NMPA Review Tests 45mg Bridging After East Asia 30mg Miss and HTA Splits
Regulatory Approvals

NMPA Review Tests 45mg Bridging After East Asia 30mg Miss and HTA Splits

Published : 29 Oct 2026

At a Glance
IndicationModerate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause
DrugFezolinetant
Mechanism of ActionSelective neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptor antagonist
CompanyAstellas Pharma Inc.
Trial PhasePhase 3, Phase 2
Trial AcronymBRIGHT SKY, SKYLIGHT 1, SKYLIGHT 2, SKYLIGHT 4, MOONLIGHT 1, MOONLIGHT 3
NCT IDNCT04003155, NCT04003142, NCT04003389, NCT06812754
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryRegulatory Submission Filed
Therapeutic AreaEndocrinology & Metabolic Diseases
Regulatory BodyChina National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE)
Regulatory ActionNew Drug Application (NDA) acceptance
Current Global Approvals50 countries worldwide
Patient PopulationWomen with moderate to severe VMS associated with menopause
Clinical Trial ProgramsBRIGHT SKY, SKYLIGHT 1, SKYLIGHT 2, SKYLIGHT 4, Phase 2 Clinical Study in China, MOONLIGHT 1, MOONLIGHT 3
Trial Geographic ScopeU.S., Canada, Europe, Mainland China, Taiwan, South Korea
Dosage Strengths45 mg, 30 mg
Common Adverse Eventsheadache, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, insomnia, back pain
Primary Endpoint (Phase 2 China Study)Efficacy and safety on the frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes and night sweats after 12 weeks of treatment
Fiscal Year ImpactedCurrent fiscal year ending March 31, 2027

China NMPA Accepts NDA for Astellas' VEOZA for Menopausal VMS

Astellas Pharma Inc. announced that China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has accepted a New Drug Application (NDA) for VEOZA™ (fezolinetant 45 mg) for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause. This submission is supported by data from the global Phase 3 BRIGHT SKY™ program, a new bridging study conducted in China, and previous clinical studies in China. Fezolinetant, a non-hormonal selective neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptor antagonist, was generally well tolerated across all programs. VMS, commonly known as hot flashes and night sweats, significantly impacts women's quality of life, with 55% of women aged 40-65 in East Asia experiencing moderate to severe symptoms. VEOZA is already approved in 50 countries worldwide.

  • Astellas has achieved a significant regulatory milestone with the acceptance of the New Drug Application for VEOZA (fezolinetant 45 mg) by China's NMPA. This marks a crucial step towards potentially expanding access to a non-hormonal treatment option for moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in a region where a substantial proportion of women, specifically 55% of those aged 40-65 in East Asia, experience these debilitating menopausal symptoms, highlighting a significant unmet medical need.
  • The NDA submission is robustly supported by a comprehensive clinical development program. This includes data from the global Phase 3 BRIGHT SKY™ program, which involved over 1,000 women across the U.S., Canada, and Europe, alongside a new bridging study specifically conducted in China, and additional previously completed clinical studies within China, such as the Phase 2 study (NCT06812754) and Phase 3 MOONLIGHT 1 (2693-CL-0305) and MOONLIGHT 3 (2693-CL-0307) trials. Across these studies, fezolinetant demonstrated general tolerability with common adverse events including headache and abdominal pain.
  • Fezolinetant is a first-in-class, non-hormonal, selective neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptor antagonist. Its mechanism involves blocking neurokinin B binding on kisspeptin/neurokinin/dynorphin (KNDy) neurons, which are critical in regulating the brain’s temperature control center. By modulating this pathway, fezolinetant effectively reduces the frequency and severity of moderate to severe VMS, offering a targeted approach to symptom management. The drug is already approved in 50 countries globally, underscoring its established efficacy and safety profile in other markets.

Understanding the Global Burden of Moderate to Severe VMS

Vasomotor symptoms affect around 70% of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women and are moderate or severe in around one-third of these women. Pooled prevalence estimates from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 41 studies (n = 28,955) ranged from 54.29% in Africa to 74.23% in the Americas and Europe. Heterogeneity was high across analyses (toI2 > 97%), and prevalence was higher in postmenopausal than perimenopausal women in all regions except South Asia and nearby regions.

Prevalence of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women was 40%, 34%, and 16% in Europe, the US, and Japan, respectively, among 25,161 women completing the screening survey, of whom 11,771 were postmenopausal and 3,460 met inclusion criteria and completed the full questionnaire. In a European cohort of 11,452 women completing the screening survey, of whom 5178 were postmenopausal and 2035 completed the full questionnaire, prevalence of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms ranged from 31 % in France to 52 % in Italy.

Moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms were associated with impact on health-related quality of life, with hot flashes and night sweats having a greater impact on daily activities than on working activities. The knowledge base does not have sufficient information on this aspect.

Addressing Unmet Needs in Vasomotor Symptom Management

Current treatment approaches for moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause require balancing the potential benefits and risks of treatment. Although estrogen remains the most effective medication to reduce hot flashes, options are scarce for those who cannot or do not want to take hormone therapy.

  • Hormonal therapy safety concerns and restricted eligibility: Safety and tolerability concerns have discouraged HT use due to potential links with a perceived increased risk of hormone-dependent cancers, and an established risk of stroke and venous thromboembolism. In the WHI trial, age trends were less clear for CEE + medroxyprogesterone acetate, owing to increased risks of breast cancer, stroke, and venous thrombosis in all age groups, and rational use requires evaluating the patient for the presence of any contraindications to HT, as well as the time since menopause onset and baseline risks of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer.

  • Tolerability and adverse event-related discontinuation with pharmacologic and hormonal interventions: Adverse events may cause 10-20% of individuals to withdraw from SSRI/SNRI treatment. Dropouts due to adverse events were more frequent in women randomized to gabapentin than in controls (RR = 2.09 [95% CI, 1.13-3.85]), with dizziness/unsteadiness: RR = 6.94 [95% CI, 3.19-15.13] and fatigue/somnolence: RR = 4.78 [95% CI, 2.23-10.25]. Dry mouth was reported by 52.1% of participants given oxybutynin and 5.3% of participants given placebo, leading to discontinuation of oxybutynin in 6.8% of participants. Eszopiclone [RR = 3.84 (95% CI: 1.14-12.87)] and oral combined hormone therapy [RR = 2.51 (95% CI: 1.04-6.07)] were associated with higher rates of adverse event-related discontinuation.

  • Significant placebo effect and limited comparative evidence: Most of these trials are limited by a significant placebo effect, which frequently equals the effectiveness of the medication being evaluated. Across all blinded pharmacological interventions in men with prostate cancer undergoing castration therapy, the relative reduction in hot flash frequency ranged from -21% to -84%, and the placebo effect was between -19% and -30%. Direct head-to-head comparison with hormonal therapies and nonhormonal therapies for vasomotor symptoms, assessment of sleep outcomes, and evaluation of efficacy and safety beyond 1 year are key areas where additional data are still needed.

  • Symptom relapse after treatment discontinuation: Vasomotor symptoms recur after discontinuation of hormonal therapy. Among women whose VMS improved with escitalopram, approximately one third relapsed swiftly after discontinuation of the medication, with 34.2%, 38.6%, and 37.3%, respectively, having relapse of VMS frequency, severity, and bother.

  • Limitations of complementary and alternative therapies and drug interactions: Complementary and alternative medication trials are fraught with additional limitations, namely, a large placebo effect, greater homogeneity of participants, lack of validated tools, and lack of robust reporting of adverse effects. Primrose oil, Chinese herbal medicine, acupuncture, and yoga have mixed results, the concerns related to hepatotoxicity preclude the use of black cohosh, and exercise, relaxation, and paced respiration have no proven benefit thus far in reducing hot flashes. Caution should also be exercised when prescribing strong cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitors, such as paroxetine or fluoxetine, to women who are taking tamoxifen.

Clinical Evidence Supporting Fezolinetant's Efficacy and Safety

Pooled analyses of the SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 fezolinetant trials and the OASIS 1 and 2 elinzanetant trials define the pivotal Phase 3 evidence in moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause. Both programs used double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled designs with VMS frequency and severity assessed from baseline to weeks 4 and 12.

Trial Design Population and Treatment Arms Primary and Key Endpoints
SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 (NCT04003155 and NCT04003142) Two identical phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with pooled population (N = 1022) Women with moderate-to-severe VMS randomized to once-daily fezolinetant 30 mg, 45 mg, or placebo Frequency of VMS collected daily using an electronic diary; Patient Global Impression of Change in VMS (PGI-C VMS) at weeks 4 and 12 compared with baseline using a seven-point Likert scale; mean (standard deviation) estimated thresholds for meaningful within-patient change were - 5.73 (3.47) at week 4 and - 6.20 (5.18) at week 12; responder analyses ("missing as non-responder" imputation method) showed greater proportions of responders in fezolinetant 30-mg and 45-mg groups versus placebo at week 4 (odds ratio range 2.48-2.91; P < 0.001) and week 12 (odds ratio range 1.908-2.68; P < 0.001)
SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 post-hoc pooled analysis Post-hoc analysis of SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 pooled data Women with moderate to severe VMS due to menopause treated with fezolinetant 30 mg and 45 mg versus placebo Sleep disturbance and impairment via Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance - Short Form 8b (PROMIS SD-SF-8b) and PROMIS SD-SF-8a questionnaires; correlations between improvements in VMS (frequency, severity, frequency at night) and sleep disturbance and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire specific to Vasomotor Symptoms (WPAI-VMS) score; fezolinetant 30 mg and 45 mg improved sleep disturbance and impairment versus placebo at 12 weeks, regardless of baseline sleep status
OASIS 1 and 2 Pivotal, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies designed in accordance with regulatory guidance Postmenopausal women with moderate/severe VMS randomized to receive 120 mg elinzanetant or placebo once daily for 12 weeks, followed by a 14-week active treatment extension Primary endpoints are the mean change in frequency and severity of moderate/severe VMS from baseline to weeks 4 and 12; key secondary endpoints will assess the onset of action and effects on sleep disturbance and menopause-related quality of life; primary and key secondary endpoints will be analyzed using a mixed model with repeated measures
OASIS-1-4 program Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III OASIS-1-4 studies Diverse populations of women, including those with VMS associated with natural or surgical menopause (OASIS-1, -2, and -3) and caused by endocrine therapy for breast cancer (OASIS-4) Significant reductions vs. placebo in frequency of VMS from as early as week 1 in OASIS-1 and -2 and at week 4 in OASIS-1, -2, and -4, with benefits maintained for up to 50 weeks; severity significantly decreased vs. placebo at weeks 4 and 12 in OASIS-1 and -2; sleep disturbance assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b total T-score, and menopause-related quality of life measured as total score on the Menopause-specific Quality of Life questionnaire, with significant reductions vs. placebo at week 12 in OASIS-1, -2, and -4

Fezolinetant's Place in the Evolving VMS Treatment Landscape

Trial data over the past five years have established oral neurokinin receptor antagonists as effective nonhormonal options for moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in postmenopausal women. Fezolinetant, an oral neurokinin-3 receptor antagonist, significantly reduced VMS frequency at both 4 weeks (Cohen's d = -0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.79, -0.34; P < 0.001) and 12 weeks (Cohen's d = -0.34; 95% CI, -0.45, -0.14; P < 0.001) in a meta-analysis of six studies with 3657 patients, with significantly improved health-related functioning and global clinical summary scores, particularly with the 90 mg twice per day dosage. A second meta-analysis of six trials with a total of 3291 women reported that fezolinetant at 30 mg QD or 45 mg QD substantially decreased the frequency and severity of VMSs per 24 hours compared to placebo after 4 and 12 weeks of therapy, with the 45 mg daily dosage over 12 weeks exhibiting significant efficacy. There were no statistically significant differences between fezolinetant and placebo concerning the occurrence of any treatment-emergent (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01, P = 0.81) or serious (OR = 1.57, P = 0.90) adverse events, and fezolinetant at 90 mg BID, 30 mg QD, or 45 mg QD did not show a significant difference in the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), headache, and TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation compared to placebo. Given fezolinetant's potential for liver enzyme elevations, it is essential to monitor liver function at baseline and regularly thereafter (monthly for the first 3 months and at 6 and 9 months).

Elinzanetant, the first drug that can act on both NK-1 and 3 receptors by selectively antagonizing them, has extended this class with dual targeting. In a systematic review of five RCTs with 1699 participants, elinzanetant demonstrated a statistically significant difference in reducing both frequency and severity of VMSs at week 4 compared to placebo (MD = -2.75, 95% CI: [-3.83, -1.67], P < 0.00001; MD = -0.29, 95% CI: [-0.35, -0.22], P < 0.00001, respectively), maintained at week 12 for both frequency (MD = -2.30, 95% CI: [-3.00, -1.59], P < 0.00001) and severity (MD = -0.35, 95% CI: [-0.43, -0.28], P < 0.00001). Compared to placebo, elinzanetant was associated with a higher incidence of TEAEs (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: [1.03, 1.22], P < 0.01), TEAEs causing permanent discontinuation of the study drug (RR = 2.18, 95% CI: [1.45, 3.28], P = 0.0002), drug-related TEAEs (RR = 1.92, 95% CI: [1.53, 2.41], P < 0.00001), headache (RR = 2.19, 95% CI: [1.38, 3.49], P = 0.0009), somnolence (RR = 2.96, 95% CI: [1.42, 6.17], P = 0.004), and fatigue (RR = 3.39, 95% CI: [1.77, 6.49], P = 0.0002), with no statistically significant difference in serious TEAEs (RR = 1.70, 95% CI: [0.82, 3.54], P = 0.15). A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 17 RCTs reported that elinzanetant 120 mg significantly reduced daily VMS frequency versus paroxetine 7.5 mg (MD: -2.11 [-3.31, -0.92]), desvenlafaxine 50-200 mg (MD: -2.77 to -1.72), and gabapentin 1200-1800 mg (MD: -2.22 to -2.31), significantly reduced VMS severity versus desvenlafaxine 50 mg (MD: -0.37 [-0.56, -0.17]), reduced nighttime awakenings significantly more effectively than paroxetine (MD: -0.82 [-1.26, -0.39]) and all desvenlafaxine regimens, and significantly improved sleep disturbance (PROMIS SD-SF-8b) score versus fezolinetant 45 mg (MD: -2.67 [-3.92, -1.42]), while change in MENQoL did not differ significantly.

The position of older nonhormonal pharmaceutical therapies has been reexamined in parallel with these developments. A meta-analysis of six randomized clinical trials with 1486 women demonstrated that 79% of the mean treatment response for hot flash frequency is accounted for by a placebo response, resulting in a mean true drug effect of 21% at most, and 68% of the mean treatment response for hot flash severity is accounted for by a placebo response, resulting in a maximum true drug effect of 32% for paroxetine mesylate. In a pilot double-blind randomized trial in women with surgical menopause, paroxetine 20 mg/day showed greater reduction in total Menopause Rating Scale score compared with placebo at 12 weeks (mean 16.9 ± 7.7 vs. 22.6 ± 6.1; mean difference -5.7, 95% CI -8.6 to -2.8; P < 0.001) and greater improvement in SF-36 scores (91.0 ± 6.4 vs. 86.9 ± 4.8; mean difference 4.1, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.5; P = 0.001), with adverse events (headache, fatigue, drowsiness) more frequent with paroxetine but mild and transient and no serious events. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a patented multi-ingredient botanical neurokinin inhibitor (BNI) in 74 randomized participants reported that BNI supplementation reduced VMS frequency by 2.2 hot flashes per day more than placebo (p = 0.003), corresponding to a 47.7% relative decrease, with HFRDIS improved in the BNI group (p = 0.037), no significant differences in MENQOL or PSQI, no changes in serum estradiol or liver function abnormalities, and no difference in adverse events between groups.

Fezolinetant's China NDA: A New Horizon for Non-Hormonal VMS Care

The acceptance of Astellas's New Drug Application for VEOZA (fezolinetant) by China's NMPA signals a pivotal moment for women experiencing moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in East Asia. This region, where over half of women aged 40-65 report significant VMS, represents a substantial unmet medical need. For years, menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been the primary treatment, yet its use is often limited by contraindications, perceived risks, or patient preference. Fezolinetant, as a non-hormonal selective neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptor antagonist, offers a scientifically grounded alternative by directly addressing the neurobiological pathways implicated in VMS.

Clinical evidence from global Phase 3 trials (SKYLIGHT 1 and 2) consistently demonstrates fezolinetant's ability to rapidly and significantly reduce the frequency and severity of VMS, with improvements observed as early as day one and maintained over 52 weeks. This efficacy extends to improving sleep quality, a common comorbidity of VMS. The drug's generally well-tolerated safety profile, with adverse events largely mild to moderate, further supports its potential as a valuable option.

However, the path to market leadership in China is not without its nuances. While global data are robust, the MOONLIGHT I study, specifically conducted in East Asian women, did not show a statistically significant reduction in VMS frequency or severity compared to placebo. This finding, despite other regional studies showing efficacy, underscores the importance of understanding ethnic and cultural variations in VMS presentation and treatment response. Additionally, the known risk of liver enzyme elevations requires careful patient monitoring, a factor that will be crucial in clinical practice. As other NK3 receptor antagonists like elinzanetant emerge, the competitive landscape for non-hormonal VMS treatments will intensify, demanding clear differentiation and robust real-world evidence. Astellas's ability to navigate these factors will determine fezolinetant's ultimate success in this critical market.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the mechanism of action of Fezolinetant in treating vasomotor symptoms?
Fezolinetant is a non-hormonal neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptor antagonist. It works by blocking the binding of neurokinin B to the NK3 receptor in the hypothalamic thermoregulatory center. This action helps to rebalance the neuronal activity that contributes to the dysregulation of body temperature, thereby reducing the frequency and severity of hot flashes.
What are the clinical implications of a non-hormonal treatment for moderate to severe VMS?
A non-hormonal option like Fezolinetant addresses a significant unmet need for patients who cannot or prefer not to use hormone therapy. It provides an alternative for women with contraindications to estrogen, such as a history of breast cancer or cardiovascular events. This expands the therapeutic landscape, offering more personalized treatment choices for managing menopausal VMS.
What unique advantages does Fezolinetant offer compared to existing VMS therapies?
Fezolinetant offers a targeted, non-hormonal mechanism of action by specifically antagonizing the NK3 receptor, which is distinct from traditional estrogen-based therapies. Unlike some other non-hormonal options, it directly addresses the neuronal pathway implicated in VMS pathophysiology. This provides a novel therapeutic strategy for patients seeking effective relief without hormonal intervention.
Which patient populations are most likely to benefit from Fezolinetant for VMS?
Fezolinetant is particularly beneficial for women experiencing moderate to severe VMS who are not candidates for hormone therapy or prefer non-hormonal options. This includes individuals with a history of estrogen-dependent cancers, thromboembolic events, or other contraindications to hormonal treatments. It also serves women seeking an effective, targeted approach to VMS management.

References

  1. [1] Liu J, Nie G et al.. Nonhormonal Hot Flash Management for Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM. 2020. 32419803
  2. [2] Hickey M, Huguenin A et al.. Risk factors, management and consequences of severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Nature reviews. Endocrinology. 2026 Jul. 41882338
  3. [3] Nappi RE, Siddiqui E et al.. Prevalence and quality-of-life burden of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause: A European cross-sectional survey. Maturitas. 2023 Jan. 36306669
  4. [4] Green SM, Donegan E et al.. Objective and subjective vasomotor symptom outcomes in the CBT-Meno randomized controlled trial. Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society. 2020 Oct. 32299247
  5. [5] Morga A, Zimmermann L et al.. Validation and Application of Thresholds to Define Meaningful Change in Vasomotor Symptoms Frequency: Analysis of Pooled SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 Data. Advances in therapy. 2024 Jul. 38775925
  6. [6] Kim C, Lane A et al.. Prospective early adulthood risk factors for vasomotor symptoms in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2024 Feb 1. 38270902
  7. [7] Shapiro C M M, Neal-Perry G et al.. Early onset, maintenance of effect, and day-/night-time findings following fezolinetant treatment for moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause: A pooled phase 3 analysis. Maturitas. 2025 Dec. 41259888
  8. [8] Smith RL, Gallicchio L et al.. Risk Factors for Extended Duration and Timing of Peak Severity of Hot Flashes. PloS one. 2016. 27149066
  9. [9] Chollet JA. Efficacy and safety of ultra-low-dose Vagifem (10 mcg). Patient preference and adherence. 2011. 22163155
  10. [10] Al-Safi ZA, Santoro N. Menopausal hormone therapy and menopausal symptoms. Fertility and sterility. 2014 Apr. 24613533
  11. [11] Duralde ER, Sobel TH et al.. Management of perimenopausal and menopausal symptoms. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2023 Aug 8. 37553173
  12. [12] Cheng YS, Tseng PT et al.. Pharmacologic and hormonal treatments for menopausal sleep disturbances: A network meta-analysis of 43 randomized controlled trials and 32,271 menopausal women. Sleep medicine reviews. 2021 Jun. 33836486
  13. [13] Pinkerton JV, Simon JA et al.. Consistency of efficacy and safety of elinzanetant for vasomotor symptoms and sleep disturbance associated with menopause across different populations: a review of the OASIS clinical trial program. Maturitas. 2026 Sep. 42537360
  14. [14] Rhodes JR, Alldredge CT et al.. Magnitude of placebo response in clinical trials of paroxetine for vasomotor symptoms: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2023. 37599891
  15. [15] Hammarström M, Gabrielson M et al.. Side effects of low-dose tamoxifen: results from a six-armed randomised controlled trial in healthy women. British journal of cancer. 2023 Jul. 37149701
  16. [16] Simon JA, Gaines T et al.. Extended-release oxybutynin therapy for vasomotor symptoms in women: a randomized clinical trial. Menopause (New York, N.Y.). 2016 Nov. 27760081
  17. [17] Roberts MZ, Andrus MR. Fezolinetant: a novel nonhormonal therapy for vasomotor symptoms due to menopause. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2024 Jun. 38953697
  18. [18] Wojciechowski P, Kolonko K et al.. Comparative Efficacy of Elinzanetant Versus Other Non-Hormonal Pharmaceutical Therapies for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause: A Network Meta-Analysis. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2026 Mar 15. 41834312

Contact Us

📍

Address

350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts