Icotrokinra's Oral IL-23R Approval: Efficacy Credible, HTA Comparator Gap Is the Decisive Risk
Regulatory Approvals

Icotrokinra's Oral IL-23R Approval: Efficacy Credible, HTA Comparator Gap Is the Decisive Risk

Published : 22 Sept 2026

At a Glance
Indicationmoderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis
Drugicotrokinra
Mechanism of ActionIL-23 receptor antagonist
CompanyJohnson & Johnson
Trial PhasePhase 3
Trial AcronymICONIC
NCT IDNCT06095115, NCT06095102, NCT06143878, NCT06220604
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryApproval Granted
Therapeutic AreaImmunology
Regulatory BodyEuropean Commission
Approval DateSeptember 21, 2026
Approved Market/RegionEurope
Patient PopulationAdults and adolescent patients (aged ≥12 years and weighing ≥40 kg)
DosageOnce-daily oral
Co-development PartnerProtagonist Therapeutics
Primary Efficacy EndpointsIGA 0/1, PASI 90
Number of Patients in Phase 3 Program2,500
ComparatorPlacebo, deucravacitinib
Follow-up DurationWeek 16, Week 52

European Commission Approves Icotrokinra for Plaque Psoriasis

Johnson & Johnson EMEA announced that the European Commission (EC) has approved ICOTYDE™ (icotrokinra), a first-in-class targeted oral peptide, for adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years and weighing ≥40 kg) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. Icotrokinra, an IL-23 receptor antagonist, demonstrated high levels of skin clearance, with approximately 70% of patients achieving clear or almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) and 55% achieving PASI 90 at Week 16 in head-to-head Phase 3 studies. The drug also showed a favorable safety profile, with adverse reactions within 1.1% of placebo rates through Week 16 and no new safety signals through Week 52, offering a convenient once-daily oral option.

  • ICOTYDE™ (icotrokinra) is the first targeted oral peptide designed to precisely block the IL-23 receptor, representing a significant scientific advancement in plaque psoriasis treatment. This once-daily oral therapy offers a convenient and innovative option for patients, addressing the need for systemic treatments beyond topicals and providing an alternative to injectable biologics.
  • The EC approval is supported by comprehensive data from the Phase 3 ICONIC clinical development program, involving 2,500 patients across four studies. In head-to-head studies, icotrokinra achieved approximately 70% of patients with clear or almost clear skin (IGA 0/1) and 55% with a PASI 90 response at Week 16, demonstrating high levels of skin clearance compared to active comparators.
  • Icotrokinra consistently demonstrated a favorable safety profile across all four Phase 3 studies. Rates of adverse reactions for icotrokinra-treated patients were within 1.1% of placebo rates through Week 16, and no new safety signals were observed through Week 52, providing reassurance for long-term use in a chronic condition like plaque psoriasis.

The Unmet Need for Oral IL-23R Targeted Therapies

Despite significant advances in biologic and small-molecule therapies, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis continues to present substantial clinical and patient-centered challenges that limit long-term treatment success.

  • Immunogenicity and loss of efficacy over time: All biotherapeutics, including monoclonal antibodies, carry immunogenic potential through the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which can result in loss of response and adverse events such as hypersensitivity reactions. Loss of efficacy accounted for 67% of all drug discontinuations in a large real-world registry cohort, underscoring this as a major area of unmet medical need. Biologic drug survival varies considerably by agent — median survival was 30 months for etanercept, 44 months for infliximab, and 59 months for adalimumab — and switching from one biologic to another is associated with further impairment of drug survival.

  • Treatment burden and patient dissatisfaction with administration: In a survey of 209 psoriasis patients in remission on biologics, 18.2% reported pain, distress, or anxiety related to injection administration, and 38.0% expressed dissatisfaction with the financial burden of biologic therapy. Preference research in the United States further confirms that patients were willing to accept a reduction in the percentage achieving clear or almost-clear skin from approximately 70% to 40% to avoid home injections in favor of a topical treatment, with topical and oral routes ranked as the most preferred modes of administration over subcutaneous or intravenous options.

  • Financial burden and uncertainty around treatment duration: Even among patients reporting high satisfaction with therapeutic efficacy (98.6%), concerns regarding treatment cost and uncertainty about the duration of therapy remained prominent, highlighting that clinical response alone does not resolve the full burden experienced by patients on long-term biologic therapy.

  • Absence of standardized dose-reduction strategies: For patients achieving low disease activity or remission on IL-17A inhibitors such as secukinumab and ixekizumab, no standardized dose-reduction guidelines exist. Extended dosing intervals (e.g., from Q4W to Q8W) have been evaluated, with 67.7% of patients sustaining PASI90 and 61.2% maintaining PASI100 at 36 weeks — suggesting feasibility, but also indicating that a meaningful proportion of patients experience disease reactivation without optimized maintenance protocols.

  • Safety monitoring requirements over prolonged exposure: Long-term safety data across multiple biologics — including ustekinumab (up to 5 years, 8998 patient-years) and certolizumab pegol (up to 144 weeks, 2231.3 patient-years) — demonstrate generally stable adverse event profiles without cumulative toxicity, yet ongoing monitoring for serious infections, malignancies, and major adverse cardiovascular events remains a clinical requirement that adds complexity to long-term disease management.

Key Efficacy and Safety Outcomes from ICONIC Program

Three recent phase 2–3 studies illustrate the evolving treatment landscape for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The IMMbrace trial evaluated subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg (administered at weeks 0, 4, and 16) against oral methotrexate (5 mg weekly, escalated up to 25 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled design conducted in Brazil. Among 98 randomized patients, risankizumab demonstrated superior efficacy at week 28, with 84.0% of patients achieving PASI 90 versus 35.4% in the methotrexate arm (p < 0.001), and sPGA 0/1 rates of 90.0% versus 64.6% (p ≤ 0.001). Efficacy was maintained through week 112, and adverse event rates were similar between the two groups, with no new safety findings observed over the extended period.

A separate phase 3, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed continuous risankizumab therapy versus treatment withdrawal in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. At week 16, 73.2% of patients receiving risankizumab achieved PASI 90 versus 2.0% on placebo, and 83.5% achieved sPGA 0/1 versus 7.0% on placebo (p < 0.001 for both). Among week-28 responders rerandomized to continued risankizumab or withdrawal, sPGA 0/1 was maintained by 87.4% versus 61.3% at week 52, and by 81.1% versus 7.1% at week 104 (p < 0.001 for both). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between risankizumab (45.7%) and placebo (49.0%) in the initial treatment phase and remained stable over the two-year trial, with no unexpected safety findings.

The phase 2b zasocitinib (TAK-279) trial evaluated a highly selective allosteric TYK2 inhibitor administered orally once daily at doses of 2, 5, 15, or 30 mg versus placebo over 12 weeks across 55 centers in the US and Canada. PASI 75 at week 12 was achieved by 18%, 44%, 68%, and 67% of patients receiving zasocitinib at 2, 5, 15, and 30 mg, respectively, compared with 6% on placebo. PASI 100 demonstrated a dose response across all doses, with 33% of patients receiving zasocitinib 30 mg achieving complete clearance. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 44% of placebo patients and 53%–62% of patients across the four zasocitinib dose groups, with no dose dependency and no clinically meaningful longitudinal differences in laboratory parameters.

Beyond Psoriasis: Icotrokinra's Expanding Pipeline

Icotrokinra (JNJ-77242113) is advancing beyond plaque psoriasis into additional immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, reflecting the broad pathogenic role of the IL-23 pathway across conditions. Ongoing phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies are evaluating its therapeutic potential in psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis.

Indication Phase Notes
Psoriatic arthritis Phase 2 and/or Phase 3 Ongoing; intervention model not reported
Ulcerative colitis Phase 2 and/or Phase 3 Ongoing; intervention model not reported

Icotrokinra: A New Era for Oral Psoriasis Therapy

The European Commission's approval of ICOTYDE™ (icotrokinra) for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis marks a pivotal moment, introducing the first-in-class targeted oral peptide that selectively blocks the IL-23 receptor. This represents a significant advancement, as it directly addresses a long-standing unmet need for highly effective oral treatment options in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. For patients, particularly adolescents and adults who prefer non-injectable therapies or have needle aversion, icotrokinra offers a compelling once-daily oral alternative with efficacy rates (70% IGA 0/1, 55% PASI 90 at Week 16) that rival some injectable biologics, coupled with a safety profile comparable to placebo through 52 weeks.

Strategically, this approval validates the oral peptide platform, opening doors for Johnson & Johnson to explore icotrokinra's potential in other IMIDs like psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis. Its demonstrated superiority over deucravacitinib, another oral therapy, positions icotrokinra as a frontrunner in the oral psoriasis landscape, setting a new benchmark for efficacy in this modality. This will undoubtedly intensify competition, prompting both oral and injectable market players to reassess their strategies.

However, several considerations warrant attention. While icotrokinra's efficacy is robust for an oral agent, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons suggest that leading injectable IL-23 inhibitors, such as risankizumab, may still offer higher peak clinical response rates. This potential efficacy gap could influence prescribing decisions for clinicians prioritizing maximal clearance. Furthermore, while short-term safety data are reassuring, the full long-term benefit-risk profile and durability of icotrokinra in real-world settings will require ongoing evaluation. Finally, as a novel, potentially premium-priced oral therapy, securing broad market access and favorable reimbursement across diverse European healthcare systems will be crucial for its commercial success in a competitive therapeutic landscape.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is considered moderate to severe plaque psoriasis?
Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis is typically characterized by involvement of 3% or more of the Body Surface Area (BSA). It is also defined by a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 10 or greater, reflecting significant erythema, induration, and desquamation. Additionally, a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 10 or greater, indicating a substantial impact on a patient's quality of life, contributes to this classification.
What is the best medication for severe plaque psoriasis?
Highly effective biologic therapies, particularly IL-17 inhibitors (e.g., secukinumab, ixekizumab) and IL-23 inhibitors (e.g., guselkumab, risankizumab), are generally considered the most efficacious systemic treatments for severe plaque psoriasis. These agents consistently achieve high PASI scores and offer sustained disease control. Treatment selection is individualized, factoring in patient comorbidities, preferences, and specific drug profiles.
Do you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis?
Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin condition affecting millions globally. It is characterized by widespread, raised, erythematous plaques covered with silvery scales, often requiring systemic therapies or biologics due to significant impact on quality of life and potential comorbidities. Severity is typically assessed by Body Surface Area (BSA) involvement, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores, and impact on daily living.
What is the best treatment for severe plaque psoriasis?
Treatment for severe plaque psoriasis primarily involves highly effective systemic therapies, with biologics being the cornerstone. IL-17, IL-23, and TNF-alpha inhibitors are widely utilized due to their superior efficacy and targeted immunomodulation. JAK inhibitors and other small molecules also represent important therapeutic options, often considered after or in conjunction with biologics.
Will my plaque psoriasis ever go away?
Plaque psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune disease, and while it is not curable, it is highly manageable. Current therapeutic advancements allow for significant disease control, often achieving long-term remission or near-clear skin. However, the underlying condition persists, necessitating ongoing management to maintain these improvements and prevent flares.
What is the most severe stage of psoriasis?
The most severe stage of psoriasis is generally classified as **severe psoriasis**, characterized by extensive body surface area (BSA) involvement (typically >10%), high Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores, and profound impact on a patient's quality of life. Specific severe forms, such as erythrodermic psoriasis and generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP), represent acute, life-threatening manifestations that often require hospitalization and immediate systemic treatment. These severe presentations can lead to systemic complications including electrolyte imbalance, infection, and cardiovascular compromise.

References

  1. [1] Lu ST, Kelly KA et al.. An overview of benvitimod for the treatment of psoriasis: a narrative review. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2022 Feb. 34937468
  2. [2] Klein ME, Bangerter A et al.. Efficacy and safety of JNJ-42165279, a fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor, in adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized, phase 2, placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Dec. 39414987
  3. [3] Wang C, Liu Y et al.. Extension of Secukinumab and Ixekizumab Dose for Moderate-To-Severe Psoriasis in Low Disease Activity Intervals. Experimental dermatology. 2025 May. 40369849
  4. [4] Papp KA, Griffiths CE et al.. Long-term safety of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: final results from 5 years of follow-up. The British journal of dermatology. 2013 Apr. 23301632
  5. [5] Subedi S, Gong Y et al.. Infliximab and biosimilar infliximab in psoriasis: efficacy, loss of efficacy, and adverse events. Drug design, development and therapy. 2019. 31413544
  6. [6] Klaassen KM, Ploegmakers MJ et al.. Subclinical enthesitis in nail psoriasis patients: a case-control study. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG. 2017 Apr. 28378489
  7. [7] Spindeldreher S, Maillère B et al.. Secukinumab Demonstrates Significantly Lower Immunogenicity Potential Compared to Ixekizumab. Dermatology and therapy. 2018 Mar. 29392570
  8. [8] Fourie AM, Cheng X et al.. JNJ-77242113, a highly potent, selective peptide targeting the IL-23 receptor, provides robust IL-23 pathway inhibition upon oral dosing in rats and humans. Scientific reports. 2024 Jul 30. 39080319
  9. [9] Feldman SR, Holmen Moeller A et al.. Relative Importance of Mode of Administration in Treatment Preferences among Plaque Psoriasis Patients in the United States. Journal of health economics and outcomes research. 2017. 37661952
  10. [10] Takata T, Takahashi A et al.. Detection of asymptomatic enthesitis in psoriasis patients: An onset of psoriatic arthritis?. The Journal of dermatology. 2016 Jun. 26666215
  11. [11] Paulus MP, Stein MB et al.. The effects of FAAH inhibition on the neural basis of anxiety-related processing in healthy male subjects: a randomized clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Apr. 33335310
  12. [12] Blauvelt A, Leonardi CL et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Risankizumab Therapy vs Treatment Withdrawal in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA dermatology. 2020 Jun 1. 32267471
  13. [13] Armstrong AW, Gooderham M et al.. Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibition With Zasocitinib (TAK-279) in Psoriasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA dermatology. 2024 Oct 1. 39167366
  14. [14] Mason KJ, Barker JNWN et al.. Comparison of Drug Discontinuation, Effectiveness, and Safety Between Clinical Trial Eligible and Ineligible Patients in BADBIR. JAMA dermatology. 2018 May 1. 29590279
  15. [15] Lebwohl M, Warren RB et al.. Deucravacitinib in plaque psoriasis: 2-year safety and efficacy results from the phase III POETYK trials. The British journal of dermatology. 2024 Apr 17. 38226713
  16. [16] Gold LS, Armstrong AW et al.. Once-daily oral icotrokinra versus placebo and once-daily oral deucravacitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 & 2): two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled and active-comparator-controlled trials. Lancet (London, England). 2025 Sep 27. 40976249

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts