SciSparc Advances Tourette’s Asset Despite Efficacy Signal Lagging Cannabinoid Approval Precedents
Clinical Trial Updates

SciSparc Advances Tourette’s Asset Despite Efficacy Signal Lagging Cannabinoid Approval Precedents

Published : 16 Jul 2026

The Overview
SciSparc Ltd., through its subsidiary NeuroThera Labs Inc., has announced the initiation of a Phase IIb clinical trial site at Hannover Medical School in Germany for SCI-110, its proprietary cannabinoid-based treatment candidate for Tourette Syndrome (TS) in adults. This trial, which previously received regulatory clearance, aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily oral SCI-110. Building on positive Phase IIa results that showed an average tic reduction of 21%, the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study will assess changes in tic severity using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. The trial will also be conducted at Yale Child Study Center and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.
Knolens Analysis

SCI-110's advancement into a Phase IIb trial for Tourette syndrome is a high-risk venture, predicated on an efficacy signal that falls substantially short of established cannabinoid approval benchmarks. [1] The reported 21% average tic reduction from the Phase IIa study provides a proof-of-concept but is modest compared to the pivotal trial data for Epidiolex, the key cannabinoid precedent. Epidiolex gained approval for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) based on a 44% median seizure reduction, setting a high bar for what regulators consider clinically meaningful. SCI-110 also targets an indication with only a Grade C (weak) evidence base for cannabinoids, unlike the more robust evidence supporting epilepsy approvals. [2] Competitors like approved antipsychotics and behavioral interventions represent an established standard of care. Furthermore, the commercial path is challenged by unfavorable cost-effectiveness precedents, such as Epidiolex's $451,800 per QALY ICER in LGS, which is far above typical payer willingness-to-pay thresholds. [3] Without data showing a substantial improvement over the Phase IIa signal, a clear safety advantage over generic antipsychotics, or a compelling quality-of-life benefit, SCI-110 faces significant hurdles to regulatory approval and market access.

The 21% average tic reduction is substantially lower than efficacy demonstrated in pivotal trials for approved cannabinoid therapies (e.g., 44% in LGS). [3] The asset also targets an indication with only a Grade C (weak) evidence base for cannabinoids.

At a Glance
IndicationTourette Syndrome
DrugSCI-110
Mechanism of ActionCannabinoid-based treatment
CompanySciSparc Ltd.
Trial PhasePhase IIb
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTrial Initiation / First Patient In (FPI)
Therapeutic AreaNeuroscience
Clinical Trial SitesHannover Medical School, Yale Child Study Center, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Regulatory ClearancesGermany’s Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, MHH's ethics committee
Patient Age Range18-65
Primary Efficacy Endpointchange in tic severity measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at weeks 12 and 26 compared to the baseline
Trial Typerandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial
Previous Phase IIa Resultsaverage tic reduction of 21% on Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Total Tic Score
Drug Componentsdronabinol, palmitoylethanolamide
Measurement ScaleYale Global Tic Severity Scale

NeuroThera Labs Initiates Phase IIb Trial for Tourette Syndrome Treatment

SciSparc Ltd., through its subsidiary NeuroThera Labs Inc., has announced the initiation of a Phase IIb clinical trial site at Hannover Medical School in Germany for SCI-110, its proprietary cannabinoid-based treatment candidate for Tourette Syndrome (TS) in adults. This trial, which previously received regulatory clearance, aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily oral SCI-110. Building on positive Phase IIa results that showed an average tic reduction of 21%, the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study will assess changes in tic severity using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. The trial will also be conducted at Yale Child Study Center and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.

  • The Phase IIb study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of daily oral SCI-110 in adults aged 18-65 with Tourette Syndrome. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in tic severity, measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale at weeks 12 and 26 compared to baseline, with safety assessed through adverse event monitoring.
  • SCI-110 is an innovative one-dosage form combining dronabinol, a synthetic cannabinoid, with the endocannabinoid-like palmitoylethanolamide. This proprietary cannabinoid-based treatment candidate is designed to reduce tics and comorbid symptoms in adults with TS while minimizing potential side effects, addressing a significant unmet medical need.
  • The initiation of the German site at Hannover Medical School marks a key step in the global development program for SCI-110, with additional sites planned at Yale Child Study Center in Connecticut and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center in Israel. This advancement follows positive safety and efficacy results from a preceding Phase IIa study, which demonstrated an average tic reduction of 21% across participants.

Current Limitations in Tourette Syndrome Treatment Approaches

Current management strategies for Tourette Syndrome—spanning behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, and emerging interventions—remain constrained by incomplete efficacy, side-effect burdens, and accessibility barriers. A substantial subset of patients continues to experience clinically significant, functionally impairing tics despite adequate trials of first-line approaches, underscoring persistent gaps in the treatment landscape.

  • Partial efficacy and realistic goals: Evidence-based treatments (behavior therapy and pharmacotherapy) are often only partially effective and are geared toward reducing tic severity to a functionally manageable level rather than achieving symptom elimination; many patients also face accessibility barriers to these interventions.

  • Treatment-resistant population: A significant proportion of patients remain refractory, defined as persistent, functionally impairing tics despite adequate behavioral therapy and trials of at least two pharmacological agents from different classes at appropriate doses and durations.

  • Weak evidentiary foundation for guidelines: Current treatment guidelines rely heavily on limited clinical trials and expert opinion, with dopamine-modulating agents and alpha-2 agonists as the most commonly used pharmacological options; real-world effectiveness and generalizability of these agents remain open questions requiring further study.

  • Heterogeneous evidence for alternative interventions: Options for treatment-resistant TS—including cannabinoid-based treatments—are supported by inconsistent, often non-statistically significant results derived largely from small or uncontrolled studies. Non-pharmacological alternative approaches are similarly limited, with evidence largely anecdotal or case-based.

  • Cannabinoid-related safety concerns: Medical cannabis has been associated with cognitive side effects (in ~40% of patients), including altered time perception, visuospatial disorientation, confusion, slowed processing speed, and attention difficulties, as well as psychiatric side effects such as worsening OCD symptoms, panic attacks, and anxiety.

  • Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) knowledge gaps: Robust data on CAM efficacy and safety in TS specifically are lacking, with few dedicated studies. Compounding this, patients frequently do not disclose CAM use to physicians unless directly asked, limiting clinical oversight and data collection.

  • Provider unfamiliarity with behavioral techniques: Many clinicians remain unfamiliar with habit reversal training, potentially limiting appropriate referral and implementation of this evidence-based behavioral approach.

  • Device-based therapy limitations: While Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) shows superior efficacy and lower complication rates compared to pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in medically intractable TS, the optimal neural target for stimulation remains undefined, despite several targets showing symptom benefit.

  • Emerging and adjunct therapies still under investigation: Novel approaches such as remotely delivered mindfulness-based interventions, immunomodulatory therapy, and botulinum toxin are being explored to diversify the treatment armamentarium, but their comparative efficacy, mechanisms, and durability of benefit are not yet fully established.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the potential mechanism of action for novel therapies like SCI-110 in Tourette Syndrome?
Novel agents for Tourette Syndrome often target neurotransmitter systems implicated in tic generation, such as dopaminergic, GABAergic, or glutamatergic pathways. By modulating these systems, therapies aim to restore neurochemical balance within the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits. This modulation can lead to a reduction in tic severity and frequency, improving overall patient function.
How might SCI-110 address current unmet needs in the management of Tourette Syndrome?
Existing Tourette Syndrome treatments can present with significant side effects or may not provide adequate efficacy for all patients, particularly those with severe or complex tics. A novel therapy like SCI-110 could offer improved tolerability profiles, broader efficacy across various tic types, or better management of common comorbidities. Such advancements would enhance patient quality of life and expand therapeutic options.
What patient characteristics are typically considered when evaluating new treatment options for Tourette Syndrome?
Key patient characteristics considered include the severity and complexity of tics, the presence of comorbid conditions such as ADHD or OCD, the patient's age, and their prior treatment history. Understanding these factors helps clinicians determine the most appropriate therapeutic approach. It also aids in identifying specific patient populations most likely to benefit from novel interventions.
What are the primary challenges in developing and evaluating new pharmacological treatments for Tourette Syndrome?
Developing new Tourette Syndrome treatments faces several challenges, including the subjective nature of tic assessment and a significant placebo effect observed in clinical trials. The heterogeneous presentation of symptoms across patients also complicates trial design and outcome measurement. Ensuring long-term safety and efficacy, particularly in pediatric populations, requires careful consideration throughout the development process.

References

  1. [1] Dooley JM. Tic disorders in childhood. Seminars in pediatric neurology. 2006 Dec. 17178353
  2. [2] Himle MB, Woods DW et al.. Brief review of habit reversal training for Tourette syndrome. Journal of child neurology. 2006 Aug. 16970874
  3. [3] Cavanna AE. When is pharmacotherapy necessary for Tourette syndrome? The risks vs reward. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2026 Jan. 41653044
  4. [4] Tomskiy AA, Poddubskaya AA et al.. Neurosurgical management of Tourette syndrome: A literature review and analysis of a case series treated with deep brain stimulation. Progress in brain research. 2022. 35667806
  5. [5] Singer HS. The treatment of tics. Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 2001 Mar. 11898516
  6. [6] Hartmann A, Martino D et al.. Gilles de la Tourette syndrome - A treatable condition?. Revue neurologique. 2016 Aug-Sep. 27476415
  7. [7] Farhat LC, Behling E et al.. Comparative efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of children, adolescents, and young adults with Tourette's syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet. Child & adolescent health. 2023 Feb. 36528030
  8. [8] Cavanna AE, Termine C. Tourette syndrome. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2012. 22411257
  9. [9] Dutta N, Cavanna AE. The effectiveness of habit reversal therapy in the treatment of Tourette syndrome and other chronic tic disorders: a systematic review. Functional neurology. 2013 Jan-Mar. 23731910
  10. [10] Mahajan UV, Purger DA et al.. Deep Brain Stimulation Results in Greater Symptomatic Improvement in Tourette Syndrome than Conservative Measures: A Meta-Analysis. Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. 2020. 32434201
  11. [11] Anis S, Zalomek C et al.. Medical Cannabis for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome: An Open-Label Prospective Study. Behavioural neurology. 2022. 35310886
  12. [12] Reese HE, Brown WA et al.. Remote delivery of a mindfulness-based intervention for adults with tics: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Contemporary clinical trials. 2026 Mar. 41539536
  13. [13] Morand-Beaulieu S, Leclerc JB. [Tourette syndrome: Research challenges to improve clinical practice]. L'Encephale. 2020 Apr. 32014239
  14. [14] Kumar A, Duda L et al.. A Comprehensive Review of Tourette Syndrome and Complementary Alternative Medicine. Current developmental disorders reports. 2018. 29755921
  15. [15] Badenoch J, Cavanna AE. Pharmacotherapy for tics in adult patients with Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2020 Jul. 32170503
  16. [16] Czech A, Czarnecka M et al.. Alternative Treatment of the Resistant-to-Treatment Tourette Syndrome-A Systematic Review. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026 Apr 29. 42123126

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts