ABS-011 HER2 PET Tracer: Phase 2b Feasibility Data Cannot Close a Clinical Utility Chasm
Mergers and Acquisitions

ABS-011 HER2 PET Tracer: Phase 2b Feasibility Data Cannot Close a Clinical Utility Chasm

Published : 11 Aug 2026

At a Glance
IndicationBreast cancer
DrugABS-011
Mechanism of ActionHER2 targeting
CompanyCurium
Trial PhasePhase 2b
Trial AcronymHERMIA
NCT IDNCT 06369831
CategoryCorporate & Strategic
Sub CategoryAcquisition Completed
Therapeutic AreaOncology
Acquired CompanyAbscint SA
Deal TypeAcquisition
Target BiomarkerHER2
Radiotracer IsotopeGallium-68
Imaging ModalityPET imaging
Acquisition DateAugust 10, 2026
Trial LocationBelgium
Acquiring Company CEOChait Tatineni
Acquired Company CEOKarine Clauwaert
Curium Global Footprint70+ countries

Curium Acquires Abscint, Expands Oncology PET Radiodiagnostic Pipeline

Curium, a global radiopharmaceutical company, has completed the acquisition of Abscint SA, a Belgian clinical-stage radiopharmaceutical company. This transaction grants Curium global rights to ABS-011, an investigational gallium-68-labeled PET radiodiagnostic tracer designed to target human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The acquisition strengthens Curium's oncology footprint, particularly in breast and gastric cancers, by enabling whole-body, quantitative imaging of HER2 expression. ABS-011 is currently being evaluated in the multicentered Phase 2b HERMIA trial (NCT 06369831) in Belgium, aiming to provide a more complete view of HER2 status for informed patient characterization and clinical assessment.

  • Curium's acquisition of Abscint SA secures global rights to ABS-011, a gallium-68-labeled PET radiodiagnostic tracer. This strategic move enhances Curium's oncology portfolio, specifically targeting HER2 expression in cancers like breast and gastric, and leverages Abscint's expertise in radiolabeled single-domain antibodies for advanced diagnostic imaging.
  • ABS-011 is designed to bind HER2 rapidly, allowing for same-day, whole-body PET imaging. This approach aims to reveal spatial heterogeneity of HER2 expression across multiple lesions, potentially improving patient characterization and guiding more informative biopsy selections compared to single-lesion biopsies.
  • ABS-011 is currently undergoing evaluation in the multicentered Phase 2b HERMIA trial in Belgium (NCT 06369831). Curium plans to apply its extensive experience in radiopharmaceutical development, manufacturing, and commercialization to accelerate the program towards regulatory approval and broader patient access.

The Evolving Landscape of HER2 Diagnostics in Breast Cancer

In clinical practice, the identification and characterization of breast cancer relies on a core panel of immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers assessed in all invasive breast carcinomas. Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status are evaluated across both invasive carcinomas and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), while HER2 receptor expression is determined through a dual-modality approach combining IHC and in situ hybridization (ISH). Together, these markers remain foundational in determining the need for and type of adjuvant therapy, forming the cornerstone of treatment stratification across breast cancer subtypes.

Molecular classification is further refined through a surrogate IHC panel that includes EGFR, CK5/6, Ki-67 (as a proliferation index), p53 mutation status, and androgen receptor (AR) expression. This panel enables classification into established molecular subtypes: Luminal A (strong ER-positive, PR-positive or -negative), Luminal B (weak to moderate ER-positive and/or PR-positive), HER2-enriched (moderate to strong HER2 positivity confirmed by silver-enhanced in situ hybridization), Basal (CK5/6- or EGFR-positive), and a penta-negative unclassified group. Each subtype carries distinct prognostic and therapeutic implications, underscoring the clinical utility of comprehensive biomarker profiling.

Imaging-based diagnostic criteria serve as a critical complement to tissue biomarkers. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) applies morphologic and kinetic analyses within the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) framework, while diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping provides quantitative differentiation between malignant and benign lesions — invasive ductal carcinoma yields a mean ADC of 0.92 ± 0.19 × 10 mm²/s, DCIS 1.11 ± 0.13 × 10 mm²/s, compared to 1.36 ± 0.22 × 10 mm²/s for benign lesions. Additionally, microcalcifications remain the most prevalent radiological feature driving DCIS detection through screening mammography, highlighting the indispensable role of multimodal imaging in early breast cancer identification.

Curium's HER2 Imaging Play: Reshaping Precision Oncology

Curium's strategic acquisition of Abscint SA and its lead asset, ABS-011, signals a significant commitment to advancing precision oncology through innovative radiopharmaceutical diagnostics. This move is particularly timely given the evolving understanding of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in various cancers, notably breast and gastric. While HER2 status has long been a cornerstone for guiding targeted therapies, the limitations of current assessment methods are becoming increasingly apparent.

Traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) often struggle with the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of HER2 expression, meaning a single biopsy may not reflect the full disease burden or changes over time. This challenge is compounded by the emergence of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, where identifying suitable candidates for novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) is a critical clinical need. ABS-011, an investigational gallium-68-labeled PET radiodiagnostic tracer, offers a potential solution by enabling non-invasive, whole-body, quantitative imaging of HER2 expression. Preclinical and early clinical studies of similar nanobody-based HER2 tracers have demonstrated high specificity, fast blood clearance, favorable biodistribution, and low toxicity, making them ideal candidates for PET imaging.

For Curium, this acquisition strengthens its oncology footprint and positions it to potentially offer a critical tool for patient characterization and treatment selection. The ability to accurately assess HER2 status across all lesions could lead to more informed clinical decisions, potentially optimizing the use of HER2-targeted therapies and improving patient outcomes. However, the path forward is not without its considerations. ABS-011 is currently in a Phase 2b trial, and its ultimate clinical utility in predicting therapeutic response or guiding treatment decisions remains to be fully established. Furthermore, the competitive landscape for HER2 PET tracers is growing, with other gallium-68 and fluorine-18 labeled agents in development. Navigating regulatory approval and securing favorable reimbursement for a novel diagnostic imaging agent will also be crucial for its successful integration into clinical practice. Despite these challenges, the potential for ABS-011 to transform how HER2-expressing cancers are diagnosed and managed is substantial, offering a glimpse into a future where imaging plays an even more central role in personalized medicine.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a breast cancer stage 11b mean?
There is no recognized breast cancer stage designated as "11b" within the TNM staging system. Breast cancer is typically classified using Roman numerals I, II, III, and IV, with further subdivisions such as IIA or IIB, based on tumor size, nodal involvement, and metastasis.
What is abs breast cancer?
"Abs breast cancer" is not a recognized medical term or classification for a specific type of breast cancer within oncology. Breast cancers are typically categorized by their histological features, receptor status (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2), and stage. This term does not correspond to any established diagnostic or prognostic category.
What does it mean to have IDC stage 1A?
IDC stage 1A refers to invasive ductal carcinoma, the most common type of breast cancer, diagnosed at an early, localized stage. Specifically, stage 1A indicates a tumor that is 2 centimeters or smaller, with no spread to regional lymph nodes or distant sites. This classification signifies a highly localized cancer with a generally favorable prognosis.
What are the possible causes of back pain after breast cancer treatment?
Back pain after breast cancer treatment warrants investigation for potential bone metastases, a critical consideration for recurrence or progression. It can also arise from treatment-related side effects, including arthralgia and myalgia associated with aromatase inhibitors or chemotherapy, and localized tissue changes from radiation therapy. Furthermore, musculoskeletal issues, deconditioning, or osteoporosis with vertebral compression fractures, often exacerbated by treatment, are common non-metastatic causes.
How curable is breast cancer?
Breast cancer is highly curable, especially when detected at early stages. Curability rates are significantly influenced by the tumor's stage at diagnosis, its molecular subtype (e.g., HR+, HER2+, TNBC), and the patient's individual characteristics. Advances in multimodal therapies, including surgery, radiation, systemic chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy, have substantially improved long-term survival and disease-free outcomes across the spectrum of presentations.
Can breast cancer survivors live a long life?
Breast cancer survivors can achieve long lifespans, largely due to significant advancements in early detection, personalized treatment modalities, and comprehensive post-treatment care. Survival rates have substantially improved across all stages, with many patients experiencing disease-free survival for decades. Prognosis is influenced by factors such as cancer subtype, stage at diagnosis, treatment efficacy, and ongoing surveillance for recurrence or secondary cancers.
What happens after getting diagnosed with breast cancer?
Following a breast cancer diagnosis, comprehensive staging is initiated to determine tumor size, lymph node involvement, and potential distant metastasis, often involving imaging and molecular profiling for hormone receptor and HER2 status. A multidisciplinary team then develops an individualized treatment plan, considering these factors alongside patient health and preferences. This plan typically integrates surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, hormone therapy, or targeted therapies.
What is the most common treatment for breast cancer?
The most common treatment for breast cancer is a multi-modal approach, typically initiated with surgery (lumpectomy or mastectomy). This is frequently followed by adjuvant therapies, which may include radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy (for hormone receptor-positive cancers), and targeted therapy. The specific combination and sequence of treatments are highly individualized, determined by the cancer's stage, molecular subtype, and patient-specific factors.

References

  1. [1] Zhang B, Zhang Z et al.. Raman microspectroscopy based TNM staging and grading of breast cancer. Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy. 2023 Jan 15. 36201869
  2. [2] Calhoun BC, Collins LC. Predictive markers in breast cancer: An update on ER and HER2 testing and reporting. Seminars in diagnostic pathology. 2015 Sep. 25770732
  3. [3] Nicosia L, Mariano L et al.. Microcalcifications matter: Diagnostic and biological differences in DCIS. Cancer treatment and research communications. 2026. 41719781
  4. [4] Venetis K, Pescia C et al.. The Evolving Role of Genomic Testing in Early Breast Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy. International journal of molecular sciences. 2024 May 24. 38891906
  5. [5] Subik K, Lee JF et al.. The Expression Patterns of ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, EGFR, Ki-67 and AR by Immunohistochemical Analysis in Breast Cancer Cell Lines. Breast cancer : basic and clinical research. 2010 May 20. 20697531
  6. [6] Kim KW, Kuzmiak CM et al.. Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade. Academic radiology. 2018 May. 29339079
  7. [7] Al Tamimi DM, Shawarby MA et al.. Protein expression profile and prevalence pattern of the molecular classes of breast cancer--a Saudi population based study. BMC cancer. 2010 May 21. 20492711
  8. [8] Schildgen V, Warm M et al.. Oncotype DX Breast Cancer recurrence score resists inter-assay reproducibility with RT(2)-Profiler Multiplex RT-PCR. Scientific reports. 2019 Dec 30. 31889145
  9. [9] Puppe J, Seifert T et al.. Genomic Signatures in Luminal Breast Cancer. Breast care (Basel, Switzerland). 2020 Aug. 32982645

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts