Novartis Q3 Growth Masks Thin Pivotal Detail on Three Pipeline Wins
Regulatory Approvals

Novartis Q3 Growth Masks Thin Pivotal Detail on Three Pipeline Wins

Published : 04 Nov 2026

At a Glance
IndicationRelapsing Multiple Sclerosis
DrugRemibrutinib
CompanyNovartis
Trial PhasePhase III
Trial AcronymREMODEL-1, REMODEL-2
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryApproval Granted
Therapeutic AreaNeuroscience
Q3 Net SalesUSD 14.5 billion
Q3 Core Operating IncomeUSD 6.0 billion
FY 2026 Core Operating Income GuidanceIn line to grow low single-digit (upgraded)
Pluvicto Approved IndicationPSMA+ metastatic androgen pathway modulation-naive/sensitive prostate cancer
Fabhalta Approved IndicationIgA nephropathy
Pelabresib Regulatory SubmissionEU submission completed for myelofibrosis
Del-zota Review DesignationFDA Priority Review for DMD44
Del-desiran Trial OutcomeDid not meet primary endpoint in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1)
Kisqali Trial OutcomeSix-year NATALEE follow-up showed clinically meaningful overall survival benefit in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer
AcquisitionMyricx Bio

Novartis Reports Strong Q3 2026 Financials and Key Pipeline Progress

Novartis reported solid Q3 2026 financial results, with net sales growing 4% (cc) to USD 14.5 billion and core operating income increasing 10% (cc) to USD 6.0 billion. This strong performance, driven by priority brands like Kisqali, Kesimpta, and Scemblix, led the company to raise its full-year 2026 core operating income guidance. The quarter also saw significant pipeline advancements, including positive Phase III results for remibrutinib in relapsing multiple sclerosis, new FDA and China approvals for Pluvicto in prostate cancer, and FDA and Japan approvals for Fabhalta in IgA nephropathy.

  • Novartis delivered robust Q3 2026 financial results, with net sales reaching USD 14.5 billion (+4% cc) and core operating income growing 10% (cc) to USD 6.0 billion. This strong performance, coupled with productivity efforts, enabled the company to upgrade its full-year 2026 core operating income guidance from a low single-digit decline to being in line or growing low single-digit.
  • Sales growth was primarily driven by the continued strong performance of key priority brands. Kisqali saw a 37% (cc) increase, Kesimpta 22% (cc), Scemblix 67% (cc), Leqvio 63% (cc), and Cosentyx 9% (cc). These brands demonstrated significant market share growth and strong demand across various regions and indications, effectively offsetting generic erosion.
  • The company achieved several significant R&D milestones, including positive Phase III results for oral remibrutinib in the REMODEL-1 and -2 trials for relapsing multiple sclerosis, meeting primary and key secondary endpoints. Additionally, Pluvicto received FDA and China NMPA approvals for PSMA+ metastatic androgen pathway modulation-naive/sensitive prostate cancer, and Fabhalta gained FDA and Japan MHLW approvals for IgA nephropathy.
  • Novartis further advanced its pipeline with regulatory submissions for pelabresib in myelofibrosis in the EU and for Vanrafia in IgAN in Japan and China. Del-zota was granted FDA Priority Review for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD44). Strategic transactions included the acquisition of Myricx Bio to strengthen the oncology pipeline and a licensing agreement with Abogen Biosciences for RNA-encoded therapeutics.

Addressing the Unmet Needs in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Treatment

Current approaches for relapsing multiple sclerosis primarily manage symptoms and slow disease progression but do not achieve remyelination or address the root causes of disease, with patient responses varying significantly. Their limited clinical efficacy reflects a focus on blocking the proinflammatory response, while progression independent of relapse activity and long-term disability remain insufficiently controlled.

  • Absence of remyelination and neuroprotection: Current therapies primarily manage symptoms and slow disease progression but do not achieve remyelination, and convincing evidence of true remyelination is limited to a subset of disease-modifying treatments. There is insufficient proof to claim that changes in surrogate markers such as advanced imaging and electrophysiological techniques can be explained by remyelination alone.

  • Persistent progression despite inflammatory control: Treatment of progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is a relevant unmet need, being only modestly affected by disease-modifying treatments which target predominantly adaptive immunity in the periphery. No evidence of disease activity-3, defined as absence of clinical relapse, disability progression, and brain magnetic resonance imaging activity, might not be sufficient to prevent cognitive deterioration and predict long-term disability, with significant brain volume loss observed even in patients achieving NEDA-3.

  • Safety, tolerability and adherence burden: Efficacy is often hindered by poor persistence and adherence, impacted by patient-perceived efficacy concerns, adverse effects, inconvenience, and forgetfulness. Risks include severe side effects, serious lymphopenia, reactivation of latent or opportunistic infections, drug-induced liver injury, malignancy imbalance in short-term data, hypogammaglobulinemia and infections with sustained immunosuppression, and natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

  • Rebound risk and sequencing complexity: Discontinuation or de-escalation of therapy is associated with a significant risk of disease reactivation, particularly after lymphocyte-trafficking inhibitors, with probability of having a relapse within the year following discontinuation of 6% for first-line DMT, 9% for fingolimod and 43% for natalizumab. Treatment-specific immunologic effects strongly influence optimal sequencing, including increased risk of relapse and worsening disability when switching from fingolimod to immune cell depletion, and need for short transition intervals and proactive transition planning to maintain disease control.

  • Evidence and measurement limitations: Trials are limited by small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, and lack of standardized clinical endpoints validating remyelination's functional impact. Evidence for disease-modifying therapies in patients aged over 50 years is limited because this population is often excluded from randomized trials, and research efforts should be dedicated to novel biomarkers to assess repair mechanisms.

Remibrutinib's Promising Phase III Efficacy and Safety in RMS

Recent studies in relapsing multiple sclerosis have evaluated monoclonal antibodies and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators in randomized trials and real-world cohorts. Efficacy assessments centered on annualized relapse rate, confirmed disability progression, no evidence of disease activity, and magnetic resonance imaging measures alongside safety monitoring.

  • ENSEMBLE, a 4-year, international, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase IIIb study, evaluated IV ocrelizumab 600 mg every 24 weeks as first-line therapy in treatment-naive patients with early-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. At week 192, 66.4% had NEDA-3 (n = 394/593), 85.0% had no MRI activity, 90.9% had no relapses, and 81.8% had no 24-week CDP, with adjusted ARR of 0.020 (95% CI 0.015-0.027) and NfL levels reduced to and remained within the healthy donor range by week 48 and week 192, respectively. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed.

  • SUNBEAM and RADIANCE, randomized, double-blind trials, evaluated ozanimod 0.46 mg or 0.92 mg daily or interferon β-1a 30 µg weekly in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Median percentage reduction in plasma neurofilament light chain concentration at 12 months in SUNBEAM and 24 months in RADIANCE was greater for ozanimod (20%-27%) than interferon β-1a (13%-16%; p < 0.01), with greater reduction associated with fewer GdE lesions, fewer new/enlarging T2 lesions per scan, less loss of brain volume, lower ARR, and no evidence of disease activity.

  • Simulated treatment comparison of ofatumumab in ASCLEPIOS I/II versus ocrelizumab in OPERA I/II compared anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ofatumumab showed significant improvement in ARR versus ocrelizumab (rate ratio: 0.60 [95% CI: 0.43-0.84]), with comparative results not significant for 3-month CDP (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.57-1.42]) or 6-month CDP (HR: 0.84 [95% CI: 0.47-1.49]), and significantly favorable results for NEDA-3 and MRI outcomes.

  • A retrospective, multicenter study of ofatumumab in 424 adults with relapsing multiple sclerosis with mean follow-up of 1.32 (± 0.61) years evaluated treatment-naive patients and switchers. During treatment, ARR decreased significantly from 0.486 to 0.027 (94.5% reduction; p < 0.001), MRI activity was significantly diminished, and at 12 months, 79.3% of evaluable patients achieved NEDA-3. Ofatumumab was well tolerated with predominantly mild injection-related reactions and low discontinuation rates, while infections occurred in 0.9% of naïve patients, 1.7% of MET switchers, and 9.5% of HET switchers (p = 0.001).

Remibrutinib's Position in the Emerging BTK Inhibitor Landscape for RMS

Remibrutinib (LOU064) is a potent, highly selective covalent BTKi with a promising preclinical and clinical profile for MS. Second-generation BTK inhibitors, including evobrutinib, tolebrutinib, fenebrutinib, and orelabrutinib, have advanced through Phase II-III development in MS.

BTK Inhibitor Representative Trial in Relapsing MS Intervention Model / Trial Design
Evobrutinib Double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial NCT02975349; evolutionRMS1 NCT04338022 and evolutionRMS2 NCT04338061 Phase 2: patients assigned to one of five groups: placebo, evobrutinib at 25 mg once daily, 75 mg once daily, or 75 mg twice daily, or open-label dimethyl fumarate as a reference; Phase 3: multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trials comparing evobrutinib 45 mg twice per day with teriflunomide 14 mg once per day
Tolebrutinib 16-week, phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-finding trial NCT03889639; long-term safety extension study Two-step randomisation to two cohorts, then to four tolebrutinib dose groups 5, 15, 30, and 60 mg once daily; Cohort 1 received tolebrutinib for 12 weeks, then matched placebo for 4 weeks; Cohort 2 received 4 weeks of placebo followed by 12 weeks of tolebrutinib; extension continued double-blind then switched to open-label treatment with tolebrutinib 60 mg/day
Fenebrutinib Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial FENopta NCT05119569 with open-label extension Patients randomly assigned 2:1 to oral fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks; participants could enter an optional open-label extension to receive fenebrutinib for up to 192 weeks
Orelabrutinib Phase II-III development in MS Not reported

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the mechanism of action of remibrutinib in relapsing multiple sclerosis?
Remibrutinib is a highly selective, potent oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. It acts by blocking BTK, a crucial enzyme in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway and Fc receptor signaling in myeloid cells. This inhibition reduces B-cell activation, differentiation, and antibody production, as well as modulating myeloid cell inflammatory responses, thereby mitigating neuroinflammation and demyelination characteristic of MS.
How does BTK inhibition contribute to managing relapsing multiple sclerosis?
BTK inhibition plays a significant role in modulating the autoimmune processes central to MS pathogenesis. By targeting BTK, these agents can suppress the activation and proliferation of B cells, which are key drivers of inflammation and demyelination in the central nervous system. Furthermore, BTK inhibition can impact myeloid cell function, reducing their pro-inflammatory activity and contributing to a broader immunomodulatory effect.
What are the potential benefits of an oral BTK inhibitor like remibrutinib for RMS patients?
Oral BTK inhibitors offer the advantage of convenient administration, potentially improving patient adherence and quality of life compared to injectable or infused therapies. This oral route may facilitate earlier intervention and broader access for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. The targeted mechanism of action also aims to provide effective disease modification while potentially offering a favorable safety profile.
What safety profile considerations are associated with remibrutinib in relapsing multiple sclerosis?
As with other BTK inhibitors, potential safety considerations for remibrutinib include liver enzyme elevations, infections, and gastrointestinal disturbances. Close monitoring for these and other adverse events is important during treatment. The overall safety profile is a critical factor in determining its suitability for long-term use in the diverse RMS patient population.

References

  1. [1] Krajnc N, Bsteh G et al.. Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management. Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2022 Apr. 35378683
  2. [2] Chappuis M, Rousseau C et al.. Discontinuation of second- versus first-line disease-modifying treatment in middle-aged patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of neurology. 2023 Jan. 36121558
  3. [3] Kappos L, Cohen J et al.. Fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis: An integrated analysis of safety findings. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2014 Jul. 25877062
  4. [4] Giménez-Arnau A, Ferrucci S et al.. Rilzabrutinib in Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: The RILECSU Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA dermatology. 2025 Jul 1. 40266575
  5. [5] Bar-Or A, Dufek M et al.. Safety and efficacy of fenebrutinib in relapsing multiple sclerosis (FENopta): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial and open-label extension study. The Lancet. Neurology. 2025 Aug. 40683275
  6. [6] Montalban X, Vermersch P et al.. Safety and efficacy of evobrutinib in relapsing multiple sclerosis (evolutionRMS1 and evolutionRMS2): two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trials. The Lancet. Neurology. 2024 Nov. 39307151
  7. [7] Roskoski R Jr. Bruton protein-tyrosine kinase (BTK) FDA-approved small molecule inhibitors used for the management of neoplastic and inflammatory disorders. Pharmacological research. 2026 May. 41937093
  8. [8] Steinmaurer A, Wimmer I et al.. Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition in the Treatment of Preclinical Models and Multiple Sclerosis. Current pharmaceutical design. 2022. 34218776
  9. [9] Boyle AJ, Lindberg A et al.. Preliminary PET imaging of [(11)C]evobrutinib in mouse models of colorectal cancer, SARS-CoV-2, and lung damage: Radiosynthesis via base-aided palladium-NiXantphos-mediated (11)C-carbonylation. Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals. 2024 May 30. 37691152
  10. [10] Comi G, O'Connor P et al.. Phase II study of oral fingolimod (FTY720) in multiple sclerosis: 3-year results. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). 2010 Feb. 20028707
  11. [11] Ruggiero A, Redemagni C et al.. A Delicate Balance: Immunotherapy for Endometrial Cancer in a Patient With Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of medical cases. 2026 Aug. 42490778
  12. [12] Garber D, Pathan M et al.. The Preclinical Effects of Prolonged Intermittent Fasting in an Animal Model on the Development of Multiple Sclerosis Pathology. Cureus. 2025 Aug. 41030725
  13. [13] Joseph RE, Wales TE et al.. Impact of the clinically approved BTK inhibitors on the conformation of full-length BTK and analysis of the development of BTK resistance mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2024 Oct 10. 38187560
  14. [14] Xu Y, Kawakatsu S et al.. A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Fenebrutinib and Effect on the QT/QTc Interval in Healthy Participants. Clinical and translational science. 2026 Mar. 41781339
  15. [15] Kaul M, End P et al.. Remibrutinib (LOU064): A selective potent oral BTK inhibitor with promising clinical safety and pharmacodynamics in a randomized phase I trial. Clinical and translational science. 2021 Sep. 33834628
  16. [16] von Hundelshausen P, Siess W. Bleeding by Bruton Tyrosine Kinase-Inhibitors: Dependency on Drug Type and Disease. Cancers. 2021 Mar 4. 33806595
  17. [17] Yokote H, Kamata T et al.. Brain volume loss is present in Japanese multiple sclerosis patients with no evidence of disease activity. Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2018 Oct. 29974307
  18. [18] Leodori G, Mancuso M et al.. Improvement of fatigue, depression, and processing speed two weeks post Natalizumab infusion in Multiple Sclerosis: No difference between standard and extended interval dosing schedules. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2024 Dec. 39504729
  19. [19] Riley N, Drudge C et al.. Comparative efficacy of ofatumumab versus oral therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis patients using propensity score analyses and simulated treatment comparisons. Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. 2024. 38525490
  20. [20] Samjoo IA, Klotz L et al.. Simulated treatment comparison of efficacy outcomes for ofatumumab in ASCLEPIOS I/II versus ocrelizumab in OPERA I/II for the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2022 Oct. 35841716

Contact Us

📍

Address

350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts