Replicate Phase 3 Functional Cure at 20 Percent Leaves 80 Percent Uncured
Regulatory Approvals

Replicate Phase 3 Functional Cure at 20 Percent Leaves 80 Percent Uncured

Published : 29 Oct 2026

At a Glance
Indicationchronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection
Drugbepirovirsen
Mechanism of Actionantisense oligonucleotide (ASO)
CompanyGSK plc
Trial PhasePhase III
Trial AcronymB-WELL
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryApproval Granted
Therapeutic AreaInfectious Diseases & Vaccines
Regulatory AgencyUS Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Approved Market/RegionUS
Review DesignationPriority Review, Breakthrough Therapy Designation
Approved Indication Detailsin combination with nucleos(t)ide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NrtI) therapy in adult patients without cirrhosis, receiving Nrtl therapy for at least 6 months, who have suppressed HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), and with hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) levels ≤3000 IU/ml
Treatment DurationSix-month treatment
Functional Cure Rate19% (for ≤3000 IU/ml HBsAg), 26% (for ≤1000 IU/ml HBsAg)
Combination Partnernucleos(t)ide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NrtI) therapy
Trial Population Size1,220 (bepirovirsen) vs. 614 (placebo) in overall population; 768 (bepirovirsen) vs. 393 (placebo) in ≤1000 IU/ml HBsAg subgroup
Primary Endpointproportion of participants achieving functional cure in patients with baseline HBsAg ≤3000 IU/ml (assessed six months after all therapies were discontinued)
Licensing PartnerIonis Pharmaceuticals

FDA Approves GSK's Hibsago for Chronic Hepatitis B

GSK announced that the US FDA has approved Hibsago (bepirovirsen) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection in adult patients without cirrhosis, who are on NrtI therapy for at least six months, have suppressed HBV DNA, and HBsAg levels ≤3000 IU/ml. This first-in-class antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) offers unprecedented functional cure rates, with 19% observed in the B-WELL Phase III trials for the approved population, significantly higher than the less than 1% typically seen with standard of care. The approval was granted under FDA priority review and Breakthrough Therapy Designation, highlighting its potential to transform CHB management with a six-month treatment course and the option for self-administration.

  • Hibsago demonstrated a clinically meaningful 19% functional cure rate in the B-WELL Phase III trials for adults with baseline HBsAg ≤3000 IU/ml, compared to less than 1% with standard of care. Functional cure is defined as undetectable HBV DNA and HBsAg for at least 24 weeks post-treatment, indicating immune system control without medication. A higher rate of 26% was achieved in patients with HBsAg ≤1000 IU/ml, representing a significant portion of diagnosed CHB cases.
  • The FDA granted approval under Priority Review and Breakthrough Therapy Designation, acknowledging bepirovirsen's significant improvement over existing treatments. This approval offers patients a six-month treatment course with the added convenience of self-administration after the initial dose, addressing the long-standing need for a finite treatment duration in CHB management.
  • Bepirovirsen, an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), works by inhibiting the production of HBV genetic components, thereby reducing viral proteins like HBsAg and potentially enabling the immune system to regain control. This innovative approach aims to mitigate the risk of serious liver complications and liver cancer associated with chronic hepatitis B, which affects approximately 1.7 million people in the US and is a leading cause of global liver cancer cases.

Unpacking the B-WELL Phase III Data for Hibsago (Bepirovirsen)

Key chronic hepatitis B trials have evaluated nucleoside/nucleotide analogues, peginterferon regimens, and AnluoHuaxian pill using histologic, virologic, and biochemical endpoints. Most pivotal designs were randomized, double-blind comparisons with 48 weeks to a minimum of 52 weeks of treatment and paired liver biopsies.

Population Design and Duration Intervention Primary Endpoint Definition
Adults with chronic HBV infection never exposed to nucleoside or nucleotide treatment, enrolled at 34 sites in North America, Asia, and Europe between November 2000 and July 2002 Randomized (2:1), double-blind study, once daily for 48 weeks with pretreatment and end-of-treatment liver biopsy 200 mg of emtricitabine (n=167) or placebo (n=81) Histologic improvement defined as a 2-point reduction in Knodell necroinflammatory score with no worsening in fibrosis
648 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B not previously treated with a nucleoside analogue Phase 3, double-blind trial, 0.5 mg of entecavir or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks Entecavir vs lamivudine Histologic improvement (a decrease by at least two points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score, without worsening of fibrosis)
715 patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B not previously received a nucleoside analogue Phase 3, double-blind trial, 0.5 mg of entecavir or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks Entecavir vs lamivudine Histologic improvement (a decrease by at least two points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score, without worsening of fibrosis) at week 48
515 patients with chronic hepatitis B positive for HBeAg Randomized to 10 mg of adefovir dipivoxil (172 patients), 30 mg of adefovir dipivoxil (173), or placebo (170) daily for 48 weeks Adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg vs 30 mg vs placebo Histologic improvement in the 10-mg group as compared with the placebo group
185 patients with chronic hepatitis B negative for HBeAg Randomized 2:1, double-blind, 10 mg of adefovir dipivoxil or placebo once daily for 48 weeks Adefovir dipivoxil vs placebo Histologic improvement
HBeAg-positive patients refractory to lamivudine therapy (persistent viremia or documented YMDD mutations while receiving lamivudine) Phase III, double-blind trial, entecavir 1 mg daily (n = 141) or lamivudine 100 mg daily (n = 145) for a minimum of 52 weeks Entecavir vs lamivudine Two coprimary end points at 48 weeks: histologic improvement and a composite end point (HBV branched DNA <0.7 MEq/mL and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] <1.25 times the upper limit of normal)
670 HBeAg-positive patients from China, Malaysia, Taiwan area, Singapore, and Thailand Multicenter, randomized trial of PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.0μg/kg/wk for 24 weeks (arm A) or 1.5μg/kg/wk for 24 weeks (arm B), or 1.5μg/kg/wk for 48 weeks (arm C) Peginterferon alfa-2b dose and duration comparison Loss of HBeAg 24 weeks after end of treatment
270 CHB patients with ALT<2ULN and F ≤ 2 treated in 12 hospitals in China Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, randomly assigned 2:1 to intervention (AHP) group and placebo group AnluoHuaxian pill (AHP) vs placebo Histological change after 48 weeks of treatment

Hibsago: Ushering in a New Era for CHB Treatment

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major threat to global public health, affecting 296 million people worldwide. Nucleos(t)ide analogs provide durable suppression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication but rarely achieve hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, and HBsAg loss can rarely (1%) be achieved with current nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) options. Consequently, functional cure, defined as sustained HBsAg loss with undetectable HBV DNA after treatment, has become the central therapeutic goal. In recent years, guidelines have stated that long-term NA treatments can be discontinued for HBeAg-negative patients without achieving HBsAg loss. The best candidates for NA withdrawal are virally suppressed, HBeAg-negative, noncirrhotic patients with CHB with low HBsAg levels, particularly Whites with <1000 IU/mL and Asians with <100 IU/mL. In the international, multicenter, multiethnic cohort (RETRACT-B Study) among 1552 patients with CHB, cumulative probability of HBsAg loss was 3.2% at 12 months and 13.0% at 48 months of follow-up. In a prospective study from April 2022 to August 2024 in 46 non-cirrhotic, HBeAg-negative, HBV DNA-negative patients on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for more than three years, HBsAg loss was observed in 3 (13%) patients in the treatment discontinuation group at the end of 24-month follow-up, whereas 69.6% of patients had HBV DNA levels <2000 IU/mL and remained in treatment-free follow-up, with no HBsAg loss observed in the control group.

Relapse patterns after NA discontinuation have been further defined, with the agent used in NA treatment itself affecting the pattern of relapse development. After cessation of NA therapy, a relapse was observed in 38 patients (56.7%) among 67 patients who received NA therapy for at least 65 months, with relapse rate 71.0% in patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) as the last NA type and 37.9% in patients treated with entecavir (ETV) (p=0.017). Relapse after NA treatment occurs significantly slower and less frequently with entecavir compared to other regimens, including tenofovir dipivoxil. In 1402 virally suppressed CHB patients who stopped either ETV (n = 981) or TDF (n = 421), HBsAg loss occurred in 96 (6.8%) patients overall during a median off-treatment follow-up of 18 months, with virological relapse occurring earlier among TDF-treated patients (P < .01) and TDF significantly associated with a higher clinical relapse rate than ETV throughout follow-up (P < .01). In 162 noncirrhotic HBeAg-negative patients, the 2-year cumulative incidence of virological relapse was significantly higher in the off-TAF group (85.0%) compared to the off-TDF group (69.5%, p = 0.024) and the off-ETV group (51.5%, p = 0.010), and the 2-year cumulative incidence of clinical relapse was significantly higher in the off-TAF group (62.4%) compared to the off-TDF group (39.0%, p = 0.026) and the off-ETV group (22.5%, p = 0.024). In 891 patients followed post-treatment for at least 12 months, cumulative rates of HBsAg loss at 7 years were 22.6% and 35.4% in the entecavir and TDF groups respectively, with patients who discontinued TDF having significantly higher rates of HBsAg loss than patients who discontinued entecavir therapy in all (p = 0.019) and propensity score-matched (p = 0.015) patients.

The pursuit of functional cure is shifting toward multidrug strategies that combine potent viral suppression, antigen reduction, and immune restoration. Recent advances highlight the promise of RNA-targeting agents, including small interfering RNAs, antisense oligonucleotides, and RNA destabilizers, which directly reduce viral transcripts and antigen production. In parallel, immunomodulators such as pegylated interferon, checkpoint inhibitors, and therapeutic vaccines aim to restore HBV-specific immunity, and rationally designed combination regimens, integrating nucleos(t)ide analogs as a backbone with antigen-lowering agents and immunotherapies, can synergistically enhance functional cure rates. Piranga is a Phase 2 platform trial that evaluated 4 xalnesiran regimens with or without an immunomodulator in virologically suppressed participants with CHB (NCT04225715). Among 121 participants, 58 (48%) met NA stopping criteria and 40 (33%) discontinued NA, of whom 17 (43%) met NA restarting criteria, 16 (40%) restarted NA, and 24 (60%) remained off NA by the end of the study (EOS). Among participants who remained off NA, 5 achieved and maintained HBsAg loss (HBsAg <0.05 IU/mL) and HBV DNA undetectable (HBV DNA <10 IU/mL), all in treatment arms with an immunomodulator, while of the 40 participants who discontinued NA, 19 (48%) experienced virological relapse (VR), 3 (8%) of whom further developed clinical relapse (CR). Within this framework, monitoring biomarkers beyond HBV DNA is critical, with quantitative HBsAg reflecting both covalently closed circular DNA and integrated HBV DNA activity, whereas hepatitis B core-related antigens (HBcrAgs) provide complementary information on covalently closed circular DNA transcriptional activity.

A New Era for Chronic Hepatitis B Functional Cure

The recent FDA approval of bepirovirsen marks a pivotal moment in the long-standing battle against chronic hepatitis B (CHB). For decades, the primary goal of CHB management has been viral suppression through nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs), a lifelong commitment that rarely leads to a functional cure. This new antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) offers a tangible path to HBsAg seroclearance, a critical endpoint that has remained largely elusive.

The 19% functional cure rate observed in the B-WELL Phase III trials, specifically in noncirrhotic patients on NA therapy with suppressed HBV DNA and HBsAg levels ≤3000 IU/ml, represents a significant advancement. This outcome, achieved with a finite six-month treatment course and the convenience of self-administration, positions bepirovirsen as a transformative option for a well-defined patient segment. Its mechanism, targeting all HBV messenger RNAs and inducing innate immune activation, addresses the multifaceted nature of CHB pathogenesis, moving beyond mere viral replication inhibition.

However, the introduction of any novel therapy comes with considerations:

  • Patient Selection and Expectations: While 19% is a breakthrough, it means 81% of treated patients will not achieve a functional cure. Managing patient expectations and ensuring appropriate selection based on the approved criteria will be crucial for successful integration into clinical practice.

  • Safety Profile Management: The observed transient ALT flares and higher rates of Grade 3 or higher adverse events, particularly ALT elevations, underscore the need for robust patient monitoring protocols. Clinicians will need to be prepared to manage these events, which could influence prescribing decisions.

  • Long-term Durability and Resistance: Although initial data suggest minimal impact from bepirovirsen binding site SNPs, ongoing surveillance for resistance mechanisms and long-term durability of the functional cure will be essential as real-world data accumulates.

This approval not only offers a new hope for CHB patients but also validates the ASO platform as a powerful tool in infectious disease therapeutics. It sets a new benchmark for functional cure rates, compelling future drug development to aim higher and potentially paving the way for combination therapies that could further enhance efficacy and broaden the treatable population. The journey towards eradicating CHB by 2030 has just gained significant momentum.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is bepirovirsen and its mechanism of action in chronic hepatitis B?
Bepirovirsen is an investigational antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) designed to target all hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNAs. It works by binding to specific sequences within the HBV RNA, leading to their degradation and subsequent reduction in viral protein production. This mechanism aims to decrease circulating levels of HBV antigens, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), which is crucial for viral persistence. Its action is independent of reverse transcriptase activity, offering a distinct approach from current nucleos(t)ide analogs.
How does bepirovirsen aim to achieve a functional cure for chronic hepatitis B?
Bepirovirsen aims for a functional cure by significantly reducing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels, a key biomarker for viral activity and immune tolerance. By degrading HBV RNA, it disrupts the production of all viral proteins, including HBsAg, which is essential for viral replication and immune evasion. Sustained HBsAg loss and seroconversion are considered hallmarks of a functional cure, indicating long-term viral control and improved clinical outcomes. This approach seeks to enable the host immune system to regain control over the infection.
What are the current unmet needs in chronic hepatitis B treatment that bepirovirsen addresses?
Current chronic hepatitis B treatments, primarily nucleos(t)ide analogs, effectively suppress viral replication but rarely lead to a functional cure, requiring lifelong therapy for most patients. A significant unmet need is the development of therapies that can achieve sustained hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss and seroconversion. Bepirovirsen addresses this by directly targeting HBV RNA to reduce HBsAg, offering a potential pathway to functional cure and treatment discontinuation. It also provides an alternative mechanism for patients who may not respond optimally to existing antiviral agents.
What is the significance of targeting hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) with therapies like bepirovirsen?
Targeting hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is critical because HBsAg plays a central role in HBV pathogenesis, immune evasion, and viral persistence. High HBsAg levels contribute to immune exhaustion and prevent the host immune system from clearing the virus. Therapies like bepirovirsen, which reduce HBsAg, aim to restore effective antiviral immunity and facilitate HBsAg seroclearance. Achieving sustained HBsAg loss is a key indicator of a functional cure and is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes, including reduced risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

References

  1. [1] Cho YY, Chang Y et al.. Long-term Nucleotide Analogue Treatment Has Higher Levels of Renal Toxicities than Does Entecavir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B. Gut and liver. 2020 Mar 15. 31060115
  2. [2] Duan L, Liu Y et al.. Global trends and insights in interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis B: a bibliometric analysis. Virology journal. 2025 Sep 1. 40890755
  3. [3] Yoo EH, Cho HJ. Clinical response to long-term tenofovir monotherapy in Korean chronic hepatitis B patients. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry. 2017 Aug. 28687350
  4. [4] Konijeti GG, Grandhe S et al.. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Patients With Solid Tumors Before Initiating Chemotherapy. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2020 Jun. 31678602
  5. [5] Xiao HM, Shi MJ et al.. Efficacy and safety of AnluoHuaxian pills on chronic hepatitis B with normal or minimally elevated alanine transaminase and early liver fibrosis: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2022 Jul 15. 35398501
  6. [6] Liang N, Kong Z et al.. Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2019 Apr 3. 30941748
  7. [7] Lin YJ, Huang LR et al.. Hepatitis B virus core antigen determines viral persistence in a C57BL/6 mouse model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010 May 18. 20439715
  8. [8] Marcellin P, Chang TT et al.. Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. The New England journal of medicine. 2003 Feb 27. 12606735
  9. [9] Korkmaz P, Demirtürk N. Discontinuation of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: Risks and Benefits. Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology. 2024 Jun. 39005698
  10. [10] Chen CH, Peng CY et al.. Higher rate of HBsAg loss after discontinuation of tenofovir than entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2023 Aug. 37265196
  11. [11] Sherman M, Yurdaydin C et al.. Entecavir for treatment of lamivudine-refractory, HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2006 Jun. 16762627
  12. [12] Seetharam A, Lisker-Melman M. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: are we ready for combination therapy?. Current gastroenterology reports. 2009 Feb. 19166655
  13. [13] Liu DL, Luo KX et al.. [Factors related to chronic hepatitis B relapse after interferon-alpha treatment: a follow-up study]. Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University. 2007 Aug. 17715044
  14. [14] Hirode G, Choi HSJ et al.. Off-Therapy Response After Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Withdrawal in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B: An International, Multicenter, Multiethnic Cohort (RETRACT-B Study). Gastroenterology. 2022 Mar. 34762906
  15. [15] Delaney WE 4th, Borroto-Esoda K. Therapy of chronic hepatitis B: trends and developments. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2008 Oct. 18835366
  16. [16] Hige S, Aoki K et al.. Real-world safety and effectiveness of tenofovir alafenamide for 144 weeks in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B. Journal of viral hepatitis. 2024 Apr. 38163911
  17. [17] Okan HD, Karabay O et al.. Comparison of patients using lamivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir according to liver fibrosis markers fibrosis-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores. Indian journal of pharmacology. 2023 Jan-Feb. 36960516
  18. [18] Yan JY, Li ZQ et al.. Management of individuals with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and persistent normal or mildly elevated aminotransferase levels. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2019 Apr. 30368885
  19. [19] Kumada T, Atsukawa M et al.. Superior Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide Compared With Entecavir in Reducing Hepatitis B Surface Antigen: A Multicentre Propensity Score-Matched Study Using Linear Mixed-Effects Models. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2026 Aug. 42076967
  20. [20] Lovett GC, Nguyen T et al.. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B: Australian real world experience. World journal of hepatology. 2017 Jan 8. 28105258

Contact Us

📍

Address

350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts