Brii's HBV Functional Cure Rates Impress, But Durability Void Remains the Decisive Risk
Clinical Trial Updates

Brii's HBV Functional Cure Rates Impress, But Durability Void Remains the Decisive Risk

Published : 06 Jul 2026

At a Glance
Indicationchronic hepatitis B virus infection
DrugBRII-179, elebsiran, and PEG-IFNα
CompanyBrii Biosciences
Trial PhasePhase IIb
Trial AcronymENRICH, ENHANCE
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaInfectious Diseases & Vaccines
Primary EndpointHBsAg loss
Patient PopulationChronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection patients
ENRICH 5-Dose HBsAg Loss Rate42.9% (42 of 98)
ENRICH 7-Dose HBsAg Loss Rate40% (20 of 50)
ENHANCE Part A-1 HBsAg Loss Rate25.5% (25 of 98)
ENHANCE Control Arm HBsAg Loss Rate10.2% (5 of 49)
Regulatory BodyChina’s Center for Drug Evaluation of the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA)
Regulatory AlignmentPreliminary alignment for a potential registrational trial
Preferred Registrational Study DesignENRICH study design

Brii Bio Reports Positive EOT Data for HBV Trials

Brii Biosciences reported topline end-of-treatment (EOT) data from its Phase IIb ENRICH and ENHANCE trials, evaluating sequential and concurrent regimens of BRII-179, elebsiran, and PEG-IFNα for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The ENRICH study, using BRII-179 as a priming therapy, showed HBsAg loss rates of 42.9% (42 of 98 patients) with five doses and 40% (20 of 50 patients) with seven doses, aligning with previous ENSURE Cohort 4 data. The ENHANCE (Part A-1) concurrent triple combination achieved a 25.5% HBsAg loss rate (25 of 98), higher than the PEG-IFNα alone control arm (10.2%). Subgroup analyses in ENHANCE suggested BRII-179's immune response benefits across baseline HBsAg levels. The ENHANCE Part A-2 sequential therapy resulted in a 22.5% HBsAg loss rate (18 of 80). Brii Bio is in preliminary alignment with China's NMPA for a potential registrational trial, favoring the ENRICH study design. No new safety issues were reported.

  • The ENRICH study, which investigated BRII-179 as a priming therapy followed by elebsiran and PEG-IFNα, demonstrated significant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss rates. Patients receiving five doses of BRII-179 achieved a 42.9% HBsAg loss (42 out of 98), while those on seven doses showed a 40% loss (20 out of 50). These results are consistent with prior ENSURE Cohort 4 data, reinforcing BRII-179's immune priming potential.
  • The ENHANCE (Part A-1) trial, testing a concurrent triple combination, yielded an HBsAg loss rate of 25.5% (25 out of 98), which, while not exceeding previous ENSURE Cohorts 2 and 3, was notably higher than the 10.2% observed in the PEG-IFNα alone control arm. Subgroup analyses further indicated that BRII-179 may induce beneficial immune responses irrespective of baseline HBsAg levels, particularly in patients with higher initial readings (1,000IU/mL-3,000IU/mL).
  • The ENHANCE Part A-2 study, employing a sequential therapy of BRII-179 plus elebsiran followed by elebsiran and PEG-IFNα, resulted in an HBsAg loss rate of 22.5% (18 out of 80), suggesting the necessity of a full course of PEG-IFNα for optimal efficacy. Based on these insights, Brii Bio has engaged with China’s NMPA and reached preliminary alignment for a potential registrational trial, with the ENRICH study design being preferred for future development.

Unpacking the ENRICH and ENHANCE Trial Designs for Chronic HBV

The clinical trial landscape for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) spans a broad range of study designs, from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses to retrospective cohort studies, each deploying distinct virological, serological, and histological endpoints. Across this evidence base, primary endpoints have evolved from simple HBV DNA suppression toward more stringent goals, including functional cure defined as sustained HBsAg loss with HBV DNA below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 24 weeks post-treatment. The table below synthesizes key design parameters and endpoints from pivotal and representative CHB trials.

Trial / Study Design Population Intervention(s) Duration Primary Endpoint(s) Key Secondary Endpoints
Phase II/III Functional Cure Framework (2023–2025 guidance) Regulatory/consensus framework for trial design HBeAg-positive or -negative CHB; treatment-naïve or virally suppressed on NAs Finite curative therapies (various) 24 weeks off-treatment follow-up Functional cure: sustained HBsAg loss + HBV DNA Partial cure: HBsAg <100 IU/mL + HBV DNA
TMF vs. TAF Real-World Study (2024) Retrospective comparative cohort 440 CHB patients (TMF n=220; TAF n=220); treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced subgroups Tenofovir amibufenamide (TMF) vs. tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 48 weeks HBV DNA conversion rate (<20 IU/mL) at 48 weeks ALT normalization rate; renal function; lipid levels at 48 weeks
ETV vs. TAF Comparative Study (2025) Retrospective; 1:1 propensity score matched 244 patients (ETV n=145; TAF n=99); matched to 99 per group Entecavir (ETV) vs. tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 288 weeks HBeAg seroclearance; HBeAg seroconversion Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis for predictors of seroclearance/seroconversion
HBcAb Predictive RCT (2022) Multicenter randomized controlled trial 74 patients with HBV DNA >1×10 copies/mL Lamivudine + adefovir (n=32) vs. entecavir (n=42) Up to 96 weeks HBeAg seroconversion at week 96; predictive value of baseline quantitative HBcAb (>4.375 log IU/mL) Sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 74.2%; OR 4.78 for HBeAg seroconversion
Pediatric CHB Study (2024) Single-center retrospective 79 children with CHB, aged 0–16 years Interferon ± nucleos(t)ide analogs 48 weeks HBsAg seroclearance HBeAg seroconversion without HBsAg seroclearance; HBcrAg, HBsAg, HBV DNA at baseline, weeks 12 and 48
BSV vs. TDF Non-Inferiority Trial (2020) Double-blind, non-inferiority RCT; 22 sites, South Korea (NCT01937806) 197 CHB patients (BSV n=99; TDF n=98) Besifovir dipivoxil maleate (BSV) 150 mg vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg 48 weeks (+ 48-week extension with TDF→BSV switch) Virologic response at week 48: HBV DNA <69 IU/mL (400 copies/mL) Bone mineral density (BMD); renal outcomes
NAs Optimized Therapy Study (2020) Retrospective 76 HBeAg-positive CHB patients 96-week optimized NA therapy (lamivudine + adefovir dipivoxil) 96 weeks Virological response (HBV DNA ≤300 copies/mL); HBeAg seroconversion HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBc, HBV DNA, ALT at baseline, weeks 12 and 24; AUROC of independent predictors
LAM-Resistant CHB / ADV Add-On Study (2014) Retrospective cohort 96 LAM-resistant CHB patients on ADV add-on LAM therapy >2 years Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) add-on to lamivudine (LAM) 96 weeks Virological response (HBV DNA <500 IU/mL) at week 96 Partial virological response (PVR) threshold at week 48 as predictor of week 96 outcome
Telbivudine vs. Entecavir Meta-Analysis (2013) Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs 555 HBeAg-positive CHB patients Telbivudine vs. entecavir 24 or 52 weeks Cumulative rate of undetectable HBV DNA ALT normalization; HBeAg disappearance; HBeAg seroconversion; adverse events
Adefovir Dipivoxil RCT (2009) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter 226 HBeAg-positive CHB patients (2:1 randomization) ADV 10 mg/d ×48 weeks vs. placebo ×24 weeks → ADV ×24 weeks 48 weeks Virologic response (mean HBV DNA reduction from baseline; undetectable rate) HBeAg loss and seroconversion; genotype B vs. C response comparison (PCR-RFLP); resistance mutation profiling (rtN236T, rtA181V)
Lamivudine + Vaccine Combination Study (2005) Controlled interventional study 72 CHB patients (HBeAg-positive n=40; anti-HBe-positive n=32); 15 received combination therapy Lamivudine 100 mg/day ×12 months ± intradermal HBsAg vaccine (20 µg every 2 weeks ×12 doses) 12 months HBV DNA negativation at 12 months HBeAg seroconversion; HBsAg clearance
HBV Vaccine Monotherapy Study (2002) Controlled study 118 treatment-naïve CHB patients with biopsy-proven disease preS2/S vaccine (n=46) vs. S vaccine (n=34) vs. no treatment control (n=37); 5 IM injections of 20 µg 12 months HBV DNA negativation (standard liquid hybridization assay) HBe/anti-HBe seroconversion; HBsAg disappearance

Topline Efficacy and Safety of BRII-179 Combinations in HBV

Recent clinical investigations in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have yielded meaningful efficacy and safety data across a range of antiviral strategies — from nucleos(t)ide analog switching trials to novel capsid assembly modulators and immunotherapy combinations. The studies summarized below span Phase II and Phase III designs, with several addressing unmet needs such as low-level viremia, functional cure, and HBV management in oncology settings.

  • B-Well 1 and B-Well 2 (Phase 3) — Bepirovirsen: Two replicate, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials enrolled adults with noncirrhotic CHB on stable nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy (HBsAg 100–3,000 IU/mL), randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous bepirovirsen 300 mg weekly or placebo for 24 weeks, with NA discontinuation at week 48. The primary endpoint — functional cure (sustained HBV DNA below LLOQ plus HBsAg loss for ≥24 weeks) at week 72 — was achieved in 20% of bepirovirsen-treated patients in B-Well 1 (127/650 vs. 0/328 placebo) and 19% in B-Well 2 (106/570 vs. 0/286 placebo). Pooled safety data showed adverse events in 91% of bepirovirsen recipients vs. 73% placebo; grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 16% vs. 3%, with ALT elevations being the most common grade 3 event (6%). Serious adverse events were reported in 7% vs. 4% (NCT05630807; NCT05630820; funded by GSK).

  • Besifovir Switching Trial (2025) — Besifovir vs. Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: This non-inferiority randomized trial enrolled 153 CHB patients with HBV DNA <20 IU/mL after ≥48 weeks of TDF therapy (median prior TDF duration: 4.14 years), randomized to besifovir (BSV) 150 mg or TDF 300 mg for 48 weeks. Per-protocol analysis (n=130) demonstrated non-inferior virologic suppression: 100.0% of the BSV group vs. 98.5% of the TDF group maintained HBV DNA <20 IU/mL (95% CI −0.01 to 0.04; P>0.999; predefined margin −0.18). BSV was associated with improved renal function (eGFR change: +1.67±11.73% vs. −1.24±11.02%) and significant improvements in bone turnover biomarkers, with increases in hip and spine bone mineral density, suggesting a favorable long-term safety profile relative to continued TDF.

  • GST-HG141 Phase II Trial (2025) — GST-HG141 (Capsid Assembly Modulator): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (NCT05637541) conducted across ten Chinese centers enrolled 90 CHB patients with low-level viremia (HBV DNA 20–2,000 IU/mL) on NA therapy for >1 year, randomized 1:1:1 to GST-HG141 50 mg BID, 100 mg BID, or placebo for 24 weeks. At week 24, HBV DNA <20 IU/mL was achieved in 84.0% (low-dose) and 81.5% (high-dose) vs. 32.1% placebo (p<0.05 for both comparisons). Mean HBV DNA reductions exceeded 1 log IU/mL in both active arms; pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) declined by an average of 1.7 log copies/mL, with undetectable pgRNA in 60% and 55% of low- and high-dose groups respectively, vs. 9.5% placebo. Adverse event rates were comparable across all groups, supporting a favorable tolerability profile.

  • KEYNOTE-966 HBV Subgroup Post Hoc Analysis (2026) — Pembrolizumab + Gemcitabine/Cisplatin: This post hoc analysis of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-966 trial examined whether HBV infection status affected outcomes in 1,069 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W or placebo, combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin for ≤35 cycles. Of 329 HBV-positive participants (30.8%), 30 had chronic and 299 had clinically resolved HBV; antiviral prophylaxis was mandated for chronic HBV patients. Overall survival HRs were closely aligned: 0.87 (95% CI 0.69–1.10) for HBV-positive and 0.85 (95% CI 0.73–0.99) for HBV-negative subgroups, with consistent safety profiles. Eight cases of HBV reactivation occurred (5 pembrolizumab, 3 placebo); no HBV-associated hepatitis was observed, supporting the safety of pembrolizumab-based regimens in HBV-positive oncology patients with appropriate antiviral monitoring.

  • DLBCL with CHB Multicentre Cohort Study (2026) — Entecavir Antiviral Prophylaxis: This retrospective multicentre study identified 112 CHB patients among 1,120 newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, stratified by baseline HBV DNA load (low: <10 IU/mL, n=82; high: ≥10 IU/mL, n=30). Entecavir-based antiviral prophylaxis effectively suppressed HBV DNA to undetectable levels in high-load patients (median baseline 1.65×10 IU/mL; p=0.001). Three-year cumulative HBV reactivation rates were low overall (4.2%), with no significant difference between high- and low-load groups (4.5% vs. 4.1%; p=0.955), though one fatal reactivation occurred following antiviral discontinuation. Hepatotoxicity was mild (grade 1–2 transaminase elevations in 33.3%–36.7%), and oncologic outcomes were comparable between strata: 3-year PFS 80.9% vs. 70.6% (p=0.137), ORR 86.7% vs. 82.9%, and CR rates 70.0% vs. 64.6%, findings confirmed on propensity score–matched analysis.

BRII-179's Role in Advancing Combination Therapies for HBV

Recent clinical investigation into chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has increasingly focused on combination regimens capable of achieving functional cure — defined as sustained HBsAg loss — rather than mere virological suppression. One of the more compelling direct-acting antiviral combinations to emerge is GST-HG141, an HBV capsid assembly modulator, evaluated in combination with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs) in a Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial (NCT05637541) conducted across ten centers in China between January 2023 and July 2024. Among 90 participants on background NUC therapy for over one year with residual low-level viremia (HBV DNA 20–2,000 IU/mL), those receiving GST-HG141 at 50 mg BID or 100 mg BID for 24 weeks achieved HBV DNA levels below 20 IU/mL in 84.0% and 81.5% of cases, respectively, versus 32.1% in the placebo arm (p < 0.05). Mean HBV DNA reductions exceeded 1 log IU/mL in both active treatment groups, and pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) declined by an average of 1.7 log copies/mL, with 60% and 55% of patients achieving undetectable pgRNA compared to just 9.5% on placebo — underscoring the potential of capsid assembly modulators to address residual viral replication in NUC-experienced patients.

At the immunomodulatory end of the combination spectrum, pegylated interferon-α (Peg-IFNα) combined with NUCs has been rigorously evaluated in a meta-analysis of 11 controlled trials encompassing 2,439 patients. At 48 weeks of treatment, HBsAg clearance rates were significantly higher in the combination arm versus Peg-IFNα monotherapy (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.01–2.52, P = 0.05); however, this advantage did not persist at 24 weeks post-treatment follow-up (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.76–2.33, P = 0.31), and HBsAg seroconversion rates were not significantly different at either timepoint. These findings suggest that while the combination confers a meaningful short-term antigen clearance benefit, durable responses require prolonged treatment duration. Consistent with this, a nationwide survey of 151 Chinese attending physicians found that 76.1% favored Peg-IFNα-containing combination regimens as their preferred functional cure strategy, with a consensus benchmark of at least 30% functional cure rate for novel therapeutic candidates and a recommendation for a minimum of one year of post-treatment follow-up alongside consolidation therapy to mitigate relapse risk.

Looking at the broader therapeutic architecture, the emerging paradigm for CHB functional cure integrates NUCs as a virological backbone with two complementary layers: RNA-targeting agents — including small interfering RNAs, antisense oligonucleotides, and RNA destabilizers — to reduce viral transcripts and antigen burden, and immunomodulatory agents — including Peg-IFNα, checkpoint inhibitors, and therapeutic vaccines — to restore HBV-specific immune responses. This framework is exemplified by the tobevibart (VIR-3434) and elebsiran (VIR-2218) combination, where the Fc-engineered anti-HBsAg monoclonal antibody is paired with an siRNA targeting a conserved region of the HBV genome; elebsiran demonstrated an EC50 of 2.5 nM for HBeAg and 1.4 nM for HBsAg in primary human hepatocytes, and combined treatment in mouse models achieved maximum mean HBsAg reductions of 2.81 log in the AAV-HBV model and 2.51 log in human liver-chimeric mice — outperforming either agent as monotherapy. Quantitative HBsAg and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) are increasingly recognized as essential biomarkers to guide these combination strategies, with HBcrAg providing complementary insight into covalently closed circular DNA transcriptional activity alongside integrated HBV DNA contributions captured by qHBsAg.

Brii Bio's Data Ignites Hope for HBV Functional Cure

The recent topline data from Brii Biosciences' Phase IIb ENRICH and ENHANCE trials mark a potentially pivotal moment in the long-standing quest for a functional cure in chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) infection. For decades, treatment strategies have largely focused on suppressing viral replication with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), which, while effective in controlling the disease, rarely lead to the coveted hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss—the closest marker to a functional cure. Pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) offers a finite treatment course and the potential for HBsAg loss, but its efficacy is limited, typically achieving HBsAg clearance in only 30-44% of patients.

Brii Bio's results, particularly the 40-42.9% HBsAg loss rate in the ENRICH study using BRII-179 as a priming therapy, are highly encouraging. This outcome, achieved through a multi-modal combination of BRII-179 (a therapeutic vaccine designed to restore HBV-specific immune responses), elebsiran (an investigational antiviral targeting HBV RNAs), and PEG-IFNα, aligns with the growing consensus in the literature that novel, synergistic therapies are essential to overcome the persistence of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and achieve durable HBsAg loss. The preliminary alignment with China's NMPA for a registrational trial further solidifies the strategic importance of these findings, potentially paving the way for a new standard of care in a region with a high CHB burden.

However, as with any emerging therapy, critical considerations remain. The long-term durability of these HBsAg loss rates post-treatment cessation needs to be established, given the historical challenge of viral relapse. Furthermore, while promising, these results will require rigorous comparison against existing combination therapies in larger Phase III trials to fully ascertain their comparative efficacy and safety profile. The observed variability in HBsAg loss rates between the ENRICH and ENHANCE regimens also underscores the need for further research into optimal patient selection and treatment sequencing. Despite these considerations, the data offer a compelling vision for a future where functional cure for CHB is a more attainable reality, moving beyond mere viral suppression to truly resolve the infection.

Frequently Asked Questions

How serious is chronic hepatitis B HBV infection?
Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infection is a serious global health problem, leading to progressive liver damage in many individuals. It significantly increases the risk of developing cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which are often fatal without intervention. The lifelong nature of the infection necessitates ongoing monitoring and, for many, antiviral therapy to prevent these severe complications and reduce mortality.
What is the new drug for chronic Hep B?
No single new drug for chronic Hepatitis B has recently received regulatory approval. The most advanced investigational agent is bepirovirsen, an antisense oligonucleotide in Phase 3 development, which aims to reduce hepatitis B surface antigen levels towards a functional cure. Other promising candidates in clinical trials include various siRNA therapeutics.
What is the latest treatment for chronic hepatitis B?
The current standard of care for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) primarily involves long-term antiviral therapy with highly potent nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) such as tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and entecavir (ETV). These treatments effectively suppress viral replication and prevent disease progression but rarely achieve a functional cure (HBsAg loss). While no new curative therapies are currently approved, ongoing research focuses on novel agents targeting different stages of the HBV life cycle and host immune responses to achieve HBsAg seroclearance.
Which person has the greatest risk of becoming infected with the hepatitis B virus?
Infants born to mothers infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) face the highest risk of acquiring the infection, particularly if the mother is HBeAg-positive. Perinatal transmission rates can reach 70-90% without timely immunoprophylaxis, frequently resulting in chronic HBV infection. Other significant risk factors include sharing needles among people who inject drugs and unprotected sexual contact with an infected individual.

References

  1. [1] Zhao P, Liu W et al.. Comparison of the 48-week efficacy between entecavir and adefovir in HBeAg-positive nucleos(t)ide-naïve Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis. Virology journal. 2011 Feb 22. 21342505
  2. [2] Gui H, Shen Y et al.. Interim Analysis of 48-week Tenofovir Amibufenamide Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Normal Alanine Aminotransferase Levels: The PROMOTE Study. Journal of clinical and translational hepatology. 2025 Jul 28. 40937079
  3. [3] Rsi Suwardana GN, Abe T et al.. A novel synthetic bile acid derivative inhibits hepatitis B virus infection at entry step by interfering with the oligomerization of sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide. Antiviral research. 2025 Nov. 40889532
  4. [4] Stockdale AJ, Holt B et al.. Service delivery models and care cascade outcomes for people living with chronic hepatitis B: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2025 Nov. 40819651
  5. [5] Rai RR, Mathur A et al.. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B & C in HIV patients infected through sexual transmission. Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation. 2007 Jan-Mar. 17896605
  6. [6] Li Y, Wang L et al.. ELISA genotyping of hepatitis B virus in China with antibodies specific for genotypes B and C. Scientific reports. 2024 Oct 12. 39396069
  7. [7] Xie Y, Zhang X et al.. HBV RNA at 6 months after nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment can predict antiviral efficacy in chronic hepatitis B patients. BMC gastroenterology. 2026 Jan 2. 41484832
  8. [8] Shin H, Hur MH et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Entecavir to Tenofovir Alafenamide in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Multicenter Randomized Trial in Korea. Gut and liver. 2026 Apr 22. 42015653
  9. [9] Verma A, Chung RT. Advancing HIV cure: insights from developing chronic hepatitis b therapies for functional cure. Current opinion in HIV and AIDS. 2025 Sep 1. 40772511
  10. [10] Chan SL, Yau T et al.. Impact of Hepatitis B Virus Infection on the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer in the KEYNOTE-966 Study. Cancer research communications. 2026 Mar 1. 41757470
  11. [11] Cai S, Li Z et al.. Serum hepatitis B core antibody levels predict HBeAg seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B patients with high viral load treated with nucleos(t)ide analogs. Infection and drug resistance. 2018. 29662321
  12. [12] Wang YH, Tao YC et al.. Discontinuation of nucleos(t)ide analogues after NA-induced HBsAg seroclearance: a single-center 48-week retrospective study. Journal of virus eradication. 2025 Dec. 41439250
  13. [13] Wang C, Kong F et al.. Safety and efficacy of GST-HG141, a novel HBV capsid assembly modulator, for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients with low-level viremia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II study. EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Sep. 40808966
  14. [14] Lin CL, Kao JH. Recent advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2011 Sep. 21682661
  15. [15] Hou X, Li N et al.. Adherence and efficacy of the 0 - 7 - 21-day versus the 0 - 1 - 6-month hepatitis B vaccination schedules among people who use drugs: a two-year randomized controlled trial. Expert review of vaccines. 2026 Dec. 41622674
  16. [16] Noack J, Anglero-Rodriguez Y et al.. Combination therapy with tobevibart and elebsiran potently reduces hepatitis B virus surface antigen levels in preclinical in vivo models. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2026 Mar 4. 41586499
  17. [17] Meng C, Belino C et al.. Reactivation of Hepatitis B virus in kidney transplant recipients with previous clinically resolved infection: A single-center experience. Nefrologia. 2018 Sep-Oct. 29709320
  18. [18] Mueller H, Wildum S et al.. A novel orally available small molecule that inhibits hepatitis B virus expression. Journal of hepatology. 2018 Mar. 29079285
  19. [19] Carloni G, Rinaldi M. Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies for HCV/HBV-Associated B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas: A Viewpoint. Oncology research. 2026. 41799526
  20. [20] Zhu C, Yang J et al.. Emerging antiviral drugs and immunotherapy for chronic hepatitis B and associated liver disease. Frontiers in immunology. 2026. 42233029

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts