| Indication | type 2 diabetes |
| Drug | orforglipron |
| Mechanism of Action | GLP-1 receptor agonist |
| Company | Eli Lilly |
| Trial Phase | Phase 3 |
| Trial Acronym | ACHIEVE |
| Category | Regulatory Milestone |
| Sub Category | Regulatory Submission Filed |
| Comparators | semaglutide, Farxiga, placebo plus insulin glargine |
| Conference Name | American Diabetes Association conference |
| Regulatory Submission Quarter | Second quarter of this year |
| Regulatory Agency | FDA |
| Key Efficacy Measures | HbA1c reduction, Weight loss |
| Foundayo Dosage | 9 mg, 17.2 mg |
| Semaglutide Dosage | 7 mg, 14 mg |
| Follow-up Duration | 52 weeks, 40 weeks |
| Patient Population | Patients with inadequate glycemic control on metformin and other prior treatments |
| Analyst Firm | BMO Capital Markets |
Lilly's Foundayo Outperforms Competitors in Type 2 Diabetes Trials
Eli Lilly's oral GLP-1 drug, Foundayo (orforglipron), demonstrated superior blood sugar control and weight loss compared to competing diabetes drugs, including Novo Nordisk's semaglutide, AstraZeneca's Farxiga, and placebo, across three Phase 3 trials (ACHIEVE-2, ACHIEVE-3, ACHIEVE-5). The trials, presented at the 2026 American Diabetes Association conference, involved patients with inadequate glycemic control on prior treatments. Foundayo's consistent performance has solidified its position in type 2 diabetes, leading Lilly to plan an FDA submission for this indication in the second quarter of this year, following its recent approval for chronic weight management.
- In the ACHIEVE-3 trial, Foundayo at a 9-mg dose achieved a 1.9% reduction in HbA1c at 52 weeks, significantly outperforming 7-mg oral semaglutide which showed a 1.1% reduction. Higher doses of Foundayo (17.2 mg) also demonstrated superior HbA1c reduction (2.2% vs 1.4%) and 73.6% greater weight loss compared to 14 mg oral semaglutide.
- Foundayo also delivered strong results in ACHIEVE-2 and ACHIEVE-5. In ACHIEVE-2, it reduced HbA1c by an average of 1.7% at 40 weeks, compared to 0.8% with AstraZeneca’s Farxiga. In ACHIEVE-5, Foundayo achieved up to a 2.1% average HbA1c drop at 40 weeks, significantly better than the 0.8% drop seen with placebo plus insulin glargine.
- Following these positive Phase 3 outcomes, Eli Lilly plans to submit Foundayo for type 2 diabetes approval to the FDA in the second quarter of this year. Analysts from BMO Capital Markets noted Foundayo's "consistently competitive profile" and see significant opportunity for the once-daily oral treatment in the broader T2D therapeutic landscape, building on its recent approval for chronic weight management.
Foundayo's ACHIEVE Program: Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in T2D
Recent clinical investigations have demonstrated significant advances in type 2 diabetes management across multiple therapeutic modalities. The studies encompass novel weekly insulin formulations, combination therapies, and real-world effectiveness analyses spanning 2025-2026.
| Study | Intervention | Key Efficacy Outcomes | Key Safety Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONWARDS 5 Trial (2026) | Once-weekly insulin efsitora alfa vs daily insulin glargine U100 | Non-inferior HbA1c reduction (-1.01% vs -1.00% from baseline 8.18%); similar glycemic control at 26 weeks | Similar hypoglycemia rates (6.6 vs 5.9 events per patient-year); comparable adverse events (7% vs 6% serious AEs) |
| PIONEER-2 Trial Emulation (2025) | Oral semaglutide vs empagliflozin | Greater HbA1c reduction with semaglutide (mean difference -0.35%); similar weight loss with modest semaglutide advantage at 18 months | Lower persistence with semaglutide (HR for discontinuation 1.47); similar safety profiles |
| SGLT2i vs Metformin Study (2025) | SGLT2i (n=460) vs Metformin (n=232) | Both reduced glucose; metformin superior for HbA1c; SGLT2i superior for triglycerides, cholesterol, and diastolic function; reduced MI and HHF risk with SGLT2i | Similar safety profiles except higher genital infection incidence with SGLT2i |
| Empagliflozin vs Sitagliptin vs Metformin (2025) | Empagliflozin vs sitagliptin vs metformin | FBS reduction: -23.1, -16.15, -15.25 mg/dl respectively; HbA1c reduction: -1.8%, -1.35%, -0.69% respectively; empagliflozin superior weight loss (-4.1 vs -0.90 kg vs metformin) | Safety outcomes not explicitly reported |
| Ranolazine Plus Metformin Study (2026) | Metformin + ranolazine vs metformin monotherapy | Greater HbA1c reduction with combination (mean difference 0.25% at 3 months, 0.23% at 6 months); significantly lower FBG and PPBG | No increased hypoglycemia risk |
| Henagliflozin Plus CSII Study (2026) | Henagliflozin + continuous insulin infusion vs CSII alone | Higher time in range (79.85% vs 74.06%); shorter time to target glucose; lower insulin dosage and mean glucose | No significant differences in urinary tract infection, diabetic ketoacidosis, or hypoglycemic events |
Foundayo's Competitive Edge in the Oral T2D Landscape
Recent evidence demonstrates that investigational therapies generally provide incremental benefits over standard-of-care treatments, though often with trade-offs in safety or tolerability profiles. The most recent 2026 network meta-analysis of botanical drug combinations showed that Huanglian Jiedu Decoction (HLJDD) combined with metformin achieved superior fasting plasma glucose reduction (MD = -1.46, 95% CrIs=(-2.24, -0.68)) compared to metformin alone across 40 RCTs involving 3,088 patients. Similarly, TMX-049, a novel xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitor, demonstrated a 35% reduction in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio versus placebo in diabetic kidney disease patients, though two patients developed gout at the 200 mg dose.
Complex insulin regimens consistently outperform basal insulin alone in glycemic control, with network meta-analysis data from 58 RCTs showing HbA1c improvements of -0.31% for basal-bolus, -0.24% for biphasic, and -0.38% for prandial insulin regimens. However, these benefits come with approximately 1 kg greater weight gain and borderline increased risk of severe hypoglycemia. Conversely, treatment simplification strategies using GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT-2 inhibitors as alternatives to bolus insulin achieved equivalent or superior glycemic control while reducing injection frequency, insulin doses, and hypoglycemia risk.
The most compelling evidence for investigational approaches comes from intensive multifactorial interventions, exemplified by the landmark Steno-2 study, which demonstrated substantial risk reductions across multiple endpoints: 53% reduction in cardiovascular events (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.73), 61% reduction in nephropathy, 58% reduction in retinopathy, and 63% reduction in autonomic neuropathy. This suggests that comprehensive investigational treatment paradigms targeting multiple pathways simultaneously may offer the greatest therapeutic advantage over conventional standard-of-care approaches, despite requiring more complex management protocols.
Addressing Unmet Needs in Type 2 Diabetes Management
Recent evidence from 2022-2024 reveals significant gaps in type 2 diabetes care that persist despite therapeutic advances. These unmet needs span from fundamental awareness and control issues to specialized population management challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated existing disparities and created new barriers to optimal diabetes care.
• Persistently low awareness, treatment, and control rates across multiple healthcare systems, with only 56.13% of patients aware of their condition in Southeast China, 47.96% receiving treatment, and merely 18.29% achieving blood glucose control, while South Korea maintained diabetes control rates at just 29.14% from 2020-2022
• Vulnerable demographic populations requiring targeted interventions, including older adults with lower educational levels who show less improvement in awareness and control trends, younger patients (ages 30-44) with higher unmet healthcare needs (OR 1.93 for T2DM), females with elevated risk of unmet needs (OR 1.46), and single-person households with increased risk (OR 1.89)
• Socioeconomic and geographic disparities affecting diabetes management, with low-family income, low-education level, and lack of medical insurance associated with higher T2DM prevalence, while rural populations require widespread screening programs and urban localities show higher diabetes prevalence rates
• COVID-19 pandemic impact creating new healthcare access challenges, with unmet healthcare needs initially declining at pandemic onset but subsequently reversing into statistically significant increasing trends (β 0.527 for T2DM), highlighting the vulnerability of diabetes care during health system disruptions
• Special population management gaps including patients with Alzheimer's disease who are less likely to initiate antidiabetic therapy (particularly newer agents like GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors), hemodialysis patients with 56.6% experiencing hypoglycemic episodes and 30% increased odds of hypoglycemia per additional HD year, and early-onset diabetes patients facing decades of disease management
• Treatment optimization needs for older adults requiring deprescribing strategies, medication burden reduction, and therapeutic realignment rather than additional medications, with major clinical practice gaps in understanding when and how to modify therapy for patients not responding to current regimens
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Cohen RV, Pinheiro JC et al.. Effects of gastric bypass surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes and only mild obesity. Diabetes care. 2012 Jul. 22723580
- [2] Russo GT, De Cosmo S et al.. Type 2 diabetes specialist care in Italy in the AMD Annals initiative 2024: The path is traced. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2025 Jul. 40409725
- [3] Lim S, Kim TN et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Sitagliptin and Empagliflozin as Add-On to Metformin in Korean Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Multi-Centre, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026 Jun. 41883295
- [4] Mongkolsucharitkul P, Surawit A et al.. Effectiveness of low-carbohydrate diets on type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Eastern vs. Western populations. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2025 Nov. 40930317
- [5] Alshadfan HS, Mirghani HO et al.. Efficacy of immediate-release versus extended-release metformin on glycemic control and insulin resistance in Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2025 Dec. 41541828
- [6] Gillani SW, Kaka Khan KK et al.. A Systematic Review on Pharmaceutical Diabetic Care Services in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Current diabetes reviews. 2021. 33371838
- [7] Giugliano D, Scappaticcio L et al.. Simplification of complex insulin therapy: a story of dogma and therapeutic resignation. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2021 Aug. 34280468
- [8] Arai K, Nishikawa T et al.. Trends in the Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Japanese Practitioners. Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders. 2025 Dec. 41108493
- [9] Zieliński M, Michalak O et al.. Synthetic Flozins in Cancer Prevention and Combination Strategies: Structural Insights and Therapeutic Potential. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2025 Dec 6. 41471707
- [10] Hamilton SJ, Watts GF. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes: pathogenesis, significance, and treatment. The review of diabetic studies : RDS. 2013 Summer-Fall. 24380089
- [11] Feroz Z, Memon I et al.. Understanding Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Knowledge Gaps among Future Health Care Professionals: Insights from Saudi Arabia. Avicenna journal of medicine. 2025 Oct. 41473853
- [12] Ong KP, Chen E et al.. Understanding the patients' experience in Primary Technology Enhanced Care Home HbA1c Testing (PTEC HAT) programme-a qualitative study. BMC primary care. 2025 Oct 13. 41083931
- [13] Zhang X, Liu Y et al.. Factors Affecting the Treatment Heterogeneity of PPARγ and Pan-PPAR Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Machine Learning-Based Meta-Regression Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2026 Jan 13. 41599737
- [14] Jankovec Z, Hahn M et al.. Analysis of continuous patient data from the Czech National Register of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using insulin pump therapy. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2010 Feb. 19853948
- [15] Wang Y, Alexander GC et al.. Treatment of type 2 diabetes among medicare beneficiaries with and without alzheimer's disease: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders. 2026 Jun. 41510365
- [16] Liakos A, Karagiannis T et al.. SGLT-2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists as Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes. Current diabetes reports. 2026 Jan 13. 41528550
- [17] Huang Z, Wan X et al.. Short-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion combined with insulin sensitizers rosiglitazone, metformin, or antioxidant α-lipoic acid in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes technology & therapeutics. 2013 Oct. 23991629
- [18] Bertuol VC Jr, Iorra F et al.. Effects of insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2026 May. 41436667
- [19] Basile F. The increasing prevalence of diabetes and its economic burden. The American journal of managed care. 2000 Nov. 11187395
- [20] Lindner N, Hoffman MC et al.. [The "arriba Diabetes" decision aid - Results of a qualitative evaluation study]. Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen. 2026 Apr. 41519647

















