Novartis Sweeps Access Index but KLU156 and Newborn Data Remain Unproven
Regulatory Approvals

Novartis Sweeps Access Index but KLU156 and Newborn Data Remain Unproven

Published : 14 Nov 2026

At a Glance
IndicationMalaria
Drugartemether and lumefantrine
CompanyNovartis
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryPriority Review / Fast Track Designation
Therapeutic AreaInfectious Diseases & Vaccines
Index NameAccess to Medicine Index
Ranking Year2026
Overall Score3.86 out of five
Number of Companies Assessed20
Technical Areas AssessedGovernance of Access, Research & Development, Product Delivery
Patients Reached (2025)304 million
Patients Reached via Access Approaches30 million
R&D Investment for Global Health (since 2021)USD 500 million
Coartem Baby Approval Countries16
Regulatory Agencies for KLU156Swissmedic, U.S. FDA

Novartis Leads 2026 Access to Medicine Index for Second Time

Novartis has secured the top position in the 2026 Access to Medicine Index for the second consecutive time, achieving an overall score of 3.86 out of five. The company is the first to rank No. 1 across all three Technical Areas (Governance of Access, Research & Development, and Product Delivery) since the Index began in 2008, with its R&D score nearly double the sector average. In 2025, Novartis reached 304 million patients globally, including 30 million through dedicated access programs. Key initiatives highlighted include expanding community health programs for chronic conditions like cancer and heart disease, launching Coartem® Baby for newborns with malaria, submitting the next-generation antimalarial KLU156 for priority review, and renewing its agreement with the WHO for free leprosy treatments.

  • Novartis achieved the top rank in the 2026 Access to Medicine Index for the second consecutive time, scoring 3.86 out of five. This marks a historic achievement as Novartis is the first company since the Index's inception in 2008 to secure the No. 1 position across all three assessed Technical Areas: Governance of Access, Research & Development, and Product Delivery, demonstrating a comprehensive commitment to improving global access to medicines.
  • The company's Research & Development efforts were particularly strong, with an R&D score almost twice the sector average. Novartis has invested over USD 500 million in R&D for global health since 2021, focusing on new treatments for malaria and neglected tropical diseases such as dengue, leishmaniasis, and Chagas disease. This includes the submission of KLU156 (ganaplacide/lumefantrine), a next-generation antimalarial, to Swissmedic and the U.S. FDA for priority review.
  • Novartis significantly expanded its patient reach and product delivery, reaching 304 million patients worldwide in 2025, with 30 million benefiting from specific access approaches, including 7.3 million through its Sub-Saharan Africa Business Unit. Notable product launches and partnerships include Coartem® Baby (artemether-lumefantrine), the first malaria treatment for newborns, approved in 16 countries, and the renewal of a landmark agreement with the World Health Organization to provide free leprosy treatments.

Addressing Critical Gaps in Global Malaria Treatment Access

Current malaria treatment is constrained by limited access to quality-assured therapies, expanding drug resistance, and safety complexities in severe disease and radical cure. Diagnostic limitations and formulation gaps further compromise effective case management.

  • Limited access and affordability of quality-assured ACT in the private sector: Less than a third, 27.7% (309/1114) of private drug outlet clients obtained a QAACT for management of malaria symptoms. Of participants who obtained QAACT, more than half 56.9% (173/309) reported finding the medicine expensive, and individuals who did not find artemisinin-based combinations to be expensive were more likely to obtain a QAACT anti-malarial (aPR = 1.24; 95%CI 1.03, 1.49). Additional predictors included type of drug outlet visited (aPR = 0.74; 95%CI 0.6, 0.91), not obtaining full dose (3-day treatment) of ACT (aPR = 0.49; 95%CI 0.33, 0.73), post-primary education (aPR = 1.29; 95%CI 1.07,1.56), business occupation (aPR = 1.24; 95%CI 1.02,1.50) and not having a prescription (aPR = 0.76; 95%CI 0.63, 0.92), with 77.9% (868/1114) obtaining anti-malarial agents without a prescription.

  • High burden of substandard and falsified medicines: Overall, 17.9% (95% CI 13.6-22.7) of tested medicines failed quality standards across 36,069 medicine samples. Substandard medicines accounted for most poor-quality products (pooled prevalence 12.8%), while falsified medicines were less common (1.2%), with antimalarials among classes ranging from 15-20% failure.

  • Artemisinin and partner-drug resistance: Artemisinin resistance, defined as a delayed time to parasite clearance following administration of artemisinin, is associated with mutations in the propeller domain of the Kelch family protein K13. Day-3 positive parasites featuring reduced sensitivity occurred without pfkelch13 mutation, with two new Pfcoronin SNVs (I68G and L173F) in addition to the P76S earlier reported identified in a recrudescent isolate. Resistance to partner drugs involves point mutations in PfCRT and PfMDR1 and amplification of pfmdr1 and plasmepsin 2 and 3, with the quintuple mutant genotype from dhfr triple mutant (51I/59R/108N) with dhps double mutant 436A/437G detected at 30% in Benin samples.

  • G6PD-related safety restrictions for 8-aminoquinoline radical cure: Both primaquine and tafenoquine can cause acute haemolytic anaemia in individuals with G6PD deficiency, and tafenoquine should only be given to those with G6PD activity >70% of the local population median. G6PD deficiency screening is usually unavailable at point of care, radical cure is greatly underused, and long courses of 7 or 14 days may result in poor adherence and low treatment efficacy. Both drugs are currently considered contraindicated in pregnant and lactating women, and impaired CYP2D6 metabolism has been associated with primaquine treatment failure with 88.9% of patients with impaired CYP2D6 activity relapsing with related parasite.

  • Severe and cerebral malaria management gaps: Cerebral malaria remains a critical condition with a mortality rate of 15-25% and long-term neurological sequelae in survivors. Intravenous artesunate is the first-line drug, with no proven benefit for adjunctive therapies in routine care, and neuromonitoring strategies are critical yet underutilized in adults with CM. Patients with cerebral malaria are unable to take oral medication due to impaired consciousness and vomiting, presently there is no intravenous formulation available for combination therapy, and rectal artesunate shows variable absorption.

  • Diagnostic limitations affecting treatment decisions: Plasmodium falciparum can sequester in the placenta resulting in low density peripheral parasitemia and false negative microscopy, while persistent HRP2 after successful treatment leads to false positive results and hrp2 and hrp3 deletions result in false-negative rapid diagnostic tests.

Novartis's Breakthroughs: Coartem® Baby and KLU156 Advancing Malaria Care

Recent malaria research has evaluated adjuvanted RTS,S vaccines and artemisinin-based combination therapies in adults and children. Studies report circumsporozoite-specific immune responses, PCR-adjusted cure rates, and safety profiles across different transmission settings.

  • Evaluation of the immune response to RTS,S/AS01 and RTS,S/AS02 adjuvanted vaccines: randomized, double-blind study in malaria-naïve adults — Interventions were RTS,S/AS01, RTS,S/AS02, or RTS,S/saline at months 0, 1, and 2. One month after the third vaccine dose, RTS,S/AS01 (160.3 EU/mL [95%CI: 114.1-225.4]) and RTS,S/AS02 (77.4 EU/mL (95%CI: 47.3-126.7)) recipients had significantly higher anti-CS antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) than recipients of RTS,S/saline (12.2 EU/mL (95%CI: 4.8-30.7); P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0011, respectively), and the anti-CS antibody GMT was significantly higher with RTS,S/AS01 than with RTS,S/AS02 (P = 0.0135). CS- and HBs-specific CD4(+) T cell responses were greater for both RTS,S/AS groups than for the RTS,S/saline group, and anti-CS antibody avidity was in the same range in all groups. Reactogenicity was in general higher for RTS,S/AS compared with RTS,S/saline, most grade 3 solicited adverse events (AEs) were of short duration and grade 3 solicited general AEs were infrequent in the 3 groups, and no serious adverse events were reported.

  • Declining Efficacy of Artemisinin Combination Therapy Against P. Falciparum Malaria on the Thai-Myanmar Border (2003-2013): The Role of Parasite Genetic Factors — Intervention was mefloquine-artesunate (MAS3) in 1005 patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-adjusted cure rates declined from 100% in 2003 to 81.1% in 2013 as proportions of isolates with multiple Pfmdr1 copies doubled from 32.4% to 64.7% and those with K13 mutations increased from 6.7% to 83.4%. The PCR-adjusted cure rate was 57.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.4, 68.3) compared with 97.8% (95% CI, 93.3, 99.3) in patients with K13 wild type and Pfmdr1 single copy, those infected with both multiple Pfmdr1 copy number and a K13 propeller mutation were 14 times more likely to fail treatment, and the combined population attributable fraction of recrudescence associated with K13 mutation and Pfmdr1 amplification was 82%.

  • Efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in the setting of three different chemopreventive regimens — Interventions were no chemoprevention, monthly sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), daily trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (TS), or monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP), with episodes of uncomplicated malaria treated with artemether-lumefantrine (AL). Early response to therapy with AL was excellent with 96.5% fever clearance and 99.4% parasite clearance by day 3, however, over 50% of AL treatments were followed by recurrent parasitaemia within 28 days. Compared to the no chemoprevention arm, the cumulative risk of recurrent malaria within 84 days following treatment with AL was significantly lower in the DP arm (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.95, p = 0.01) but not the SP or TS arms, and none of the chemopreventive regimens were associated with an increased risk of adverse events following treatment of malaria with AL.

  • Randomized controlled trial of RTS,S/AS02D and RTS,S/AS01E malaria candidate vaccines given according to different schedules in Ghanaian children — Interventions were RTS,S/AS01(E) or RTS,S/AS02(D) given by 0,1-, 0,1,2- or 0,1,7-months schedules in infants and young children 5-17 months of age. Both candidate vaccines were highly immunogenic for anti-circumsporozoite and anti-Hepatitis B Virus surface antigen antibodies, recipients of RTS,S/AS01(E) compared to RTS,S/AS02(D) had higher peak anti-circumsporozoite antibody responses for all 3 schedules, and three dose schedules were more immunogenic than 2 dose schedules. The number of serious adverse events reported across groups was balanced, one child had a simple febrile convulsion, which evolved favourably without sequelae, considered to be related to RTS,S/AS01(E) vaccination, low grade reactions occurred slightly more frequently in recipients of RTS,S/AS than rabies vaccines, grade 3 reactions were infrequent, and less local reactogenicity occurred with RTS,S/AS01(E) than RTS,S/AS02(D).

Targeting Underserved Populations and Unmet Needs in Malaria

Malaria remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, with 247 million malaria cases and 619,000 deaths in 84 endemic countries in 2021. Recent literature focuses on long-acting monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, and radical cure strategies to provide rapid, highly effective, and durable protection, particularly for populations at greatest risk of infection.

  • Young children and pediatric populations in endemic regions — including children under 5 years, children aged 5-36 months, and children aged 5-15 years, with emphasis on durable, population-level protection, booster strategies, long-term effectiveness monitoring, and extrapolation to pediatric populations by incorporating developmental physiology, protein turnover, and FcRn-mediated recycling.

  • Pregnant women and individuals in seasonal transmission settings — including intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy and infancy and seasonal chemoprevention, and complementary combination strategies leveraging broad, durable immunity from vaccines and immediate, predictable protection from antibodies, particularly during seasonal peaks or in high-risk groups.

  • Plasmodium vivax relapse populations requiring radical cure — with prevention of P. vivax malaria recurrence essential for malaria elimination in Brazil, Cambodia, and Thailand, using chloroquine (25 mg/kg over 3 days) plus point-of-care quantitative glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing followed by single-dose tafenoquine 300 mg, 7-day primaquine 0.5 mg/kg per day, primaquine 0.75 mg/kg per week for 8 weeks, or 14-day primaquine targeting dormant hypnozoites in the liver to prevent relapse.

  • Subclinical and asymptomatic infection reservoirs sustaining transmission — with parasite prevalence of 57.1% by qPCR, 40.9% by RDT, and 8.4% by microscopy in three districts in Ghana, 33.8% (219/647) of infections sub-patent, and 22% (1,136/5,134) mRDT-negative but qPCR-positive in Bagamoyo District, predominantly because of low-density parasitemia (92% had <100 p/µL by qPCR).

  • Severe and cerebral malaria in resource-limited African settings — predominantly affecting children and pregnant women in Sub-Saharan Africa, associated with high mortality rates (15%-30%) and significant long-term neurological sequelae among survivors (10%-30%), compounded by widespread misdiagnosis (up to 23% of clinically diagnosed CM cases may not meet strict diagnostic criteria), delayed presentation, and limited access to specialized neurological rehabilitation services.

  • Migrant and imported-case populations and drug- and diagnostic-resistance threats — including Afghan nationals comprising 80.8% of infections and imported cases representing 80.8% of the total burden in Isfahan Province, Iran, Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 (K13) propeller-domain mutations reaching 32% in Rwanda with K13-561H (23.5% 20/85) and K13-675V (6.4%, 6/94 infections), and hrp2/hrp3 deletions assessed by qPCR and digital PCR (dPCR).

Frequently Asked Questions

How does artemether and lumefantrine function as an antimalarial, and what is its standing in global treatment guidelines?
Artemether, an artemisinin derivative, provides rapid parasite clearance, while lumefantrine, a longer-acting aryl amino alcohol, eliminates residual parasites and prevents recrudescence. This synergistic action makes it a highly effective artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). Artemether and lumefantrine is a cornerstone treatment recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for uncomplicated *Plasmodium falciparum* malaria, particularly in regions with chloroquine resistance. Its inclusion in national treatment protocols globally underscores its critical role in malaria control strategies.
What are the key challenges posed by artemether and lumefantrine resistance, and how do regulatory strategies adapt to these concerns?
Emerging resistance to artemisinin components, particularly delayed parasite clearance, and reduced lumefantrine efficacy pose significant threats to artemether and lumefantrine's long-term effectiveness. Regulatory strategies involve enhanced surveillance programs to monitor resistance patterns and guide treatment policy updates. This includes supporting research into novel antimalarials and advocating for judicious use of existing therapies to preserve their efficacy.
What is the clinical rationale for combining artemether and lumefantrine, and what regulatory advantages does this fixed-dose combination offer?
The combination of artemether and lumefantrine leverages their distinct mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles to achieve rapid parasite killing and sustained therapeutic levels. Artemether's fast action reduces parasite load quickly, while lumefantrine's longer half-life ensures complete parasite elimination. From a regulatory perspective, fixed-dose combinations like AL improve patient adherence, simplify prescribing, and reduce the risk of monotherapy, which can accelerate resistance development. These benefits often streamline regulatory review processes for essential medicines.
What are the primary regulatory pathways facilitating global access to artemether and lumefantrine, especially in malaria-endemic regions?
Global access to artemether and lumefantrine is primarily facilitated through stringent regulatory authority (SRA) approvals and prequalification by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO prequalification ensures quality, safety, and efficacy, enabling procurement by international agencies and national health programs. Additionally, national regulatory agencies in endemic countries conduct their own reviews, often relying on SRA approvals or WHO prequalification as benchmarks for expedited registration.

References

  1. [1] El-Assaad F, Combes V et al.. Potential efficacy of citicoline as adjunct therapy in treatment of cerebral malaria. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2014. 24165175
  2. [2] Kosasih A, James R et al.. Case Series of Primaquine-Induced Haemolytic Events in Controlled Trials with G6PD Screening. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland). 2023 Sep 19. 37764985
  3. [3] Vathi S, Corriero A et al.. Management and monitoring strategies for severe cerebral malaria: a guide for the intensivist. Annals of intensive care. 2025 Oct 8. 41060528
  4. [4] Ocan M, Nakalembe L et al.. Access to quality-assured artemisinin-based combination therapy and associated factors among clients of selected private drug outlets in Uganda. Malaria journal. 2024 Apr 30. 38689257
  5. [5] Rashid MA, Tumbo AM et al.. The promise of monoclonal antibody interventions in malaria: a narrative review. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2026 Nov. 42632421
  6. [6] Gebreegziabher EA, Ouattara M et al.. Indirect benefits of seasonal malaria chemoprevention for non-malarial pediatric infections and routine antibiotic use in real-world programmatic settings: a pre-post study using positive and negative controls. BMC infectious diseases. 2026 Jan 12. 41527053
  7. [7] Sharma R, Sharma H et al.. Optimal balance of benefit versus risk for tafenoquine in the treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria. Malaria journal. 2024 May 13. 38741094
  8. [8] Phyo AP, Ashley EA et al.. Declining Efficacy of Artemisinin Combination Therapy Against P. Falciparum Malaria on the Thai-Myanmar Border (2003-2013): The Role of Parasite Genetic Factors. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2016 Sep 15. 27313266
  9. [9] Peixoto HM, Bastos Gottin LL et al.. The cost-effectiveness of tafenoquine following screening with STANDARD™ G6PD screening for the treatment of vivax malaria in the Brazilian Public Health System. Lancet regional health. Americas. 2025 Nov. 40978565
  10. [10] Siddiqui FA, Liang X et al.. Plasmodium falciparum resistance to ACTs: Emergence, mechanisms, and outlook. International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance. 2021 Aug. 34090067
  11. [11] Mim SR, Xavier LC et al.. Quantitative and Clinical Pharmacology Perspectives on Next-Generation Malaria Prevention Using Vaccines and Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibodies. Clinical and translational science. 2026 Aug. 42587382
  12. [12] Ajibaye O, Olukosi YA et al.. Detection of novel Plasmodium falciparum coronin gene mutations in a recrudescent ACT-treated patient in South-Western Nigeria. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2024. 38716192
  13. [13] Vera-Arias CA, Holzschuh A et al.. High-throughput Plasmodium falciparum hrp2 and hrp3 gene deletion typing by digital PCR to monitor malaria rapid diagnostic test efficacy. eLife. 2022 Jun 28. 35762586
  14. [14] Leroux-Roels G, Leroux-Roels I et al.. Evaluation of the immune response to RTS,S/AS01 and RTS,S/AS02 adjuvanted vaccines: randomized, double-blind study in malaria-naïve adults. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. 2014. 25424924
  15. [15] Watson J, Taylor WRJ et al.. Implications of current therapeutic restrictions for primaquine and tafenoquine in the radical cure of vivax malaria. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2018 Apr. 29677199
  16. [16] Mukhopadhyay E, Camacho CL et al.. Subcutaneous administration of the malaria R21/Matrix M vaccine and immune complex formation with anti-circumsporozoite protein mAb 2A10 elicit protective efficacy in mice. Frontiers in immunology. 2025. 41126835
  17. [17] Sudathip P, Khantikul N et al.. Prospective observational study to assess the feasibility and safety of appropriate Plasmodium vivax radical cure with tafenoquine or primaquine after quantitative G6PD testing during pilot implementation in Thailand. BMJ global health. 2025 Apr 24. 40274286
  18. [18] Lesani S, Boozhmehrani MJ et al.. Epidemiological and clinical profile of malaria patients in Isfahan Province, Iran: a retrospective analysis from 2009 to 2025. Malaria journal. 2025 Dec 26. 41454402
  19. [19] Lek D, Tsai YC et al.. Radical cure for Plasmodium vivax malaria after G6PD qualitative testing in four provinces in Cambodia, results from Phase I implementation. Malaria journal. 2024 Feb 23. 38395925
  20. [20] Chu CS, Bancone G et al.. The impact of using primaquine without prior G6PD testing: a case series describing the obstacles to the medical management of haemolysis. Wellcome open research. 2019. 31069260

Contact Us

📍

Address

350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts