Novartis Cosentyx® PMR data in New England Journal of Medicine showed sustained remission vs placebo in twice as many patients
Clinical Trial Updates

Novartis Cosentyx® PMR data in New England Journal of Medicine showed sustained remission vs placebo in twice as many patients

Published : 04 Jun 2026

At a Glance
IndicationPolymyalgia rheumatica
DrugSecukinumab
Mechanism of ActionInterleukin-17A inhibitor
CompanyNovartis
Trial PhasePhase III
Trial AcronymREPLENISH
NCT IDNCT05767034
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Publication JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Conference Name2026 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) Congress
Primary EndpointSustained remission at week 52 (Cosentyx 300mg s.c. plus a 24-week steroid taper superior to placebo plus a 24-week steroid taper)
Secondary EndpointsProportion of patients achieving complete sustained remission at week 52, adjusted annual cumulative steroid dose, time to first use of escape or rescue treatment through week 52
Dosage300mg, 150mg
ComparatorPlacebo, 24-week steroid taper regimen
Patient PopulationAdults aged 50 years and older with polymyalgia rheumatica
Follow-up DurationWeek 52
Sustained Remission Rate (Cosentyx 300mg)41.2%
Sustained Remission Rate (Cosentyx 150mg)40.6%
Sustained Remission Rate (Placebo)20.4%
Mean Adjusted Annual Cumulative Glucocorticoid Dose (Cosentyx 300mg)1604 mg
Mean Adjusted Annual Cumulative Glucocorticoid Dose (Cosentyx 150mg)1683 mg
Mean Adjusted Annual Cumulative Glucocorticoid Dose (Placebo)2093 mg
P-value (Sustained Remission)< 0.001
P-value (Glucocorticoid Dose, 300mg)< 0.001
P-value (Glucocorticoid Dose, 150mg)0.0015
Regulatory Submission RegionsUS, EU, Japan
Trial Countries27

Novartis Cosentyx Phase III REPLENISH Data Shows Sustained Remission in PMR

Novartis announced positive Phase III REPLENISH trial results for Cosentyx (secukinumab) in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), demonstrating statistically significant and clinically meaningful efficacy. The data, published in the New England Journal of Medicine and presented at EULAR 2026, showed that Cosentyx treatment led to sustained remission rates approximately twice as high as placebo at week 52. Furthermore, patients receiving Cosentyx achieved significant reductions in steroid use, addressing a critical unmet need in PMR management. The trial met all primary and secondary endpoints, and the safety profile was consistent with previous observations for Cosentyx. These findings support regulatory submissions in the US, EU, and Japan.

  • The Phase III REPLENISH trial demonstrated superior efficacy for Cosentyx in polymyalgia rheumatica, with 41.2% of patients on 300mg and 40.6% on 150mg achieving sustained remission at week 52, significantly higher than 20.4% for placebo (p-value < 0.001). Additionally, Cosentyx significantly reduced the mean adjusted annual cumulative glucocorticoid dose to 1604mg (300mg) and 1683mg (150mg) compared to 2093mg for placebo, addressing a critical need to reduce steroid reliance.
  • Following these robust results, Novartis has submitted Cosentyx for health authority review for PMR in the US, EU, and Japan, with additional country filings planned throughout 2026. This addresses a significant unmet need for advanced treatments in PMR, a chronic inflammatory disease where current standard of care involves long-term steroid use with associated risks and frequent relapses, impacting patients over 50.
  • The REPLENISH trial, a global Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study across 27 countries, evaluated Cosentyx 300mg and 150mg in combination with a 24-week steroid taper regimen. The study confirmed that Cosentyx's known safety profile remained consistent in PMR patients, with no new safety signals identified, reinforcing its potential as a long-term treatment option.

Addressing Unmet Needs in Polymyalgia Rheumatica Treatment

Current treatment approaches for polymyalgia rheumatica face significant challenges that impact both efficacy and patient safety. While glucocorticoids remain the mainstay therapy, substantial limitations exist in optimizing their use and managing their associated risks. The need for evidence-based treatment protocols and effective steroid-sparing alternatives continues to drive clinical research efforts.

Prolonged glucocorticoid dependency and high relapse rates — Treatment typically requires 1-2 years of glucocorticoid therapy, with relapses occurring in 40-60% of patients during tapering, and one-third experiencing disease recurrence even after achieving remission

Significant glucocorticoid-related adverse events — Side effects occur in 22.7% of patients and are particularly problematic in elderly populations, with vertebral fractures and infections among the most serious complications of long-term corticosteroid therapy

Lack of evidence-based tapering protocols — Guideline recommendations for steroid tapering regimens are largely based on expert consensus rather than controlled studies, with no robust evidence to guide optimal initial dosing or tapering strategies

Individual variability in treatment response — Prednisone pharmacokinetics vary significantly between patients, with weight-based dosing being a critical factor, making steroid tapering more of an art requiring individualized approaches

Complex disease monitoring challenges — Assessment of disease activity is complicated by comorbidities such as osteoarthritis, and acute phase reactants may not reliably indicate flares during treatment, while the role of imaging in disease activity assessment remains incompletely defined

Variable disease course requiring long-term management — The disease course is not uniformly monophasic, with some patients requiring therapy longer than four years and others experiencing recurrence after prolonged disease-free intervals

Limited availability of proven steroid-sparing agents — While IL-6 inhibitors like tocilizumab and sarilumab show promise, and methotrexate may be useful in refractory cases, randomized controlled trials with new immunosuppressive agents are still needed to establish optimal glucocorticoid-sparing strategies

REPLENISH Trial Design and Positive Cosentyx Results

Recent clinical trials in polymyalgia rheumatica have primarily focused on tocilizumab as a steroid-sparing therapy, with several key studies demonstrating significant efficacy in achieving glucocorticoid-free remission. The most robust evidence comes from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses examining tocilizumab's role in PMR treatment, along with established core domain sets for standardizing trial endpoints.

Study Design Sample Size Primary Endpoint Key Results
Tocilizumab Phase 2/3 (2022) Double-blind, multi-centre RCT 36 patients (19 TCZ, 17 placebo) Glucocorticoid-free remission at week 16 63.2% vs 11.8% remission rate (p=0.002); OR=12.9
GiACTA PMR Subgroup (2021) Post-hoc analysis of GCA trial 52 PMR-only patients Sustained remission at week 52 45.2% vs 19.0% (p=0.0446)
Tocilizumab Meta-analysis (2025) Systematic review of 3 RCTs 188 patients (99 TCZ, 89 placebo) GC-free remission at week 24 RR 2.64 (95% CI 1.38-5.06, p=0.003)
Methotrexate Meta-analysis 4 RCTs 194 patients (97 MTX, 97 controls) Remission rate OR=5.699 (95% CI 2.401-13.53, p<0.001)
OMERACT Core Domain Set (2018) Consensus development 70 participants in Delphi Domain standardization Inner core: inflammation markers, pain, stiffness, physical function (93% agreement)

Cosentyx's Potential to Reshape PMR Treatment

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that investigational IL-6 receptor blocking agents, particularly tocilizumab and JAK inhibitors like baricitinib, show superior efficacy compared to standard glucocorticoid monotherapy in polymyalgia rheumatica. In a 2022 randomized controlled trial, tocilizumab achieved glucocorticoid-free remission in 63.2% of patients versus 11.8% receiving placebo (OR 12.9, 95% CI: 2.2-73.6), while also extending time to first relapse (130±13 days versus 82±11 days) and reducing cumulative glucocorticoid exposure. Similarly, baricitinib demonstrated remarkable efficacy in a 2025 trial, with 78% of participants achieving the primary endpoint compared to 13% in the placebo group (relative risk 5.8, 95% CI 3.2-10.6).

Methotrexate has emerged as the most established steroid-sparing agent, with moderate to high-quality evidence supporting its use in early PMR. A landmark 2004 multicenter trial showed that 87.5% of patients receiving methotrexate plus prednisone were able to discontinue prednisone at 76 weeks compared to 53.3% receiving placebo (P=0.003), with a 34 percentage point risk difference and significant reduction in cumulative prednisone dose (2.1g versus 2.97g). These findings contrast sharply with standard glucocorticoid therapy, where prolonged treatment remains common, with median continuous treatment duration of 15.8 months and approximately 25% of patients requiring more than 4 years of therapy.

The safety profiles of investigational therapies appear favorable compared to the well-documented risks of prolonged glucocorticoid use, which causes serious adverse effects in 48-65% of patients, including vertebral fractures and infections. Current 2025 guidelines now recommend IL-6 receptor blocking agents for relapsing disease and consideration in new-onset PMR patients at high risk for glucocorticoid-related adverse events, representing a significant shift from traditional glucocorticoid monotherapy. Anti-TNF agents have proven ineffective, while the role of rituximab as an alternative steroid-sparing option continues to be evaluated.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Cosentyx treat PMR?
Cosentyx (secukinumab) is not indicated for the treatment of Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR). Its approved indications include plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, and enthesitis-related arthritis. PMR is primarily managed with corticosteroids, and secukinumab's mechanism of action targeting IL-17A is not established for this condition.
Is there a biologic for polymyalgia rheumatica?
There is no biologic specifically approved for polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) as a primary indication. Corticosteroids remain the first-line treatment for PMR. While some biologics are approved for related conditions like giant cell arteritis (e.g., tocilizumab), their use in PMR is generally off-label for refractory cases or steroid-sparing strategies. Clinical trials continue to explore novel therapeutic options for PMR.
What is the role of IL-17A in the inflammatory pathways relevant to polymyalgia rheumatica?
Interleukin-17A (IL-17A) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in various autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. While its direct and primary role in the core pathogenesis of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is still under investigation, PMR is characterized by systemic inflammation, often involving T-cell activation and other cytokine networks. Understanding the interplay of IL-17A with these established inflammatory pathways could provide insights into potential therapeutic targets.
Why is secukinumab being explored as a potential treatment for polymyalgia rheumatica?
Secukinumab is a selective IL-17A inhibitor, a cytokine implicated in various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The exploration of secukinumab in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is driven by the significant unmet need for effective, steroid-sparing treatments beyond conventional corticosteroids. Investigating novel immunomodulatory approaches aims to identify therapies that can address the underlying inflammatory processes in PMR, potentially offering improved long-term outcomes for patients.

References

  1. [1] Rio-Alamos C, Montefusco-Siegmund R et al.. Acute Relaxation Response Induced by Tibetan Singing Bowl Sounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial. European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education. 2023 Jan 29. 36826208
  2. [2] Duarte C, Ferreira RJ et al.. Outcome Measures in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. A Systematic Review. The Journal of rheumatology. 2015 Dec. 26568600
  3. [3] Caporali R, Cimmino MA et al.. Prednisone plus methotrexate for polymyalgia rheumatica: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2004 Oct 5. 15466766
  4. [4] Gu J, Yang M et al.. Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors versus DMARDs in the Treatment of Polymyalgia Rheumatica in China. International journal of general medicine. 2023. 37465555
  5. [5] Rahimi M, Esalatmanesh K et al.. Outcomes of polymyalgia rheumatica in real-world practice: a longitudinal cohort study. Romanian journal of internal medicine = Revue roumaine de medecine interne. 2024 Sep 1. 38470357
  6. [6] Meskimen S, Cook TD et al.. Management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. American family physician. 2000 Apr 1. 10779249
  7. [7] Partington RJ, Muller S et al.. Incidence, prevalence and treatment burden of polymyalgia rheumatica in the UK over two decades: a population-based study. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2018 Dec. 30297332
  8. [8] Charalambous A, Giannakopoulou M et al.. A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Effectiveness of Progressive Muscle Relaxation and Guided Imagery as Anxiety Reducing Interventions in Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM. 2015. 26347018
  9. [9] Filippou G, Sirotti S. How can ultrasonography help in the management of CPPD? From diagnosis to clinical subset identification. Current opinion in rheumatology. 2023 May 1. 36943699
  10. [10] Nettleton E, Carlson K et al.. The emerging risk of overdiagnosis in rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. The Lancet. Rheumatology. 2025 Feb. 39341221
  11. [11] Spiera R, Unizony SH et al.. Tocilizumab vs placebo for the treatment of giant cell arteritis with polymyalgia rheumatica symptoms, cranial symptoms or both in a randomized trial. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 2021 Apr. 33784598
  12. [12] Izumi K, Kuda H et al.. Tocilizumab is effective against polymyalgia rheumatica: experience in 13 intractable cases. RMD open. 2015. 26635968
  13. [13] Maritescu A, Pescaru CC et al.. The Effects of Progressive Muscle Relaxation on Mental Health and Sleep Quality in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025 Apr 18. 40283637
  14. [14] Mackie SL, Twohig H et al.. The OMERACT Core Domain Set for Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. The Journal of rheumatology. 2017 Oct. 28765246
  15. [15] Bonelli M, Radner H et al.. Tocilizumab in patients with new onset polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR-SPARE): a phase 2/3 randomised controlled trial. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2022 Jun. 35210264
  16. [16] Saraux A, Carvajal Alegria G et al.. Baricitinib in early polymyalgia rheumatica (BACHELOR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. The Lancet. Rheumatology. 2025 Apr. 39818228
  17. [17] Docken WP. Polymyalgia rheumatica can recur years after discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy. Clinical and experimental rheumatology. 2009 Jan-Feb. 19646342
  18. [18] Nielsen EL, Nielsen AW et al.. Impact of a rapid access strategy on referral rates, diagnosis, and glucocorticoid initiation in suspected polymyalgia rheumatica. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 2025 Oct. 40729826
  19. [19] Li J, Hall J et al.. Rates of glucocorticoid taper in the management of polymyalgia rheumatica: the science behind the "art". Clinical rheumatology. 2025 Jan. 39641835
  20. [20] de Boysson H, Devauchelle-Pensec V et al.. French protocol for the diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis. La Revue de medecine interne. 2025 Jan. 39487062

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts