Novartis receives positive CHMP opinion for Itvisma® for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)
Regulatory Approvals

Novartis receives positive CHMP opinion for Itvisma® for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

Published : 27 Apr 2026

At a Glance
IndicationSpinal Muscular Atrophy
DrugItvisma (onasemnogene abeparvovec)
Mechanism of ActionAAV9-based gene therapy
CompanyNovartis
Trial PhasePhase III
Trial AcronymSTEER
NCT IDNCT05386680
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryApproval Pending
Regulatory BodyEMA, CHMP, European Commission
Regulatory ActionPositive opinion, Marketing Authorization Recommendation
Approved Market/RegionEuropean Union, Europe
Patient PopulationChildren two years and older, teens, and adults with 5q spinal muscular atrophy with a bi-allelic mutation in the SMN1 gene
Primary EndpointHFMSE point improvement
Itvisma HFMSE Improvement2.39 points
Sham HFMSE Improvement0.51 points
P-value0.0074
Follow-up Duration52 weeks
Dosage RegimenOne-time fixed dose
Administration RouteIntrathecal injection
Comparator ArmSham
Supporting TrialSTRENGTH
Supporting TrialSTRONG
Publication JournalNature Medicine
US Approval StatusApproved in the US under the brand name Itvisma
Gene TargetSMN1 gene

CHMP Recommends Itvisma for Older Children and Adults with SMA

Novartis announced that the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) adopted a positive opinion recommending marketing authorization for Itvisma (onasemnogene abeparvovec) for children two years and older, teens, and adults with 5q spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). This gene replacement therapy, designed to address the genetic root cause of SMA with a single dose, demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in motor function in the registrational Phase III STEER study. If approved, Itvisma would be the first and only gene replacement therapy for this older patient population in the EU, offering the potential to reduce the need for chronically administered treatments.

  • The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has issued a positive opinion for Itvisma, recommending its marketing authorization for children aged two years and older, teenagers, and adults with 5q spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) who have a bi-allelic mutation in the SMN1 gene. This recommendation marks a significant step towards expanding treatment options for an underserved older patient population in Europe.
  • The positive opinion is primarily supported by data from the registrational Phase III STEER study, which showed Itvisma achieved a statistically significant 2.39-point improvement in the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale (HFMSE) compared to a 0.51-point improvement in the sham group (p=0.0074). These effects were sustained over 52 weeks of follow-up, demonstrating clinically meaningful benefits for both treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients.
  • Itvisma is an adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9)-based gene therapy designed to deliver a functional copy of the human SMN1 gene via a single, one-time intrathecal injection. This unique approach aims to address the genetic root cause of SMA, offering the potential to improve motor function through sustained SMN protein expression and reduce the long-term burden associated with chronically administered treatments.

Why Older Children and Adults with SMA Need New Options

Recent literature reveals significant unmet needs in the SMA population, particularly among older patients who remain underserved despite therapeutic advances. Adults with SMA represent a growing population with distinct treatment priorities that differ from pediatric patients, while musculoskeletal complications continue to progress even with current disease-modifying therapies.

Functional improvement priorities - Gaining muscle strength was the most frequently reported unmet need among adults with SMA, followed by improving daily functioning, achieving new motor function, and stabilizing motor function

Musculoskeletal complications persist - Progressive spine deformity and hip subluxation remain significant problems in the majority of SMA type 1 cases despite disease-modifying therapy, with 93.1% having scoliosis, 69% having pelvic obliquity, and 60.7% having hip subluxation

Underserved adult population - 21.8% of the adult SMA population remains untreated, with progressive impairment and increased sensitivity to treatment discontinuations, along with delayed or reduced access to commercialized SMA drugs and clinical trials

Respiratory and bulbar function needs - People with more severe SMA types and lower mobility were more likely to report lung function and bulbar function as important unmet needs, with breathing function being the most important treatment attribute for caregivers

Treatment response biomarkers - High costs and treatment burden of gene-based therapies highlight the need for biomarkers to objectify or predict treatment response, with Neuronal Pentraxin 2 (NPTX2) emerging as a potential biomarker for nusinersen response

SMN-independent therapeutic targets - Recognition that current SMN replacement therapies have limitations has driven development of complementary targets, with Stathmin-2 (STMN2) being explored as a novel SMN-independent target showing promise in preclinical studies

Key Efficacy and Safety Outcomes from Itvisma's STEER Study

The literature reveals several landmark SMA studies demonstrating significant therapeutic advances across multiple treatment modalities. Recent investigations have provided crucial insights into both established and emerging interventions, with particular focus on long-term outcomes and comparative effectiveness. Key findings highlight the evolving treatment landscape and improved patient outcomes across different SMA subtypes.

OFELIA Study (2025) evaluated onasemnogene abeparvovec (1·1 × 10 vg/kg) in 16 symptomatic patients ≤24 months of age across Brazil and Argentina. Safety outcomes included universal adverse events, with 11 patients experiencing serious AEs and hepatotoxicity (n=11/12), thrombocytopenia (n=5/12), and two deaths (one possibly treatment-related). Most patients maintained or improved motor milestones through 18 months, including sitting, crawling, standing, and walking abilities.

French National SMA Registry Comparative Study (2025) compared nusinersen versus onasemnogene abeparvovec as first-line treatments in 24 children with SMA1. Gene therapy demonstrated superior supportive care outcomes at 2 years: nutritional support required in 9% versus 50% with nusinersen, nocturnal ventilation in 45% versus 80%. Unsatisfactory clinical response occurred in 25% of gene therapy patients compared to 67% receiving nusinersen, though motor outcomes remained comparable between groups.

International 4-Year Nusinersen Study (2025) tracked 73 SMA type II and 111 type III patients, revealing mean HFMSE improvements of +4.18 points (SMA II) and +1.08 points (SMA III). Age and baseline HFMSE emerged as strongest progression predictors, with younger patients and higher baseline scores associated with superior outcomes, particularly during the initial two years of treatment.

Korean Adult Nusinersen Study (2026) demonstrated significant HFMSE improvements of 2.28 points at 12 months (p=0.0002) in 19 adult patients, with sustained gains of 4.55 and 6.57 points at 24 and 36 months respectively. Type 2 SMA patients exhibited faster drug response compared to type 3a patients, with 86% achieving clinically meaningful improvements by 36 months.

Czech and Slovak Risdiplam Study (2025) in 59 adults showed motor stability over 3 years with sustained upper-limb improvements and favorable respiratory trajectories. RULM improved during the first 6 months and remained stable through 24-36 months, with no patients requiring new ventilation support during follow-up.

Systematic Review of Combination Therapies (2025) analyzed 29 patients receiving dual (n=26) or triple (n=3) therapy regimens, demonstrating general tolerability without consistent additive toxicity. Some patients showed improved motor milestones and respiratory function with early intervention, though switching therapies (particularly from nusinersen or risdiplam to onasemnogene abeparvovec) were most common.

How Itvisma Redefines Gene Therapy for Older SMA Patients

The treatment landscape for spinal muscular atrophy has undergone a revolutionary transformation over the past five years, fundamentally changing SMA from a uniformly fatal condition to a treatable disease. Three disease-modifying therapies have become available through accelerated approval programs: nusinersen (Spinraza®), onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma), and risdiplam (Evrysdi). These therapies work through distinct mechanisms - nusinersen and risdiplam function at the pre-mRNA level to increase SMN protein production, while onasemnogene abeparvovec provides gene replacement therapy at the DNA level. Prior to these breakthrough treatments, children with SMA type 1 typically did not survive beyond age two, with management being primarily palliative.

Real-world evidence accumulated over the past five years demonstrates significant clinical improvements across all three therapeutic approaches, though with important limitations. Nusinersen studies involving over 400 patients have shown that 72% experience improved motor function and 18% achieve stabilization, with optimal outcomes observed when treatment begins within the first two years of life. The RESTORE registry data for onasemnogene abeparvovec reveals that patients identified through newborn screening achieve superior outcomes compared to those diagnosed clinically, with all treated patients maintaining or achieving motor milestones. Risdiplam has demonstrated effectiveness across the broadest age range and SMA subtypes, with systematic reviews supporting motor function improvements sustained for up to 48 months of treatment.

A critical evolution in clinical understanding has emerged regarding the differential treatment effects across organ systems. While motor function improvements have been consistently documented across all therapies, respiratory and nutritional outcomes show minimal improvement, and progressive spine deformity remains problematic in the majority of patients. Recent studies indicate that 60-93% of treated SMA type 1 patients still develop scoliosis, and many continue to require ventilatory and nutritional support despite motor gains. This has led to recognition that these therapies change the disease phenotype rather than providing complete cures, necessitating multidisciplinary care approaches that address the persistent multisystem manifestations of SMA even in the era of disease-modifying therapy.

Gene Therapy for Older SMA Patients: A New Frontier

The recent positive CHMP opinion for Itvisma (onasemnogene abeparvovec) in older spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients marks a significant step forward, extending the promise of gene therapy beyond the infant population. This recommendation, if it leads to full marketing authorization, would introduce the first and only gene replacement therapy for children two years and older, teens, and adults with 5q SMA in the European Union. The registrational Phase III STEER study, alongside growing real-world evidence, indicates that Itvisma can deliver clinically meaningful improvements in motor function for this broader patient group, offering a single-dose alternative to chronically administered treatments.

However, this expansion into an older, more diverse patient population also brings important considerations. Studies suggest that while efficacy is observed, the magnitude or speed of motor function improvement may differ compared to treatment in infants. Furthermore, the safety profile in older and heavier patients warrants careful attention. Evidence indicates a higher incidence, severity, and prolonged duration of adverse events, particularly hepatotoxicity and thrombocytopenia, in these groups. This often necessitates more intensive and extended corticosteroid regimens, highlighting the need for robust monitoring protocols and potentially more tailored management strategies.

From a strategic standpoint, this move significantly broadens Itvisma's market potential, positioning Novartis to compete more directly with existing chronic therapies across a wider age range. Yet, the high acquisition cost of gene therapies remains a critical hurdle. Prior analyses have questioned the cost-effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec in some healthcare systems, and these challenges will likely intensify as the indication expands to a larger, potentially more heterogeneous patient cohort. Demonstrating long-term durability and sustained clinical benefit will be crucial for securing favorable reimbursement and ensuring equitable access. The evolving landscape of SMA treatment, including the potential for sequential or combination therapies, as suggested by studies evaluating nusinersen after onasemnogene abeparvovec, underscores the dynamic nature of patient care and the ongoing need for comprehensive real-world data to guide optimal treatment pathways.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the latest advances in spinal muscular atrophy?
Recent advances in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treatment continue to build upon the success of approved therapies like nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam. Current focus is on optimizing treatment paradigms, including the impact of early diagnosis via newborn screening and the potential for combination therapies to achieve greater functional improvements. Research also explores novel targets and improved delivery methods to address remaining unmet needs and expand therapeutic benefits across all SMA types.
Are they working on a cure for SMA?
While a complete "cure" that fully reverses all aspects of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is not yet available, significant therapeutic advancements have transformed the disease. Approved treatments like nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam are highly effective disease-modifying therapies. These interventions target the underlying genetic defect, dramatically improving motor function, survival, and quality of life, particularly when administered early in the disease course. Ongoing research continues to explore further enhancements and novel therapeutic strategies.
What is the miracle drug for SMA?
While there isn't a single "miracle drug," several highly effective therapies have revolutionized the treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). These include nusinersen (Spinraza), an antisense oligonucleotide; onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma), a gene therapy; and risdiplam (Evrysdi), an oral small molecule. Each targets the underlying SMN protein deficiency through different mechanisms, significantly improving motor function, survival, and quality of life for patients across various SMA types. These treatments represent a major therapeutic breakthrough, transforming SMA from a rapidly progressive and often fatal disease into a manageable condition for many.
What is the mechanism of action for Itvisma in treating Spinal Muscular Atrophy?
Itvisma (onasemnogene abeparvovec) is a gene therapy designed to deliver a functional copy of the *SMN1* gene to motor neuron cells. This addresses the genetic root cause of Spinal Muscular Atrophy, which is a deficiency in the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein due to mutations in the *SMN1* gene. By providing the missing gene, the therapy aims to enable sustained SMN protein production, thereby improving motor neuron function and clinical outcomes.

References

  1. [1] Yasar NE, Ozdemir G et al.. Nusinersen therapy changed the natural course of spinal muscular atrophy type 1: What about spine and hip?. Journal of children's orthopaedics. 2024 Jun. 38831860
  2. [2] Giess D, Erdos J et al.. An updated systematic review on spinal muscular atrophy patients treated with nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec (at least 24 months), risdiplam (at least 12 months) or combination therapies. European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society. 2024 Jul. 38905882
  3. [3] Peterson IS, Chitale R et al.. SMA Community Priorities for Future Drug Therapies: Cross-Sectional Survey Findings Representing 410 Adults with SMA. Neurology and therapy. 2025 Jun. 40317455
  4. [4] Svoboda MD, Kuntz N et al.. Summary of Research: Risdiplam Treatment Following Onasemnogene Abeparvovec in Individuals with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Multicenter Case Series. Advances in therapy. 2026 Apr. 41718941
  5. [5] Waldrop MA. Clinical decision making around commercial use of gene and genetic therapies for spinal muscular atrophy. Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2024 Jul. 39241317
  6. [6] Pagliari E, Taiana M et al.. Targeting STMN2 for neuroprotection and neuromuscular recovery in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: evidence from in vitro and in vivo SMA models. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS. 2024 Dec 27. 39725771
  7. [7] Colombo LF, Camporesi A et al.. Fusionless spinal surgery in children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 with bipolar system: a preliminary communication. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B. 2026 Jan 22. 41566962
  8. [8] Crisafulli S, Boccanegra B et al.. Pharmacological Therapies of Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Narrative Review of Preclinical, Clinical-Experimental, and Real-World Evidence. Brain sciences. 2023 Oct 10. 37891814
  9. [9] Cattinari MG, De Lemus M et al.. [Spinal Muscular Atrophy: The Reality of the Adult Patient in Spain]. Revista de neurologia. 2025 Mar 27. 40191902
  10. [10] Dosi C, Masson R. The impact of three SMN2 gene copies on clinical characteristics and effect of disease-modifying treatment in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in neurology. 2024. 38487326
  11. [11] Saenz V, Chlistalla M et al.. Patient and caregiver spinal muscular atrophy treatment attribute preferences in Latin America. Journal of neuromuscular diseases. 2025 Sep. 40396433
  12. [12] Paik J. Risdiplam: A Review in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. CNS drugs. 2022 Apr. 35284988
  13. [13] Coskery S, Erdler M et al.. Summary of Research: Fertility Outcomes in Risdiplam-Treated Male Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Multicenter Case Series. Neurology and therapy. 2025 Dec. 41085915
  14. [14] Viscidi E, Juneja M et al.. Comparative All-Cause Mortality Among a Large Population of Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Versus Matched Controls. Neurology and therapy. 2022 Mar. 34936050
  15. [15] Parsons JA, Land N et al.. Remaining Burden of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Among Treated Patients: A Survey of Patients and Caregivers. Annals of clinical and translational neurology. 2025 Oct. 40619819
  16. [16] Moore Burk M, Crawford TO et al.. New SMA era: A broad-range tiered assessment of function for the evolving SMA phenotype (EVOLVE-SMA). Journal of neuromuscular diseases. 2025 Dec 30. 41467984
  17. [17] García Estévez DA. Effectiveness of Risdiplam Treatment in Adult Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type IIb-III. Revista de neurologia. 2026 Jan 26. 41609131
  18. [18] Požun N, Perko D et al.. Current Status of Newborn Screening in Southeastern and Central Europe. International journal of neonatal screening. 2026 Mar 2. 41892022
  19. [19] Al-Jedai A, Al-Mudaiheem H et al.. Pioneering SMA therapies for all types: survival gains, cost dynamics, and performance-based agreements. Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E. 2025 Aug 5. 40765022
  20. [20] Consensus Expert Group On Carrier Screening For Monogenic Disorders, Genetic Counseling Group Of Medical Genetics Branch Of Chinese Medical Association et al.. [Expert consensus over genetic counseling for carrier screening of Spinal muscular atrophy]. Zhonghua yi xue yi chuan xue za zhi = Zhonghua yixue yichuanxue zazhi = Chinese journal of medical genetics. 2024 Jun 10. 38818549

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts