Novartis Malaria Program: Scale Masks Structural Resistance Threat and HTA Ceiling
Regulatory Approvals

Novartis Malaria Program: Scale Masks Structural Resistance Threat and HTA Ceiling

Published : 24 Sept 2026

At a Glance
IndicationMalaria
DrugArtemisinin-based combination therapy
CompanyNovartis
Trial PhasePhase III
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryApproval Granted
Therapeutic AreaInfectious Diseases & Vaccines
Award/RecognitionFortune's Change the World 2026 list
Program DurationMore than three decades
Total Treatments Delivered1.1 billion antimalarial treatment courses
Child-Friendly Doses DeliveredMore than 500 million doses
Deaths Averted (2022)More than 500,000 deaths
Productivity Losses Averted (2022)USD 24 billion
Newborn/Infant Treatment Prequalification Year2026
R&D Investment (since 2021)More than USD 500 million
Regulatory AgencyWorld Health Organization (WHO)
Combination PartnerMedicines for Malaria Venture

Novartis Recognized by Fortune for Global Malaria Program

Novartis has been recognized by Fortune, earning a spot on its 2026 Change The World list for its significant and sustained malaria program. For over three decades, Novartis has been at the forefront of fighting malaria, a disease responsible for over 600,000 deaths annually, primarily in young children. The company's efforts include the discovery, development, and distribution of innovative antimalarial treatments, delivering more than 1.1 billion treatment courses worldwide, largely on a not-for-profit basis. This commitment has led to averting over 500,000 deaths and USD 24 billion in productivity losses in Africa in 2022 alone, alongside continuous R&D to combat emerging drug-resistant strains.

  • Novartis has demonstrated a sustained, three-decade commitment to combating malaria, a leading cause of death globally. This dedication led to the introduction of the world's first artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in 1999, which became the global standard of care for acute, uncomplicated malaria, effectively addressing the challenge of emerging drug resistance at the time.
  • The company has achieved a remarkable scale in treatment delivery, distributing over 1.1 billion antimalarial treatment courses worldwide, predominantly on a not-for-profit basis. This includes more than 500 million doses of a child-friendly formulation, significantly contributing to global health by averting an estimated 500,000 deaths and USD 24 billion in productivity losses in Africa in 2022.
  • Novartis continues to innovate in the fight against malaria, particularly against drug-resistant parasite strains. Recent breakthroughs include the 2025 introduction of the world's first antimalarial treatment for newborns and young infants (2-5 kg), which received WHO prequalification in 2026. Furthermore, their most advanced candidate, KLU156 (GanLum), has reported positive Phase III clinical trial results and has been submitted for regulatory approval.

Understanding the Enduring Global Burden of Malaria

In 2021, the global age-standardized incidence rate of malaria stood at 3,485.3 per 100,000 (95% uncertainty interval: 2,804.5–4,435.7), representing a 5.24% decrease since 1992. Despite this overall decline, the burden remains profoundly concentrated geographically: Sub-Saharan Africa recorded an age-standardized rate of 20,225.9 per 100,000 (95% UI: 16,033.5–25,862.6), accounting for 92% of all new malaria cases globally in 2021. Age-period-cohort analysis of data from 1992 to 2021 confirms that age-standardized malaria incidence rates generally declined across the highest-risk regions, though Sub-Saharan Africa experienced the smallest reduction, with a net drift of -0.74% (95% CI: -1.32 to 0.17) — the most modest improvement of any high-burden region examined.

Within the global distribution of disease, the 0–4 age group carries the highest risk, with incidence decreasing progressively with age. Data from Sao Tome and Principe — an island nation in West Africa — illustrate the trajectory possible with sustained intervention: the age-standardized incidence rate, age-standardized mortality rate, and age-standardized DALYs rate declined by 77.08%, 87.84%, and 82.21%, respectively, between 1990 and 2019, though a slight rebound in incidence was observed after 2015. Children under five in that setting nonetheless retained the highest disease burden relative to other age groups, consistent with global patterns.

A critical challenge compounding accurate incidence estimation is the systematic underreporting inherent to passive surveillance infrastructure. The World Health Organization estimates that routine surveillance detects only 14% of global malaria cases. Research in Madagascar's Ifanadiana District demonstrated that passive surveillance missed approximately 4 in every 5 malaria cases across all age groups, and 2 out of every 3 cases among children under five — underscoring that published incidence figures likely represent a substantial undercount of the true global burden.

Novartis's Pioneering Role in Malaria Treatment Evolution

Over the past five years, published trial data have reinforced the continued efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) as the cornerstone of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria treatment, while simultaneously exposing critical geographic vulnerabilities. Studies conducted in Chad confirmed PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) rates of 97.8% to 100% for artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and 100% for artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) across all sites, with an absence of known pfkelch13 mutations associated with artemisinin partial resistance (ART-R). Similarly, trials in Equatorial Guinea reported PCR-adjusted cure rates of 92.4% to 100% for AL and 98.6% to 100% for AS-AQ, with no Pfkelch13 mutations linked to artemisinin resistance detected among 476 interpretable samples. However, data from Burkina Faso presented a starkly different picture: PCR-corrected 28-day efficacy for AL reached only 74% in Nanoro and 76% in Gourcy, and 42-day efficacy for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) was 84% in Gourcy and 89% in Nanoro — findings the investigators concluded may warrant a change of first-line ACT in those sites.

Compounding these efficacy concerns, surveillance data from Eritrea documented a rising prevalence of the Pfkelch13 R622I mutation — increasing from 8.6% of isolates in 2016 to 21.0% in 2019 — alongside a corresponding rise in day-3 positivity from 0.4% to 4.2% over the same period. Patients carrying the 622I variant faced odds of day-3 positivity 6.2 times higher (95% CI 2.5 to 15.5) than those without it, and the World Health Organization definition of partial artemisinin resistance was met in Eritrea. Dual pfhrp2/pfhrp3 deletions — which threaten the performance of HRP2-based rapid diagnostic tests — were detected in 16.9% of parasites carrying the Pfkelch13 R622I mutation in Eritrea and in 2.3% of isolates in Chad, adding a diagnostic dimension to the resistance challenge. Pharmacokinetic data further nuanced the treatment picture: pregnant women demonstrated 21% higher elimination clearance of dihydroartemisinin compared to non-pregnant women, resulting in proportionally lower drug exposure and a potentially elevated risk of treatment failure in this vulnerable population.

Against this backdrop of resistance emergence and pharmacokinetic complexity, the vaccine pipeline has advanced meaningfully. The R21/Matrix-M candidate demonstrated vaccine efficacy of 74% (95% CI 63–82) and 77% (67–84) at six months in two adjuvant-dose groups in Burkina Faso children, with efficacy remaining at 77% (67–84) at one year in the lower-adjuvant group. Following a booster dose administered 12 months after the primary series, efficacy reached 71% (95% CI 60–78) in the low-dose adjuvant group and 80% (72–85) in the high-dose adjuvant group, with 2,285 (95% CI 1,911–2,568) malaria cases averted per 1,000 child-years at risk in the second year. The blood-stage candidate RH5.1/Matrix-M, evaluated in a phase 2b trial in Burkina Faso, showed a vaccine efficacy of 55% (95% CI 20–75%; p=0.0071) under a delayed third-dose regimen, with high anti-RH5.1 IgG concentrations and in vitro growth inhibition activity of 79.0% (SD 14.3) against P. falciparum. Taken together, these data reflect a treatment landscape in active transition — one in which ACT stewardship, resistance surveillance, and vaccine deployment are increasingly interdependent strategic priorities.

Addressing Emerging Drug Resistance in Malaria Treatment

Antimalarial drug resistance spans multiple drug classes and is driven by a range of molecular mechanisms, from point mutations in target proteins to gene copy number variations. Surveillance of these markers is critical for guiding treatment policy and preserving the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) and their partner drugs.

  • K13 mutations and artemisinin resistance: Mutations in the P. falciparum K13 protein — including F446I, M476I, Y493H, R539T, N458Y, C469Y, F495L, and P413A — are the primary drivers of partial artemisinin resistance, defined clinically as delayed parasite clearance following artemisinin-based treatment. The P413A mutation, located in the BTB/POZ domain upstream of the Kelch propeller domain, demonstrates that the propeller domain is not the sole mediator of K13-associated resistance. Different mutations carry distinct fitness costs: N458Y confers a significant fitness penalty, while F446I — the predominant mutation in northern Myanmar — shows only marginal fitness loss, partially explaining its high regional prevalence.

  • Proteasome inhibition as a strategy to reverse artemisinin resistance: A Plasmodium-selective proteasome inhibitor strongly synergized dihydroartemisinin activity in P. berghei K13 mutant lines, providing evidence that proteasome inhibition can offset K13 mutation-mediated artemisinin resistance in vivo.

  • Pfdhfr and Pfdhps mutations and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance: Resistance to SP is conferred by mutations in P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (Pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (Pfdhps). The combined Pfdhfr/Pfdhps quintuple mutation is strongly associated with SP resistance. Following SP withdrawal in North Western Ethiopia, the frequency of the triple Pfdhfr mutation decreased significantly from 50.8% to 15.9% (P<0.001), and the quintuple mutation decreased from 40.7% to 13.6% (P<0.0001), consistent with reduced fitness of resistant parasites in the absence of drug pressure.

  • Cytochrome b (cytb) mutations and atovaquone-proguanil (AP) resistance: AP resistance is mediated by point mutations in P. falciparum cytochrome b (pfcytb). Known resistance-associated mutations include Y268S and Y268C; a novel mutation, I258M, was identified in one of two AP treatment failures in travelers returning from Nigeria. In Cambodia, cytb mutation played a minor role in AP treatment failures, with only one of 14 recrudescent cases harboring the Y268C mutation, arising de novo rather than from pre-existing low-frequency variants.

  • PfCRT mutations and piperaquine resistance: Newly emerged mutations in the P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (PfCRT) — including T93S, H97Y, and F145I — can confer piperaquine resistance independently of amplified plasmepsin II (pfpm2). In northern Cambodia, these PfCRT mutations increased to >98% prevalence by 2017 following the adoption of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. Notably, none of these mutations were detected in 268 isolates from southeastern Nigeria, indicating piperaquine remains viable in that region.

  • Copy number variation (CNV) in pfpm2 and pfmdr1: Increased copy number of pfpm2 confers parasite tolerance to piperaquine, while increased pfmdr1 copy number is associated with resistance to mefloquine and decreased susceptibility to lumefantrine — both ACT partner drugs. In southern Angola, 9.8% of isolates carried increased pfpm2 CNV and 8.9% carried increased pfmdr1 CNV, representing the first such evidence from that region.

  • Cross-resistance and multi-target resistance acquisition: In vitro selection studies using diverse antimalarial compounds demonstrate that resistant parasites can emerge across targets including pfatp4, cytochrome bc1, pfcarl, pfdhod, pfcrt, pfmdr, pfdhfr, cytoplasmic prolyl t-RNA synthetase, and hsp90. Of 48 in vitro selections, 23 yielded resistant parasites, with time to resistance onset ranging from 15 to 300 days, suggesting that fast-killing compounds may result in slower onset of clinical resistance.

Sustaining the Fight: Pharma's Enduring Role in Malaria Eradication

The ongoing recognition of Novartis's malaria program highlights a critical intersection of pharmaceutical innovation, public health commitment, and the enduring fight against a formidable global disease. While significant progress has been made in reducing the malaria burden through interventions like vector control and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), the battle is far from over. The persistent threat of drug resistance, particularly from Plasmodium falciparum strains originating in Southeast Asia, underscores the necessity for continuous research and development into novel antimalarial agents.

Companies like Novartis, with their long-term, not-for-profit engagement, are not just providing treatments; they are actively shaping the future of malaria control. Their pipeline, including candidates like KAE609 and KAF156, aims to address the evolving parasite landscape by targeting transmission and liver-stage forms, which is crucial for achieving disease elimination. However, the path to eradication is fraught with challenges:

  • Evolving Resistance: The emergence of even mild mutator phenotypes in parasites suggests a continuous arms race, demanding a robust and agile drug discovery pipeline.

  • Implementation Gaps: Even with effective drugs, real-world challenges persist. Studies indicate that community health worker programs, while promising, face hurdles in uptake and fidelity, especially in urban settings, due to factors like lack of awareness or drug stock-outs.

  • Pediatric Adherence: Administering antimalarials to young children remains difficult, emphasizing the need for user-friendly formulations that ensure accurate dosing and improve compliance.

This sustained effort by Novartis demonstrates that combating malaria requires a multi-pronged approach: innovative drug discovery, accessible distribution, and a deep understanding of the practical challenges in endemic regions. The pharmaceutical industry's role extends beyond drug development to fostering sustainable health systems and ensuring that life-saving treatments reach those who need them most, even when profitability is not the primary driver.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are some examples of artemisinin-based combination therapy for malaria?
Common artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) for uncomplicated *Plasmodium falciparum* malaria include artemether-lumefantrine (AL), artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PPQ). Other WHO-recommended ACTs are artesunate-mefloquine (ASMQ) and artesunate-pyronaridine (ASPY). These combinations pair a fast-acting artemisinin derivative with a longer-acting partner drug to ensure rapid parasite clearance and prevent recrudescence.
Is artemisinin the same as ivermectin?
Artemisinin and ivermectin are distinct pharmaceutical compounds with different origins, chemical structures, and primary mechanisms of action. Artemisinin is a sesquiterpene lactone derived from the *Artemisia annua* plant, primarily known for its antimalarial properties. Ivermectin is a macrocyclic lactone derived from *Streptomyces avermitilis*, widely used as an antiparasitic agent against nematodes and arthropods. While both have shown some broad-spectrum activity in various *in vitro* studies, their established clinical indications and pharmacological profiles differ significantly.
What are the artemisinin-based drugs used to treat malaria?
Artemisinin-based drugs used to treat malaria are primarily artemisinin derivatives such as artesunate, artemether, and dihydroartemisinin. These are almost exclusively administered as Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (ACTs) to prevent resistance and enhance efficacy. Common ACTs include artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate-amodiaquine, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, artesunate-mefloquine, and artesunate-pyronaridine.
Is artemisinin still used today?
Artemisinin remains a critical antimalarial drug, primarily utilized as a core component of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs). These ACTs are the first-line treatment recommended by the WHO for uncomplicated *Plasmodium falciparum* malaria globally. Despite emerging artemisinin resistance in some regions, its rapid parasiticidal action and ability to reduce parasite biomass make it indispensable in combination regimens to prevent resistance development to partner drugs. Ongoing research also explores its potential in oncology and other therapeutic areas.
Is malaria fully treatable?
Malaria is generally treatable with antimalarial drugs, particularly when diagnosed early. However, treatment efficacy varies by *Plasmodium* species, drug resistance patterns, and patient factors. *P. falciparum* resistance to common antimalarials, and the dormant liver stages (hypnozoites) of *P. vivax* and *P. ovale* requiring specific radical cure to prevent relapse, present ongoing challenges to complete eradication.
What are the 7 warning signs of malaria?
The 7 warning signs of severe malaria, indicating urgent medical intervention, include impaired consciousness, prostration, multiple convulsions, and respiratory distress. Further critical indicators are circulatory collapse, pulmonary edema, and abnormal bleeding.
What is the best treatment for malaria?
Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are the recommended first-line treatment for uncomplicated *Plasmodium falciparum* malaria, with specific regimens varying based on regional resistance patterns and national guidelines. For severe malaria, parenteral artesunate is the gold standard. Treatment for *P. vivax* and *P. ovale* also requires a hypnozoiticide, such as primaquine or tafenoquine, to prevent relapses, following G6PD deficiency testing.
How did the USA get rid of malaria?
The USA eliminated endemic malaria through a multi-pronged public health strategy focused on aggressive vector control, including large-scale drainage projects, larvicides, and widespread application of DDT post-World War II. Concurrently, robust surveillance and prompt treatment of infected individuals broke local transmission chains. Improved housing conditions and coordinated efforts by federal and state agencies, notably the Public Health Service and later the CDC, effectively eradicated the disease by the early 1950s.

References

  1. [1] Willilo RA, Molteni F et al.. Pregnant women and infants as sentinel populations to monitor prevalence of malaria: results of pilot study in Lake Zone of Tanzania. Malaria journal. 2016 Jul 29. 27473039
  2. [2] Moolman C, Sluis RV et al.. An Update on Development of Small-Molecule Plasmodial Kinase Inhibitors. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2020 Nov 7. 33171706
  3. [3] Hyde E, Bonds MH et al.. Estimating the local spatio-temporal distribution of malaria from routine health information systems in areas of low health care access and reporting. International journal of health geographics. 2021 Feb 12. 33579294
  4. [4] Birgersson S, Valea I et al.. Population pharmacokinetics of artesunate and dihydroartemisinin in pregnant and non-pregnant women with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Burkina Faso: an open label trial. Wellcome open research. 2019. 32025570
  5. [5] Wang Y, Li M et al.. Burden of Malaria in Sao Tome and Principe, 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022 Nov 10. 36429536
  6. [6] Sitali L, Mwenda MC et al.. Data on selected antimalarial drug resistance markers in Zambia. Data in brief. 2021 Feb. 33364273
  7. [7] Issa MS, Warsame M et al.. Therapeutic efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Chad: clinical and genetic surveillance. Malaria journal. 2023 Aug 23. 37612601
  8. [8] Brown O, Flegg JA et al.. A global mathematical model of climatic suitability for Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Malaria journal. 2024 Oct 10. 39390501
  9. [9] Chuang YM, Tang XD et al.. A Mosquito AgTRIO Monoclonal Antibody Reduces Early Plasmodium Infection of Mice. Infection and immunity. 2022 Jan 25. 34724388
  10. [10] Datoo MS, Natama HM et al.. Efficacy and immunogenicity of R21/Matrix-M vaccine against clinical malaria after 2 years' follow-up in children in Burkina Faso: a phase 1/2b randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. Infectious diseases. 2022 Dec. 36087586
  11. [11] Simwela NV, Stokes BH et al.. Plasmodium berghei K13 Mutations Mediate In Vivo Artemisinin Resistance That Is Reversed by Proteasome Inhibition. mBio. 2020 Nov 10. 33173001
  12. [12] Natama HM, Salkeld J et al.. Safety and efficacy of the blood-stage malaria vaccine RH5.1/Matrix-M in Burkina Faso: interim results of a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial in children. The Lancet. Infectious diseases. 2025 May. 39672183
  13. [13] Mihreteab S, Platon L et al.. Increasing Prevalence of Artemisinin-Resistant HRP2-Negative Malaria in Eritrea. The New England journal of medicine. 2023 Sep 28. 37754284
  14. [14] Duarte D, Manuel F et al.. Low prevalence of copy number variation in pfmdr1 and pfpm2 in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from southern Angola. Malaria journal. 2025 Jan 10. 39794826
  15. [15] Rejeki DSS, Fuad A et al.. Spatiotemporal patterns of malaria at cross-boundaries area in Menoreh Hills, Java, Indonesia. Malaria journal. 2019 Mar 15. 30876422
  16. [16] Datoo MS, Natama MH et al.. Efficacy of a low-dose candidate malaria vaccine, R21 in adjuvant Matrix-M, with seasonal administration to children in Burkina Faso: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2021 May 15. 33964223
  17. [17] Implications of insecticide resistance for malaria vector control with long-lasting insecticidal nets: trends in pyrethroid resistance during a WHO-coordinated multi-country prospective study. Parasites & vectors. 2018 Oct 22. 30348209
  18. [18] Lin JT, Waltmann A et al.. Selection of Cytochrome b Mutants Is Rare among Plasmodium falciparum Patients Failing Treatment with Atovaquone-Proguanil in Cambodia. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2021 Feb 17. 33361308
  19. [19] Plucinski MM, Huber CS et al.. Novel Mutation in Cytochrome B of Plasmodium falciparum in One of Two Atovaquone-Proguanil Treatment Failures in Travelers Returning From Same Site in Nigeria. Open forum infectious diseases. 2014 Sep. 25734129

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts