Peking University People’s Hospital Presents Phase I Results for Novel CD5 CAR-T Therapy
Clinical Trial Updates

Peking University People’s Hospital Presents Phase I Results for Novel CD5 CAR-T Therapy

Published : 05 Jun 2026

At a Glance
IndicationT-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
DrugSL105
Mechanism of ActionCD5 CAR-T therapy
CompanyPeking University People’s Hospital
Trial PhasePhase I
Trial AcronymCONQUER
NCT IDNCT06874946
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Neutral / Mixed
Conference NameAmerican Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting
Conference DatesMay 29–June 2, 2026
Patient PopulationAdult R/R patients
Number of Patients22
Objective Response Rate (ORR)81.8%
Combined Complete Response (CRc)54.5%
Grade 3+ Infection Incidence90.9%
Infection-Related Deaths7
Median Overall Survival3.6 months
Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D)2.0 x10^6 CAR-T cells/kg

Peking University People’s Hospital Reports Mixed Phase I Results for CD5 CAR-T

Peking University People’s Hospital presented Phase I results from its CONQUER trial at the ASCO Annual Meeting 2026, evaluating SL105, a novel nanobody-based autologous CD5 CAR-T therapy for relapsed/refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL), peripheral T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (PTCL), and cutaneous TCL. The trial in 22 adult patients showed a three-month maximum objective response rate (ORR) of 81.8% and a combined complete response (CRc) of 54.5%, with all responders achieving minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity. While cytokine release syndrome was manageable (72.7%, mostly Grade 1/2), a striking 90.9% of patients experienced Grade 3 or higher infections, leading to seven infection-related deaths and a median overall survival of 3.6 months.

  • The CONQUER trial demonstrated promising initial efficacy, achieving an 81.8% objective response rate and a 54.5% combined complete response rate at three months. All patients who responded were confirmed to be minimal residual disease-negative, indicating deep and meaningful responses in a challenging patient population with limited treatment options.
  • While cytokine release syndrome was observed in 72.7% of patients, it was predominantly Grade 1 or 2 and manageable. However, a significant safety concern emerged with 90.9% of patients experiencing Grade 3 or higher infections, including high rates of EBV and CMV. These severe infections led to seven deaths and contributed to a median overall survival of only 3.6 months, highlighting a critical area for protocol modification.
  • SL105 utilizes a unique nanobody-based approach to block CD5 expression on CAR-T cells, preventing fratricide and allowing targeting of CD5-positive malignant T-cells. Researchers plan to apply a recommended Phase II dose of 2.0 x10^6 CAR-T cells/kg in a larger cohort and introduce protocol modifications to ensure earlier allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) post-CAR-T administration to mitigate infection risks and improve long-term survival.

Why Novel Therapies are Crucial for T-cell Malignancies

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) presents significant therapeutic challenges that distinguish it from B-precursor ALL, with frequent relapse, chemotherapy resistance, and poorer overall prognosis. Despite improved treatment protocols, a substantial portion of T-ALL patients still experience treatment failure, and progress in T-cell ALL has notably lagged behind advances in B-lineage ALL.

Limited prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets: Many treatment challenges reflect the lack of prognostic cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities on which to base therapy, including targeted approaches, with molecularly targeted therapy further hindered by significant heterogeneity in T-ALL

Dismal outcomes in relapsed/refractory disease: Patients with refractory or relapsed T-ALL show cure rates below 10% with limited therapeutic options, as pediatric patients often do not derive additional benefit from intensified conventional chemotherapy approaches that have been maximized in the upfront setting

Immunotherapy development barriers: The lack of tumor-restricted T-cell antigens hampers immunotherapy progress, while targeting surface antigens (CD2, CD5, CD7, CD38) faces challenges including T-cell fratricide during manufacturing, T-cell depletion during treatment, and high frequency of target-negative relapse

Resistance mechanisms: Loss of PTEN is common in primary T-ALLs and results in resistance to γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) that target Notch1 mutations, while repressing p53-mediated apoptosis

Poor transplant outcomes: In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation studies, overall survival at 5 years was only 34%, with relapse being the most common cause of death (58% of patients) and cumulative incidence of relapse at 41%

Treatment-related mortality: The emergence of treatment-related morbidity and mortality alongside relapse remain major challenges, with non-relapse mortality reaching 26% in transplant studies

Peking University's SL105 CAR-T: Early Efficacy and Safety

Recent clinical studies in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia have demonstrated promising advances across multiple therapeutic modalities, with particular progress in novel targeted approaches and conditioning regimens. A comprehensive analysis of current research reveals significant developments in both efficacy outcomes and safety profiles for this challenging malignancy.

A notable phase 1/2 study (NCT02553460) evaluated the combination of bortezomib and vorinostat with chemotherapy backbone in 50 infant ALL patients, demonstrating manageable toxicity profiles despite concerning infectious complications. The study showed no dose-limiting toxicities at lower vorinostat doses, though grade 3-4 adverse events during induction included hypertension (48%), infections (44%), and fever with neutropenia (42%). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 patients, all due to infectious events including parainfluenza, cytomegalovirus, and Aspergillus fumigatus, highlighting the persistent challenge of immunosuppression-related mortality extending beyond the induction phase. Additional studies examining conditioning regimens revealed that total body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide may provide superior composite outcomes compared to modified busulfan plus cyclophosphamide, with 3-year graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival significantly higher at 52% versus 22% after propensity score matching.

Emerging targeted therapies have shown considerable promise, particularly menin inhibitors and BET protein degraders for treatment-resistant disease. Menin inhibitors including ziftomenib demonstrated efficacy in reducing tumor burden without major toxicity in xenograft models, with MEF2C S222 phosphorylation identified as a predictive biomarker for treatment sensitivity. For nelarabine-resistant T-ALL, BET family protein degraders ARV-771 and ARV-825 successfully targeted MYC addiction pathways, significantly reducing leukemia burden and extending survival in preclinical models. Novel fusion targets such as TPR::ABL2 have shown sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, while oleandrin demonstrated dose-dependent anti-leukemic effects with IC₅₀ values of 16-31 nM and no significant toxicity in mouse models, supporting the continued expansion of precision medicine approaches in T-ALL management.

CD5 CAR-T: A Glimmer of Hope, Shadowed by Infection Risk

The recent Phase I data for SL105, a nanobody-based autologous CD5 CAR-T therapy, presents a compelling, yet complex, picture for the future of T-cell malignancy treatment. For patients battling relapsed/refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, peripheral T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma, and cutaneous TCL—conditions notoriously difficult to treat with very poor prognoses—the reported objective response rate of 81.8% and complete response rate of 54.5% are undeniably encouraging. Achieving minimal residual disease-negativity in all responders further underscores the potent anti-tumor activity of this novel CAR-T construct. This level of efficacy in T-cell malignancies, where CAR-T development has historically faced unique challenges like T-cell fratricide and aplasia, suggests a significant step forward in addressing a high unmet medical need.

However, the enthusiasm is tempered by a stark safety signal: a staggering 90.9% of patients experienced Grade 3 or higher infections, leading to seven infection-related deaths. While cytokine release syndrome was manageable, this severe infection burden is a critical concern. It highlights the delicate balance between potent anti-tumor activity and systemic toxicity inherent in CAR-T therapies. The median overall survival of 3.6 months, despite the high initial response rates, further emphasizes that the durability of response or the impact of these severe toxicities may be undermining long-term patient benefit. Future development must strategically prioritize robust infection prophylaxis, refined patient selection, and potentially modifications to the CAR-T construct or lymphodepletion regimens to mitigate these life-threatening adverse events. The ability to improve this safety profile will be paramount in determining whether SL105 can translate its impressive initial efficacy into a viable, life-extending therapy for these aggressive T-cell cancers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is T-cell leukemia curable now?
Curability for T-cell leukemia depends significantly on the specific subtype, patient age, and disease stage. Pediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) has high cure rates with intensive chemotherapy, often exceeding 80-90%. Adult T-ALL, adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), and T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) remain challenging, though allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and novel targeted therapies, including CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory T-ALL, are improving outcomes and offering curative potential for select patients.
Is T-cell leukemia aggressive?
T-cell leukemias, including T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL), are typically aggressive hematologic malignancies. T-ALL is characterized by rapid proliferation of immature T-lymphoblasts and requires intensive, multi-agent chemotherapy due to its aggressive nature. T-PLL is a rare, highly aggressive mature T-cell leukemia with a poor prognosis, often demonstrating resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic regimens.
What is the new treatment for T-cell leukemia?
Tecartus (brexucabtagene autoleucel) is a new treatment approved for adult patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). This CD19-directed autologous T-cell immunotherapy represents the first CAR T-cell therapy specifically indicated for this aggressive form of leukemia. It involves genetically modifying a patient's own T-cells to target and destroy leukemia cells expressing the CD19 antigen.
What is the best treatment for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia?
The primary treatment for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is intensive multi-agent chemotherapy, often incorporating a backbone similar to B-ALL regimens but with specific adaptations. Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis is crucial due to the high risk of CNS involvement. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered for high-risk patients or those with persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) after initial therapy. For relapsed/refractory T-ALL, nelarabine is an approved option, and novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies are under investigation.

References

  1. [1] Bensberg M, Selimović-Pašić A et al.. Exposing the DNA methylation-responsive compartment of the leukaemic genome in T-ALL cell lines support its potential as a novel therapeutic target in T-ALL. Clinical epigenetics. 2025 Jul 3. 40611304
  2. [2] Hales EC, Taub JW et al.. New insights into Notch1 regulation of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR1 signaling axis: targeted therapy of γ-secretase inhibitor resistant T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cellular signalling. 2014 Jan. 24140475
  3. [3] Zheng B, Fu J et al.. Preclinical and Case Series Studies on the Combination of Venetoclax with Epigenetic Drugs in T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer management and research. 2025. 41185639
  4. [4] Li J, Yuan Y et al.. USP7 mutations are associated with adverse outcomes in pediatric T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma. Annals of hematology. 2025 Oct. 40982000
  5. [5] Wu K, Qian W et al.. Continuity of paediatric care for adolescents and young adults with leukaemia: a single-centre experience from China. BMJ paediatrics open. 2025 Nov 2. 41177559
  6. [6] Wang Y, Fu S et al.. [Analysis of ten cases of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia with non-KMT2A::AFF1 transcriptional variant 11q23 rearrangements]. Zhonghua yi xue yi chuan xue za zhi = Zhonghua yixue yichuanxue zazhi = Chinese journal of medical genetics. 2026 Apr 10. 41918382
  7. [7] Bug G, Labopin M et al.. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)- or alemtuzumab-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients 40 years and older with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission: a study from the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party. Bone marrow transplantation. 2026 Apr. 41792300
  8. [8] Mesilhy R, Khan MN et al.. Comparative survival outcomes between therapy-related and de novo acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC cancer. 2025 Nov 29. 41318424
  9. [9] Abuasab T, Rowe J et al.. Emerging Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for the Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Biologics : targets & therapy. 2021. 34703207
  10. [10] Ravikumar V, Berkowitz J et al.. A Rare Case of Therapy-Related B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Arising From Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cureus. 2023 Sep. 37872919
  11. [11] Shimamoto K, Karaoglu DA et al.. Targeting menin in T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Molecular cancer therapeutics. 2026 Mar 4. 41778833
  12. [12] Li XY, Han XW et al.. Chidamide as maintenance after chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 27 children with T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: A real-world prospective study. Frontiers in medicine. 2023. 36817761
  13. [13] Toutounchian S, Behboodi K et al.. MicroRNAs as potential prognostic biomarkers in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and bioinformatics study. Systematic reviews. 2026 Jan 29. 41612480
  14. [14] Fortner C, Niedermayer A et al.. Therapeutic potential of BH3-mimetics and NK cell-mediated immunotherapy in T-ALL. Cell death & disease. 2026 Apr 4. 41935056
  15. [15] Zhuang H, Jiang X et al.. Oleandrin Suppresses the PI3K/AKT Pathway to Inhibit Growth and Induce Apoptosis in T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells and Xenograft Mice. Planta medica. 2026 Mar 5. 41786305
  16. [16] Rivera-Pérez C, Morgades M et al.. Outcomes of pediatric and adult patients with relapsed/refractory cortical (CD1a+) T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The Spanish experience from SEHOP and PETHEMA groups. Annals of hematology. 2026 Mar 24. 41874722
  17. [17] Gruber TA, Jeha S et al.. Bortezomib and vorinostat in combination with mitoxantrone, dexamethasone, and pegasparaginase during induction and reinduction for infants with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre single-arm phase 1/2 study. The Lancet. Haematology. 2026 Mar. 41692013
  18. [18] Lato MW, Przysucha A et al.. The New Therapeutic Strategies in Pediatric T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021 Apr 26. 33925883
  19. [19] Asare JM, Rabik CA et al.. Investigational treatment options in phase I and phase II trials for relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in pediatric patients. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2021 Jun. 33896328
  20. [20] Riillo C, Caracciolo D et al.. A Novel Bispecific T-Cell Engager (CD1a x CD3ε) BTCE Is Effective against Cortical-Derived T Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) Cells. Cancers. 2022 Jun 11. 35740552

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts