| Indication | Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia |
| Drug | Botreso (API-1) |
| Company | Jyong Biotech Ltd. |
| Trial Phase | Phase III |
| Category | Corporate & Strategic |
| Sub Category | Licensing Agreement |
| Therapeutic Area | Nephrology & Urology |
| Global BPH Patient Population (2021) | 112.5 million |
| Projected BPH Patient Population (2035) | 150 million to 156 million |
| Global BPH Market Size (2025) | $13 billion |
| Projected Global BPH Market Size (2035) | $22 billion to $22.6 billion |
| Existing Treatment Discontinuation Rate | 60% to 90% |
| Number of Phase III Trials | Four |
| Regulatory Agency | U.S. FDA |
| Company Location | Taiwan |
| Current BPH Treatments | alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) |
| Conference Attended | BIO 2026 International Convention |
Jyong Biotech Reaffirms Global Licensing Focus for BPH Botanical Drug
Jyong Biotech Ltd. is reaffirming its strategic focus on global licensing partnerships to address the growing medical needs in the urology sector, particularly for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). The company, the first Taiwanese firm to advance an oral botanical new drug to U.S. FDA Phase III clinical trials, is actively engaging with international pharmaceutical companies. This strategy is driven by the increasing global BPH patient population, projected to reach 150-156 million by 2035, and a market size estimated to grow from $13 billion in 2025 to $22-22.6 billion by 2035. Jyong Biotech aims to provide safer, long-term treatment options for BPH, addressing the high discontinuation rates of existing therapies.
- Jyong Biotech is actively pursuing global licensing partnerships to expand its cooperation network and address unmet medical needs in urology, leveraging its differentiated botanical drug platform. This strategy builds on its recent participation at BIO 2026 and existing collaborations, aiming to introduce its innovative plant-derived therapeutics to the global market.
- The press release highlights the substantial and growing market for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) treatment. The global BPH patient population is projected to increase from 112.5 million in 2021 to 150-156 million by 2035, with the market size expected to grow from approximately $13 billion in 2025 to $22-22.6 billion by 2035, driven by global population aging.
- Jyong Biotech is developing Botreso® (API-1), an oral botanical new drug candidate, which has undergone four Phase III clinical trials in Taiwan and the US. This drug aims to overcome the severe side effects and high discontinuation rates (60-90%) associated with current BPH treatments like alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, offering a safer, long-term alternative.
Why Current BPH Treatments Fall Short for Patients
While the benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment landscape offers a spectrum of options from pharmacotherapy to major surgery, significant challenges persist for both clinicians and patients. Current approaches often involve a trade-off between efficacy, safety, and durability, highlighting an ongoing need for more definitive and less burdensome solutions.
Limited Efficacy and Tolerability of Medical Therapy: Pharmacological agents, including 5α-reductase inhibitors and alpha-blockers, provide only moderate symptom relief, with mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improvements of 3-10 points. Their utility is constrained by adverse effects—such as finasteride-induced testicular apoptosis and other impacts on quality of life—which can limit long-term adherence and fail to halt disease progression in all patients.
Morbidity of Gold-Standard Surgery: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the surgical reference standard for efficacy, providing superior and more durable symptom relief than other modalities. However, this effectiveness comes with notable morbidity, including risks of retrograde ejaculation, erectile dysfunction, and incontinence, making it a less attractive option for patients prioritizing the preservation of sexual and urinary function.
Durability and Data Gaps in Minimally Invasive Techniques: Newer minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) like prostatic urethral lift and water vapor therapy offer a superior safety profile with significantly lower rates of sexual dysfunction. This advantage is counterbalanced by a higher need for surgical retreatment (up to 21% for some procedures) compared to TURP and a lack of long-term, prospective clinical trial data to fully appraise their long-term efficacy and cost-efficiency.
Failure to Address Underlying Pathophysiology: Current treatments primarily manage symptoms without addressing the fundamental cellular mechanisms driving the disease. The clonal proliferation of prostate stem cells is considered a key reason for prostate regrowth following therapy, leading to treatment failure and the eventual need for additional interventions.
Unpredictable Disease Progression: The natural course of BPH is characterized by a waxing and waning of lower urinary tract symptoms. This makes it difficult for clinicians to predict an individual patient's likelihood of progressing to future complications, such as acute urinary retention, which complicates decisions around the optimal timing and selection of interventions.
Positioning Botreso Against Current BPH Standard of Care
Recent studies offer direct comparisons between established standard-of-care treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and emerging investigational therapies. While pharmacotherapy and traditional surgery remain foundational, minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) and other novel approaches are being evaluated for their relative efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. The data highlight a shifting landscape where newer modalities demonstrate competitive, and in some cases superior, results against current standards.
| Therapy | Comparison Group | Key Efficacy Outcomes | Key Safety & Tolerability Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transurethral Water Balloon Dilation | Combination Pharmacotherapy (α-blockers + 5-ARIs) | Superior at 6 months: • IPSS: 8.32 vs. 14.22 • Qmax: 20.59 mL/s vs. 14.54 mL/s • PVR: 29.58 mL vs. 45.92 mL |
• Lower unadjusted adverse event rate (6.7% vs. 20.0%) • Higher standardized short-term procedural event rate • Higher compliance (95% vs. 68.3%) and patient satisfaction |
| Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (WVTT) | Baseline / TURP (Implied) | • 48% IPSS reduction at 5 years • Recommended for medium-sized glands |
• No new sexual dysfunction reported • Outpatient procedure, can be performed under local anesthesia |
| Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) | Baseline / TURP (Implied) | • 35% IPSS improvement at 5 years • Recommended for medium-sized glands |
• No new sexual dysfunction reported • Outpatient procedure, can be performed under local anesthesia |
| Aquablation | Baseline / TURP | Durable efficacy at 2 years (prostates 80-150 cc): • IPSS improved from 23.2 to 5.8 • Qmax increased from 8.7 to 18.2 cc/sec |
• Lower rate of retrograde ejaculation than TURP • Low retreatment rate (2/101 subjects in 2 years) • Acceptable safety profile |
| Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) | Baseline / TURP | • >44% prostate volume reduction for prostates >80 cm³ • A non-inferiority trial vs. TURP is underway |
• Suitable for older, high-risk patients • Safe and efficient outpatient procedure |
| Temporary Implantable Nitinol Device (iTIND) | Baseline | • Demonstrates promise but requires more long-term data | • Long-term (5-year) retrograde ejaculation rate of 4% |
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Sreekumar A, Simmons MN et al.. Therapeutic potential of pomegranate juice-derived nanovesicles in nude mouse benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) xenograft model. Scientific reports. 2023 Aug 1. 37528206
- [2] Khoury S. Future directions in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. British journal of urology. 1992 Nov. 1281730
- [3] Freeman MR, Solomon KR. Cholesterol and benign prostate disease. Differentiation; research in biological diversity. 2011 Nov-Dec. 21862201
- [4] Abubakar M, Prasad R et al.. Orthostatic Hypotension in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients and Its Association With Alpha-1 Antagonist Use: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Cureus. 2023 Aug. 37750139
- [5] Sandhu JS, Vaughan ED Jr. Combination therapy for the pharmacological management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: rationale and treatment options. Drugs & aging. 2005. 16323969
- [6] Aoun F, Marcelis Q et al.. Minimally invasive devices for treating lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostate hyperplasia: technology update. Research and reports in urology. 2015. 26317083
- [7] Duan Z, Zhang Z et al.. Retrospective Comparison of Transurethral Prostatic Columnar Water Balloon Dilation and Pharmacotherapy for Moderate-to-Severe Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Efficacy, Safety and Compliance. Archivos espanoles de urologia. 2026 May. 42265966
- [8] Wei JT, Dauw CA et al.. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men: A Review. JAMA. 2025 Sep 2. 40658396
- [9] Husted M, Gray D et al.. Reaching a Tipping Point: A Qualitative Exploration of Quality of Life and Treatment Decision-Making in People Living With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Qualitative health research. 2022 Nov. 36154347
- [10] Triffaux F, Waltregny D et al.. [What the last 10 years have brought in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia]. Revue medicale de Liege. 2020 May. 32496694
- [11] Gomez-Regalado F, Ruiz-Guerrero L et al.. Assessing the Surgical Efficiency of Instrument Miniaturization: Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Minimally Invasive Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (MiLEP). Cureus. 2026 Feb. 41909319
- [12] Kaplan SA, Olsson CA et al.. The American Urological Association symptom score in the evaluation of men with lower urinary tract symptoms: at 2 years of followup, does it work?. The Journal of urology. 1996 Jun. 8618299
- [13] Bartsch G, Rittmaster RS et al.. Dihydrotestosterone and the concept of 5alpha-reductase inhibition in human benign prostatic hyperplasia. European urology. 2000 Apr. 10765065
- [14] Descazeaud A, Robert G et al.. [Initial assessment, follow-up and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: guidelines of the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association]. Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie. 2012 Dec. 23178093
- [15] Smith AB, Carson CC. Finasteride in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Therapeutics and clinical risk management. 2009 Jun. 19707263
- [16] Cohen SA, Parsons JK. Combination pharmacological therapies for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Drugs & aging. 2012 Apr 1. 22428659
- [17] Zhou Y, Luo Q et al.. Integrated management strategies for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Frontiers in urology. 2025. 41158964
- [18] Malling B, Lönn L et al.. Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men Unfit for Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2019 Apr 25. 31027211
- [19] Napal Lecumberri S, Insausti Gorbea I et al.. Prostatic artery embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: protocol for a non-inferiority clinical trial. Research and reports in urology. 2018. 29492398
- [20] Sapoval M, Dariane C et al.. [Prostatic artery embolisation for symptomatic BPH]. Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983). 2019 Apr. 31047745
Contact Us
Address
One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850
For General Inquiry
info@pienomial.com











