Sardocor Cardiac Gene Therapy: First-Mover Positioning in Asia-Pacific, Zero Clinical Data to Validate It
Mergers and Acquisitions

Sardocor Cardiac Gene Therapy: First-Mover Positioning in Asia-Pacific, Zero Clinical Data to Validate It

Published : 23 Sept 2026

At a Glance
IndicationHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)
CompanyMedera Inc.
CategoryCorporate & Strategic
Sub CategoryCollaboration / Partnership
Therapeutic AreaCardiovascular
Partner CompanyNational Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS)
LocationSingapore, Boston, MA
Support FrameworkSingapore’s Research, Innovation and Enterprise 2025 (RIE2025)
SubsidiaryNovoheart, Sardocor
Technology PlatformHuman mini-heart cardiac disease modeling, Human-based cardiac tissue engineering, AAV-based gene therapy
Collaboration PartnerIQVIA
CEORonald Li, PhD
Announcement DateSeptember 22, 2026
Regional HubAsia-Pacific

Medera Expands Singapore Presence, Advances Cardiac Gene Therapies

Medera Inc. announced an expanded partnership with the National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS), supported by Singapore’s Research, Innovation and Enterprise 2025 (RIE2025) framework. This collaboration aims to advance human mini-heart-based cardiac disease modeling, translational research, and non-animal drug discovery. Concurrently, Medera is establishing a Singapore laboratory and office to serve as an Asia-Pacific hub for its cardiac technology platform. The company is also progressing its cardiac gene therapy programs through its Sardocor subsidiary, including a randomized clinical trial for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) currently underway in Singapore, believed to be the first of its kind in the region.

  • Medera's expanded partnership with the National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS), through its Novoheart subsidiary, focuses on developing and validating human-relevant cardiac disease models. These models are intended for drug discovery, cardiotoxicity assessment, therapeutic efficacy testing, and translational cardiovascular research, supported by Singapore’s RIE2025 framework.
  • The establishment of a new laboratory and office in Singapore positions the city-state as a crucial Asia-Pacific hub for Medera's cardiac technology platform, translational research partnerships, and regional business development. This strategic expansion complements Medera's broader international footprint and its collaboration with IQVIA for global deployment of Novoheart’s human cardiac technology platforms.
  • Medera is advancing its cardiac gene therapy programs via its therapeutic subsidiary, Sardocor, targeting heart failure. This includes a randomized clinical trial for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) currently underway in Singapore, marking what is believed to be the first cardiac gene therapy clinical trial in the country. Medera also plans to expand its heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) program into its regional clinical development strategy.

Medera's Singapore Hub to Advance HFrEF Drug Discovery

Despite significant advances in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), the management of HFrEF continues to face substantial real-world implementation gaps and clinical barriers that limit optimal patient outcomes.

  • Underuse of GDMT in clinical practice: Early and rapid initiation of the 4 pillars of GDMT has been shown to significantly improve morbidity and mortality in HFrEF, yet GDMT remains significantly underused. Contributing factors include the lack of simplified, patient-profile-tailored treatment protocols, concerns regarding safety or tolerability of medications, and therapeutic inertia.

  • Difficulty achieving target doses: Even in structured clinical settings, reaching goal doses across all GDMT classes is uncommon. In the COAPT trial, among patients with LVEF ≤40% who underwent systematic HF specialist-directed GDMT optimization, goal doses were achieved for beta-blockers in only 32.3% and for ACEIs/ARBs/ARNIs in only 10.2% of patients, with only 2.2% tolerating goal doses across all 3 GDMT classes. Hypotension and kidney dysfunction were the most common intolerances limiting titration.

  • Logistical barriers to titration: Implementing swift initiation and titration of GDMT in practice remains a significant challenge for healthcare systems. Conventional approaches require frequent in-clinic assessment visits, contributing to delays in reaching optimal medical therapy (OMT).

  • Uncertainty around ICD use in the contemporary GDMT era: The landmark studies underpinning current ICD recommendations for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in HFrEF preceded the 4 pillars of GDMT, prompting questions about the continued role of ICDs in current clinical practice given the impact of contemporary GDMT on outcomes.

  • Unmet needs in advanced and end-stage HFrEF: As HF progresses, patients experience high symptom burden, recurrent hospitalizations, and poor quality of life. An increasing proportion of patients progresses to advanced stages and are ineligible for heart transplantation or mechanical circulatory support due to age, comorbidities, frailty, or limited social support, leaving significant unmet needs in this population.

Key Trial Designs and Endpoints in HFrEF Gene Therapy

Several landmark trials have shaped the evidence base for HFrEF pharmacotherapy, spanning diverse study designs, patient populations, and endpoint frameworks. The trials below reflect a range of interventions — from soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators and SGLT2 inhibitors to potassium binders and cardiac resynchronization — each evaluated against clinically meaningful composite and individual endpoints.

Trial Intervention Study Design Key Population Primary Endpoint Key Secondary / Exploratory Endpoints
VICTORIA Vericiguat vs. placebo Randomized controlled trial HFrEF patients with recent worsening HF (decompensation) Cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization Basis for FDA/EC approval; real-world eligibility assessed in KorAHF and Alberta cohorts
VICTOR Vericiguat vs. placebo Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled Ambulatory, compensated HFrEF patients with no HHF within 6 months or outpatient IV diuretic use within 3 months; on contemporary guideline therapy (n=6,105 randomized) Composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF (HHF) Overall worsening HF (inpatient + outpatient); composite of all-cause death and overall worsening HF; outpatient oral diuretic initiation or intensification
DAPA-HF Dapagliflozin vs. placebo Randomized controlled trial NYHA class II–IV HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%) with elevated NT-proBNP (n=4,744; 1,096 from Asia) Composite of worsening HF (HF hospitalization or urgent HF visit requiring IV therapy) or cardiovascular death Regional subgroup analysis (Asia vs. elsewhere); study drug discontinuation; prespecified adverse events
PARADIGM-HF (post-hoc analysis) Cystatin C vs. creatinine-based eGFR assessment Post-hoc analysis of randomized trial data 1,970 HFrEF patients with available baseline cystatin C and serum creatinine measurements PARADIGM-HF primary endpoint: composite of CV mortality or HF hospitalization CV mortality; all-cause mortality; worsening kidney function; poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL); frailty; worsening HF at 8-month follow-up
REALIZE-K Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) vs. placebo Prospective, double-blind, randomized-withdrawal trial HFrEF (NYHA class II–IV; LVEF ≤40%) with prevalent or incident MRA-induced hyperkalemia on optimal guideline-directed therapy except MRA (n=203 randomized) Optimal treatment response: normokalemia (K⁺ 3.5–5.0 mEq/L) on spironolactone ≥25 mg/day without rescue therapy for hyperkalemia at months 1–6 Normokalemia on randomization dose of spironolactone without rescue therapy; proportion receiving spironolactone ≥25 mg/day; time to hyperkalemia; time to spironolactone decrease/discontinuation; KCCQ-CSS at 6 months; exploratory composite of CV death or worsening HF
CRT Morphology Study CRT device implantation stratified by QRS morphology (LBBB vs. RBBB vs. IVCD) Retrospective analysis of 542 consecutive patients (335 met inclusion criteria) Systolic HF patients undergoing new CRT implantation; excluded narrow QRS or paced ventricular rhythm Long-term survival Changes in EF, LV end-diastolic and systolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, NYHA functional class

The HFrEF treatment landscape has been substantially reshaped by the emergence of SGLT2 inhibitors as a foundational pillar of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). The DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials established that dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, added to standard HF therapy, deliver clear clinical benefit in reducing the primary endpoint of CV mortality or HF hospitalization in HFrEF patients with or without type 2 diabetes — with HF hospitalization reductions of HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.59–0.83; ARR 3.7%) and HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.59–0.81; ARR 5.1%), respectively. A network meta-analysis comparing sacubitril/valsartan, vericiguat, and SGLT2 inhibitors across PARADIGM-HF, VICTORIA, DAPA-HF, EMPEROR-Reduced, and DECLARE-TIMI 58 ranked SGLT2 inhibitors as the most effective therapy overall, followed by sacubitril/valsartan and vericiguat, though the difference in risk of CV death or HF hospitalization between SGLT2 inhibitors and sacubitril/valsartan did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.81–1.05). Evidence has also extended to HFpEF (EF >40%) through the EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER trials, and to hospitalized acute HF patients through EMPULSE and DICTATE-AHF, broadening the therapeutic reach of this drug class considerably.

Alongside the consolidation of SGLT2 inhibitors, the field has moved toward earlier, more aggressive implementation of all four GDMT pillars — an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), a beta-blocker, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and an SGLT2 inhibitor. The STRONG-HF trial validated rapid up-titration strategies, demonstrating that early high-intensity GDMT implementation with structured follow-up significantly reduces 180-day mortality and readmissions. Evidence-based rapid sequencing proposals advocate initiating all four foundational treatments within 2–4 weeks, prioritising low starting doses across all classes over up-titration to target doses, given that the efficacy of each foundational therapy is independent of treatment with the other drugs. Despite this evidence base, real-world adoption remains uneven; Indian registry data, for instance, indicate that just one quarter of patients leave hospital with complete GDMT, and fewer than 5% receive ARNIs.

Novel mechanisms of action have also entered the HFrEF landscape. Omecamtiv mecarbil, a selective cardiac myosin activator, was evaluated in the GALACTIC-HF trial — a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven outcomes trial enrolling more than 8,000 patients with LVEF ≤35%. The trial demonstrated a treatment effect for the primary endpoint of CV death or first HF event (HR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.86–0.99]; P = 0.03), with the benefit consistent across age groups and particularly pronounced in patients with severe HF (LVEF ≤30%, NYHA class III/IV, HF hospitalisation within 6 months), where omecamtiv mecarbil significantly reduced the primary outcome in both patients <65 years (HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.64–0.92]) and those ≥65 years (HR: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.71–0.97]). Subsidiary analyses from GALACTIC-HF have further characterised prognostic factors in contemporary HFrEF populations, including the finding that hypermagnesaemia — present in 10.7% of outpatients — was associated with a higher incidence rate of the primary composite outcome (34.9 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 31.2–39.0) compared to normal magnesium concentrations, while abnormal magnesium levels were not associated with a higher risk of sudden death or ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Medera's Dual Strategy: Advancing Cardiac Models and Gene Therapy

Medera Inc.'s latest announcement signals a bold, dual-pronged strategy to tackle cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of global mortality. By expanding its partnership with the National Heart Centre Singapore and establishing an Asia-Pacific hub, Medera is making a significant investment in human-centric preclinical research. This move leverages cutting-edge advancements in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiac models, including engineered heart tissues (EHTs) and cardiac organ chips. These sophisticated platforms are designed to more accurately simulate human cardiac physiology and pathology, addressing a critical gap where traditional animal models often fall short in predicting drug efficacy and cardiotoxicity.

This focus on advanced in vitro models holds the promise of accelerating drug discovery, reducing the reliance on animal testing, and ultimately bringing more effective and safer therapies to patients faster. Studies indicate that these models can faithfully replicate physiological and pharmacological responses, offering a more predictive tool for screening compounds and modeling diseases like dilated cardiomyopathy. However, the full translational impact of these advanced models, from preclinical success to clinical approval, remains an area requiring ongoing validation.

Concurrently, Medera is pushing forward with its cardiac gene therapy programs for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), a condition with persistent high hospitalization rates and mortality. While gene transfer for HFrEF has faced significant hurdles, with large trials like CUPID 2 failing to meet primary endpoints despite safety, Medera's commitment to a randomized clinical trial in Singapore highlights a determination to innovate in this challenging space. This high-risk, high-reward endeavor aims to unlock a potentially transformative treatment. Yet, the path is fraught with known challenges, including the need to demonstrate clear clinical efficacy, ensure long-term durability of gene expression, manage potential immunogenicity, and mitigate risks of liver toxicity, as seen in other gene therapy applications. Successfully navigating these scientific and clinical complexities will be crucial for Medera to realize its ambitious vision in cardiovascular medicine.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long can you live with 45 percent heart function?
A left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 45% indicates mildly reduced heart function, often categorized as heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or borderline normal. Life expectancy is highly variable and cannot be precisely quantified solely based on this percentage, as it depends significantly on the underlying etiology, presence of comorbidities, effectiveness of medical management, and patient-specific factors. With appropriate treatment and lifestyle modifications, many individuals can maintain a good quality of life for many years.
Can you improve ejection fraction with exercise?
Regular exercise training, particularly structured cardiac rehabilitation, can lead to modest but significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Beyond direct EF changes, exercise consistently enhances functional capacity, quality of life, and reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by improving cardiac remodeling, endothelial function, and autonomic balance. These benefits underscore exercise as a crucial non-pharmacological intervention in heart failure management.
What is the best treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
The best treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) involves a foundational quadruple therapy. This includes an Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) or ACE inhibitor/ARB, a beta-blocker, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i). These agents, initiated and titrated as tolerated, are proven to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in HFrEF patients.
Does heart failure go away?
Heart failure is a chronic, progressive condition that generally does not resolve spontaneously. While symptoms can be effectively managed with pharmacotherapy, lifestyle modifications, and device therapies, the underlying structural or functional cardiac impairment typically persists. True remission is rare and usually associated with specific, reversible etiologies, but for most patients, it requires lifelong management.
How long can you live with 20 percent heart function?
Life expectancy with 20% ejection fraction is highly variable and depends on numerous factors, including the underlying etiology of heart failure, patient age, comorbidities, and response to guideline-directed medical therapy. While it indicates severe cardiac dysfunction, prognosis can range from months to several years, particularly with optimal medical management and potential advanced therapies like cardiac resynchronization therapy, left ventricular assist devices, or transplantation.
What are the diagnostic criteria for HFrEF?
HFrEF is diagnosed by the presence of typical heart failure symptoms and/or signs, coupled with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The defining LVEF threshold is generally ≤40%, often accompanied by objective evidence of structural or functional cardiac abnormalities, such as elevated natriuretic peptides or imaging findings.
Can heart failure with preserved ejection fraction be reversed?
Complete reversal of the underlying pathophysiology in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is generally not achievable. However, significant clinical improvement, symptom remission, and improved quality of life are possible through aggressive management of comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, obesity) and guideline-directed medical therapies, notably SGLT2 inhibitors. These interventions can substantially mitigate disease progression and reduce hospitalizations, though they do not fully restore cardiac function to a pre-disease state.
Is an ejection fraction of 15% considered normal?
An ejection fraction of 15% is not considered normal. A healthy left ventricular ejection fraction typically ranges from 50% to 70%. An EF of 15% indicates severe systolic dysfunction, often associated with advanced heart failure and significantly impaired cardiac output.

References

  1. [1] Pulatov O, Kim SY et al.. In-hospital SGLT2 inhibitor initiation, prescribing gaps, and 30-day all-cause readmission in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a US post-guideline cohort study. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2026 Jun 30. 42374214
  2. [2] Ponde CK, Mohan JC et al.. An Indian Expert Consensus on Patient-Profile-Based Implementation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in the Management of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: APPROACH-HF. Journal of cardiac failure. 2025 Dec. 40681141
  3. [3] Yehya A, Batista JL et al.. Revisiting ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. JACC. Heart failure. 2025 Jan. 39641686
  4. [4] Laflamme É, Vachon A et al.. Usefulness of a titration algorithm for de novo users of sacubitril/valsartan in a tertiary centre heart failure clinic. Cardiovascular journal of Africa. 2018 Nov/Dec 23. 30152839
  5. [5] Rickard J, Kumbhani DJ et al.. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-left bundle branch block morphologies. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. 2010 May. 20025703
  6. [6] Panjaitan FH, Hasanah DY et al.. Ambulatory Care Management in Low Blood Pressure Patient with HFrEF. The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc. 2025 Sep. 40771294
  7. [7] Zannad F, Reddy YNV et al.. Effect of Vericiguat on Total Heart Failure Events in Compensated Outpatients With HFrEF: Insights From VICTOR. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2025 Dec 16. 40892609
  8. [8] Oh J, Lee CJ et al.. Real-world eligibility for vericiguat in decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. ESC heart failure. 2022 Apr. 35142095
  9. [9] Aimo A, Pateras K et al.. Relative Efficacy of Sacubitril-Valsartan, Vericiguat, and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Cardiovascular drugs and therapy. 2021 Oct. 33074526
  10. [10] Teerlink JR, Diaz R et al.. Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Rationale and Design of GALACTIC-HF. JACC. Heart failure. 2020 Apr. 32035892
  11. [11] Casado J, Montero M et al.. Clinical characteristics and prognostic influence of renal dysfunction in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction. European journal of internal medicine. 2013 Oct. 23830876
  12. [12] Lemond L, Allen LA. Palliative care and hospice in advanced heart failure. Progress in cardiovascular diseases. 2011 Sep-Oct. 21875515
  13. [13] Lu H, Claggett BL et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction According to Age: The GALACTIC-HF Trial. JACC. Heart failure. 2026 Feb. 41123512
  14. [14] Çavuşoğlu Y, Altay H et al.. [Current Use of Sodium Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure Therapy]. Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir. 2024 Sep. 39225638
  15. [15] Dasgupta I, Bagnis CI et al.. Anaemia and quality of life in chronic kidney disease: a consensus document from the European Anaemia of CKD Alliance. Clinical kidney journal. 2024 Aug. 39135937
  16. [16] Sepehrvand N, Islam S et al.. Epidemiology of Worsening Heart Failure in a Population-based Cohort from Alberta, Canada: Evaluating Eligibility for Treatment With Vericiguat. Journal of cardiac failure. 2022 Aug. 35589087
  17. [17] Kosiborod MN, Cherney DZI et al.. Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate for Management of Hyperkalemia During Spironolactone Optimization in Patients With Heart Failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2025 Mar 18. 39566872
  18. [18] Louca A, Thomas D et al.. Telemonitored standardized titration for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, an open clinical cohort study. European heart journal. Digital health. 2025 Sep. 40984989
  19. [19] Docherty KF, Anand IS et al.. Effects of Dapagliflozin in Asian Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction in DAPA-HF. JACC. Asia. 2022 Apr. 36339117
  20. [20] Beldhuis IE, Lam CSP et al.. Evidence-Based Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Chronic Kidney Disease. Circulation. 2022 Mar. 35226558

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts