
Moderna's Combo Vaccine: EU Breakthrough, US Regulatory Challenge
Moderna's recent European Commission approval for mCOMBRIAX, its combination flu and COVID-19 vaccine for individuals aged 50 and above, marks a pivotal moment for the company and the broader mRNA vaccine landscape. This regulatory success in the EU positions Moderna as an early leader in the emerging market for multi-pathogen respiratory vaccines, offering a streamlined solution for a vulnerable population. Studies have consistently demonstrated the high effectiveness of Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine in preventing severe outcomes, including hospitalization, among older adults, reinforcing the clinical value of this combined approach. This approval not only diversifies Moderna's product portfolio beyond its foundational COVID-19 vaccine but also leverages its innovative mRNA platform for broader applications in seasonal disease prevention.
However, the path to global market penetration is not without its complexities. The stark contrast with the US regulatory experience, where the investigational flu component faced a refusal-to-file and the combo shot's resubmission remains uncertain, highlights significant challenges. This divergence underscores the varied regulatory requirements and data interpretations across different health authorities. For Moderna, this means:
Navigating distinct regulatory pathways: A tailored approach to clinical data presentation and regulatory engagement will be critical for securing US approval, potentially requiring additional studies or a revised submission strategy.
Managing market access timelines: Delays in the US could impact overall revenue projections and allow competitors to gain ground in this lucrative market.
Sustaining public and regulatory confidence: Transparent communication regarding the safety and efficacy of the combination vaccine, particularly concerning any rare adverse events associated with mRNA technology, will be paramount.
While the EU approval is a clear win, the company must meticulously address the US regulatory hurdles and prepare for an increasingly competitive landscape. The long-term success of mCOMBRIAX, and indeed the future of mRNA combination vaccines, will hinge on Moderna's ability to harmonize its global regulatory strategy and continue demonstrating robust safety and efficacy across diverse populations.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Godinho PIC, Soengas RG et al.. Therapeutic Potential of Glycosyl Flavonoids as Anti-Coronaviral Agents. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2021 Jun 7. 34200456
- [2] Bonvehi P, Trejo Varon R et al.. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on influenza vaccination coverage in Latin America: Southern Cone, Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health. 2025. 41450794
- [3] Zhang T, Yang D et al.. Current development of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 neutralizing antibodies (Review). Molecular medicine reports. 2024 Aug. 38940338
- [4] Karczmarzyk K, Kęsik-Brodacka M. Challenges and Prospects in the Development of a Universal SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. Vaccines. 2026 Feb 13. 41746093
- [5] Nellore A, Bajema K et al.. IDSA 2025 Guidelines on the use of vaccines for the prevention of seasonal COVID-19 infections in immunocompromised patients. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2026 Feb 25. 41739597
- [6] Amit AML, Pepito VCF et al.. COVID-19 vaccine brand hesitancy and other challenges to vaccination in the Philippines. PLOS global public health. 2022. 36962166
- [7] Mabrey FL, Nian H et al.. Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-center trial of the clinical and biological effects of anti-CD14 treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. EBioMedicine. 2023 Jul. 37336058
- [8] Sawangjit R, Sadoyu S et al.. Effectiveness and safety of turmeric for the treatment of COVID-19: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complementary therapies in medicine. 2025 Dec. 41176175
- [9] McIlroy PR, Pham LTM et al.. Nanobody screening and machine learning guided identification of cross-variant anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing heavy-chain only antibodies. PLoS pathogens. 2025 Jan. 39847604
- [10] Iftikhar N, Ahmed AE et al.. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in an adult after Covid-19 vaccination (MIS-V): a case report and review of published literature. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2024 Oct. 39407384
- [11] Khorramnia S, Navidi Z et al.. Remdesivir Versus Sotrovimab in Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Health science reports. 2025 Jul. 40709071
- [12] Al Hashimi F, Shuaib SE et al.. COVID-19 Vaccine Timing and Co-Administration with Influenza Vaccines in Canada: A Systematic Review with Comparative Insights from G7 Countries. Vaccines. 2025 Jun 21. 40733647
- [13] Goodfellow L, Soble A et al.. The potential global health impact and net monetary benefit of programmatic use of improved influenza vaccines: a mathematical modelling study. Vaccine. 2025 Jul 11. 41830734
- [14] Tan-Koi WC, Khoo YK et al.. Regulatory Strengthening as a Pillar of Health System Resilience for Sustainable Immunization. Vaccines. 2025 Dec 26. 41600949
- [15] Farias DLC, Prats J et al.. Rationale and design of the "Tocilizumab in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: an open-label multicentre randomized controlled" trial (TOCIBRAS). Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. 2020 Jul-Sep. 32965395
- [16] Junejo Y, Ozaslan M et al.. Novel SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: Origin, pathogenesis, genes and genetic variations, immune responses and phylogenetic analysis. Gene reports. 2020 Sep. 32566803
- [17] Clark TW, Beard KR et al.. Clinical impact of a routine, molecular, point-of-care, test-and-treat strategy for influenza in adults admitted to hospital (FluPOC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Respiratory medicine. 2021 Apr. 33285143
- [18] Wang T, Yan Y et al.. Ibrutinib alternating with three cycles of interval fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in adults with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia as time-limited regimen: a single-arm, multicentre phase 2 trial in China. EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Dec. 41497516
- [19] Sornlorm K, Muntaphan S. Explanatory spatial modeling of COVID-19 vaccine coverage in Thailand: policy implications for equitable distribution. BMC public health. 2025 Sep 2. 40898147
- [20] Dansana D, Kumar R et al.. Early diagnosis of COVID-19-affected patients based on X-ray and computed tomography images using deep learning algorithm. Soft computing. 2023. 32904395




















