Ipsen Presents New Late-Breaking Data for IQIRVO® in Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Clinical Trial Updates

Ipsen Presents New Late-Breaking Data for IQIRVO® in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Published : 29 May 2026

At a Glance
IndicationPrimary Biliary Cholangitis
Drugelafibranor
Mechanism of ActionPPAR agonist
CompanyIpsen
Trial PhasePhase III
Trial AcronymELATIVE
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Conference NameEuropean Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) congress
Key Outcome (ELATIVE Fatigue)Clinically meaningful fatigue improvement
Fatigue Improvement Rate (ELATIVE)67% (IQIRVO) vs 31% (placebo) at Week 52
ALP Normalization Rate (Real-World)59% at 6 months
Patient Population (Real-World)PBC patients with ALP 1-1.67 x ULN
Secondary Trial AcronymELFINITY
Secondary Trial PhasePhase IV
Regulatory DesignationBreakthrough Therapy Designation (U.S. FDA)
Approved Regions and DatesU.S. FDA accelerated approval (June 2024), EMA conditional approval (September 2024), UK MHRA approval (October 2024)
Combination Therapyursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)

Ipsen's IQIRVO Shows Clinically Meaningful Fatigue Improvement in PBC

Ipsen announced new late-breaking results for IQIRVO (elafibranor) in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) from the pivotal ELATIVE® Phase III trial and two real-world studies, presented at the EASL congress. The data reinforce IQIRVO as a second-line PBC treatment, demonstrating rapid and robust alkaline phosphatase (ALP) reduction, significant fatigue improvement in patients with moderate-to-severe fatigue, and pruritus relief. A post hoc analysis of ELATIVE showed 67% of IQIRVO patients achieved clinically meaningful fatigue improvement versus 31% on placebo at Week 52 (p=0.020). A U.S. real-world analysis reported 59% of patients with ALP 1-1.67 x ULN achieved ALP normalization at 6 months. Interim Phase IV ELFINITY® study findings also showed rapid ALP reductions and improvements in fatigue and pruritus.

  • A post hoc analysis of the pivotal ELATIVE Phase III study revealed that patients with moderate-to-severe fatigue at baseline experienced significantly greater reductions in fatigue with IQIRVO compared to placebo over 52 weeks. A clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue was achieved by 67% of patients on IQIRVO versus 31% on placebo (p=0.020) at Week 52, with benefits observed as early as Week 4 across multiple dimensions of physical and mental fatigue, including extreme exhaustion and difficulty thinking clearly.
  • A U.S. real-world analysis, utilizing the Health Verity database, demonstrated IQIRVO's effectiveness in reducing alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels in PBC patients with ALP elevated between 1-1.67 times the upper limit of normal. This study showed that 72% of second-line treatment-naïve patients achieved a ≥15% ALP reduction, with mean ALP declining from 174 U/L to 131 U/L, and 59% achieving ALP normalization at 6 months, highlighting a key treatment goal for improved long-term prognosis.
  • Interim month 3 findings from the global Phase IV ELFINITY® study, conducted in routine clinical practice, further supported IQIRVO's rapid and sustained ALP reductions, with biochemical response achieved in 55% of patients. Over half of patients with moderate-to-severe fatigue at baseline experienced clinically meaningful improvements by month 3, alongside clinically important improvements in pruritus. The study also confirmed a favorable tolerability profile, consistent with prior studies, with no serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events reported.

The Persistent Challenges and Unmet Needs in PBC Treatment

Current treatment approaches for Primary Biliary Cholangitis face several significant obstacles that impact patient outcomes and clinical management. Despite advances in therapeutic options, substantial gaps remain in treatment efficacy, physician knowledge, and clinical practice implementation.

Limited first-line treatment efficacy: Up to 40% of patients show inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), which remains the standard first-line treatment, with studies demonstrating no beneficial effect on symptoms or liver histology after 2 years of treatment despite improvements in serum liver tests.

Second-line therapy challenges: Obeticholic acid (OCA), initially approved as second-line therapy, recently lost its marketing authorization in the EU due to unfavorable risk-benefit balance, while newer agents like seladelpar and elafibranor show variable response rates depending on baseline alkaline phosphatase levels.

Significant physician knowledge gaps: Overall mean awareness score for PBC among physicians was only 62.6%, with critical knowledge deficits regarding second-line therapies (only 6.8% awareness of steroid use) and substantial disparities between specialists and primary care providers.

Treatment personalization limitations: Challenges persist in developing personalized treatment approaches, identifying robust endpoints beyond alkaline phosphatase normalization, and improving quality of life outcomes for patients with varying disease severity.

Access and implementation barriers: Broader access to effective new therapies remains limited, while targeted medical education for primary care physicians is essential to ensure timely referral and optimize patient outcomes across different healthcare settings.

IQIRVO's Impact on ALP, Fatigue, and Pruritus in PBC

UDCA remains the first-line therapy for PBC, though approximately 25-40% of patients demonstrate inadequate response and require second-line treatments. Recent phase 3 trials have established the efficacy of newer therapeutic options, with FDA-approved second-line therapies showing significant biochemical improvements and potential symptom relief.

UDCA monotherapy achieves biochemical response in 60-75% of patients, with treated patients showing reduced mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.64) and gaining an average of 2.24 years in life expectancy compared to standard care

Obeticholic acid demonstrates biochemical response rates of 47.2% at 12 months, increasing to 68.6% at 36 months, though 45% of patients discontinue treatment over 48 months due to adverse effects, with 12-month non-responders showing heightened clinical event risk (hazard ratio 4.50)

Elafibranor achieved 51% biochemical response versus 4% placebo in the phase 3 ELATIVE trial (difference 47 percentage points; P<0.001), with 15% of patients achieving ALP normalization compared to none in placebo group

Triple therapy combinations (UDCA + OCA + fibrates) show significantly superior response rates compared to dual therapy, with higher rates of ALP normalization, deep response, and biochemical remission (all p<0.001)

PPAR agonists combined with UDCA demonstrate significantly greater ALP reduction compared to UDCA alone (MD -131.15, 95% CI -155.95 to -106.36) in meta-analysis of 17 studies involving 1,219 patients

Post-transplant outcomes remain excellent for PBC patients, with current five- and ten-year survival rates of 88% and 78% respectively, while the need for liver transplantation has decreased with improved medical management

Elafibranor's Dual PPAR Agonism and the PBC Treatment Landscape

Several PPAR agonists are being investigated for similar indications as elafibranor, primarily targeting NAFLD/MASLD through metabolic pathway modulation. The clinical development programs show varied intervention models ranging from phase 2 studies to comprehensive meta-analyses across multiple patient populations.

Drug PPAR Target Indication Trial Design Key Intervention Details
Lanifibranor Pan-PPAR agonist (α, δ, γ) MASLD/T2D Phase 2, randomized (1:1) 38 patients, 800mg vs placebo, 24 weeks (NCT03459079)
Lanifibranor Pan-PPAR agonist (α, δ, γ) MASH/fibrosis Placebo-controlled Meta-analysis of 2,497 individuals (NCT04849728)
Saroglitazar Dual-PPAR agonist NAFLD Multiple studies 10 studies included in systematic review
Chiglitazar Pan-PPAR agonist NAFLD Preclinical model C57BL/6J mice, HFD model, 5-10 mg/kg/d, 10 weeks

Key Efficacy Findings: Lanifibranor demonstrated significant IHTG reduction (-44% vs -12% placebo, p<0.01), with 65% of patients achieving ≥30% IHTG reduction compared to 22% on placebo. Meta-analysis data showed improvements in lipid profiles (HDL-C +9.87%, triglycerides -26.90%) though fibrosis improvement was not statistically significant (OR 1.26, p=0.08). All PPAR agonist classes demonstrated efficacy for NAFLD treatment (P<0.05) with good safety profiles, though gastrointestinal adverse events were commonly reported.

IQIRVO's Comprehensive Data Reshapes Second-Line PBC Management

The recent presentation of new data for IQIRVO (elafibranor) at EASL marks a significant moment for the management of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), a chronic autoimmune liver disease that often leaves patients with debilitating symptoms despite first-line treatment. Elafibranor, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α/δ agonist, has recently secured accelerated FDA approval and a positive opinion in the EU, positioning it as a critical second-line option for patients who do not adequately respond to or tolerate ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

The comprehensive data package reinforces IQIRVO's robust efficacy, particularly its ability to achieve rapid and significant reductions in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels, a key biochemical marker of cholestasis. Real-world evidence further supports this, showing a notable rate of ALP normalization. Beyond biochemical improvements, the new findings highlight a clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue for patients experiencing moderate-to-severe symptoms, a crucial differentiator given that fatigue is a pervasive and often undertreated aspect of PBC that severely impacts quality of life. Additionally, the data indicate relief from pruritus, another burdensome symptom.

However, the evolving landscape also presents considerations. While elafibranor offers a favorable safety profile compared to some alternatives, common gastrointestinal adverse events like abdominal pain and diarrhea were observed. Furthermore, as a relatively new entrant, long-term data on histological outcomes and transplant-free survival are still accumulating, which will be vital for broader clinical confidence and guideline integration. The market is also becoming increasingly competitive with other PPAR agonists, such as seladelpar, demonstrating similar efficacy profiles, potentially leading to a more fragmented treatment paradigm.

Ultimately, these advancements underscore a shift towards more personalized treatment strategies in PBC. Clinicians now have additional well-tolerated options that not only address biochemical markers but also offer tangible improvements in patient-reported symptoms like fatigue and pruritus. This move beyond solely biochemical endpoints to a more holistic approach, considering individual patient needs and symptom burden, is poised to redefine optimal care for those living with PBC.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is elafibranor approved for PBC?
Elafibranor (Iqirvo) received FDA approval for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in June 2024. It is indicated for the treatment of PBC in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in adults with an inadequate response to UDCA, or as monotherapy for those unable to tolerate UDCA.
Does PBC affect teeth?
Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) is frequently associated with Sjögren's syndrome, an autoimmune condition that causes xerostomia. This dry mouth significantly increases the risk of dental caries, periodontal disease, and other oral health complications in affected individuals.
What are the three criteria for PBC?
Diagnosis of Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) typically requires the presence of at least two out of three key criteria. These include elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) for at least six months, positive anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) at a titer of 1:40 or greater, and/or histological evidence of non-suppurative destructive cholangitis and interlobular bile duct destruction on liver biopsy.
What is the triad of PBC?
The triad of Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) refers to the three key diagnostic features: elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP), the presence of anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA), and characteristic liver histology. Histological findings include non-suppurative cholangitis and destruction of small-to-medium sized intrahepatic bile ducts. While AMA and elevated ALP are often sufficient for diagnosis, liver biopsy can confirm the typical pathological changes.

References

  1. [1] Corpechot C. Primary Biliary Cirrhosis Beyond Ursodeoxycholic Acid. Seminars in liver disease. 2016 Feb. 26870929
  2. [2] de la Monte SM, Pang M et al.. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist treatment of alcohol-induced hepatic insulin resistance. Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology. 2011 Apr. 21426453
  3. [3] Otte CM, Penning LC et al.. [Cholangitis in cats: symptoms, cause, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis]. Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde. 2011 May 1. 21614849
  4. [4] Jones D, Carbone M et al.. Impact of setanaxib on quality of life outcomes in primary biliary cholangitis in a phase 2 randomized controlled trial. Hepatology communications. 2023 Mar 1. 36809195
  5. [5] Goet JC, Hirschfield GM. Guideline review: British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC Primary Biliary Cholangitis treatment and management guidelines. Frontline gastroenterology. 2019 Jul. 31281627
  6. [6] Kuiper EM, Hansen BE et al.. Trends in liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis in the Netherlands 1988-2008. BMC gastroenterology. 2010 Dec 20. 21172005
  7. [7] Tsakou A, Notas G et al.. Somatostatin Effect on Growth Factors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Current issues in molecular biology. 2026 Jan 26. 41751398
  8. [8] Zhao S, Tian F et al.. Efficacy of tirzepatide, lanifibranor, and resmetirom in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials. Internal and emergency medicine. 2026 Mar 31. 41917519
  9. [9] Chascsa D, Carey EJ et al.. Old and new treatments for primary biliary cholangitis. Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver. 2017 Apr. 28371104
  10. [10] Kelly C, Zen Y et al.. Post-Transplant Immunosuppression in Autoimmune Liver Disease. Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. 2023 Mar-Apr. 36950491
  11. [11] Tidwell J, Balassiano N et al.. Emerging therapeutic options for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review. World journal of hepatology. 2023 Aug 27. 37701920
  12. [12] Kimura N, Takahashi K et al.. Development and validation of machine learning model for predicting treatment responders in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology. 2024 Jan. 37691006
  13. [13] Buchanan-Peart KA, Dasani D et al.. Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Novel and Emerging Therapies. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2025 Nov. 41626062
  14. [14] Pape T, Baumann U et al.. Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Pediatric Patients following Liver Transplantation. Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition. 2025 Mar. 40109569
  15. [15] Zhu H, Zheng M et al.. Development and external validation of an early prediction model to identify irresponsive patients and prognosis of UDCA treatment in primary biliary cholangitis. Scientific reports. 2024 Dec 28. 39732944
  16. [16] Liu L, Sun W et al.. Chiglitazar attenuates high-fat diet-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by modulating multiple pathways in mice. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2024 Nov 1. 39098464
  17. [17] Machado NO, Chopra PJ et al.. Choledochal Cyst in Adults: Etiopathogenesis, Presentation, Management, and Outcome-Case Series and Review. Gastroenterology research and practice. 2015. 26257778
  18. [18] Salamat Ali J, Salamat Ali T et al.. Latest FDA approved drug Elafibranor (Iqirvo): a novel prospect for treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012). 2025 Jan. 40109633
  19. [19] Verma A, Jazrawi RP et al.. Prescribing habits in primary biliary cirrhosis: a national survey. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 1999 Aug. 10514110
  20. [20] Ahmed T, Farooq S et al.. Pathogenesis and Treatment of Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis and Its Fibrosis: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2025 Aug. 40951083

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts