ADA: Obesity partners Zealand and Roche aim for weight loss ‘sweet spot’ with amylin agonist
Clinical Trial Updates

ADA: Obesity partners Zealand and Roche aim for weight loss ‘sweet spot’ with amylin agonist

Published : 05 Jun 2026

At a Glance
IndicationObesity
Drugpetrelintide
Mechanism of Actionamylin agonist
CompanyRoche
Trial PhasePhase 2
Trial AcronymZUPREME-1
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Petrelintide Phase 2 Weight Loss9% at 42 weeks
Enicepatide Phase 2 Weight Loss22.5% placebo-adjusted at 48 weeks
Conference Name2026 American Diabetes Association conference
Petrelintide Future DevelopmentPhase 3 study expected to begin in second half of the year
Enicepatide Standalone Phase 3 StatusCurrently in two Phase 3 studies
Enicepatide/Petrelintide Combination TrialMid-stage trial slated for second half of this year
Enicepatide Discontinuation Rate5.9% due to adverse events vs 1.3% in placebo arm
Petrelintide Comparator Weight LossEli Lilly’s eloralintide achieved about 16% weight loss in a Phase 2 trial
Enicepatide Patient Response26% of participants lost more than 30% of their weight, and almost 40% shed 25% or more

Roche and Zealand Advance Petrelintide to Phase 3 with Focus on Tolerability

Roche and Zealand Pharma presented Phase 2 data for their amylin analog, petrelintide, at the 2026 American Diabetes Association conference. The ZUPREME-1 study showed 9% weight reduction at 42 weeks, which, while below analyst expectations and a rival Eli Lilly candidate, met Roche's internal goals. The companies emphasize petrelintide's tolerability, with a placebo-like discontinuation rate, positioning it as a first-line option for patients seeking approximately 10% weight loss without significant side effects. They aim to address unmet needs in the complex obesity landscape by offering a differentiated treatment modality.

  • Roche and Zealand Pharma are strategically positioning petrelintide, an amylin analog, not for maximum weight loss but for optimal tolerability and adherence. Despite achieving 9% weight reduction at 42 weeks in the Phase 2 ZUPREME-1 study, which was less than some analyst predictions and a competitor, the companies believe this level of efficacy with placebo-like side effects represents a 'sweet spot' for a first-choice medicine, catering to patients prioritizing comfort over aggressive weight loss.
  • Beyond petrelintide, Roche is also advancing enicepatide, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, which demonstrated substantial efficacy in its Phase 2 CT388-103 trial. This candidate achieved a 22.5% placebo-adjusted weight loss after 48 weeks, with a significant proportion of participants (26% losing >30% and nearly 40% shedding >25%) achieving profound weight reduction and many no longer meeting the definition of obesity, highlighting its potential for significant health benefits.
  • Both petrelintide and enicepatide are progressing rapidly in their development pipelines. Petrelintide is slated to enter Phase 3 studies in the second half of the year, with a focus on quick market access. Enicepatide is already in two standalone Phase 3 studies, and a mid-stage trial combining enicepatide with petrelintide is also planned for the latter half of this year, indicating a comprehensive strategy to address various patient needs in the obesity treatment landscape.

Petrelintide's ZUPREME-1: A Tolerability-Focused Approach to Weight Loss

Tirzepatide Clinical Evidence (2025)

A comprehensive analysis of nine randomized controlled trials encompassing 7,111 participants demonstrated tirzepatide's substantial efficacy in obesity management. This dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, administered as a weekly injection ranging from 5 mg to 15 mg, achieved a mean percentage body weight reduction of 16.03% (95% CI -18.91 to -13.14) at medium-term follow-up of 12-18 months. The proportion of participants achieving clinically meaningful 5% weight reduction increased significantly with a risk ratio of 3.60 (95% CI 2.44 to 5.30). Long-term efficacy at 3.5 years remained robust, with sustained weight reduction of 15.66% and continued high rates of clinically significant weight loss.

From a safety perspective, tirzepatide demonstrated an acceptable tolerability profile with some notable considerations. Medium-term treatment was associated with an increase in non-serious adverse events (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.71), while showing little difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or mortality compared to placebo. The intervention showed little difference in adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal, though there was very uncertain evidence regarding serious adverse events. Long-term safety data revealed similar patterns, with maintained tolerability and no significant differences in MACE or mortality outcomes.

Network Meta-Analyses of Anti-Obesity Medications (2025)

A systematic evaluation of 22 reviews, with 14 prioritized for analysis, established the comparative effectiveness landscape of current obesity pharmacotherapies. At six months, subcutaneous tirzepatide emerged as the most effective intervention, achieving weight reductions ranging from 9 kg at the 5 mg dose to 12 kg at the 15 mg dose. Subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg demonstrated comparable efficacy with weight loss between 11.5 and 12.5 kg across multiple network meta-analyses. Updated analyses incorporating 11 additional trials confirmed tirzepatide's superiority at the 15 mg dose when indirectly compared to semaglutide 2.4 mg, though lower tirzepatide doses (5 mg and 10 mg) did not demonstrate this advantage.

The safety profile analysis revealed a consistent pattern where agents achieving the greatest weight loss, specifically tirzepatide and semaglutide 2.4 mg, were generally associated with increased risk of safety issues compared to placebo. However, both interventions maintained favorable benefit-risk profiles sufficient to support their clinical use. The network meta-analyses provided robust evidence for positioning these agents as first-line pharmacological interventions for obesity management, with dose-dependent efficacy considerations informing optimal prescribing strategies.

Male Fertility Impact Study (2025)

A comprehensive analysis of 32 studies specifically examined the effects of obesity interventions on male reproductive health outcomes. Bariatric surgery studies (18 investigations) revealed no clinically significant changes in semen parameters or DNA damage following surgical intervention, suggesting reproductive safety of this approach. Pharmacotherapy studies evaluating metformin and liraglutide (5 studies) provided insufficient data to draw definitive conclusions regarding fertility impact, highlighting an important evidence gap requiring further investigation.

Lifestyle intervention studies (10 investigations) demonstrated modest but statistically significant improvements in sperm quality parameters. Specifically, lifestyle modifications achieved improvements in sperm normal morphology with a mean difference of 0.59% (95% CI 0.23, 0.94) and enhanced progressive motility by 10.56% (95% CI 8.97, 12.15). These findings suggest that comprehensive lifestyle approaches may offer dual benefits for weight management and reproductive health in men with obesity, though the clinical significance of these improvements requires further longitudinal assessment to determine impact on fertility outcomes.

Enicepatide's CT388-103: Unlocking Significant Weight Loss and Health Benefits

The current landscape of obesity clinical trials demonstrates remarkable diversity in therapeutic approaches, ranging from novel pharmacological interventions to advanced endoscopic procedures and comprehensive lifestyle modifications. These studies collectively represent the most comprehensive effort to address obesity through evidence-based interventions, with trial designs evolving to capture both efficacy and real-world applicability across diverse patient populations.

Study/Program Phase Sample Size Population Primary Endpoint Duration Key Results
Maridebart Cafraglutide (MariTide) Phase 2 592 participants Obesity cohort: 465 (BMI 37.9); Obesity-diabetes: 127 (BMI 36.5) Percent change in body weight from baseline to week 52 52 weeks Weight loss -12.3% to -16.2% (obesity) vs -2.5% placebo; -8.4% to -12.3% (diabetes) vs -1.7% placebo
Retatrutide Phase 2 338 adults BMI ≥30 or BMI 27-30 with weight-related conditions Percentage change in body weight at 24 weeks 48 weeks Results pending
STEP Program (Semaglutide) Phase 3 ~5,000 participants Adults with obesity, separate diabetes cohort Change in body weight from baseline 68 weeks (STEP 1,3) Mean weight loss -14.9% to -16.0% (non-diabetes); treatment difference -6.2% to -14.8% vs placebo
Endoscopic Gastroplasty Pragmatic RCT 184 patients BMI 36.5 ± 3.0 kg/m² Percentage total body weight loss 18 months 100% technical success, 1.1% serious adverse events
Tirzepatide SURPASS-3 Phase 3 substudy 296 participants Type 2 diabetes with BMI ≥25 kg/m² Liver fat content reduction 52 weeks Absolute liver fat reduction -8.09% vs -3.38% insulin degludec
AspireAssist System Not specified 207 participants BMI 35.0-55.0 kg/m² Mean percent excess weight loss and proportion achieving ≥25% excess weight loss 52 weeks 31.5% excess weight loss vs 9.8% lifestyle counseling; 58.6% vs 15.3% achieved ≥25% loss
Canagliflozin Phase 3 Study 1: 1,450; Study 2: 714 Ages 18-80 and 55-80 years respectively Sustained weight loss 104 weeks Sustained weight loss vs glimepiride/placebo, majority from fat mass loss

Roche's Strategic Portfolio: Combining Therapies for Diverse Obesity Needs

Recent clinical trials are investigating several promising combination therapy approaches for obesity, with pharmaceutical companies exploring both multi-target single molecules and combinations of existing agents. These strategies aim to achieve greater weight loss efficacy than monotherapy approaches while addressing the complex pathophysiology of obesity through multiple mechanisms of action.

The most extensively studied combination approach involves bimagrumab plus semaglutide, currently in Phase 2 trials with 507 adults with obesity. This combination targets both metabolic regulation through GLP-1 receptor agonism and muscle preservation through activin receptor inhibition. The high-dose combination (bimagrumab 30 mg/kg plus semaglutide 2.4 mg) achieved superior weight loss of -17.8 kg at 48 weeks compared to -14.2 kg with semaglutide alone and -9.3 kg with bimagrumab alone, demonstrating clear synergistic effects. Additionally, tirzepatide is being evaluated in specialized populations, including a Phase II trial combining it with standard fertility-sparing treatment for obese patients with endometrial cancer, reflecting the expanding therapeutic applications of combination approaches.

Multi-receptor agonist molecules represent another significant advancement, with retatrutide emerging as the leading triple agonist targeting GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors. In Phase 2 studies, retatrutide achieved remarkable weight loss of up to 24.2% in individuals with obesity and 16.9% in those with type 2 diabetes, while improving multiple cardiometabolic parameters including an 82% reduction in hepatic steatosis. Survodutide, a dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist, is advancing through Phase 3 trials (SYNCHRONIZE-1) in 725 participants across 14 countries, targeting both obesity and associated comorbidities. These unimolecular multi-agonist approaches offer the advantage of coordinated receptor activation while potentially reducing pill burden and improving adherence compared to combination regimens of separate agents.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the mechanism of action of petrelintide in treating obesity?
Petrelintide is an amylin analog, designed to mimic the actions of the naturally occurring neuroendocrine hormone amylin. Amylin plays a crucial role in glucose homeostasis and satiety regulation. Its mechanism involves slowing gastric emptying, promoting a sense of fullness, and potentially modulating glucagon secretion, all contributing to reduced caloric intake and subsequent weight loss.
How does petrelintide differentiate itself from other pharmacological treatments for obesity?
Unlike many current anti-obesity medications that primarily target incretin pathways, petrelintide offers a distinct mechanism as an amylin analog. This unique approach to enhancing satiety and regulating gastric emptying through a different physiological pathway could provide a novel therapeutic option. It may be particularly beneficial for patients who require a different or complementary mechanism of action for effective weight management.
What are the potential benefits of petrelintide beyond weight reduction in patients with obesity?
Effective weight loss achieved through therapies like petrelintide can lead to significant improvements in various obesity-related comorbidities. These benefits often include better glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes, reductions in blood pressure, and improvements in lipid profiles. Addressing these metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors can substantially enhance overall patient health and reduce long-term disease burden.
Which patient profiles might be most suitable for petrelintide therapy in obesity management?
Petrelintide could be a suitable therapeutic option for adult patients diagnosed with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) or overweight (BMI ≥27 kg/m²) with at least one weight-related comorbidity. It may be particularly relevant for individuals who have not achieved adequate weight loss with lifestyle interventions alone or who could benefit from a distinct pharmacological mechanism due to intolerance or insufficient response to other anti-obesity medications.

References

  1. [1] Rubio-Herrera MA, Mera-Carreiro S. Weight management treatment in obesity. Medicina clinica. 2025 Nov. 40865172
  2. [2] Guan H, Jiang H et al.. Long-term efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in participants with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin and/or sulfonylurea: Post-hoc analysis of SURPASS-4. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2025 Nov. 40926359
  3. [3] Neff GW. Shared mechanistic pathways of glucagon signalling: Unlocking its potential for treating obesity, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, and other cardio-kidney-metabolic conditions. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2025 Dec. 41025406
  4. [4] Kolesárová M, Zálešová N et al.. Evaluation of polycystic ovary syndrome pharmacotherapy. Ceska a Slovenska farmacie : casopis Ceske farmaceuticke spolecnosti a Slovenske farmaceuticke spolecnosti. 2024. 41577468
  5. [5] Maruyama F, Kitsunai H et al.. Real-World Clinical Evidence of Tirzepatide for Metabolic Abnormalities in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes: The Multicenter Retrospective Observational Hokkaido-TZP Study. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026 Jun. 41944182
  6. [6] Zheng J, Yang J et al.. Tirzepatide for fertility-sparing treatment in obese/overweight patients with endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: a phase II single-arm clinical trial protocol. BMJ open. 2025 Nov 5. 41198197
  7. [7] Vadalà di Prampero SF, Geraci M et al.. Effects of different techniques of endoscopic gastroplasty on weight loss among patients with obesity: a randomized, single-center pragmatic trial. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2025 Dec 26. 41456751
  8. [8] Quimbayo-Cifuentes AF. Weight Regain After GLP-1-Based Therapy Discontinuation: Failure, Physiology, or Follow-Up Gap. Cureus. 2026 Feb. 41909366
  9. [9] Abulehia A, Ayesh H et al.. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Glucagon Receptor Agonists on Metabolic Outcomes: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism. 2026 Mar. 41787737
  10. [10] Abdul Wahab R, le Roux CW. A review of the evidence on cardiovascular outcomes from obesity treatment. Obesity pillars. 2023 Sep. 37990679
  11. [11] Maselli DB, Kucera A et al.. The endoscopic bariatric patient: characteristics, beliefs, and fears. iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights. 2024 Mar. 41648882
  12. [12] Wu H, Shi Y et al.. Time-restricted eating as a potential strategy for healthy lifespan: an evaluation of current evidence. Frontiers in medicine. 2025. 41601725
  13. [13] Hansen A, Raymond K et al.. Very Low-Carbohydrate Breakfast Intervention for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes and Persistent Hyperglycemia: Protocol for a Digital, Nonrandomized Pre-Post Study. JMIR research protocols. 2026 Jan 28. 41605502
  14. [14] Zheng L, Yang Y et al.. Phase I study of the oral GLP-1 receptor agonist DA-302168S: Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in healthy and overweight/obese adults. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2025 Dec. 40994059
  15. [15] Joshi S, Das AK et al.. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy. 2026. 41836360
  16. [16] Holland TL, Shorr AF et al.. Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in patients treated with ceftobiprole: results from Phase 3 clinical trials. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2025 Jun 3. 40155066
  17. [17] Ji L, Jiang H et al.. Mazdutide 9 mg in Chinese adults with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2) but without diabetes: A phase 2 randomized controlled trial. Med (New York, N.Y.). 2026 May 8. 41875890
  18. [18] Arora G, Conde KR et al.. Pharmacologic Treatments for the Preservation of Lean Body Mass During Weight Loss. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026 Jan 9. 41598480
  19. [19] Balbino KP, Kravchychyn ACP et al.. Precision nutrition in weight loss and neuroendocrine control of people with obesity: The study protocol of a factorial randomised controlled trial (GenON Programme). Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026 Mar. 41480659
  20. [20] Austregésilo de Athayde De Hollanda Morais B, Martins Prizão V et al.. The efficacy and safety of GLP-1 agonists in PCOS women living with obesity in promoting weight loss and hormonal regulation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of diabetes and its complications. 2024 Oct. 39178623

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts