| Indication | Haemophilia A (congenital FVIII deficiency), with or without inhibitors |
| Drug | denecimig |
| Mechanism of Action | FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibody |
| Company | Novo Nordisk |
| Trial Phase | Phase 3 |
| Trial Acronym | FRONTIER |
| NCT ID | NCT05053139 |
| Category | Regulatory Milestone |
| Sub Category | Approval Granted |
| Therapeutic Area | Hematology |
| Regulatory Body | European Commission, European Medicines Agency (CHMP) |
| Approval Date | 13 November 2026 |
| Approved Market/Region | European Union |
| Dosing Regimens | Once-monthly, once-every-two-weeks, once-weekly |
| Key Efficacy Outcome | Significantly reduced annualised bleeding rates |
| Patient Population | Adults and children with haemophilia A, with or without inhibitors |
| Other Approvals | Saudi Arabia |
| Regulatory Review Status | Under review by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other regulatory authorities |
| Comparator (FRONTIER2) | Prior clotting factor prophylaxis and on-demand treatment |
| Switching Study (FRONTIER5) | Direct switch from emicizumab |
EU Approves Novo Nordisk's FREHEMGO® for Haemophilia A
Novo Nordisk announced that the European Commission has granted marketing authorisation for FREHEMGO® (denecimig) for routine prophylaxis in adults and children with haemophilia A, with or without inhibitors. This FVIIIa mimetic bispecific antibody offers flexible dosing options: once-monthly, once-every-two-weeks, or once-weekly, administered via a single-use pre-filled pen. The approval is supported by the FRONTIER clinical trial program, including the pivotal FRONTIER2 trial, which demonstrated a significant reduction in annualised bleeding rates compared to prior treatments. Results from FRONTIER3 in children and FRONTIER5 on switching from emicizumab also showed consistent efficacy and no new safety signals.
- Flexible Dosing and Administration: FREHEMGO® (denecimig) is the first FVIIIa mimetic to provide patients and healthcare teams with a choice of once-monthly, once-every-two-weeks, or once-weekly subcutaneous prophylaxis using a convenient single-use pre-filled pen. This flexibility aims to better integrate treatment into patients' daily lives, enhancing adherence and quality of life for individuals with haemophilia A.
- Robust Clinical Efficacy: The approval is underpinned by the comprehensive FRONTIER clinical program, particularly the pivotal FRONTIER2 trial, which showed denecimig significantly reduced annualised bleeding rates in adults and adolescents with haemophilia A, irrespective of inhibitor status. Consistent efficacy was also observed in children in the FRONTIER3 trial, with a substantial proportion of participants across the program achieving zero treated bleeds.
- Safety and Switching Profile: Data from the FRONTIER5 trial demonstrated that directly switching patients from emicizumab to denecimig prophylaxis was safe, with no new safety signals identified. This trial also highlighted a clear preference for the denecimig pen and showed a sustained increase in thrombin generation into the normal range without posing a thrombotic risk, offering a viable transition option for patients.
Addressing Unmet Needs in Haemophilia A with FREHEMGO®
Hemophilia A management reflects a delicate balance between procoagulant and anticoagulant mechanisms, where bleeding prophylaxis must be weighed against paradoxical thrombotic risks. Current factor and non-factor approaches have improved outcomes, yet inhibitor development, pharmacokinetic variability, and aging-related comorbidities continue to limit long-term control.
Inhibitor development renders FVIII replacement ineffective: Inhibitors are alloantibodies that neutralize the procoagulant activity of exogenous FVIII and represent the most severe complication of haemophilia A. Treatment requires administration of FVIII-containing products either on demand or as prophylaxis, which can induce inhibitor development in 20%-35% of patients. Patients with inhibitors present with bleeding episodes that are difficult to control, and they have reduced response to FVIII replacement.
Immune tolerance induction is lengthy, costly and incompletely effective: Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the treatment of choice for inhibitor eradication and the strategy for achieving antigen-specific tolerance to FVIII. ITI success rate ranges commonly between 60% and 80%, with one registry reporting ITI was successful in 91/137 patients (66.4%), while in nonsevere haemophilia A most inhibitors disappear spontaneously but an anamnestic response still can occur when rechallenged in 35% (25/72) of these patients.
Bypassing and rebalancing agents carry thromboembolic risk with unestablished monitoring: For treatment of patients with high-titre, high-responding inhibitors, 'by-pass' therapy with activated prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant factor VIIa is generally recommended. Incidence rates were 15.4 events (95% CI: 6.7–30.3) per 1,000 aPCC-exposed py; 18.2 events (95% CI: 8.3–34.6) per 1,000 rFVIIa-exposed py; and 29.7 events (95% CI: 6.1–86.7) per 1,000 py of concomitant exposure to both agents. The treatment with emicizumab showed tolerable safety both in clinical trials and long-term real-world observations with few thrombotic events, while in some clinical trials with rebalancing therapies (fitusiran and concizumab) thrombotic events occurred, and monitoring of the haemostatic function of novel therapies especially with concomitant haemostatic treatment is not yet established.
Pharmacokinetic variability limits protection on extended prophylaxis: During 1 year of pharmacokinetic-guided prophylaxis every third day, 131 bleeding episodes occurred in 24/34 patients. Average peak FVIII levels ranged from 24 to 168 IU dL(-1), with higher values associated with a decreased risk for all bleeding and joint bleeding, while median percent of time spent with FVIII levels >20 IU dL(-1) was 22% and median AUC was 1363, supporting the need for high peak levels and AUC in some patients treated every third day.
Aging, comorbidities and gene therapy durability complicate long-term care: Aging-related comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, HIV-associated complications, and acute coronary syndromes, impact thrombotic risk, with acute coronary syndromes occurring even among relatively younger persons with haemophilia typically in association with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. For adeno-associated virus vector expression of FVIII, long-term follow-up showed a continuous decline in the FVIII transgene levels starting 1 year after vector injection through year 5, vector readministration is not feasible at this time, and hepatocyte health including chronic hepatitis C virus infection and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatosis or steatohepatitis may compromise efficacy and safety.
FRONTIER Program: Demonstrating FREHEMGO®'s Efficacy and Safety
Recent studies in congenital haemophilia A have evaluated factor-based and non-factor strategies in patients with and without inhibitors. The data span immune tolerance induction dosing, porcine-sequence FVIII replacement for inhibitor bleeds, and every-4-week emicizumab prophylaxis.
| Study | Intervention | Key Efficacy Outcomes | Key Safety Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAVEN 4: multicentre, open-label, non-randomised phase 3 study in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older with severe congenital haemophilia A (<1% of normal FVIII activity in blood) or haemophilia A with FVIII inhibitors | Emicizumab subcutaneously 6 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks or more; for patients in the expansion cohort preceded by four loading doses of 3 mg/kg once weekly | Annualised rate of treated bleeds was 2·4 (95% CI 1·4-4·3); 23 (56·1%; 95% CI 39·7-71·5) of 41 reported no treated bleeds and 37 (90%; 76·9-97·3) reported zero to three treated bleeds; annualised bleed rate was 4·5 (95% CI 3·1-6·6) for all bleeds, 0·6 (0·3-1·5) for treated spontaneous bleeds, 1·7 (0·8-3·7) for treated joint bleeds, and 1·0 (0·3-3·3) for treated target joint bleeds | Most frequent treatment-related adverse event was injection-site reaction (nine [22%] of 41 patients); no thrombotic events or development of de-novo antidrug antibodies with neutralising potential or FVIII inhibitors |
| Prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative, Phase II study of recombinant B-domain-deleted porcine sequence factor VIII (r-pFVIII) for non-life/non-limb-threatening bleeding in haemophilia A with FVIII inhibitors | Acute episodes in patients with pFVIII inhibitor titres <0.8 BU mL treated with 50 U kg body weight r-pFVIII; those with titres of >0.8 BU mL received an initial calculated r-pFVIII loading dose followed by 50 U kg treatment dose, continued at 6-hourly intervals until bleeding controlled or maximum eight doses | All 25 bleeding episodes in nine patients (mean age: 23.7 years; range: 14-34 years) controlled successfully with eight or fewer injections; median time from bleeding onset to administration was 5.7 h (range: 1.5-20.0 h); twenty episodes (80%) controlled with one treatment dose (with or without loading dose, median dose: 200.8 U kg ; range: 50-576 U kg ) | r-pFVIII was well tolerated and no treatment-emergent serious adverse events were considered by the investigator to be related to r-pFVIII administration |
| Multinational randomised controlled trial in 115 paediatric participants with severe haemophilia A and high-responding inhibitors for first immune tolerance induction attempt | Low dose (50 IU/kg of factor VIII concentrate three times per week) versus high dose (200 IU/kg of factor VIII daily) | 24 out of 58 participants (46.6%) in low-dose group and 22 out of 57 (38.6%) in high-dose group experiencing full tolerance, risk ratio 1.07 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.68); 50 out of 58 participants (86.2%) in low-dose group experienced one or more bleeding events versus 36 out of 57 participants (63.1%) in high-dose group, risk ratio 1.36 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.71) | Rate of infection was not statistically different; 19 out of 47 participants (40.4%) with central venous catheter in low-dose arm had 69 infections, and 22 out of 52 participants (42.3%) in high-dose arm had 55 infections, risk ratio 0.96 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.53); one factor VIII reaction, one incidence of trauma and 13 incidences of needing to insert or remove the catheter reported as trial-related serious adverse events; no incidence of nephrotic syndrome was reported |
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Berntorp E, Hermans C et al.. Optimising prophylaxis in haemophilia A: The ups and downs of treatment. Blood reviews. 2021 Nov. 34243987
- [2] Jardim LL, Chaves DG et al.. Development of inhibitors in hemophilia A: An illustrated review. Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis. 2020 Jul. 32685884
- [3] Tellier Z, André MH et al.. Management of haemophilia A-inhibitor patients: clinical and regulatory perspectives. Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. 2009 Oct. 19184560
- [4] Ishiguro A. [Immune mechanisms involved in the development and eradication of anti-factor VIII alloantibodies in hemophilia]. Nihon Rinsho Men'eki Gakkai kaishi = Japanese journal of clinical immunology. 2011. 22214808
- [5] Batty P, Mo AM et al.. Long-term follow-up of liver-directed, adeno-associated vector-mediated gene therapy in the canine model of hemophilia A. Blood. 2022 Dec 22. 35405003
- [6] Mancuso ME, Croteau SE et al.. Benefits and risks of non-factor therapies: Redefining haemophilia treatment goals in the era of new technologies. Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. 2024 Apr. 38481077
- [7] Teitel J, Berntorp E et al.. A systematic approach to controlling problem bleeds in patients with severe congenital haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors. Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. 2007 May. 17498074
- [8] Athale AH, Marcucci M et al.. Immune tolerance induction for treating inhibitors in people with congenital haemophilia A or B. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 Apr 24. 24763974
- [9] Knoebl P, Thaler J et al.. Emicizumab for the treatment of acquired hemophilia A. Blood. 2021 Jan 21. 32766881
- [10] Jiang H, Lillicrap D et al.. Multiyear therapeutic benefit of AAV serotypes 2, 6, and 8 delivering factor VIII to hemophilia A mice and dogs. Blood. 2006 Jul 1. 16522813
- [11] Ebbert PT, Xavier F et al.. Observational study of recombinant factor VIII-Fc, rFVIIIFc, in hemophilia A. Thrombosis research. 2020 Nov. 32653601
- [12] Shi Q, Wilcox DA et al.. Lentivirus-mediated platelet-derived factor VIII gene therapy in murine haemophilia A. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2007 Feb. 17269937
- [13] Zanon E. Acquired Hemophilia A: An Update on the Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2023 Jan 23. 36766524
- [14] Bykov K, Bohn RL et al.. Use of Bypassing Agents and Risk of Thromboembolic Events in Patients with Haemophilia and Inhibitors. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2017 Dec. 29212114
- [15] Camelo RM, Chaves DG et al.. Predictors of the outcome of immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors: The Brazilian Immune Tolerance (BrazIT) Study protocol. PloS one. 2021. 34437573
- [16] Valentino LA, Pipe SW et al.. Association of peak factor VIII levels and area under the curve with bleeding in patients with haemophilia A on every third day pharmacokinetic-guided prophylaxis. Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. 2016 Jul. 26930418
- [17] Mahlangu JN, Andreeva TA et al.. Recombinant B-domain-deleted porcine sequence factor VIII (r-pFVIII) for the treatment of bleeding in patients with congenital haemophilia A and inhibitors. Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. 2017 Jan. 27761964
Contact Us
Address
350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901
For General Inquiry
info@pienomial.com














