| Indication | Type I allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis |
| Drug | Anaphylm (dibutepinephrine) |
| Mechanism of Action | Adrenergic agonist prodrug |
| Company | Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. |
| Category | Regulatory Milestone |
| Sub Category | Regulatory Submission Filed |
| Therapeutic Area | Immunology |
| Regulatory Submission Target | Q3 2026 |
| Regulatory Agency | FDA |
| CRL Date | January 30, 2026 |
| Total Revenue Q2 2026 | $13.8 million |
| Net Loss Q2 2026 | $22.9 million |
| Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA Loss Q2 2026 | $5.2 million |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | $98.5 million (as of June 30, 2026) |
| Ex-U.S. Filing Targets | Canada (end of 2026), European Union (Q1 2027), United Kingdom (2027) |
| Orphan Drug Exclusivity Expiration | January 2027 |
Aquestive Therapeutics Advances Anaphylm Towards Q3 2026 NDA Resubmission
Aquestive Therapeutics announced its Q2 2026 financial results and provided a strategic business update, highlighting significant progress for its lead product candidate, Anaphylm (dibutepinephrine) sublingual film. The company successfully completed human factors validation and pharmacokinetic studies, addressing deficiencies from the FDA's Complete Response Letter. Aquestive remains on track to resubmit the Anaphylm New Drug Application (NDA) in Q3 2026 and plans ex-U.S. filings starting Q4 2026. Total revenues increased by 38% to $13.8 million in Q2 2026, though the company reported a net loss of $22.9 million.
- Aquestive Therapeutics successfully completed the human factors validation study and a pharmacokinetic (PK) study for Anaphylm (dibutepinephrine) sublingual film. These studies were required to address deficiencies identified in the FDA's Complete Response Letter (CRL) dated January 30, 2026. The company reaffirms its guidance to resubmit the Anaphylm New Drug Application (NDA) in the third quarter of 2026, with preliminary PK study data meeting primary endpoints and no serious adverse events observed.
- Aquestive is actively advancing its global regulatory strategy for Anaphylm, with plans to submit regulatory applications in Canada by the end of 2026 and in the European Union in the first quarter of 2027. The company also expects to support regulatory submissions in additional markets, including the United Kingdom, in 2027. Concurrently, Aquestive is progressing commercial readiness activities, including medical affairs engagement and refining market access strategies, in anticipation of a potential Anaphylm launch.
- For the second quarter of 2026, Aquestive reported a 38% increase in total revenues to $13.8 million, up from $10.0 million in Q2 2025, primarily driven by increases in manufacture and supply revenue. The company's net loss for the quarter was $22.9 million, or $0.18 per share, compared to a net loss of $13.5 million in Q2 2025. Non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA loss improved to $5.2 million in Q2 2026 from $9.3 million in Q2 2025, with cash and cash equivalents at $98.5 million as of June 30, 2026.
Anaphylm's Potential to Transform Anaphylaxis Treatment
Current treatment approaches for Type I allergic reactions and anaphylaxis are hampered by a constellation of practical, pharmacological, and compliance-related limitations. Across the major therapeutic modalities — from emergency intervention to long-term immunotherapy — each approach carries distinct drawbacks that compromise both patient safety and treatment efficacy.
Adrenaline auto-injector (AAI) underutilization and device limitations: Despite being the cornerstone of acute anaphylaxis management, AAIs are frequently not carried by patients and are often administered incorrectly — even by trained healthcare professionals and caregivers. Device-specific constraints include variable needle lengths that may be insufficient in obese patients or excessive in others, with injection depth and drug pharmacokinetics further confounded by BMI, soft tissue compression, and propulsion mechanics. Compounding this, there is a notable absence of validated assessment criteria and standardized regulatory requirements for next-generation devices.
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) tolerability and long-term sustainability concerns: OIT is associated with high rates of allergic adverse reactions during treatment and significant patient non-compliance, contributing to a substantial overall treatment burden. While earlier intervention may improve outcomes, it introduces its own set of clinical challenges. When omalizumab is used as an adjunct to OIT, the long-term durability of tolerance following omalizumab discontinuation remains uncertain.
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) — efficacy, safety, and adherence deficits: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is limited by well-documented disadvantages spanning efficiency, safety profile, treatment duration, and patient compliance. Local and systemic allergic reactions occur commonly, and although anaphylaxis is reported rarely, it remains a clinically significant risk.
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) — local and systemic adverse event burden: SLIT is associated with a high incidence of local side effects, affecting approximately 40.83% of patients. While systemic adverse events are less frequent — occurring in approximately 1.09% of patients — anaphylaxis has been reported in 0.13% of the SLIT population, representing a non-negligible safety consideration even with this less invasive route of administration.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Janz TA, Jimoh RO et al.. Exploring Side Effects of Sublingual Immunotherapy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ear, nose, & throat journal. 2024 Jun 5. 38840522
- [2] Pouessel G, Neukirch C. Alternatives to Injectable Adrenaline for Treating Anaphylaxis. Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2025 Jan. 39581195
- [3] Frew AJ. What are the 'ideal' features of an adrenaline (epinephrine) auto-injector in the treatment of anaphylaxis?. Allergy. 2011 Jan. 20716315
- [4] Song TT, Lieberman P. Epinephrine auto-injector needle length: what is the ideal length?. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology. 2016 Aug. 27271769
- [5] Buono EV, Giannì G et al.. Omalizumab and Oral Immunotherapy in IgE-Mediated Food Allergy in Children: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2025 Mar 20. 40143213
- [6] Bayar Muluk N, Cingi C. Biologics in allergic rhinitis. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2023 Oct. 37869947
- [7] Li S, Toriumi H et al.. Safe and efficient oral allergy immunotherapy using one-pot-prepared mannan-coated allergen nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2023 Dec. 37935073
- [8] Brough HA, Kim EH et al.. Treatment of Food Allergy: Immunotherapy, Omalizumab, or Both. The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. 2025 Apr. 39701277
- [9] Rice JL, Diette GB et al.. Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Pediatric Asthma: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics. 2018 May. 29572287
Contact Us
Address
One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850
For General Inquiry
info@pienomial.com















