Syndax Announces Four Revuforj® (revumenib) Abstracts Accepted for ASCO 2026, Including an Oral Presentation of Post-Transplant Data
Clinical Trial Updates

Syndax Announces Four Revuforj® (revumenib) Abstracts Accepted for ASCO 2026, Including an Oral Presentation of Post-Transplant Data

Published : 22 May 2026

At a Glance
IndicationAcute leukemia
DrugRevumenib
Mechanism of ActionMenin inhibitor
CompanySyndax Pharmaceuticals
Trial PhasePhase 3
Trial AcronymEVOLVE-2, REVEAL-ND NPM1
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Conference NameAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting
Conference DatesMay 29 – June 2, 2026
Conference LocationChicago
Presentation TypesOral presentation, Poster presentation
Patient Population (Oral Presentation)21 adults and children with KMT2Ar, NPM1m, or NUP98r acute leukemia
Line of Therapy (Oral Presentation)Maintenance following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)
Genetic SubtypesKMT2Ar, NPM1m, NUP98r
Regulatory StatusFDA approved
Combination Partner (EVOLVE-2)Venetoclax/azacitidine
Combination Partner (REVEAL-ND NPM1)Intensive chemotherapy

Syndax Highlights Revuforj Post-Transplant and PK Data at ASCO 2026

Syndax Pharmaceuticals announced the acceptance of four Revuforj (revumenib) abstracts for presentation at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting in Chicago. Key presentations include an oral presentation highlighting favorable outcomes in 21 adults and children with KMT2Ar, NPM1m, or NUP98r acute leukemia who received revumenib post-transplant. Additionally, a poster will detail revumenib's pharmacokinetic profile, emphasizing its compatibility with gastric acid reducing agents and low-fat meals, and a clear dose adjustment strategy for strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. The company will also present designs for ongoing pivotal Phase 3 trials.

  • The oral presentation (Abstract 6505) will showcase safety and efficacy data from 21 adults and children with KMT2Ar, NPM1m, or NUP98r acute leukemia who received revumenib as maintenance following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This presentation will include observed overall survival and relapse rates, along with a comparison to a historical cohort, providing crucial evidence for post-transplant management.
  • A poster presentation (Abstract 6528) will characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of revumenib, highlighting its unique profile. This includes the ability to administer revumenib with gastric acid reducing agents without reducing efficacy, a clear dose adjustment strategy for optimal exposure in the presence of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, and its compatibility with low-fat meals, offering important practical guidance for clinicians.
  • Syndax will also present 'Trial in progress' abstracts for two ongoing Phase 3 studies: EVOLVE-2 (revumenib plus venetoclax/azacitidine in newly diagnosed NPM1-mutated or KMT2A-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy) and REVEAL-ND NPM1 (revumenib in combination with intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia), outlining future directions for the drug's development.

Revuforj's Favorable Outcomes in Post-Transplant Acute Leukemia

Recent studies have demonstrated significant advancements in acute leukemia treatment, particularly with venetoclax-based combinations and targeted therapies. A 2025 retrospective analysis of 90 treatment-naive elderly AML patients compared 14-day versus 28-day venetoclax plus azacitidine regimens, revealing comparable clinical remission rates (57.4% vs 58.1%, P=0.947) with no significant differences in median overall survival or event-free survival. However, the 14-day cohort demonstrated superior safety outcomes, including significantly faster neutrophil recovery (median 12.5 vs 26 days, P<0.01) and reduced febrile neutropenia (73.3% vs 90.9%, P<0.05). A separate target trial emulation study using propensity score matching confirmed that venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents conferred superior overall survival compared to hypomethylating agents alone in elderly patients ≥60 years, with particularly prominent benefits in patients ≥75 years old.

Transplant conditioning regimens have also shown promising results in real-world settings. A 2026 retrospective analysis of 66 patients with AML and MDS evaluated treosulfan-fludarabine with or without thiotepa intensification for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Despite a patient population with median age 67 years and 56% having hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index >2, the study achieved encouraging outcomes with 3-year overall survival of 52%, progression-free survival of 46%, and nonrelapse mortality of only 18%. Safety profiles were acceptable, with 100-day cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 acute graft-versus-host disease at 34% and 3-year moderate-to-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease at 21%.

Salvage therapy optimization has emerged as another critical area of investigation. A 2026 multicenter retrospective analysis comparing CLAG regimen with cytarabine doses of 1 g/m² versus 2 g/m² in 183 relapsed/refractory AML patients demonstrated significantly higher complete response rates with the higher dose (71.9% vs 53.7%, p=0.013) and superior 2-year overall survival (46.2% vs 13.4%, p=0.004). The higher dose regimen showed similar toxicity profiles except for longer neutropenia duration (18 vs 16 days, p=0.003), without increases in significant toxicity. These findings highlight the importance of dose optimization in salvage settings while maintaining acceptable safety profiles.

Optimizing Revuforj Administration: PK Insights from ASCO

Revumenib demonstrated a manageable safety profile across clinical studies, with treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation in only 4.8% of patients in the AUGMENT-101 study. The safety data was consistent across different patient populations with predictable and acceptable toxicities. Grade ≥3 adverse events and key safety considerations include several distinct toxicity patterns.

Hematologic toxicities: Febrile neutropenia was the most common grade ≥3 adverse event, occurring in 37.2% of patients in the AUGMENT-101 study

Differentiation syndrome: This key toxicity associated with menin inhibitors occurred in 10-25% of patients with KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1-mutated AML, representing 16.0% of grade ≥3 events

Cardiac toxicities: QTc prolongation was identified as a significant toxicity, occurring as a grade ≥3 event in 13.8% of patients

Treatment discontinuation rate: Treatment-related adverse events led to discontinuation in 4 patients (4.8%) in the NPM1-mutated AML cohort of 84 patients who received ≥1 dose

Cross-study consistency: The safety profile remained consistent with previously reported results across different patient populations and study phases

Resistance patterns: Early resistance emergence was observed, primarily through MEN1 mutations appearing as early as two treatment cycles, though this represents an efficacy rather than safety concern

Advancing Revuforj: Phase 3 Trials in Newly Diagnosed AML

Recent acute leukemia trials demonstrate evolving approaches to study design, incorporating biomarker stratification, multiomics analyses, and refined endpoint selection. These studies span from early-phase dose-finding trials to large retrospective analyses, reflecting the field's progression toward precision medicine approaches and improved prognostic modeling.

Study Type Sample Size Key Design Features Primary Endpoints Notable Findings
Multiomics Analysis (2022) TCGA database + GSE106291 (n=251) LASSO-Cox regression model, single-cell RNA sequencing validation Overall survival, molecular docking optimization 5-gene risk score model identified immune infiltration subtypes
Biomarker Study (2021) 196 de novo AML patients, 50 controls Real-time qPCR and Western blot for ITGA7 expression Risk stratification, complete remission, event-free survival ITGA7 expression correlates with clinical outcomes
CN-AML Flowcytometry (2020) 80 CN-AML patients ≤60 years Fresh bone marrow CD25/CD123 expression analysis Induction remission rate, overall survival CD25+/CD123+ co-expression showed poorest outcomes
WT1 Prognostic Study (2014) 584 AML patients Retrospective WT1 level assessment at multiple timepoints Overall survival, leukemia-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse Post-induction WT1 levels stratified into 3 prognostic groups
Flavopiridol Phase I (2006) 34 adults (26 AML, 8 ALL) Timed sequential therapy, dose escalation design Maximum tolerated dose, overall response rate MTD 50 mg/m²/d, 31% response rate in AML
PF4 Biomarker (2008) Not specified MALDI-TOF protein profiling with immunoassay validation Complete remission status, platelet recovery PF4 levels correlated with platelet count recovery

Revuforj: Charting a Course for Broader Acute Leukemia Impact

The upcoming ASCO presentations for Revuforj (revumenib) underscore a pivotal moment for precision medicine in acute leukemia, particularly for patients with KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2Ar), NPM1-mutated (NPM1m), or NUP98-rearranged disease. As a recently FDA-approved, first-in-class menin inhibitor, revumenib has already demonstrated promising efficacy in heavily pretreated, relapsed or refractory (R/R) settings, achieving meaningful remission rates and high measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity. The new data, especially the favorable outcomes in post-transplant patients, signals a strategic expansion of its therapeutic potential. This suggests revumenib could play a crucial role in preventing relapse or as a maintenance therapy, addressing a significant unmet need in these high-risk populations where long-term disease control remains challenging.

Furthermore, the detailed pharmacokinetic profile, confirming compatibility with common gastric acid reducing agents and low-fat meals, along with clear dose adjustment guidelines for strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, is not merely scientific detail. It represents a practical enhancement for clinicians, simplifying administration and potentially improving patient adherence, thereby facilitating broader real-world adoption. The company's announcement of ongoing pivotal Phase 3 trial designs clearly indicates an ambition to move beyond the R/R setting, exploring revumenib's utility in earlier lines of therapy or as part of combination regimens, aiming to establish it as a new standard of care.

However, this promising trajectory is not without its considerations. The literature highlights the emergence of resistance mechanisms, such as acquired MEN1 mutations and de novo TP53 mutations, which can limit the durability of monotherapy responses. Managing the known adverse events, particularly QTc prolongation and differentiation syndrome, will remain critical, especially as the drug is integrated into more complex combination strategies. Moreover, the burgeoning pipeline of other menin inhibitors suggests an increasingly competitive landscape, necessitating continuous innovation and robust clinical differentiation for revumenib to maintain its leadership position. Ultimately, these presentations reinforce the menin inhibitor class as a transformative force in acute leukemia, but also emphasize the ongoing need for strategic development to maximize patient benefit and navigate evolving challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is revumenib approved for AML?
Revumenib is not currently approved for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It is an investigational, oral menin-KMT2A inhibitor undergoing clinical trials for relapsed/refractory AML, particularly in patients with *KMT2A*-rearranged or *NPM1*-mutated disease. The agent has received Breakthrough Therapy Designation from the FDA for this indication.
What is the standard of care for leukemia?
The standard of care for leukemia is highly individualized, varying significantly by the specific type (e.g., AML, ALL, CML, CLL), patient age, and risk stratification. It typically involves multi-agent chemotherapy, often in induction, consolidation, and maintenance phases. Targeted therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors for CML or specific inhibitors for certain AML/ALL mutations, and immunotherapies like CAR T-cell therapy, are increasingly integral. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains a curative option for eligible patients, particularly in high-risk or relapsed settings.
What is the gold standard for acute leukemia?
The gold standard for diagnosing acute leukemia involves a comprehensive evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. This includes morphological assessment, immunophenotyping via multiparameter flow cytometry to determine lineage and aberrant antigen expression, and cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses. These combined approaches are critical for accurate diagnosis, classification, risk stratification, and guiding targeted therapeutic strategies.
How does revumenib target acute leukemia?
Revumenib functions as a potent, selective, small molecule inhibitor of the menin-KMT2A (MLL1) interaction. This interaction is a critical oncogenic driver in acute leukemias characterized by KMT2A rearrangements (KMT2A-r) and nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations. By disrupting the menin-KMT2A complex, revumenib aims to restore myeloid differentiation and inhibit the proliferation of leukemia cells. This targeted mechanism offers a novel therapeutic approach for specific genetically defined subsets of acute leukemia.

References

  1. [1] DiNardo KW, LeBlanc TW et al.. Novel agents and regimens in acute myeloid leukemia: latest updates from 2022 ASH Annual Meeting. Journal of hematology & oncology. 2023 Mar 3. 36869366
  2. [2] Espinoza-Gutarra MR, Jarrett BA et al.. Health Disparities in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Treatment with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Therapy Targeting FLT3, IDH1, or IDH2. Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy. 2026. 41847630
  3. [3] Del Poeta G, Bruno A et al.. Deregulation of the mitochondrial apoptotic machinery and development of molecular targeted drugs in acute myeloid leukemia. Current cancer drug targets. 2008 May. 18473734
  4. [4] Buyse M, Michiels S et al.. Leukemia-free survival as a surrogate end point for overall survival in the evaluation of maintenance therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission. Haematologica. 2011 Aug. 21546500
  5. [5] Yu Z, Li S et al.. Venetoclax combined with azacitidine in elderly acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospective comparison of 14-day vs 28-day dosing regimens. Medicine. 2025 Aug 15. 40826699
  6. [6] Mirzania M, Khajeh-Mehrizi A et al.. Salvage therapy with etoposide and mitoxantrone in patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective cohort study. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012). 2026 Jan. 41497074
  7. [7] Issa GC, Aldoss I et al.. Menin Inhibition With Revumenib for KMT2A-Rearranged Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia (AUGMENT-101). Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2025 Jan. 39121437
  8. [8] Elgarten CW, Aplenc R. Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: updates on biology, risk stratification, and therapy. Current opinion in pediatrics. 2020 Feb. 31815781
  9. [9] Salter B, Ge S et al.. Efficacy of hypomethylating agents in combination with venetoclax in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Leukemia research. 2026 Jun. 41980466
  10. [10] Wang SA, Patel KP et al.. Acute erythroid leukemia with <20% bone marrow blasts is clinically and biologically similar to myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts. Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 2016 Oct. 27443511
  11. [11] Kim HT, Gray R. Three-component cure rate model for nonproportional hazards alternative in the design of randomized clinical trials. Clinical trials (London, England). 2012 Apr. 22353928
  12. [12] Sun J, Yu W et al.. MENIN inhibitor-based therapy in acute leukemia: latest updates from the 2024 ASH annual meeting. Experimental hematology & oncology. 2025 May 22. 40405313
  13. [13] Fernández Fernández A, García Fortes M et al.. Maintenance Treatment with 5-Azacitidine in Patients with Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Ineligible for Intensive Treatment and with Response After Induction Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial. Cancers. 2025 Aug 18. 40867307
  14. [14] Itzykson R, Gardin C et al.. Impact of post-remission therapy in patients aged 65-70 years with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a comparison of two concomitant randomized ALFA trials with overlapping age inclusion criteria. Haematologica. 2011 Jun. 21459791
  15. [15] Imanaka R, Numata H et al.. Real-world outcomes of venetoclax and azacitidine in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (VENUS study). International journal of hematology. 2026 Feb. 41201768
  16. [16] Furumoto T, Ando K et al.. Efficacy of Azacitidine Plus Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Transformed from Myelodysplastic Syndrome after Failure of Azacitidine Monotherapy. Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2026 Feb 1. 40634091
  17. [17] Perner F, Stein EM et al.. MEN1 mutations mediate clinical resistance to menin inhibition. Nature. 2023 Mar. 36922589
  18. [18] Zehtabcheh S, Soleimani Samarkhazan H et al.. Insights into KMT2A rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia: from molecular characteristics to targeted therapies. Biomarker research. 2025 May 13. 40361241
  19. [19] Seçilmiş S, Kabukçu Hacıoğlu S et al.. Real-World Utilization of Midostaurin in Combination with Intensive Chemotherapy for Patients with FLT3 Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter Study. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026 Jan 21. 41598791
  20. [20] Mansour R, Yaseen A et al.. Differentiation Syndrome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Spectrum, and Emerging Therapeutic Paradigms. International journal of molecular sciences. 2026 Feb 12. 41751911

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts