First FXIa Stroke Approval Wins China but Benefit Stays Narrowly Indication-Locked
Regulatory Approvals

First FXIa Stroke Approval Wins China but Benefit Stays Narrowly Indication-Locked

Published : 10 Nov 2026

At a Glance
IndicationSecondary stroke prevention
Drugasundexian
Mechanism of ActionFactor XIa inhibitor
CompanyBayer
CategoryRegulatory Milestone
Sub CategoryApproval Granted
Therapeutic AreaCardiovascular
Group Sales Q3 202610.053 billion euros
Group EBITDA Before Special Items Q3 20261.615 billion euros
Pharmaceuticals Sales Growth (Fx & Portfolio Adj.)6.4 percent
Nubeqa Sales Growth (Fx & Portfolio Adj.)58.3 percent
Kerendia Sales Growth (Fx & Portfolio Adj.)64.9 percent
Asundexian Approved RegionChina
Asundexian Brand NameSunharbo™
Updated Group EBITDA Before Special Items Guidance (2026)9.8 to 10.3 billion euros
Updated Free Cash Flow Guidance (2026)minus 1.5 to minus 0.5 billion euros
Net Financial Debt (as of Sep 30, 2026)31.083 billion euros

Bayer's Q3 Performance Driven by Pharma Growth, Outlook Raised

Bayer reported increased sales of 10.053 billion euros (up 1.9% Fx & portfolio adj.) and EBITDA before special items of 1.615 billion euros (up 6.9%) in Q3 2026. The Pharmaceuticals division drove growth, entering a new cycle with strong performance from Nubeqa™ (up 58.3%) and Kerendia™ (up 64.9%). Notably, asundexian received approval in China for secondary stroke prevention under the brand name Sunharbo™, making it the first approved Factor XIa inhibitor worldwide. Against this backdrop, Bayer raised its full-year guidance for Group EBITDA before special items, free cash flow, and net financial debt, while Crop Science and Consumer Health performed in line with targets despite market pressures.

  • Robust Financial Performance and Debt Reduction: Bayer's Q3 2026 saw group sales reach 10.053 billion euros, a 1.9 percent increase (Fx & portfolio adj.), and EBITDA before special items rise by 6.9 percent to 1.615 billion euros. Despite non-cash charges impacting core earnings per share (0.31 euros) and net income (minus 672 million euros), the company reduced its net financial debt to 31.083 billion euros by September 30, 2026, partly due to a 3.0 billion euro payment from Apollo Global Management Inc.
  • Pharmaceuticals Division Drives Growth and Innovation: The Pharmaceuticals division experienced significant growth, with sales increasing by 6.4 percent (Fx & portfolio adj.) to 4.680 billion euros. This was primarily fueled by the strong performance of Nubeqa™ and Kerendia™, which saw sales jump by 58.3 percent and 64.9 percent, respectively. Nubeqa™ sales reached approximately one billion euros in Q3, while Kerendia™ achieved blockbuster status over the preceding 12 months.
  • Strategic Regulatory Milestone and Improved Outlook: A key highlight was the approval of asundexian in China for secondary stroke prevention, marketed as Sunharbo™, marking it as the world's first approved Factor XIa inhibitor. This regulatory success, combined with strong operational performance, led Bayer to upgrade its full-year 2026 guidance for Group EBITDA before special items to between 9.8 and 10.3 billion euros, free cash flow to between minus 1.5 and minus 0.5 billion euros, and net financial debt to between 28.0 and 29.0 billion euros.
  • Mixed Performance in Other Divisions and Litigation Progress: While Crop Science sales were down 2.4 percent (Fx & portfolio adj.) due to regulatory impacts and adverse weather, and Consumer Health sales remained flat (up 0.1 percent Fx & portfolio adj.) amidst a mixed market, both divisions performed in line with their targets. Additionally, Bayer secured a unanimous win in the first glyphosate Roundup™ trial since the U.S. Supreme Court decision, signaling progress in its litigation containment efforts.

Asundexian's Novel Factor XIa Inhibition in Secondary Stroke Prevention

Asundexian is a direct inhibitor of activated factor XIa (FXIa) evaluated combined with antiplatelet therapy for prevention of ischemic stroke after non-cardioembolic stroke or high-risk TIA. Milvexian is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor of factor (F) XIa undergoing evaluation in Phase 3 clinical trials for the same secondary stroke prevention setting in addition to background single or dual antiplatelet therapy.

Drug Trial Population and Indication Dose Regimen Intervention Model and Design
Milvexian AXIOMATIC-SSP Ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack for Secondary Stroke Prevention 1 of 5 doses of milvexian or placebo for 90 days; clopidogrel 75 mg daily for the first 21 days and aspirin 100 mg for 90 days Phase II, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at 367 sites in 2019; Participants (N = 2366) with ischemic stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤7) or high-risk TIA (ABCD score ≥6) were randomized
Milvexian LIBREXIA Stroke (NCT05702034) Non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack Milvexian 25 mg twice daily Phase 3 trial with placebo, in addition to background single or dual antiplatelet therapy

Why New Options for Secondary Stroke Prevention Are Crucial

Current secondary stroke prevention relies heavily on antiplatelet and anticoagulant regimens, yet efficacy remains inconsistent across patient subgroups and clinical settings. Residual vascular risk, drug resistance, bleeding trade-offs, and cost pressures further limit long-term effectiveness.

  • Reduced clopidogrel-aspirin benefit restricted by genetics and glycemic control: There was significant interaction between carrier status and antiplatelet therapy regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke (P=0.03) in patients with GA levels of ≤15.5%, but not in those with GA levels of >15.5% (P=0.48). Only in noncarriers with low GA levels, dual-antiplatelet therapy reduced stroke recurrence (3.5%) compared with those on aspirin alone (14.7%; hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.49; P<0.001). No significant difference in bleeding was found among groups.

  • Clopidogrel resistance and bleeding versus efficacy trade-off: clopidogrel resistance occurs in approximately 20% of Japanese and other Asian populations. A longer duration of DAPT after CAS is associated with lower rates of readmission for stroke, but increased risk of hemorrhagic complications, and the potential benefits of antithrombotic agents must be weighed against the corresponding increased risk of bleeding complications.

  • Uncertain optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after carotid artery stenting: The duration of DAPT after CAS remains controversial. The primary outcome did not differ significantly between the groups (2.5% versus 2.1%; adjusted hazard ratio of long-DAPT to short-DAPT, 0.869 [95% CI, 0.652-1.158]; P=0.337).

  • Residual inflammatory risk not addressed by intensified antiplatelets: Compared with the bottom quartile, those in the top quartile (hsCRP>4.86 mg/L) were at increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (adjusted HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.15-4.68). There was no interaction with randomized antiplatelet treatment, and hsCRP did not predict the response to dual antiplatelets.

  • High drug cost burden driven by anticoagulation: The total estimated annual drug expenditure was € 241,808; of which 51.6% was due to DOACs. Cardioembolic strokes had the highest annual costs per patient (€1328.6 [1169.0-1403.4]), while DAPT costs were highest for large-vessel strokes (p<0.001) and accounted for 2.5% of total costs.

Beyond Stroke: Asundexian's Expanding Clinical Development

Asundexian, a selective Factor XIa inhibitor, is furthest advanced for stroke prevention in high-risk atrial fibrillation, evaluated head-to-head against standard-dose apixaban in the phase 3 OCEANIC-AF trial. Broader evidence synthesis spans myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke, with emerging interest in venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome as potential long-term anticoagulation indications.

Indication Trial / Evidence Source Intervention Model Key Data Points
Atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke OCEANIC-AF, phase 3, international, double-blind trial, NCT05643573, EudraCT number 2022-000758-28 1:1 randomization to asundexian at a dose of 50 mg once daily or standard-dose apixaban; 14,810 randomly assigned patients in intention-to-treat population; mean age 73.9±7.7 years, 35.2% women, mean CHADS-VASc score 4.3±1.3 Stroke or systemic embolism in 98 patients (1.3%) with asundexian and in 26 (0.4%) with apixaban (hazard ratio, 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.46 to 5.83); major bleeding in 17 patients (0.2%) with asundexian and in 53 (0.7%) with apixaban (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.55); trial stopped prematurely at recommendation of independent data monitoring committee
Myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation (AF), and ischemic stroke Systematic review and meta-analysis of 4 RCTs, PROSPERO CRD420251039715 Randomized controlled trials comparing Asundexian with placebo or active controls; random-effects model; Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 All-cause mortality RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.73-1.48, P=.83; ischemic stroke RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.51-5.25, P=.40; cardiovascular-related mortality RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.77-1.66, P=.53; ISTH major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.21-1.91, P=.41
Venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome Narrative review including PACIFIC-AF and PACIFIC-STROKE Not reported Potential applicability in other conditions requiring long-term anticoagulation, such as venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome; fixed dosing regimen, oral administration, and lack of routine coagulation monitoring

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the mechanism of action of asundexian in secondary stroke prevention?
Asundexian is an oral, direct inhibitor of activated Factor XIa (FXIa). By selectively targeting FXIa, it aims to reduce thrombin generation and subsequent clot formation. This mechanism is designed to prevent thrombotic events with a potentially lower bleeding risk compared to agents that inhibit Factor Xa or thrombin directly.
How does Factor XIa inhibition differentiate from other anticoagulant strategies for stroke prevention?
Factor XIa inhibition targets the intrinsic pathway of coagulation, which is crucial for pathological thrombus formation while potentially preserving primary hemostasis. This contrasts with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that inhibit Factor Xa or thrombin, which play broader roles in both pathological and physiological coagulation. The selective nature of FXIa inhibition aims to offer antithrombotic efficacy with a reduced risk of bleeding complications.
Which patient populations are most likely to benefit from asundexian for secondary stroke prevention?
Asundexian is being investigated for patients at high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, particularly those who may be intolerant to or have contraindications for current antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapies. This includes individuals with a history of acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Its novel mechanism may offer a therapeutic option for patients requiring effective antithrombotic protection with a favorable safety profile.
What are the potential advantages of asundexian over existing therapies for secondary stroke prevention?
Asundexian's primary advantage lies in its targeted inhibition of Factor XIa, which is hypothesized to provide effective antithrombotic protection with a lower risk of bleeding compared to current anticoagulants. This could address a significant unmet need for patients requiring long-term secondary stroke prevention. Its oral administration also offers convenience for chronic management.

References

  1. [1] Gibson CM, Steg PG et al.. Milvexian with Antiplatelet Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome Event. The New England journal of medicine. 2026 Oct 22. 42670965
  2. [2] Sharma M, Molina CA et al.. Rationale and design of the AXIOMATIC-SSP phase II trial: Antithrombotic treatment with factor XIa inhibition to Optimize Management of Acute Thromboembolic events for Secondary Stroke Prevention. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association. 2022 Oct. 36037679
  3. [3] Pradhan A, Mahalawat S et al.. From the INVICTUS Trial to Current Considerations: It's Not Time to Retire Vitamin K Inhibitors Yet!. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2024 Oct 31. 39598370
  4. [4] Lerman TT, Tiosano S et al.. Machine Learning Application for Bleeding Risk Prediction in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Oral Anticoagulation. Acta haematologica. 2025. 40517766
  5. [5] Zelinka T, Petrák O et al.. High incidence of cardiovascular complications in pheochromocytoma. Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2012 May. 22517556
  6. [6] Xue Z, Liao S et al.. A Systematic Review of Factor XI/XIa Inhibitors Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2025 Jan-Dec. 40232269
  7. [7] Frost C, Nepal S et al.. Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of multiple oral doses of apixaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, in healthy subjects. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2013 Nov. 23451769
  8. [8] Raffo C, Capodanno D. Factor XI inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndrome. European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology. 2024 Apr. 38867863
  9. [9] Gibson CM, Bahit MC et al.. Oral factor xia inhibitor milvexian after a recent acute coronary syndrome: Rationale and design of the phase 3 (Librexia ACS). American heart journal. 2025 Jul. 39986336
  10. [10] Piccini JP, Patel MR et al.. Asundexian versus Apixaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. The New England journal of medicine. 2025 Jan 2. 39225267
  11. [11] Paszek E, Undas A. Coagulation factor XI and coronary artery disease: is there room for factor XI inhibitors?. Polish archives of internal medicine. 2025 Dec 18. 41312611
  12. [12] Guimarães HP, Lopes RD et al.. Rivaroxaban in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and a Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve. The New England journal of medicine. 2020 Nov 26. 33196155
  13. [13] Armenian SH, Armstrong GT et al.. Cardiovascular Disease in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Insights Into Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Prevention. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2018 Jul 20. 29874141
  14. [14] Nakagawa I, Kotsugi M et al.. Antithrombotic Therapy in Carotid Artery and Intracranial Artery Stent. Journal of neuroendovascular therapy. 2025. 40007971
  15. [15] Prisco D, Canfora M et al.. Factor XI Inhibitors: perspectives in primary and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. Internal and emergency medicine. 2024 Oct. 38743127
  16. [16] Luo M, Wu J. Abelacimab for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Translating Dual FXI/XIa Inhibition from Mechanism to Clinical Prospects. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2025 Jan-Dec. 41051962
  17. [17] Imazio M, Brucato A. [Ten questions on colchicine as a "new" cardiovascular drug]. Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006). 2021 Jul. 34175909
  18. [18] Zaman MA. Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: Is a Paradigm Shift From Xa to XIa Inhibitors on the Horizon?. Cardiology in review. 2025 May 29. 40439401
  19. [19] Arif Z, Wadood MA et al.. Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Asundexian in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2025 Jan-Dec. 40726194
  20. [20] Deeks ED. Ticagrelor: a review of its use in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Drugs. 2011 May 7. 21568367

Contact Us

📍

Address

350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts