Glepaglutide Clears EMA Gate, But HTA Cost-Effectiveness Wall Looms Large
Regulatory Approvals

Glepaglutide Clears EMA Gate, But HTA Cost-Effectiveness Wall Looms Large

Published : 23 Sept 2026

At a Glance
Indicationshort bowel syndrome
Drugglepaglutide
Mechanism of ActionGLP-2 analog
CompanyZealand Pharma
Trial PhasePhase 3
Trial AcronymEASE-1
NCT IDNCT03690206
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryApproval Pending
Therapeutic AreaGastroenterology & Hepatology
Regulatory BodyEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), European Commission
Regulatory ActionPositive opinion, recommending marketing authorization
Approved Market/RegionEuropean Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway
Primary Endpoint (EASE-1)Absolute change in weekly parenteral support volume from baseline at 24 weeks
P-value (EASE-1 Primary Endpoint)0.0039
Clinical Response Rate (Glepaglutide Twice Weekly)65.7%
Enteral Autonomy Rate (Glepaglutide Twice Weekly)14%
Patient Population Size (EASE-1)106 SBS patients
Follow-up Duration (EASE-1)24 weeks
Orphan Drug DesignationU.S. FDA

Zealand Pharma's Zeydovio Receives Positive CHMP Opinion for SBS

Zealand Pharma announced that the CHMP of the European Medicines Agency issued a positive opinion, recommending marketing authorization for Zeydovio™ (glepaglutide) for adults with short bowel syndrome (SBS). This marks the first major advancement in SBS treatment in Europe in over a decade. The recommendation is based on data from the pivotal Phase 3 EASE-1 trial, where twice-weekly glepaglutide significantly reduced parenteral support requirements. Two-thirds of patients achieved at least a 20% reduction in weekly parenteral support volume, and 14% achieved enteral autonomy after 24 weeks. The European Commission is expected to make a final decision within approximately 67 days.

  • The positive CHMP opinion for Zeydovio™ (glepaglutide) signifies a crucial regulatory milestone, being the first major advancement in European short bowel syndrome (SBS) treatment in over ten years. This recommendation for marketing authorization by the European Medicines Agency paves the way for potential approval across the EU, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway, with a final decision from the European Commission anticipated within approximately 67 days. This development offers new hope for thousands of patients burdened by chronic parenteral support dependence.
  • The CHMP's recommendation is underpinned by robust data from the pivotal Phase 3 EASE-1 trial. In this study, twice-weekly glepaglutide demonstrated statistically significant and superior reductions in parenteral support (PS) requirements compared to placebo. A notable 65.7% of patients achieved a clinical response, defined as at least a 20% reduction in weekly PS volume at 24 weeks. Furthermore, 14% of patients treated with glepaglutide twice weekly achieved complete enteral autonomy, eliminating their need for PS entirely.
  • Zeydovio™ (glepaglutide) is a long-acting GLP-2 analog designed to improve intestinal function and reduce parenteral support dependence. Its convenient twice-weekly subcutaneous administration via a ready-to-use autoinjector aims to ease disease management. Beyond the EASE-1 trial, the positive opinion is supported by long-term extension trials (EASE-2, EASE-3) and a mechanistic trial (EASE-4). Zealand Pharma is also actively enrolling patients in the Phase 3 EASE-5 trial to support a U.S. regulatory submission, indicating a comprehensive global development and commercialization strategy.

The Daily Burden of SBS and Limitations of Current Care

Current treatment approaches for short bowel syndrome (SBS) center on long-term parenteral nutrition (PN), which sustains patients but carries a substantial burden of complications and dependency. Emerging pharmacological options such as teduglutide offer meaningful reductions in PN requirements, yet introduce their own unresolved safety questions that complicate long-term use.

  • PN-associated complications: Long-term PN is accompanied by severe complications including catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), and is associated with high healthcare costs. In pediatric cohorts on home parenteral nutrition, IFALD was recorded in 20% of patients and CRBSI at a rate of 4 per 1,000 PN days in earlier periods, though outcomes have improved over time.

  • Central venous access risks: Delivery of PN requires long-term central venous access. Surgically placed central venous catheters carry complications that can lead to significant morbidity, including CRBSI and venous thrombosis, necessitating evaluation of alternative access strategies such as peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).

  • Tolerability and safety concerns with teduglutide: Teduglutide, the GLP-2 analog approved for SBS, has been shown to be well tolerated for up to 30 months, but tolerability for even longer periods of treatment has not been examined. Safety concerns about possible carcinogenic properties during long-term use require ongoing evaluation, as studies in rodents have shown that exogenously administered GLP-2 increases the growth and incidence of adenomas in the colon, and the association between exogenous GLP-2 treatment and intestinal neoplasia in humans has not been fully identified.

  • Metabolic complexity in pediatric SBS: Pediatric SBS patients on long-term PN exhibit distinct plasma metabolomic signatures, with significantly increased levels of glutamine compared to those in the short-term PN group, and alterations in amino acid metabolism and cell death pathways. These findings underscore the metabolic complexity of the condition and the challenge of identifying which patients will require prolonged PN support.

The EASE Program: Clinical Evidence Supporting Zeydovio's Efficacy

Several randomized, placebo-controlled and observational trials have evaluated teduglutide in adults with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure (SBS-IF), establishing a consistent evidence base across dose regimens, geographies, and treatment durations. The primary efficacy endpoint across pivotal studies was the proportion of responders — defined as patients achieving ≥20% reduction in parenteral support (PS) volume from baseline at weeks 20 and 24 — with secondary endpoints capturing absolute PS volume reduction, days off PS per week, and biomarkers of intestinal adaptation.

Trial / Study Design Population Treatment Primary Endpoint Key Efficacy Results
NCT00172185 (2011) 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled 83 patients with SBS-IF Teduglutide 0.10 mg/kg/day (n=32), 0.05 mg/kg/day (n=35), or placebo (n=16) subcutaneous once daily Graded response score (GRS): ≥20% reduction in PS volume at weeks 20 and 24 0.05 mg/kg/day: 16/35 responders (p=0.007); 0.10 mg/kg/day: 8/32 vs 1/16 placebo (p=0.16, not significant); 3 patients fully weaned off PS
NCT00798967 (2013; STEPS) 24-week prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled 86 patients with SBS-IF (teduglutide n=43, placebo n=43) Teduglutide 0.05 mg/kg/day subcutaneous once daily Number of responders (>20% reduction in PS volume from baseline at weeks 20 and 24) 27/43 (63%) teduglutide vs 13/43 (30%) placebo (P=.002); mean PS volume reduction 4.4 ± 3.8 L/wk vs 2.3 ± 2.7 L/wk (P<.001); 54% vs 23% achieved ≥1 day/week reduction in PS (P=.005)
STEPS / STEPS-2 / STEPS-3 (2021) Phase III open-label extension series 39 adults with SBS-IF requiring PS ≥3×/week for ≥12 months Teduglutide (dose per STEPS protocol) PS independence and days off PS per week 8/39 achieved PS independence; >6 months of treatment required before enteral autonomy; lower baseline PS volume and non-IBD etiology associated with greater benefit
TED-C14-004 / SHP633-306 / SHP633-307 (2023) Two Phase III studies with open-label extension; interim cut-off at 4.5 years Adult Japanese patients with SBS-IF Teduglutide 0.05 mg/kg/day PS volume reduction ≥20% at 24 weeks; long-term PS reduction at data cut-off 9/18 patients achieved ≥20% PS reduction at 24 weeks; all 11 patients in SHP633-307 met threshold by data cut-off; mean PS reduction: -30.1 ± 25.9% (TED-C14-004), -25.6 ± 25.5% (SHP633-306), -57.08 ± 28.49% at data cut-off (SHP633-307)
French Observational Cohort (2021) Real-world, 6-month observational cohort 54 consecutive SBS-IF patients from 10 expert centers in France Teduglutide (≥6 months) Response (PS reduction ≥20%) and PS discontinuation rate at week 24 85% responders; 24% weaned off PS; 51% reduction in PS needs; 1.5 ± 0.2 days off PS per week; response associated with higher baseline oral intake (p=0.02); weaning associated with colon presence (p=0.04), lower PS volume (p=0.03), and higher oral intake (p=0.01)

Zeydovio's Impact on the Evolving SBS Treatment Landscape

Over the past five years, the short bowel syndrome (SBS) treatment landscape has been shaped substantially by accumulating evidence on glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analogues — most notably teduglutide — across both adult and paediatric populations. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 4 randomised controlled trials enrolling 283 patients demonstrated that GLP-2 analogues produced a significantly greater reduction in weekly parenteral support (PS) volume compared with placebo (SMD -0.54; 95% CI -0.71 to -0.36; p=0.0022; I²=0%), and more frequently achieved reductions in PS of ≥1 day/week (RR 2.27; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.26; p=0.0219; I²=0%). No significant differences were observed in enteral autonomy (RR 4.21; 95% CI 0.00 to 280351.17; p=0.3479) or clinical response — defined as a ≥20% reduction in weekly PS volume sustained through weeks 20 and 24 — between GLP-2 analogue and placebo groups. Complementing this, phase III data from Japanese adult patients with SBS and intestinal failure (SBS-IF) showed mean PS volume reductions from baseline of -30.1 ± 25.9% at 24 weeks in TED-C14-004 and -25.6 ± 25.5% in SHP633-306, extending to -57.08 ± 28.49% at a 4.5-year interim data cut-off in the extension study SHP633-307 — findings consistent with prior international studies and without new population-specific safety signals.

The evidence base has also expanded meaningfully into paediatric SBS-IF, where long-term real-world data were previously scarce. A 2024 Spanish multicentre prospective study of 31 children (median age at treatment initiation 2.3 years; median treatment duration 19 months) reported that 80% achieved a >20% reduction in weekly parenteral nutrition (PN) energy and 77% achieved a >20% reduction in weekly PN volume. Among responders, 29% were fully weaned from PN, with a median treatment duration to weaning of 6 months. Critically, younger age at treatment initiation was the only statistically significant predictor of response (p=0.028), establishing an evidence-based rationale for earlier intervention. A 2025 case report further documented the first known instance of teduglutide use exceeding 6 years in a paediatric patient, resulting in complete PN independence despite a residual small bowel length of 9 cm — underscoring the potential for sustained intestinal adaptation with prolonged therapy.

Beyond efficacy endpoints, the field has increasingly recognised the importance of quality of life (QoL) and real-world treatment optimisation. A 2023 nested matched-pair real-world study demonstrated significant improvements in both SBS-QoL subscale and sum scores, as well as SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores (all p<0.02), over a median teduglutide treatment duration of 4.3 years — with no significant QoL changes observed in matched non-treated controls (SF-36 between-group differences: p=0.031 and p=0.012). Concurrently, a 2024 international survey of 19 expert intestinal failure centres revealed that only 10% of SBS-IF patients were receiving GLP-2 analogue therapy despite an estimated 30% eligibility rate, with most centres initiating treatment 6–12 months post-resection. Response assessment most commonly relied on a >20% PS decrease (95% of centres), ≥1-day/week PS reduction (84%), and increased urinary output (68%). Together, these data reflect a treatment landscape that has matured from proof-of-concept to real-world integration, while highlighting persistent gaps in access and standardisation of care.

Zeydovio's CHMP Nod: Reshaping Europe's SBS Treatment Landscape

The European Medicines Agency's CHMP positive opinion for Zeydovio™ (glepaglutide) marks a pivotal moment for adults living with short bowel syndrome (SBS) in Europe. For over a decade, significant advancements in this challenging condition have been scarce, leaving many patients reliant on burdensome parenteral support (PS). Glepaglutide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) analog, is poised to change this landscape.

GLP-2 agonists work by enhancing intestinal adaptation and absorption, ultimately reducing the need for external nutritional support. The Phase 3 EASE-1 trial demonstrated that twice-weekly glepaglutide significantly reduced PS volumes, with a remarkable two-thirds of patients achieving at least a 20% reduction and 14% achieving complete enteral autonomy. This level of clinical benefit, coupled with a twice-weekly subcutaneous injection, offers a substantial convenience advantage over existing daily therapies, potentially improving patient quality of life and reducing the complications associated with long-term PS.

However, the evolving competitive landscape warrants consideration. While glepaglutide offers a less frequent dosing schedule than the established daily GLP-2 agonist, teduglutide, other novel GLP-2 analogs with even longer half-lives are in development, potentially offering even less frequent dosing in the future. Furthermore, it's important to note that while the twice-weekly regimen proved highly effective, the once-weekly glepaglutide regimen did not achieve statistical significance in the pivotal trial, suggesting that optimal dosing frequency is critical for maximizing patient outcomes. As glepaglutide moves towards final European Commission approval, the medical community will be keen to see how it integrates into clinical practice and how long-term real-world data further defines its role amidst a growing class of intestinotrophic therapies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the life expectancy of short gut syndrome?
The life expectancy for short gut syndrome (short bowel syndrome, SBS) is highly variable, depending on factors such as remaining bowel length, presence of the ileocecal valve, underlying etiology, and the development of complications. With advancements in parenteral nutrition, surgical techniques, and pharmacotherapy, survival rates have significantly improved. However, long-term mortality is primarily driven by complications like parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease and catheter-related bloodstream infections.
What is the most common cause of short bowel syndrome?
Extensive surgical resection of the small intestine is the most common cause of short bowel syndrome. This is frequently necessitated by conditions such as Crohn's disease, mesenteric ischemia, or trauma in adults. In neonates, necrotizing enterocolitis is a primary driver for such extensive resections.
Is GLP-2 effective for treating short gut?
GLP-2 is effective for treating short gut, clinically known as short bowel syndrome (SBS). As an intestinotrophic hormone, GLP-2 promotes intestinal adaptation, enhances nutrient absorption, and improves mucosal growth. Teduglutide, a GLP-2 analog, is approved for SBS and has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the need for parenteral support in both adult and pediatric patients.
Can you fix short bowel syndrome?
Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is not typically "fixed" by a single curative intervention, as it results from irreversible loss of functional small intestine. Management focuses on optimizing nutritional support, promoting intestinal adaptation with therapies like GLP-2 analogs, and considering surgical options such as bowel lengthening or transplantation to achieve intestinal autonomy. The goal is to minimize parenteral nutrition dependence and improve long-term outcomes.
Is short bowel syndrome a chronic illness?
Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS) is a chronic illness. It is characterized by severe malabsorption resulting from a significant loss of functional small intestine, often requiring lifelong nutritional support, frequently parenteral nutrition. Management is long-term and complex, focusing on optimizing nutrient absorption, preventing complications, and improving quality of life, underscoring its chronic nature.
How to stay hydrated with short bowel syndrome?
Hydration in short bowel syndrome (SBS) primarily relies on carefully balanced oral rehydration solutions (ORS) to optimize water and electrolyte absorption, as excessive plain water can paradoxically increase fluid losses. For patients with high-output stomas or severe malabsorption, parenteral nutrition and intravenous fluids are often essential to maintain fluid and electrolyte balance. Dietary modifications, including avoiding hyperosmolar beverages and managing fat intake, further support fluid retention and minimize gastrointestinal losses.
How long can someone live with short bowel syndrome?
Life expectancy for individuals with short bowel syndrome (SBS) varies significantly, primarily depending on the underlying cause, remaining bowel length, and the presence of intestinal failure requiring parenteral nutrition (PN). With advancements in home PN, intestinal rehabilitation, and management of complications like PN-associated liver disease and catheter-related bloodstream infections, many patients can now live for decades. However, long-term complications and the need for ongoing specialized care continue to impact overall prognosis.
Can short bowel syndrome cause diarrhea?
Short bowel syndrome frequently causes diarrhea due to the extensive loss of small intestinal absorptive surface area. This leads to significant malabsorption of water, electrolytes, and nutrients. Unabsorbed bile acids and fatty acids reaching the colon can induce osmotic and secretory diarrhea, often exacerbated by rapid intestinal transit and potential bacterial overgrowth.

References

  1. [1] Jeppesen PB, Gilroy R et al.. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of teduglutide in reducing parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluid requirements in patients with short bowel syndrome. Gut. 2011 Jul. 21317170
  2. [2] DePaula B, Mitchell PD et al.. Parenteral nutrition dependence and growth in pediatric patients with intestinal failure following transition to blenderized tube feedings: A case series. Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2025 Feb. 39499057
  3. [3] Nakamura S, Wada M et al.. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of teduglutide in adult Japanese patients with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure: two phase III studies with an extension. Surgery today. 2023 Mar. 36201060
  4. [4] Blüthner E, Pape UF et al.. Quality of Life in Teduglutide-Treated Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome Intestinal Failure-A Nested Matched Pair Real-World Study. Nutrients. 2023 Apr 18. 37111167
  5. [5] Ho MY, Mackey JR. Presentation and management of docetaxel-related adverse effects in patients with breast cancer. Cancer management and research. 2014. 24904223
  6. [6] Tee CT, Wallis K et al.. Emerging treatment options for short bowel syndrome: potential role of teduglutide. Clinical and experimental gastroenterology. 2011. 22016579
  7. [7] Ashrafzadeh K, Shafiekhani M et al.. Lessons learned from successful autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction in patients with intestinal failure: a case series. BMC surgery. 2021 Feb 4. 33541322
  8. [8] Wu G, Liu C et al.. Living Donor Intestinal Transplantation: Recipient Outcomes. Annals of surgery. 2022 Nov 1. 35968890
  9. [9] Jeppesen PB, Pertkiewicz M et al.. Teduglutide reduces need for parenteral support among patients with short bowel syndrome with intestinal failure. Gastroenterology. 2012 Dec. 22982184
  10. [10] Germán-Díaz M, Alcolea A et al.. Early use of teduglutide in paediatric patients with intestinal failure is associated with a greater response rate: a multicenter study. European journal of pediatrics. 2024 Aug. 38664251
  11. [11] Cakir M, Levent E et al.. A rare complication of central catheter in an infant with intestinal failure. Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre. 2008. 18523406
  12. [12] Peters EN, Mosesova I et al.. Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Spectrum Red Softgels in Healthy Participants. Journal of analytical toxicology. 2022 May 20. 33848338
  13. [13] Seidner DL, Gabe SM et al.. Enteral Autonomy and Days Off Parenteral Support With Teduglutide Treatment for Short Bowel Syndrome in the STEPS Trials. JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition. 2020 May. 31423614
  14. [14] Hartmann M, Timmer W et al.. A Thorough QT Study of Teduglutide in Healthy Subjects. Clinical pharmacology in drug development. 2012 Apr. 27121220
  15. [15] Huisman-de Waal G, Schoonhoven L et al.. The impact of home parenteral nutrition on daily life-a review. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2007 Jun. 17161888
  16. [16] Vanuytsel T, Lakananurak N et al.. Real-world experience with glucagon-like peptide 2 analogues in patients with short bowel syndrome and chronic intestinal failure: Results from an international survey in expert intestinal failure centers. Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2024 Dec. 39489296
  17. [17] Gürkan A. Advances in small bowel transplantation. Turkish journal of surgery. 2017. 28944322
  18. [18] Wang Y, Liu Y et al.. Untargeted Metabolomics Reveal Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Alterations in Pediatric Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome. Metabolites. 2022 Jun 27. 35888724
  19. [19] Martínez Martínez AL, Calles Romero LA et al.. [Is there life after teduglutide?]. Nutricion hospitalaria. 2020 Jul 13. 32406744
  20. [20] Orhan A, Gögenur I et al.. The Intestinotrophic Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 in Relation to Intestinal Neoplasia. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2018 Aug 1. 29741675

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts