AK157D1 NMPA Clearance: Phase 1 Entry Into a B7-H3 ADC Race Already Defined by Rivals
Regulatory Approvals

AK157D1 NMPA Clearance: Phase 1 Entry Into a B7-H3 ADC Race Already Defined by Rivals

Published : 27 Aug 2026

At a Glance
Indicationadvanced malignant solid tumors
DrugAK157D1
Mechanism of ActionB7-H3-targeting antibody-drug conjugate
CompanyAkeso, Inc.
Trial PhasePhase I
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryApproval Granted
Therapeutic AreaOncology
Regulatory AgencyChina's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA)
Clearance DateAugust 21, 2026
Development StrategyIO2.0 + ADC2.0 strategy
Combination Therapy Partnersivonescimab, cadonilimab
Other Pipeline ADCsAK146D1 (TROP2/Nectin-4 ADC), AK138D1 (HER3 ADC), AK158D1 (bispecific ADC)
Preclinical Efficacypotent antitumor activity
Preclinical Safetyfavorable safety profile
Target Expression Profilehighly expressed in a broad range of solid tumors, limited expression in normal tissues
Targeted Limitations of Existing ADCshematologic toxicity, interstitial lung disease

Akeso's AK157D1 B7-H3 ADC Cleared for Phase I in Solid Tumors

Akeso, Inc. announced that its investigational B7-H3-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, AK157D1, received clinical trial clearance from China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) on August 21, 2026. This clearance allows for the initiation of a Phase I study in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors. AK157D1 is Akeso's third next-generation ADC candidate to enter clinical development, following AK146D1 and AK138D1, and is a key part of the company's IO2.0 + ADC2.0 strategy. Preclinical studies have shown potent antitumor activity and a favorable safety profile, suggesting its potential to address limitations of existing ADCs.

  • Novel ADC Design and Preclinical Profile: AK157D1 is a novel, in-house developed B7-H3-targeting ADC that has demonstrated potent antitumor activity and a favorable safety profile in preclinical studies. Its proprietary design aims to overcome limitations of current ADCs, such as hematologic toxicity and interstitial lung disease, positioning it as a potential monotherapy or combination therapy option.
  • Strategic Pipeline Expansion: The clearance of AK157D1 marks the third next-generation ADC from Akeso to enter clinical development, reinforcing the company's "IO2.0 + ADC2.0" strategy. This expands Akeso's broad oncology pipeline, complementing existing bispecific antibodies like ivonescimab and cadonilimab, with plans for future combination studies.
  • B7-H3 as a Promising Target: B7-H3 is identified as a highly expressed target across a wide range of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung, prostate, breast, and colorectal cancers, while showing limited expression in normal tissues. This favorable expression profile supports B7-H3's potential as a broad-spectrum antitumor target for AK157D1, indicating its therapeutic versatility.

Addressing Limitations in Advanced Solid Tumor Treatment

Advanced malignant solid tumors present a constellation of treatment challenges that have resisted resolution despite decades of oncologic innovation. Across tumor types — including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS/pMMR CRC), adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), and FGFR-driven malignancies — common barriers to durable disease control persist at biological, pharmacological, and clinical levels.

  • Limited efficacy of conventional therapies: Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy yield only modest survival benefits in high-mortality tumor types such as pancreatic cancer, which is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030, underscoring the urgent need for more effective systemic approaches.

  • Poor immunotherapy response in immunologically "cold" tumors: Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate objective response rates below 5% in MSS/pMMR CRC — which represents more than 85% of colorectal cancer cases — and have similarly shown disappointing efficacy in PDAC and ACC, reflecting profound intrinsic resistance across these histologies.

  • Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME): A durable immunosuppressive axis — driven by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) — promotes immune evasion, tumor progression, metastasis, and chemoresistance through multilayered mechanisms including bidirectional chemotactic recruitment, reciprocal cytokine signaling, metabolic suppression, and exosome-mediated communication.

  • Physical and molecular barriers to immune infiltration: In PDAC specifically, aberrant vasculature, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and excessive hyaluronic acid deposition impede immune cell infiltration, while low tumor mutational burden combined with KRAS mutations and MYC overexpression further diminishes tumor immunogenicity and antitumor immune priming.

  • Acquired resistance to targeted therapies: In FGFR-targeted treatment, secondary mutations, activation of bypass signaling pathways, and intratumoral heterogeneity collectively drive acquired resistance, limiting the durability of initial responses.

  • Treatment-related toxicity burden: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of all grades developed in 27.0% of ICI-treated patients, with grade ≥3 events in 10.7%; cumulative irAE rates reached 43.0% by 20 cycles. In separate analyses, 29.24% of patients discontinued immunotherapy due to irAEs. Ramucirumab use was associated with a significantly elevated risk of serious adverse events (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05–1.21; incidence 37.5% vs. 33.5%).

  • Marginal clinical benefit of approved agents: Assessed using the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS), ramucirumab failed to demonstrate substantial clinical benefit across any of its approved indications — with five of six approvals receiving a "negligible benefit" score of 1 or 2 — and quality of life was either unreported (30%) or unimproved (70%) across its randomized controlled trials.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are advanced solid tumors?
Advanced solid tumors are cancers that have progressed beyond their primary site, typically characterized by metastasis to distant organs or tissues. This stage often signifies a more aggressive disease course and a need for systemic therapies rather than localized treatment approaches. It can also encompass locally advanced tumors that are unresectable.
What is a solid malignant tumor?
A solid malignant tumor is an abnormal, uncontrolled proliferation of cells that forms a distinct mass of tissue. These tumors are characterized by their ability to invade surrounding tissues and metastasize to distant sites, distinguishing them from benign tumors and hematological malignancies. Their cellular architecture typically involves a stroma and parenchyma, contributing to their palpable or imaging-detectable mass.
What is the most effective treatment for a solid tumor?
There is no single "most effective" treatment for all solid tumors, as efficacy is highly individualized. Optimal treatment strategies depend on the specific tumor type, stage, molecular characteristics, and patient health status. Current approaches often involve a multidisciplinary combination of surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. The most effective regimen is determined through comprehensive diagnostic profiling and a personalized treatment plan.
What is an advanced solid tumour?
An advanced solid tumour is a malignant growth originating in an organ that has progressed beyond its primary site. This progression typically involves extensive local invasion into surrounding tissues or, more commonly, distant metastasis to other organs. Such tumours are characterized by their aggressive nature, often leading to more complex treatment challenges and a poorer prognosis compared to early-stage disease.
What is the standard of care for metastatic melanoma?
The standard of care for metastatic melanoma primarily involves targeted therapy for *BRAF*-mutated disease and immunotherapy for all eligible patients. For *BRAF* V600-mutated melanoma, combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors are a first-line option. Immunotherapy, including PD-1 inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab, is a cornerstone treatment for both *BRAF*-mutated and *BRAF*-wild type metastatic melanoma.
What are the NCCN guidelines?
The NCCN Guidelines are a comprehensive set of evidence-based, consensus-driven recommendations for cancer care developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. They provide detailed algorithms and clinical decision-making tools covering screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and supportive care for nearly all cancer types. Widely recognized as a standard for clinical policy in oncology, these guidelines are utilized by clinicians, payers, and regulatory bodies to optimize and standardize cancer care globally.
What does standard of care mean in oncology?
Standard of care in oncology refers to the currently accepted and widely practiced treatment approach for a specific cancer type and stage, based on robust clinical evidence and expert consensus. It represents the best available therapy proven to be safe and effective, often encompassing surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, targeted therapies, or immunotherapy. This benchmark guides clinical practice, informs regulatory decisions, and serves as the comparator arm in clinical trials evaluating novel agents. Adherence ensures patients receive optimal, evidence-based care.

References

  1. [1] Karwacka I, Obołończyk Ł et al.. The Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Adrenocortical Carcinoma. Biomedicines. 2021 Jan 20. 33498467
  2. [2] Huang G, Liu S et al.. PD-1 inhibitor-based adverse events in solid tumors: A retrospective real-world study. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2022. 36438818
  3. [3] Sindhu KK, Leiter A et al.. Durable disease control with local treatment for oligoprogression of metastatic solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer treatment and research communications. 2020. 33049542
  4. [4] Effing SMA, Gyawali B. Assessing the risk-benefit profile of ramucirumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Aug. 32954236
  5. [5] Pan D, Li X et al.. Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Frontiers in immunology. 2025. 40443678
  6. [6] Yoshikawa Y, Imamura M et al.. Prevalence of immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in Japanese patients with various solid tumors. BMC cancer. 2022 Nov 29. 36447159
  7. [7] He Z, Chen Y et al.. FGFR Aberrations in Solid Tumors: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Translation of Targeted Therapies. Cancers. 2025 Dec 27. 41514604
  8. [8] Zhang W, Jin C et al.. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells in colorectal cancer: a synergistic immunosuppressive axis and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Frontiers in immunology. 2026. 41694372
  9. [9] Formelli MG, Palloni A et al.. Classic versus innovative strategies for immuno-therapy in pancreatic cancer. Advanced drug delivery reviews. 2025 Oct. 40783052

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts