| Indication | Stage-III DNA mismatch repair colon cancer |
| Drug | Tecentriq |
| Mechanism of Action | Cancer immunotherapy |
| Company | Roche |
| Trial Phase | Phase III |
| Trial Acronym | ATOMIC |
| Category | Regulatory Milestone |
| Sub Category | Approval Granted |
| Therapeutic Area | Oncology |
| Group Sales (9M 2026) | CHF 46.5 billion |
| Group Sales Growth (Q3 2026 CER) | +7% |
| Regulatory Agency | US FDA, European Commission, EMA |
| Review Designation | Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation |
| Approved Indication (Enspryng) | Thyroid eye disease |
| Approved Indication (Susvimo) | Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) |
| Drug (fenebrutinib) | fenebrutinib |
| Indication (fenebrutinib) | Relapsing multiple sclerosis, Primary progressive multiple sclerosis |
| Publication Journal | The New England Journal of Medicine |
| Investment (Hillsboro facility) | USD 750 million |
Roche Reports Strong Q3 Sales and Multiple Key Approvals
Roche reported robust financial performance in the third quarter of 2026, with Group sales increasing +7% at constant exchange rates (CER) and +8% in CHF, contributing to a +6% CER growth for the first nine months to CHF 46.5 billion. This growth was driven by strong demand across both its Pharmaceuticals and Diagnostics Divisions. The company also announced multiple significant regulatory approvals in the US and EU, alongside positive clinical data readouts for several pipeline assets, underscoring its continued progress in delivering innovative healthcare solutions.
- Strong Financial Performance: Roche's Group sales for the first nine months of 2026 reached CHF 46.5 billion, a +6% increase at CER, with Q3 sales alone growing +7% at CER. The Pharmaceuticals Division contributed CHF 36.2 billion (+7% CER), propelled by top growth drivers like Xolair, Hemlibra, Ocrevus, Phesgo, and Vabysmo, while the Diagnostics Division grew +4% at CER to CHF 10.3 billion.
- Key Regulatory Milestones: Roche secured several important approvals, including US FDA approval for Tecentriq in adjuvant stage-III DNA mismatch repair colon cancer, Gazyva/Gazyvaro for childhood-onset idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, and Enspryng for thyroid eye disease. Additionally, Susvimo received EU approval for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, and fenebrutinib was granted US FDA Priority Review for both relapsing and primary progressive multiple sclerosis.
- Advancing Clinical Pipeline: Positive phase III data were reported for Lunsumio in follicular lymphoma (CELESTIMO study) and Tam-Peli in relapsed small-cell lung cancer, showing significant improvements in progression-free and overall survival, respectively. Interim phase III data for sefaxersen in IgA nephropathy demonstrated significant proteinuria reduction, while phase II results for enicepatide showed best-in-disease potential for glycaemic control and weight loss in type 2 diabetes and obesity.
- Diagnostics Innovation and Strategic Investments: The US FDA cleared the Elecsys pTau217 test, the first single-biomarker blood test for Alzheimer’s disease, enhancing diagnostic capabilities. Roche also announced significant investments, including a USD 750 million expansion of its Hillsboro injectable medicines facility and the grand opening of its Innovation Center Boston, focusing on cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic diseases.
Addressing Key Challenges in Stage-III dMMR Colon Cancer
Stage-III dMMR colon cancer retains a good prognostic phenotype, but the survival advantage is probably more pronounced for stage II than stage III tumor, complicating adjuvant decision-making. Current management centers on fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin, yet efficacy is uneven across endpoints and the optimal duration, regimen, and patient selection remain unresolved.
Lack of efficacy of 5-fluorouracil alone: Deficient mismatch repair colon cancer is reportedly resistant to 5-fluorouracil adjuvant chemotherapy, and microsatellite instability status would predict the lack of efficacy of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. As compared with surgery alone, adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone did not improve disease-free survival in multivariable analysis (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.49, P = .38).
Dependence on oxaliplatin combination with divergent survival signals: Microsatellite instability tumors would have a survival benefit with the addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant 5FU chemotherapy. As compared with surgery alone, adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy improved disease-free survival in multivariable analysis (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.65, P < .001), with the DFS benefit statistically significant in multivariable analysis only in stage III (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.19 to 0.87, P = .02). In stage III MSI-H/dMMR disease, overall survival was improved with any adjuvant chemotherapy vs. any control arm (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.66; P < 0.01), while DFS was not significantly improved (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.45-1.09; P = 0.11).
Unresolved regimen, duration, and patient fitness considerations: The duration of the adjuvant treatment (3 or 6 months) and the regimen used (FOLFOX or XELOX) should be based on the recommendations of the international IDEA consortium pending the results of the translational studies of this trial. Discussion of adjuvant treatment in MSI tumors should also include other factors such as the patient's age and comorbidities.
Biologic heterogeneity and predictors of poor chemotherapy response: BRAF mutation was prognostic for overall survival, particularly in patients with MSI-low and stable tumors (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.4; P = .0003), and the V600E BRAF mutation confers a worse prognosis to stage II and stage III colon cancer patients independently of disease stage and therapy. Increased expression of osteopontin (p = 0.019) and low density of CD8-positive T-cells (p = 0.043) were significantly associated with unfavourable response to 5-FU, and miR-1290 was positively correlated with dMMR status and predicted poor prognosis in stage II and III colon cancer patients who received 5-FU-based chemotherapy.
Investigational role of immunotherapy in early-stage disease: The promising results of immunotherapy in metastatic MSI colorectal led to the development of clinical trials evaluating "immune checkpoint blockers" in combination with FOLFOX in the treatment of stage III MSI colon cancer.
The ATOMIC Study: Design and Endpoints for Adjuvant Tecentriq
Perioperative and neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition is being evaluated as a chemotherapy-free option for resectable dMMR/MSI-H colon cancer. Evidence spans an ongoing global Phase III randomized study and prospective Phase 2 trials and real-world series in stage II-III disease, centered on pathological response, clinical complete response, and event-free survival endpoints.
| Study / Population | Design Parameters | Treatment | Endpoints |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZUR-2, NCT05855200 — adult patients with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, radiologically evaluable T4N0 or Stage III resectable dMMR/MSI-H colon adenocarcinoma | Global, Phase III, open-label, randomized study, 2:1 randomization to perioperative dostarlimab monotherapy compared with standard of care (SoC) (adjuvant chemotherapy or surveillance); neoadjuvant dostarlimab 500 mg every 3 weeks (4 cycles), followed by surgery, then adjuvant dostarlimab 1000 mg every 6 weeks (6 cycles), versus immediate surgery followed by SoC | Neoadjuvant dostarlimab 500 mg every 3 weeks (4 cycles) + surgery + adjuvant dostarlimab 1000 mg every 6 weeks (6 cycles) vs immediate surgery + SoC | Primary endpoint is event-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review; key secondary endpoint is overall survival; additional secondary endpoints include pathological response assessed by residual viable tumor determined by local assessment, safety, and tolerability |
| Systematic review, PROSPERO CRD420251074066 — 8 prospective phase 2 trials encompassing 352 patients with stage II-III dMMR/MSI-H colorectal cancer; search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov until May 2025 | Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines; prospective interventional studies involving neoadjuvant immunotherapy in adults with stage II-III dMMR/MSI-H colorectal adenocarcinoma; risk of bias assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool | Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade, including nivolumab plus ipilimumab, dostarlimab, and camrelizumab plus apatinib | Primary outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), and clinical complete response (cCR) |
| Systematic review, CRD42024594173 — 21 articles with 628 non-metastatic dMMR colorectal cancers; databases up to November 2024 | Systematic review collecting clinical data from PubMed, Wanfang Embase, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases | Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, including immune monotherapy group and immune therapy plus chemotherapy group | Primary outcomes of major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), and other outcomes; secondary outcomes (pCR rates for the subgroups) |
| Multicenter real-world case series — 94 patients with colorectal cancer who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy from January 2017 to October 2021; 12 cases TNM staging II and 82 cases stage III; 26 patients (27.7%) with dMMR and MSI-H, 68 cases (72.3%) with pMMR and MSS | Retrospective multicenter case series; median cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy was 4 (1-10); median interval between completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgery was 30 (21-55) days; median follow-up of 32 (1-46) months | 26 patients with dMMR and MSI-H treated with immunotherapy alone, mainly programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1); 68 pMMR and MSS treated with immune combined with neoadjuvant therapy, mainly CapeOx (capecitabine+oxaliplatin) combined with PD-1 antibody plus long- or short-course radiotherapy, or PD-1 antibody combined with cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody | Efficacy evaluation included major pathological remission (MPR) defined as tumor regression induced by neoadjuvant therapy in pathology residual tumor ≤10%, pathological complete response (pCR) defined as tumor regression induced by neoadjuvant therapy without residual tumor in pathology, tumor response rate as disease control rate (DCR) namely proportion of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD), and objective response rate (ORR) as CR+PR; adverse events per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Standard version 3.0; surgical complications per Clavien-Dindo grading standard |
Tecentriq's New Role in Stage-III dMMR Colon Cancer Standard of Care
In stage III colon cancer, standard treatment consists of a combination of fluoropyrimidine (oral or intravenous) with oxaliplatin for 6 months, although administration of CAPOX can be considered for 3 months in low-risk tumors. Universal MMR testing is mandatory, with deficient MMR (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors representing approximately 15% of stage II/III cases, and it is mandatory to determine MSI/MMR status for avoiding administering fluoropyrimidines in monotherapy to patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors. Adjuvant therapy significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.93; P = .02) in patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors, while patients with dMMR tumors receiving fluorouracil (FU) had no improvement in DFS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.42 to 2.91; P = .85) compared with those randomly assigned to surgery alone, and in resected, dMMR/MSI-H stage II colorectal cancer (CRC), adjuvant fluoropyrimidine has no benefit and is not recommended.
For stage III disease, the phase III ATOMIC trial demonstrated that adding atezolizumab to mFOLFOX significantly improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) versus chemotherapy alone (86.4% vs. 76.6%; HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.34-0.72). The POLEM trial is recruiting patients with completely resected, stage III colon cancer confirmed to have dMMR/MSI-H or POLE exonuclease domain mutation, randomized in a 1:1 ratio to standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (capecitabine, oxaliplatin for 12 weeks or capecitabine for 24 weeks) or chemotherapy followed by avelumab (10 mg/kg, 2 weekly for 24 weeks), with DFS as the primary endpoint and a control 3-year DFS rate expected to be ~75% versus 87% with avelumab.
Neoadjuvant treatment is not consolidated yet although immunotherapy is achieving very good preliminary results in MSI-H patients, including neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab with pathological response in 109 of 111 patients (98%; 95% CI, 94 to 100), including 105 (95%) with a major pathological response and 75 (68%) with a pathological complete response. The use of ctDNA to define the treatment and monitoring of resected tumors is only recommended within studies, although plasma ctDNA offers a window to gauge efficacy of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy to clear microscopic disease, with failure to clear minimal residual disease prompting change to immune checkpoint blockade with pembrolizumab and resultant ctDNA clearance in reported dMMR/MSI-H stage III cases.
Roche's Innovation Engine: Reshaping Treatment Paradigms with Multi-Targeted Therapies
Roche's recent financial results, underscored by significant regulatory approvals and positive clinical data, paint a picture of a pharmaceutical powerhouse effectively leveraging its innovation engine. This robust performance is not merely about sales figures; it reflects a strategic advancement in addressing critical unmet medical needs across diverse therapeutic areas.
A prime example is the continued impact of faricimab, a bispecific antibody that targets both VEGF-A and Ang-2. Its demonstrated long-term durability and ability to extend dosing intervals are fundamentally reshaping the treatment paradigm for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. This innovation significantly reduces the treatment burden for patients while maintaining or improving visual and anatomical outcomes, a crucial differentiator in a competitive market. However, the ongoing influx of new anti-VEGF agents and alternative treatment strategies means that sustained market leadership will depend on continuous evidence of superior long-term efficacy and patient adherence.
In oncology, the notable efficacy of mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, particularly for patients previously treated with CAR-T therapy, highlights the transformative potential of bispecific antibodies in challenging hematologic malignancies. This success is complemented by the strengthening of the immuno-oncology portfolio through atezolizumab-based combinations, especially in hepatocellular carcinoma. While the prior setbacks of TIGIT inhibitors like tiragolumab serve as a reminder of the inherent risks in novel pathway development, they also underscore the importance of precise patient selection and combination strategies to unlock the full potential of next-generation immunotherapies.
Furthermore, the approval of remibrutinib, a novel Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for chronic spontaneous urticaria marks a strategic expansion into inflammatory diseases. This offers a new therapeutic avenue for patients refractory to existing treatments. Yet, the history of other BTK inhibitors being discontinued due to safety or efficacy concerns emphasizes the need for vigilant post-market surveillance and clear differentiation to ensure long-term success and patient safety within this class. Collectively, these advancements demonstrate a clear strategic focus on developing precision-targeted, multi-mechanism therapies, positioning the company for continued growth while navigating the complexities of drug development and market competition.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Nitsche U, Rosenberg R et al.. Integrative marker analysis allows risk assessment for metastasis in stage II colon cancer. Annals of surgery. 2012 Nov. 23095620
- [2] Isella C, Mellano A et al.. MACC1 mRNA levels predict cancer recurrence after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Annals of surgery. 2013 Jun. 23665971
- [3] Zhang Y, Wu Z et al.. Prognostic impact of high-risk factors and KRAS mutation in patients with stage II deficient mismatch repair colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Annals of translational medicine. 2022 Jun. 35845506
- [4] Blons H, Emile JF et al.. Prognostic value of KRAS mutations in stage III colon cancer: post hoc analysis of the PETACC8 phase III trial dataset. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2014 Dec. 25294886
- [5] Fariña-Sarasqueta A, van Lijnschoten G et al.. The BRAF V600E mutation is an independent prognostic factor for survival in stage II and stage III colon cancer patients. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2010 Dec. 20501503
- [6] Zou D, Xu T. Construction and validation of a colon cancer prognostic model based on tumor mutation burden-related genes. Scientific reports. 2024 Feb 4. 38311637
- [7] Taieb J, Balogoun R et al.. Adjuvant FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in full RAS and BRAF wildtype stage III colon cancer patients. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2017 Apr 1. 28031175
- [8] Sabbagh C, Mauvais F et al.. A lymph node ratio of 10% is predictive of survival in stage III colon cancer: a French regional study. International surgery. 2014 Jul-Aug. 25058763
- [9] Kalkan NO, Ucar G et al.. Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Shorter versus Extended Adjuvant Treatment Duration for Stage III Low-Risk Colon Cancer: A Comparative Analysis. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2025 Feb 1. 40326903
- [10] Jongeneel G, Greuter MJE et al.. Model-based evaluation of the cost effectiveness of 3 versus 6 months' adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer patients. Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology. 2020. 32994804
- [11] Li Y, Zhang W et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Subcutaneous Envafolimab in dMMR/MSI-H Locally Advanced Colon Cancer. Targeted oncology. 2024 Jul. 38691294
- [12] Roth AD, Tejpar S et al.. Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010 Jan 20. 20008640
- [13] Zaanan A, Taieb J. [Predictive and prognostic value of MSI phenotype in adjuvant colon cancer: Who and how to treat?]. Bulletin du cancer. 2019 Feb. 30527814
- [14] Dasanu CA, Alani M et al.. Immune checkpoint inhibition in advanced colorectal cancer with inherited and acquired microsatellite instability: Current state and future directions. Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners. 2026 Mar. 37246506
- [15] Kawakami H, Hironaka S et al.. An Investigator-Initiated Phase 2 Study of Nivolumab Plus Low-Dose Ipilimumab as First-Line Therapy for Microsatellite Instability-High Advanced Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer (NO LIMIT, WJOG13320G/CA209-7W7). Cancers. 2021 Feb 15. 33671871
- [16] Karaoğlan BB, Öztürk İ et al.. Adjuvant Chemotherapy Duration and Disease-Free Survival in Low-Risk Stage III Colon Cancer with N1a-b and N1c Disease: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer. 2024 Oct 31. 39480587
- [17] Ziane Bouziane S, Mans L et al.. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) duodenal adenocarcinoma leads to pathological complete response and paves the way for new strategies. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2024 Jul. 38805957
- [18] Zhang X, Yang R et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Monoimmunotherapy With PD-1 Inhibitor for dMMR/MSI⁃H Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center Real-World Study. Frontiers in immunology. 2022. 35958603
- [19] Karri V, Nimkar S et al.. Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Microsatellite Instability-High Colon Cancer: A Literature Review on Efficacy, Challenges, and Future Directions. Discovery medicine. 2025 May. 40415356
- [20] Liu XZ, Xiong Z et al.. [Multicenter real-world study on safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in combination with immunotherapy for colorectal cancer]. Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2022 Mar 25. 35340171
Contact Us
Address
350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901
For General Inquiry
info@pienomial.com













