Darlifarnib's FTI Class Baggage Overshadows Mechanistically Differentiated RCC Combination Bid
Clinical Trial Updates

Darlifarnib's FTI Class Baggage Overshadows Mechanistically Differentiated RCC Combination Bid

Published : 15 Jul 2026

The Overview
Kura Oncology announced that updated Phase 1a results from the ongoing FIT-001 clinical trial (NCT06026410), evaluating darlifarnib in combination with cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), will be featured in an oral presentation at the 2026 Kidney Cancer Research Summit (KCRS). These long-term follow-up data will highlight darlifarnib’s potential as a combination agent with VEGFR-targeted therapies in heavily pretreated, cabozantinib-naïve patients with refractory RCC. Kura is currently enrolling patients in the randomized Phase 1b dose-optimization portion of FIT-001, comparing darlifarnib plus cabozantinib versus cabozantinib alone, to inform the selection of a recommended Phase 3 dose for a registrational study planned for 2028.
Knolens Analysis

The most important verdict here is not what Kura announced — it is what the data cannot yet show. Kura Oncology is presenting updated Phase 1a long-term follow-up from FIT-001 (NCT06026410) at KCRS 2026, a single-arm, uncontrolled, early-phase dataset in heavily pretreated, cabozantinib-naïve patients with refractory RCC. No efficacy figures — response rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival — are disclosed in the inputs, and primary endpoints during dose escalation are safety-oriented: incidence of dose interruptions, reductions, and discontinuations. This is preclinical-to-Phase-1a-level evidence, and it cannot be weighted equivalently to the randomized Phase 1b data that Kura is now actively enrolling. The mechanistic rationale is genuinely differentiated from prior farnesyltransferase inhibitor programs: KO-2806 inhibits mTORC1 signaling in endothelial cells to enhance antiangiogenic TKI activity, and preclinical RCC models demonstrated tumor regressions and sensitization of tumors previously progressing on anti-VEGFR TKIs. [1] However, the resolution precedent that defines the risk envelope is unambiguous — tipifarnib, the most-studied FTI in oncology, failed across pancreatic cancer (688 patients, median OS 193 vs. 182 days, P=0.75), breast cancer (ORR 30% vs. 38% for letrozole alone), and pediatric brain tumors (no advantage over historical controls). Lonafarnib showed unfavorable outcomes in ovarian cancer, with FNTB GG genotype patients recording median PFS of 10 months versus 40 months in non-FTI-treated patients — a pharmacogenomic signal darlifarnib's development program does not appear to address. [2] One safety precedent demands monitoring: the combination of sorafenib and tipifarnib in a metastatic RCC patient produced three deeply invasive squamous cell carcinomas within three months, a class-plus-VEGFR-inhibitor signal directly relevant to the darlifarnib-cabozantinib arm. The sharpest risk is that Kura's 2028 registrational timeline rests on a Phase 1b dose-optimization readout from a program with no disclosed biomarker selection strategy, a class with no pivotal-trial successes in solid tumors, and a competitor-dense RCC landscape where IO/TKI combinations already hold approved indications in the IO-pretreated setting.

FIT-001 Phase 1a primary endpoints measure dose interruptions, reductions, and discontinuations — not tumor response or survival. No ORR, PFS, or OS figures appear in the inputs, and the mechanistic basis remains preclinical-only at this disclosure stage.

At a Glance
IndicationRenal Cell Carcinoma
Drugdarlifarnib
Mechanism of ActionFarnesyl transferase inhibitor
CompanyKura Oncology, Inc.
Trial PhasePhase 1a/1b
Trial AcronymFIT-001
NCT IDNCT06026410
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaOncology
Combination Partnercabozantinib
Conference2026 Kidney Cancer Research Summit (KCRS)
Presentation DetailsOral presentation, July 24, 2026, 3:05 p.m. – 3:45 p.m. ET
Patient PopulationCabozantinib-naïve, heavily pretreated, refractory advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients
Ongoing Trial ArmsDarlifarnib plus cabozantinib versus cabozantinib alone
Planned Registrational StudyPlanned for 2028
Future Expansion IndicationRAS-mutated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Future Expansion Combination Partnerdaraxonrasib
US Annual ccRCC Cases>61,000

Kura Oncology to Present Long-Term Darlifarnib Data in RCC at KCRS

Kura Oncology announced that updated Phase 1a results from the ongoing FIT-001 clinical trial (NCT06026410), evaluating darlifarnib in combination with cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), will be featured in an oral presentation at the 2026 Kidney Cancer Research Summit (KCRS). These long-term follow-up data will highlight darlifarnib’s potential as a combination agent with VEGFR-targeted therapies in heavily pretreated, cabozantinib-naïve patients with refractory RCC. Kura is currently enrolling patients in the randomized Phase 1b dose-optimization portion of FIT-001, comparing darlifarnib plus cabozantinib versus cabozantinib alone, to inform the selection of a recommended Phase 3 dose for a registrational study planned for 2028.

  • Kura Oncology will present updated long-term follow-up data from the Phase 1a portion of the FIT-001 study at the 2026 Kidney Cancer Research Summit (KCRS) on July 24, 2026. These results focus on darlifarnib combined with cabozantinib in heavily pretreated, cabozantinib-naïve patients with refractory advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), providing further evidence of darlifarnib's potential to enhance VEGFR-targeted therapies.
  • Darlifarnib is a next-generation farnesyl transferase inhibitor (FTI) designed to inhibit farnesylation of RHEB and suppress mTORC1 signaling. This mechanism aims to counter a key resistance mechanism to targeted therapies, thereby enhancing the depth and durability of response. Kura highlights darlifarnib's potential as a precision combination agent across multiple targeted therapy classes, including VEGF-TKI, KRAS, and PI3Ka inhibitors.
  • Kura is actively enrolling patients in the U.S. and E.U. for the randomized Phase 1b dose-optimization portion of the FIT-001 trial, comparing darlifarnib plus cabozantinib against cabozantinib alone in cabozantinib-naïve, refractory, advanced ccRCC. This phase is crucial for selecting a recommended Phase 3 dose for a registrational study anticipated in 2028. The company also plans to evaluate darlifarnib in combination with daraxonrasib for RAS-mutated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

The Need for Deeper, More Durable Responses in RCC

Despite meaningful advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a disease with substantial unmet clinical need — metastatic RCC carries a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%, and approximately 20–30% of clear cell RCC patients progress to aggressive metastatic disease. The therapeutic landscape is further complicated by inherent resistance mechanisms, significant toxicity burdens, and the growing complexity of treatment selection across a rapidly expanding armamentarium.

  • Broad resistance to conventional therapies: RCC is among the most resistant tumours to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy. Response rates to cytokine-based regimens such as IL-2 and IFN-alpha remain in the 10–20% range, with few long-term survivors and no demonstrated survival benefit from IFN-alpha as adjuvant therapy in three separate randomized trials.

  • Acquired resistance to targeted agents: Drug resistance to first-line VEGF-targeted therapies frequently emerges through angiogenic escape — the activation of VEGF-independent pathways — rendering frontline TKIs progressively ineffective. When progression occurs following both ICI and TKI therapy, subsequent therapeutic options are markedly limited.

  • Toxicity constraints across treatment modalities: High-dose IL-2 produces durable responses in a small subset of patients but is accompanied by formidable toxicity, restricting its use to carefully selected populations. Sunitinib-related toxicity affected approximately 50% of patients in clinical experience, with hypertension, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, diarrhoea, and fatigue among the most common adverse events; Grade 3 serious adverse events affected up to 10% of patients. Surgical morbidity, thalidomide-associated neurotoxicity, and the significant toxicity profile of stem cell transplantation further constrain the available treatment space.

  • Complexity of treatment sequencing and selection: While the number of available therapeutic options continues to grow, selecting the optimal strategy for individual patients has become increasingly challenging. Each agent must be evaluated across dimensions of toxicity, cost, and clinical benefit, with unresolved questions remaining around the timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy, optimal combination versus sequential single-agent approaches, and the value of chronic novel agent therapy.

  • Absence of validated predictive biomarkers: Despite focused investigative efforts, no reliable predictive biomarkers for response to specific targeted therapies have been successfully validated to date. This gap impedes rational patient selection and limits the ability to prospectively identify which patients are most likely to derive durable benefit from available regimens.

  • Limited durability of responses: Even among patients who do respond to current systemic therapies, durable remissions remain uncommon. The combination of IFN-alpha and IL-2 increases overall response rates compared to monotherapy, yet no improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated, underscoring the critical need for therapies that translate objective responses into meaningful long-term outcomes.

Long-Term Follow-Up from FIT-001 Phase 1a in ccRCC

Recent clinical investigations in renal cell carcinoma span a broad range of intervention types — from targeted HIF-2α inhibition and IO-TKI combinations to real-world dosing strategies and radiotracer-based diagnostics. The studies below, published in 2025–2026, capture key efficacy and safety signals across both clear cell and non-clear cell histologies.

Study Name Intervention Key Efficacy Outcomes Key Safety Outcomes
LITESPARK-022 (Phase III, 2026) Belzutifan + pembrolizumab vs. pembrolizumab alone (adjuvant, ccRCC) 28% reduction in risk of disease recurrence; prolonged DFS over pembrolizumab alone Not specified in detail
LITESPARK-011 (Phase III, 2026) Belzutifan + lenvatinib vs. cabozantinib (post-immunotherapy) Superior ORR, PFS, and duration of response vs. cabozantinib Not specified in detail
Phase 2 Trial – ChiCTR2000034384 (2026) Camrelizumab 200 mg Q2W + apatinib 250 mg QD (2L+ metastatic ccRCC post-TKI failure; n=41) Median PFS: 11.6 months (95% CI 6.2–18.5); median OS: not reached; ORR: 41.5% (95% CI 26.3%–57.9%) Grade 3–4 TRAEs: ALT elevation 26.8%, AST elevation 22.0%, proteinuria 22.0%; no treatment-related deaths
Samsung Medical Center Retrospective Study (2026) ICI-TKI combinations (n=37) vs. TKI monotherapy (n=110); favorable-risk metastatic RCC; median follow-up 46.3 months Overall median PFS: 20.1 months; ICI-TKI vs. TKI mono PFS: 26.2 vs. 17.0 months (HR 1.32; p=0.25); ORR: 68% vs. 46% (p=0.01); median OS not reached in either group; 3-year OS: 89% vs. 84% Not explicitly reported
Real-World IO-TKI Study (2026) Lenvatinib + pembrolizumab, cabozantinib + nivolumab, pembrolizumab + axitinib, or avelumab + axitinib as 1L therapy (n=68; median follow-up 32.7 months) Median PFS: 19.9 months; median OS: 46.7 months; ORR: 57%; ccRCC vs. nccRCC: PFS 23.0 vs. 13.8 months (p=0.0503), OS NR vs. 37.4 months (p=0.0016) Grade ≥3 AEs: 65%; discontinuation of both drugs: 21%; discontinuation of one drug: 31%; high-dose glucocorticoids required: 15%
NICE Pilot Pathways Appraisal (2026) Cabozantinib + nivolumab for advanced RCC (vs. pazopanib and other regimens) Better PFS and OS vs. TKIs in all-risk group; QALY gains comparable to pembrolizumab + lenvatinib and nivolumab + ipilimumab; ICER vs. pazopanib: £275,106/QALY (all-risk), £379,222/QALY (favorable-risk); dominated by cabozantinib and pazopanib monotherapy in intermediate-/poor-risk base case Not applicable (HTA appraisal)
Meet-URO-23/I-RARE International Study (2026) ICI-combinations (ICI+ICI or ICI+VEGF-TKI) vs. other regimens in metastatic nccRCC (n=156) Median OS: 17.5 months (95% CI 14.7–27.6); median PFS: 10.2 months (95% CI 7.6–13.7); ICI-combo median OS NR vs. 14.7 months (p=0.0053); ICI+TKI ORR: 53.3%; DCR: 93.3%; ORR papillary: 55.5%, chromophobe: 46.1% Not explicitly reported
IMDC Retrospective Study – Non-ccRCC First-Line Therapies (2026) IOVE, IOIO, cabozantinib, sunitinib/pazopanib, or mTOR inhibitor monotherapy in metastatic nccRCC (n=1,551) Papillary RCC — ORR/OS: IOVE 31%/33.2 mo, IOIO 26%/31.9 mo, CABO 37%/30.7 mo, SUN/PAZ 13%/17.2 mo, mTOR 3.4%/13.1 mo; sarcomatoid: IOIO highest ORR (39%) and OS (31.9 mo) Not explicitly reported
Retrospective Comparative Study – N-I vs. L-P/NC (2025) Nivolumab + ipilimumab (N-I, n=109) vs. lenvatinib + pembrolizumab / nivolumab + cabozantinib (L-P/NC, n=85) as 1L advanced RCC Median PFS: 26.0 vs. 9.0 months (p=0.0024); ORR: 61.4% vs. 45.6% (p=0.031); median OS: NR vs. 56.0 months (p=0.193, NS) AEs: 97.4% (L-P/NC) vs. 78.8% (N-I) (p<0.0001); treatment interruption: 70.5% vs. 51.1% (p=0.007); glucocorticoid requirement: 43.8% (N-I) vs. 27.5% (L-P/NC) (p=0.023)
Retrospective Sequencing Study – Post-ICI Combination (2025) Second-line TKI following IO-IO (n=66) vs. IO-TKI (n=39) discontinuation (n=105 total) 2L PFS: 12.1 vs. 6.3 months (p=0.0048); PFS2: 19.7 vs. 15.4 months (p=0.0416); 2L conversion rate: 73% vs. 54% (p=0.0489); IO-IO independently associated with PFS2 (HR 0.51, p=0.0057) Not explicitly reported
Aarhus University Hospital Real-World Study (2025) Cabozantinib as later-line treatment in mRCC (n=179; 2L n=139, 3+L n=40) Median PFS: 11.2 months (2L), 11.6 months (3+L); median OS: 15.6 months (2L), 17.1 months (3+L); IMDC favorable risk: PFS 28.5 months, OS 52.1 months Treatment-related toxicity correlated with improved survival: OS 66.8 vs. 32.8 months (p=0.016); PFS 14.7 vs. 8.5 months (p=0.013); 40 mg identified as preferred dosing landing zone
Retrospective TKI Dose Study (2025) Full-dose vs. reduced starting-dose TKIs in 1L IO-TKI regimens (n=155; 52 [34%] reduced dose) PFS and OS did not differ significantly between dose groups (p=0.202 and p=0.309); ORR trend favoring full-dose, not significant after covariate adjustment (p=0.0588) No significant differences in dose reduction, interruption, or glucocorticoid use; grade ≥3 AEs more frequent with full dose (NS, p=0.121)
ZIRCON Phase 3 Trial (2026) [⁸⁹Zr]girentuximab (CAIX-targeted PET radiotracer) for detection of ccRCC and nccRCC in renal masses Met primary endpoint; PPV for any renal malignancy: 98%; sensitivity: 82%; specificity: 87%; also identified nccRCC, particularly papillary RCC with higher CAIX H-score and SUVmax Not applicable (diagnostic study)
Machine Learning Survival Prediction Study (2025) Sunitinib, axitinib, sorafenib, interferon-alpha, avelumab + axitinib (predictive modeling across 4 trials; n=1,839) Tree-based ML (random survival forest, XGBoost) outperformed parametric/semi-parametric models; PFS C-index: 0.783–0.785 vs. 0.725–0.738 (p<0.05); OS C-index: 0.77–0.867 vs. 0.750–0.758 (p<0.05); RSF achieved comparable prediction with only 3–5 covariates Not applicable (predictive modeling study)

Darlifarnib's Broader Potential as a Precision Combination Agent

Beyond its application in renal cell carcinoma, darlifarnib (KO-2806) is being investigated as a combination agent in KRAS-driven solid tumours, with preclinical evidence supporting its role in overcoming resistance to RAS-directed therapies. The mechanistic rationale centres on darlifarnib's ability to block mTORC1 activation via RHEB while sparing mTORC2, thereby targeting a key resistance node while limiting associated toxicities.

  • KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are the two additional indications for which darlifarnib is being trialled, with persistent mTORC1 activity identified as a frequent, nongenetic driver of both inherent and adaptive resistance to RAS inhibition in preclinical models of both tumour types.

  • The intervention model is combination therapy, specifically the addition of darlifarnib to tumours already progressing on RAS inhibitors — including mutant-selective RAS inhibitors — resulting in rapid and durable tumour regression in preclinical NSCLC and CRC settings.

  • Darlifarnib rescued sensitivity to the pan-RAS inhibitor RMC-6236 in progressing tumours, underscoring its utility as a re-sensitising agent when added to an existing RAS inhibitor backbone rather than replacing it.

  • Monotherapy switching was insufficient: transitioning from a mutant-selective to a pan-RAS inhibitor as a single agent produced only tumour stasis in NSCLC and had no meaningful effect on CRC tumour progression, reinforcing the necessity of the combination approach.

Darlifarnib's Strategic Play in Refractory RCC

The ongoing evolution of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment has seen significant strides, particularly with the advent of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like cabozantinib and various immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations. Yet, for patients whose disease progresses despite these therapies, especially those who are heavily pretreated and refractory, the need for novel, effective options remains critical. Kura Oncology's darlifarnib, in combination with cabozantinib, is emerging as a potential answer, with updated Phase 1a data slated for presentation.

Cabozantinib is a well-established agent, targeting key pathways like VEGFR, MET, and AXL, and has demonstrated efficacy in both monotherapy and combination settings across various lines of RCC treatment. Darlifarnib, a farnesyl transferase inhibitor, offers a distinct mechanistic approach by inhibiting mTORC1 signaling in endothelial cells. Preclinical evidence suggests this mechanism can enhance the antiangiogenic effects of TKIs and even re-sensitize tumors that have developed resistance. This synergistic potential is what makes the combination particularly intriguing for refractory RCC.

Kura's strategy appears to be a calculated move to carve out a niche in this difficult-to-treat population. By leveraging cabozantinib's known profile, the company aims for an efficient development path, with a randomized Phase 1b dose-optimization study underway to inform a registrational Phase 3 trial planned for 2028. This approach seeks to capitalize on a mechanistic differentiation that could overcome common resistance pathways.

However, the path forward is not without its hurdles:

  • Clinical Translation: While preclinical data are promising, demonstrating a significant and durable clinical benefit in heavily pretreated, refractory patients is a high bar.

  • Toxicity Management: Cabozantinib is known for its adverse event profile. The addition of darlifarnib could introduce additive toxicities, necessitating careful dose management and potentially impacting patient adherence.

  • Competitive Landscape: The RCC market is dynamic, with numerous effective ICI+TKI combinations already approved. Darlifarnib+cabozantinib will need to demonstrate a compelling risk-benefit profile to stand out.

Ultimately, if darlifarnib can successfully translate its preclinical promise into meaningful clinical outcomes, it could offer a valuable new therapeutic avenue for patients with advanced, refractory RCC, extending the utility of TKI-based strategies in a population desperately needing new options. The upcoming data will be crucial in validating this potential.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the drug of choice for renal cell carcinoma?
For advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), there is no single "drug of choice," but rather several preferred first-line systemic therapies, predominantly immunotherapy-based combinations. These often include combinations such as pembrolizumab with lenvatinib or axitinib, or nivolumab with cabozantinib. The optimal regimen is selected based on risk stratification, tumor histology, and individual patient characteristics.
Can RCC be completely cured?
Localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can often be cured with surgical resection, especially when detected at an early stage. However, once RCC has metastasized, it is generally considered incurable, though highly treatable. Management of advanced disease focuses on prolonging survival and improving quality of life through systemic therapies such as immunotherapy and targeted agents.
What's the treatment for renal cell carcinoma?
Treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) primarily involves surgery (partial or radical nephrectomy) for localized disease, which can be curative. For advanced or metastatic RCC, systemic therapies are crucial. These include targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mTOR inhibitors, as well as immunotherapy, particularly checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1, CTLA-4), often used alone or in combination regimens. Radiation therapy may be employed for palliative care or specific metastases.
What are the emerging therapeutic strategies for advanced renal cell carcinoma?
The therapeutic landscape for advanced renal cell carcinoma continues to evolve with a focus on novel targeted agents and immunotherapies. Emerging strategies often involve combination regimens, leveraging synergistic effects to improve response rates and progression-free survival. Research is actively exploring new mechanisms of action, including HIF-2α inhibitors and agents targeting metabolic pathways, to address resistance and enhance durable responses in diverse patient populations.

References

  1. [1] Ferreira DP, Mizael ACS et al.. Targeting G6PD (Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase) as a Biomarker of Therapeutic Vulnerability in Renal Cell Carcinoma. International journal of molecular sciences. 2026 Mar 20. 41898704
  2. [2] Johnston SR, Semiglazov VF et al.. A phase II, randomized, blinded study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib combined with letrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer after antiestrogen therapy. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2008 Jul. 17851757
  3. [3] Lee SI, Kwon M et al.. Effect of First-Line Combination Systemic Therapy on Favorable-Risk Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study. Biomedicines. 2026 Jan 21. 41595772
  4. [4] Schrader AJ, Steffens S. Renal Cell Carcinoma Update: News from the AUA, EAU, and ASCO Annual Meetings 2011. ISRN urology. 2012. 22779004
  5. [5] Vuky J, Motzer RJ. Cytokine therapy in renal cell cancer. Urologic oncology. 2000 Nov 1. 11008093
  6. [6] Haas-Kogan DA, Banerjee A et al.. Phase II trial of tipifarnib and radiation in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Neuro-oncology. 2011 Mar. 21339191
  7. [7] Rametta A, Buti S et al.. International multicenter experience of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Tumori. 2026 May 4. 42077128
  8. [8] Lee D, Muthukumar M et al.. Treatments for renal cell carcinoma: NICE Pilot Treatment Pathways Appraisal. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). 2026 Jan. 41555735
  9. [9] Cervantes F, Mesa R et al.. New and old treatment modalities in primary myelofibrosis. Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). 2007 Nov-Dec. 18032975
  10. [10] Ramaswamy A, Joshi A et al.. Poor Risk Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Outcomes from a Registry in a Tertiary Cancer Center. Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology. 2017 Jul-Sep. 29200680
  11. [11] Karp JE, Smith BD et al.. Phase II trial of tipifarnib as maintenance therapy in first complete remission in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia and poor-risk features. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2008 May 15. 18483374
  12. [12] Pontes O, Oliveira-Pinto S et al.. Renal cell carcinoma therapy: Current and new drug candidates. Drug discovery today. 2022 Jan. 34265458
  13. [13] Motzer RJ, Rakhit A et al.. Phase II trial of branched peginterferon-alpha 2a (40 kDa) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2002 Nov. 12419754
  14. [14] Wang J, Du L et al.. TFPI2 expression predicts resistance to immunotherapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor and informs first-line therapy selection in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands). 2026 May 22. 42171882
  15. [15] Takemura K, Graham J et al.. Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Contemporary or Traditional First-line Therapies: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. European urology oncology. 2026 Jan 19. 41558869
  16. [16] Kaba A, Kanabur P et al.. Performance of [(89)Zr]girentuximab PET/CT in Predicting the Presence of Any Renal Malignancy: A Reanalysis of the ZIRCON Trial. European urology. 2026 Apr 22. 42025513
  17. [17] Pruthvi Raj R, Swetha BR et al.. Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome: Genetic Insights, Clinical Challenges, and Innovative Therapeutic Approaches. Current gene therapy. 2026 May 5. 42099136
  18. [18] Ho AL, Brana I et al.. Tipifarnib in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma With HRAS Mutations. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2021 Jun 10. 33750196
  19. [19] Ishihara H, Omae K et al.. Comparison of real-world outcomes between nivolumab plus ipilimumab and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or nivolumab plus cabozantinib combination therapies for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma. Urologic oncology. 2025 Oct. 40754547
  20. [20] Rini BI, McDermott D et al.. What is standard initial systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma?. Clinical genitourinary cancer. 2007 Mar. 17553205

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts