| Indication | Obesity |
| Drug | ASC35 |
| Mechanism of Action | GLP-1R/GIPR dual peptide agonist |
| Company | Ascletis Pharma |
| Trial Phase | Phase I |
| Category | Regulatory Milestone |
| Sub Category | Approval Granted |
| Regulatory Agency | US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) |
| Drug Formulation | Once-monthly subcutaneous (SQ), Self-Assembling Lipid Depot (SALD) formulation |
| Dosing Frequency | Once-monthly (for ASC35), Once-weekly (for tirzepatide comparator) |
| Comparator Drug | Tirzepatide |
| Patient Population Size | 84 participants |
| Patient Inclusion Criteria | BMI ≥30.0kg/m² (obesity), BMI ≥27.0kg/m² with weight-related comorbidities (overweight) |
| Trial Design | Placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind, Single-ascending dose (SAD), Multiple-ascending-dose (MAD), Head-to-head comparison |
| Drug Discovery Platform | AI-assisted structure-based drug discovery (AISBDD) platform |
| Formulation Technology Platform | Ultra-long-acting platform (ULAP) technology |
| Press Release Date | June 24, 2026 |
FDA Clears Ascletis' Once-Monthly ASC35 for Phase I Obesity Trial
Ascletis Pharma has received Investigational New Drug (IND) clearance from the US FDA to initiate a Phase I study for ASC35, a once-monthly subcutaneous glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GLP-1R/GIPR) dual peptide agonist, for the treatment of obesity. The placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind trial will enroll 84 participants with obesity or overweight with weight-related comorbidities. The study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ASC35 through single and multiple ascending doses, including a head-to-head comparison with once-weekly tirzepatide in Part B.
- Ascletis Pharma achieved a significant regulatory milestone with FDA IND clearance for ASC35, advancing its peptide pipeline for obesity treatment. ASC35 is a novel once-monthly subcutaneous GLP-1R/GIPR dual peptide agonist, independently discovered and developed using Ascletis’ AI-assisted structure-based drug discovery (AISBDD) platform, highlighting the company's innovative approach to drug development.
- The upcoming Phase I study is designed as a placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind trial involving 84 participants. The patient population includes individuals with obesity (BMI ≥30.0kg/m²) or those overweight (BMI ≥27.0kg/m²) with weight-related comorbidities, ensuring a relevant cohort for evaluating ASC35's safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.
- The clinical trial features a two-part design, with Part B conducting a head-to-head, multiple-ascending-dose comparison between ASC35’s proprietary once-monthly Self-Assembling Lipid Depot (SALD) formulation and the FDA-approved, once-weekly tirzepatide. The SALD formulation, developed using the ultra-long-acting platform (ULAP) technology, is engineered to provide sustained drug release over one month or longer, potentially offering a more convenient and patient-friendly dosing regimen.
ASC35's Phase I Design: A Head-to-Head Look at Once-Monthly Dosing
The obesity therapeutic landscape has been shaped by a diverse range of trial designs, spanning pharmacological, device-based, behavioral, and dietary interventions across both pediatric and adult populations. Key trials vary considerably in duration, randomization strategy, and primary endpoint selection, reflecting the multifactorial nature of obesity as a disease. The following table summarizes the design parameters and endpoints of the most clinically and strategically relevant trials identified in the literature.
| Trial / Study | Design | Population | N | Duration | Primary Endpoint(s) | Key Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beinaglutide RCT (2024) | Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (2:1) | Chinese adults; BMI ≥28 kg/m² (obesity) or 24–27.9 kg/m² (overweight with complications) | 427 | 16 weeks | % body weight change; proportion achieving ≥5% weight reduction | −6.0% vs −2.4% weight change (difference −3.6%, P<0.0001); 58.2% vs 25.4% achieved ≥5% reduction |
| Elecoglipron Phase 2 (2026) | Randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-dose | Adults with obesity or overweight; mean BMI 38.2 kg/m² | 310 | 26 weeks | % change from baseline in body weight; proportion achieving ≥5% weight loss | Weight change: −2.6% to −10.5% vs −0.6% placebo; ≥5% weight loss in 40.4–88.8% vs 15.6% placebo |
| Tirzepatide SURPASS-3 Substudy (2022–2024) | Randomized controlled substudy | T2D patients; mean baseline liver fat content 15.71% | 296 | 52 weeks | Absolute reduction in liver fat content (LFC) | LFC reduction: −8.09% (tirzepatide 10/15 mg pooled) vs −3.38% (insulin degludec); ETD −4.71% (P<0.0001) |
| AspireAssist RCT (2017) | Randomized clinical trial (2:1) | Adults; BMI 35.0–55.0 kg/m² | 207 | 52 weeks | Mean % excess weight loss; proportion achieving ≥25% excess weight loss | 31.5% vs 9.8% excess weight loss (P<0.001); 58.6% vs 15.3% achieved ≥25% excess weight loss |
| Canagliflozin Phase 3 Studies (2017) | Two 104-week Phase 3 RCTs | Adults with T2D aged 18–80 (Study 1) and 55–80 (Study 2) | 1,450 / 714 | 104 weeks | Weight loss vs comparator (glimepiride or placebo); proportion with ≥5% weight loss; BMI and waist circumference change | Sustained weight loss with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg vs comparator; majority of loss attributable to fat mass |
| Self-Control Training RCT (2022) | Double-blind, multicentre RCT (1:1); online self-control training vs sham, added to multidisciplinary obesity treatment | Children and adolescents aged 8–18 with obesity (inpatient and outpatient) | 259 | Not specified | BMI SDS | No overall benefit; subgroup of inpatient children aged 8–12 showed significant BMI benefit (p=0.026) |
| TRECO Study Protocol (2025) | Open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel design RCT; block randomization stratified by sex and age | Children aged 8–17 with obesity (BMI-Z >2) | 128 | 12 weeks (extended to 48 weeks) | BMI-Z reduction from baseline at 12 weeks | Protocol; long-term adherence data pending |
| Pediatric Pharmacological Trial (2011) | Triple-masked RCT; metformin, fluoxetine, combination, or placebo | Adolescents aged 10–16 with obesity | 180 | 12 weeks + 12-week follow-up | BMI change; waist circumference change | All medication groups: BMI decrease ~−1.2±0.2 kg/m² (P<0.05); waist circumference reduced in metformin (−2.1 cm) and combination (−2.5 cm) groups |
| Remote Nursing Monitoring RCT (2019) | Controlled RCT; remote telephone monitoring vs conventional monitoring | Overweight women at outpatient obesity clinic | 101 | 3 months | Weight, BMI, and waist circumference change | Intervention: −1.66 kg (p=0.017), −0.66 kg/m² BMI (p=0.015), −2.5 cm waist circumference (borderline, p=0.055) |
| Ceftobiprole Phase 3 Post Hoc Analysis (2025) | Post hoc analysis of three Phase 3 registrational trials | Patients with SAB, ABSSSI, or CABP stratified by BMI | 1,641 | Varies by indication | Clinical cure rate by BMI category | Cure rate 81.7% (BMI 30–40 kg/m²) vs 68.2% (BMI ≥40 kg/m²) vs 80.4% overall; safety unaffected by BMI |
| VLCD Observational Study (2015) | Prospective descriptive observational study | Adults with BMI >30 kg/m²; mean age 42 years | 44 | 3 pharmacotherapy consultations | Absolute and relative weight loss; weight loss rate (kg/week); side effect incidence; adherence (SMAQ) | Mean weight loss 7 kg; relative loss 6.7% (p<0.0005); rate 1.2 kg/week; 33% mild side effects; 84% adherent |
| Diversity in Phase 3/4 Obesity Trials (Systematic Review) | Systematic review of 18 Phase 3 and Phase 4 trials | Obesity trial participants across multiple studies | — | — | Racial, ethnic, and gender representation vs obesity prevalence in underrepresented populations | White non-Hispanic and female participants predominated; no studies classified by gender identity; non-uniform race/ethnicity reporting |
Addressing Key Unmet Needs in the Evolving Obesity Treatment Landscape
The obesity treatment landscape has increasingly shifted toward recognizing heterogeneity in disease burden, with mounting evidence highlighting that unmet needs extend well beyond pharmacological gaps to encompass structural, demographic, and disease-specific dimensions. Across recent literature, several discrete populations and clinical scenarios have emerged as priority targets where current standards of care remain inadequate. The following areas represent the most substantiated unmet needs identified over this period.
Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomically marginalized communities: Racial and ethnic minorities in the US experience disproportionately higher rates of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease relative to White populations. MASLD prevalence is rising fastest among older adults and Hispanic women, particularly in low-income and rural communities. Historical structural factors — including redlining, underinvestment in social infrastructure, limited green space access, and food deserts — compound genetic risk and perpetuate health disparities that pharmacologic advances alone cannot address. Equitable access to approved pharmacologic therapies remains a critical gap.
Pediatric and adolescent populations: Children and adolescents with severe obesity represent an underserved clinical population, with early-onset chronic comorbidities requiring earlier intervention thresholds, including timely referral for metabolic and bariatric surgery evaluation. Adolescents aged 12–18 show high rates of suboptimal dietary patterns. Additionally, GLP-1 receptor agonists have demonstrated significant BMI reduction (−1.7, p=0.02) and ALT reduction (−3.0, p=0.01) in youth, though long-term safety data and clinical significance of metabolic improvements remain insufficiently characterized.
Patients with monogenic obesity (MC4R deficiency): MC4R deficiency — the most common monogenic cause of obesity — presents with severe hyperphagia and early-onset obesity, yet targeted therapeutic approaches remain largely unexplored in pediatric patients. A case report of a 17-year-old with MC4R deficiency treated with tirzepatide demonstrated initial hyperphagia reduction and 20.9% total body weight loss at 37 weeks, but hunger scores rebounded toward pre-treatment levels by week 28, underscoring the need for combination strategies and dedicated pediatric trial data.
Obese patients with MASH (≤F3 fibrosis) without diabetes: This subgroup carries high risk of progression to advanced liver disease and cirrhosis, yet remains undertreated. An estimated 782,920 obese adults in Italy fall within this target population. Cost-effectiveness analysis of semaglutide 2.4 mg in this group demonstrated an ICER of €22,691 per QALY gained over a 10-year horizon — below accepted Italian willingness-to-pay thresholds — indicating both clinical and economic rationale for targeted intervention in this cohort.
Patients with sarcopenic obesity: Characterized by concurrent excessive adiposity and reduced skeletal muscle mass with impaired function, sarcopenic obesity requires individualized management across special populations including adolescents, the elderly, and menopausal individuals. Expert consensus (2026 edition) recommends a multidisciplinary approach integrating endocrinology, bariatric surgery, clinical nutrition, and rehabilitation medicine, with combining lifestyle interventions and incretin-based therapies showing meaningful improvements in body composition and muscle function.
Geographically isolated and indigenous communities: Pacific Island nations — particularly the Republic of the Marshall Islands — face among the highest global rates of obesity-related diabetes and downstream complications, including one of the highest amputation rates worldwide, compounded by minimal healthcare infrastructure, financial barriers, and culturally based hesitancy to seek care. Tribal populations in India similarly present with distinct metabolic-hematologic profiles and elevated risk driven by high illiteracy rates and tobacco and alcohol use, necessitating culturally informed, population-specific prevention frameworks.
Very preterm-born children in socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods: This often-overlooked population demonstrates substantially elevated risk of overweight or obesity at two years of age (42.8% vs. 35.3%, p=0.004), with disadvantaged neighborhood status independently associated with obesity risk (adjusted OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.10–2.23; p=0.01), reinforcing the need for early, neighborhood-level obesity prevention strategies targeting this high-risk developmental window.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Jensterle M, Janež A. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in the Treatment of Obesity. Hormone research in paediatrics. 2023. 34852347
- [2] Osborne WB, Vöcking O et al.. Exogenous estradiol does not regulate daily metabolic rhythms underlying diet-induced obesity in male mice. PloS one. 2026. 41843570
- [3] Bashir AO, Osman OE et al.. Prevalence and associated factors of overweight, obesity, and central obesity among adults in Northern Sudan: a community-based cross-sectional study. Scientific reports. 2025 Aug 9. 40783581
- [4] Shi X, Jiang P et al.. Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial to reduce weight among youth with obesity using time-restricted eating: the TRECO study. BMC pediatrics. 2025 Dec 3. 41340042
- [5] Zhang C, Shen C et al.. Cross-sectional analysis of the association between physical activity and metabolic syndrome in the elderly. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2026. 41958880
- [6] Wirtz Baker JM, Aballay LR et al.. Exploring the quality of urban green spaces and their association with health: An epidemiological study on obesity using Street View technology. Public health. 2024 Dec. 39321662
- [7] Park S, Kim SK. Aerobic Training for Obesity Management in Individuals with Down Syndrome: A Bibliometric and Meta-Analyses. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2026 Apr 15. 42072951
- [8] Austregésilo de Athayde De Hollanda Morais B, Martins Prizão V et al.. The efficacy and safety of GLP-1 agonists in PCOS women living with obesity in promoting weight loss and hormonal regulation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of diabetes and its complications. 2024 Oct. 39178623
- [9] Sofen HL, Gogineni R et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Scalp Psoriasis in Patients with Obesity Over 52 Weeks. Dermatology and therapy. 2026 Jun. 42105056
- [10] Tziomalos K, Athyros VG et al.. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: pathogenesis and treatment options. Current vascular pharmacology. 2012 Mar. 22239625
- [11] Thompson CC, Abu Dayyeh BK et al.. Percutaneous Gastrostomy Device for the Treatment of Class II and Class III Obesity: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2017 Mar. 27922026
- [12] Johnson-Mann CN, Cupka JS et al.. A Systematic Review on Participant Diversity in Clinical Trials-Have We Made Progress for the Management of Obesity and Its Metabolic Sequelae in Diet, Drug, and Surgical Trials. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities. 2023 Dec. 36536164
- [13] Torre E, Di Matteo S et al.. Semaglutide 2.4 mg for Obese Patients with MASH: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the Italian NHS Perspective. ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR. 2026. 42099530
- [14] Madrona Marcos F, Panisello Royo JM et al.. Effect of a motivational physical activity program on lipid parameters in patients with obesity and overweight. Clinica e investigacion en arteriosclerosis : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Arteriosclerosis. 2019 Nov-Dec. 30971374
- [15] Blonde L, Stenlöf K et al.. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. Postgraduate medicine. 2016 May. 27002421
- [16] Sáez Belló M, Segarra Villalba C et al.. [Effectiveness and safety of Very Low Calory Diets in obese patients]. Farmacia hospitalaria : organo oficial de expresion cientifica de la Sociedad Espanola de Farmacia Hospitalaria. 2014 Jan 1. 24483860
- [17] Egan JC. Seminars in pediatric sugery pediatric metabolic and bariatric surgery. Seminars in pediatric surgery. 2026 Jun. 42140765
- [18] Krishnan A, Kadakia KC et al.. Modern Diets, Metabolic Inequity, and Race-Ethnic Disparities: Unraveling the Associations With MASLD and Cancer Risk. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2026 Feb. 41435869
- [19] Lim J, Oh J. Cluster-Based Evaluation of Dietary Guideline Adherence and Food Literacy Among Adolescents: Implications for Tailored Diets. Nutrients. 2026 Jan 12. 41599854
- [20] Poljo A, Hasani A et al.. The impact of obesity onset and duration on outcomes after metabolic bariatric surgery: an international multicenter cohort study. Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2026 May 12. 42225532
















