| Indication | Type 1 diabetes |
| Drug | Acmopatide |
| Mechanism of Action | Incretin therapy |
| Company | Roche |
| Trial Phase | Phase II |
| Category | Clinical Trial Event |
| Sub Category | Topline Results Positive |
| Conference Name | American Diabetes Association (ADA) conference 2026 |
| Roche Patient Population | Type 1 diabetes patients with overweight or obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 27 kg/m²) |
| Roche A1C Reduction | 0.34% from baseline |
| Roche Weight Loss | Up to 7% |
| MannKind Drug Approval Date | 29 May 2026 |
| MannKind Approved Age Group | Children and adolescents aged six and older |
| Amgen 3-P MACE Reduction | 29% |
| Amgen Achieved LDL-C | 45 mg/dL (Repatha arm), 106 mg/dL (placebo) |
| Lilly A1C Reduction (Retatrutide) | 1.7%, 1.9%, 1.9% (for 4mg, 9mg, 12mg doses) |
| Lilly Triglycerides Reduction | Up to 39.6% |
Roche's Acmopatide Shows Positive Phase II Results in Type 1 Diabetes
Roche presented positive data from its randomized Phase II study of acmopatide in type 1 diabetes patients with overweight or obesity at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) conference 2026. The treatment improved blood glucose management, reducing A1C levels by 0.34% from baseline, with 56% of participants achieving an A1C below 7%. Acmopatide also led to dose-dependent weight loss of up to 7% and reduced insulin use by up to 15% compared to placebo, and was generally well tolerated with no reported safety concerns.
- Acmopatide demonstrated significant improvement in blood glucose management, achieving a 0.34% reduction in A1C from baseline. Notably, 56% of patients reached the recommended A1C target of below 7%, highlighting its potential to enhance glycemic control in type 1 diabetes patients.
- Beyond its impact on blood glucose, acmopatide also showed dose-dependent weight loss of up to 7% and reduced insulin requirements by up to 15%. These additional benefits are crucial for addressing common comorbidities and alleviating treatment burdens associated with type 1 diabetes.
- The treatment was generally well tolerated, with no reported safety concerns, indicating a promising safety profile. As the first incretin therapy specifically developed for type 1 diabetes, acmopatide offers a potential new therapeutic class beyond traditional insulin treatments.
Roche's Acmopatide: A Novel Incretin Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes
Recent clinical investigations in type 1 diabetes have demonstrated significant advances across multiple therapeutic modalities, with several studies showing promising safety and efficacy profiles. The Phase 1-2 study of zimislecel (VX-880-101 FORWARD Trial) represents a landmark achievement in cell-based therapy, where 14 participants receiving allogeneic stem cell-derived islet cells achieved remarkable outcomes. All participants demonstrated engraftment and restored islet function evidenced by C-peptide detection, with 83% achieving insulin independence at day 365. While neutropenia occurred in three participants and two deaths were reported (one from cryptococcal meningitis, one from dementia progression), the trial established proof-of-concept for functional β-cell replacement.
The teplizumab studies have consolidated evidence for immunomodulatory intervention in stage 2 type 1 diabetes, with multiple investigations confirming its ability to delay disease progression by a median of two years while preserving β-cell function (adjusted HR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.22-0.78). Real-world experience from Italian compassionate use programs demonstrated overall tolerability, though cytokine-release syndrome and lymphopenia were observed in some patients. Advanced automated insulin delivery systems, particularly the MiniMed 780G studies, showed substantial improvements in glycemic control with time-in-range increasing from 54.4% to 71.4% in youth and 66.5% to 80.2% in adults, while maintaining acceptable safety profiles with minimal increases in hypoglycemia risk.
Adjunctive therapies have emerged as valuable treatment options, with GLP-1 receptor agonists demonstrating significant cardiovascular and renal benefits in large-scale analyses of 174,678 patients, showing reduced risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR: 0.85) and end-stage kidney disease (HR: 0.81) without increasing diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia risks. The comparative study of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT2 inhibitors revealed distinct therapeutic profiles, with GLP-1 therapy providing superior HbA1c and weight reduction alongside LDL cholesterol improvements, while SGLT2 inhibitors showed benefits in renal markers and insulin dose reduction. Statin therapy for primary prevention demonstrated meaningful reductions in all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular disease, with absolute risk reductions being most pronounced in women, patients ≥40 years, and those with higher baseline cardiovascular risk profiles.
Afrezza's Inhaled Insulin: Comparing Efficacy and Satisfaction in T1D
Several investigational therapies show promise as adjunctive treatments to standard insulin therapy in Type 1 diabetes, with varying efficacy profiles and safety considerations. While intensive insulin therapy remains the established standard of care based on landmark trials like DCCT/EDIC, emerging therapies offer potential benefits for specific patient populations and clinical scenarios.
• SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrate superior renal protection compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists, with eGFR preservation of +3.5 ml/min per 1.73 m² over 5 years and reduced risks of heart failure (RR 0.44) and CKD development (RR 0.49), though they carry increased risks of diabetic ketoacidosis (RR 2.08) and urinary tract infections (RR 2.27)
• GLP-1 receptor agonists provide greater glycemic improvement than SGLT2 inhibitors with HbA1c reduction of -5.4 mmol/mol (-0.5%) versus -2.6 mmol/mol (-0.2%), while offering superior cardiovascular outcomes including 15% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events and 19% reduction in end-stage kidney disease risk
• Teplizumab, the most recent FDA-approved investigational therapy (November 2022), represents the first disease-modifying treatment for Type 1 diabetes by slowing beta-cell decline in stage 2 and early stage 3 patients, potentially delaying progression to clinical diabetes
• Metformin as adjunctive therapy shows significant improvements in glycemic control with meaningful HbA1c reductions (p<0.001) and prevention of weight gain associated with intensive insulin therapy, particularly in adolescent patients above 12 years of age
• Advanced glucose monitoring systems like FreeStyle Libre demonstrate substantial HbA1c improvements (-0.75% in T1D at 3 months) that are maintained at 12 months, with greatest benefits observed in patients with baseline HbA1c >7.5%, while patients with HbA1c >10% showed dramatic reductions of -4.66%
• Intensive insulin therapy, while remaining standard of care, carries well-documented risks including increased severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia unawareness, and weight gain, with conventional therapy associated with 2-fold increased retinopathy risk and 5-fold increased cataract risk when applied longer than 3.5 years
Addressing Unmet Needs and Limitations in Type 1 Diabetes Treatment
Despite decades of research and therapeutic advances, type 1 diabetes treatment faces significant challenges that leave patients with substantial unmet medical needs. Current insulin-based approaches fail to adequately replicate normal pancreatic function, and emerging therapeutic strategies continue to encounter fundamental limitations.
• Inadequate glycemic control with standard insulin therapy - Standard insulin regimens cannot maintain blood glucose concentrations within the narrow physiological range achieved by normal pancreatic beta cells, failing to provide satisfactory glycemic control in the majority of patients
• Limited treatment options and heavy disease burden - Close to 2 million individuals in the U.S. remain dependent on multiple daily insulin injections or continuous pump infusion with no oral medications available, while the disease continues to cause severe complications and increased mortality despite modern techniques
• Poor achievement of metabolic targets in pediatric populations - Few pediatric patients with T1D achieve their metabolic targets, requiring comprehensive management that addresses glucose control, insulin resistance, beta-cell preservation, quality of life, and cardiovascular risk factors
• Insufficient efficacy of immunomodulatory approaches alone - Decades of focusing solely on immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies have proven inadequate after disease onset, requiring combination approaches that also address beta cell health and function
• Challenges in achieving permanent disease remission - Permanent remission of type 1 diabetes has not been satisfactorily achieved due to the difficulty of overcoming the persistent autoimmune response that destroys regenerated beta cells
• Limited availability and durability of islet transplantation - Islet cell replacement therapy is constrained by shortage of pancreas donors, limited availability of human islets from cadaveric sources, and challenges with encapsulation material stability and longevity in vivo
• Lack of physiologically responsive insulin delivery systems - Current insulin gene therapy approaches lack regulatory systems that can express and release insulin in response to glucose with satisfactory kinetics, failing to replicate normal pancreatic function
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Snoek FJ, van der Ven NC et al.. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) compared with blood glucose awareness training (BGAT) in poorly controlled Type 1 diabetic patients: long-term effects on HbA moderated by depression. A randomized controlled trial. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2008 Nov. 19046225
- [2] Sebastian-Valles F, Sager-La Ganga C et al.. Analysis of glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction with a connected smart pen cap in adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, parallel-group trial. Diabetologia. 2026 May. 41634174
- [3] Willey VJ, Kong S et al.. Estimating the Real-World Cost of Diabetes Mellitus in the United States During an 8-Year Period Using 2 Cost Methodologies. American health & drug benefits. 2018 Sep. 30464797
- [4] Xu Y, Malek ND et al.. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in type 1 diabetes. Nature medicine. 2026 May. 41857198
- [5] Klein R. Hyperglycemia and microvascular and macrovascular disease in diabetes. Diabetes care. 1995 Feb. 7729308
- [6] Naciu AM, Pozzilli P. Novel blood glucose lowering therapies for managing type 1 diabetes in paediatric patients. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2018 Mar. 29460641
- [7] Ward MC, Boucsein A et al.. Extended Use of Automated Insulin Delivery in Young People with Type 1 Diabetes and Elevated HbA1c: 52-Week Outcomes of the CO-PILOT Trial. Diabetes technology & therapeutics. 2026 Mar 5. 41784095
- [8] Martinez-Mateu C, Duperval R et al.. Comparison of demographics and treatment outcome in children with type 1 diabetes related to the economic background of their country of residence: observations from the SWEET database. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2026 Feb. 41443303
- [9] Piemonti L. From survival to freedom: redefining success in type 1 diabetes. The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2026 Apr. 41763233
- [10] Leszek P, Csanádi Z et al.. Real-world evidence with dapagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Central Eastern Europe and the Baltic region (EVOLUTION-HF CEE-BA Study). ESC heart failure. 2026 May 5. 41858299
- [11] Amina Raza -, Iftikhar Ahmed - et al.. Effect of Metformin as adjunct therapy with insulin in adolescent Pakistani people with type 1 diabetes. Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2023 Jul. 37599482
- [12] Livingstone R, Boyle JG et al.. A new perspective on metformin therapy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2017 Sep. 28770327
- [13] Saboo B. Key elements of successful intensive therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. 2015 Apr. 25941650
- [14] Bora Güneş N, Taşdelen Baş M et al.. Management of Type 1 diabetes in adolescents: Effectiveness of the remote personalized system of instruction model. Journal of pediatric nursing. 2026 Mar-Apr. 41547334
- [15] Lin YK, Hepworth E et al.. A pilot trial of 'HypoPals': Assessing trial procedures feasibility and intervention acceptability for a prospective digital hypoglycemia behavioral intervention study. Contemporary clinical trials. 2026 Apr. 41724265
- [16] de Oliveira HM, Gallo Ruelas M et al.. Degludec insulin versus efsitora insulin in diabetes mellitus management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of diabetes and its complications. 2025 Oct. 40627908
- [17] Bayona Cebada A, Nattero-Chávez L et al.. Efficacy and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes After the Introduction of an Off-Label Use Protocol for Clinical Practice. Diabetes technology & therapeutics. 2020 Mar. 31644310
- [18] Lin YC, Thùy TD et al.. Type 1 diabetes, cardiovascular complications and sesame ( zhī má). Journal of traditional and complementary medicine. 2014 Jan. 24872931
- [19] Nassar M, Chaudhuri A et al.. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as a possible intervention to delay the onset of type 1 diabetes: A new horizon. World journal of diabetes. 2024 Feb 15. 38464377
- [20] Schnell O, Cappuccio F et al.. Type 1 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular diabetology. 2013 Oct 28. 24165454

















