At ASCO, Merck makes case for a ‘cornerstone’ cancer drug
Clinical Trial Updates

At ASCO, Merck makes case for a ‘cornerstone’ cancer drug

Published : 29 May 2026

At a Glance
IndicationLung cancer
Drugsacituzumab tirumotecan and Keytruda
Mechanism of ActionTROP2-targeting ADC, PD-1 inhibitor
CompanyMerck & Co.
Trial PhasePhase 3
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Conference NameAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conference
Risk Reduction65%
Follow-up Duration10.5 months
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Control Group5.7 months
Originating CompanyKelun-Biotech
Number of Phase 3 Studies17
Competitor Drug 1Datroway
Competitor Drug 2Trodelvy
Other Indication with SuccessEndometrial cancer
Analyst FirmLeerink Partners

Merck Presents Strong Phase 3 Data for Sac-TMT in Lung Cancer at ASCO

Merck presented promising Phase 3 data for its antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) in combination with Keytruda for lung cancer at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conference. The trial, conducted in China, showed the combination reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 65% compared to Keytruda alone after a median follow-up of 10.5 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached for the sac-TMT arm, while the Keytruda-only group had a median PFS of 5.7 months. The positive results, observed across major subgroups, have bolstered Merck's confidence in sac-TMT as a potential "cornerstone" cancer drug, leading to a 5% rise in Merck's shares.

  • Detailed data presented at ASCO revealed that the benefits of sac-TMT plus Keytruda were consistent across major subgroups of lung cancer patients, including those with squamous and non-squamous disease, and varying levels of PD-L1 expression. This broad efficacy profile suggests the combination's potential applicability to a diverse patient population, reinforcing Merck's conviction in its global development program, which includes 17 studies in various tumor types.
  • The safety profile of sac-TMT was perceived by analysts as cleaner than anticipated, contributing significantly to investor optimism. Following the abstract release and detailed presentation, Merck's shares climbed over 5%, reflecting the market's positive outlook on the therapy's potential to become a significant asset as the company prepares for the eventual patent expiration of its blockbuster drug, Keytruda.
  • Despite the positive data, sac-TMT faces a competitive landscape with other TROP2-targeting ADCs like AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo’s Datroway and Gilead’s Trodelvy, as well as emerging PD-1/VEGF inhibitors. Challenges remain, including the need for global trial results and comparisons against standard-of-care Keytruda-chemotherapy combinations, which were not used as a control in the reported Chinese study. Merck, however, expresses confidence in sac-TMT's unique linker technology and consistent benefits observed.

Sac-TMT + Keytruda's Efficacy in Lung Cancer at ASCO

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant advances in lung cancer treatment across multiple therapeutic modalities. Key studies from 2025-2026 provide important insights into both targeted therapies and immunotherapy approaches, with several trials showing improved survival outcomes while others highlight the need for careful patient selection.

KRYSTAL-12 Trial evaluated adagrasib versus docetaxel in 453 patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. The study demonstrated significantly improved median PFS (5.5 vs 3.8 months; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45-0.76, p<0.0001), with grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurring in 47% of adagrasib patients versus 46% receiving docetaxel.

ALEX Trial Final Analysis compared alectinib to crizotinib in 303 treatment-naïve ALK-positive NSCLC patients, showing remarkable median OS benefit (81.1 vs 54.2 months; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.08). Particularly notable were outcomes in CNS metastases patients (63.4 vs 30.9 months) and median duration of response (42.3 vs 11.1 months; HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.30-0.56).

Antibody-Drug Conjugates Meta-Analysis of 13 studies involving 1,681 patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC revealed pooled ORR of 30%, median PFS of 4.62 months, and median OS of 11.82 months. However, treatment-related adverse events occurred in 95% of patients with 44% experiencing grade ≥3 events, questioning clear superiority over standard chemotherapy.

PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Elderly Patients meta-analysis across 12 RCTs with 3,078 patients demonstrated significant OS improvement (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.84, p<0.001) and event-free survival benefit (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.83, p<0.001), establishing efficacy in this vulnerable population.

SAFFRON-301 Trial testing sitravatinib plus tislelizumab versus docetaxel in 377 patients was terminated early due to unfavorable risk-benefit assessment, with similar median OS (11.5 vs 11.4 months) but concerning safety signals including grade 5 hemoptysis in 1.6% of combination therapy patients.

Several TROP2-targeted ADCs and anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors are being evaluated in similar combination strategies across multiple cancer types. The most notable example is enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, which achieved the first FDA approval for an ADC-ICI combination in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Drug Combination Mechanism of Action Cancer Indication Trial Phase/Status
Enfortumab vedotin + Pembrolizumab Anti-Nectin-4 ADC + Anti-PD-1 ICI Locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma FDA approved (first-line)
Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab RTK inhibitor + Anti-PD-1 ICI Advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer Phase 3 trials ongoing
Sacituzumab govitecan (monotherapy) Anti-TROP2 ADC Advanced urothelial carcinoma FDA approved
Nivolumab Anti-PD-1 ICI Multiple indications including NSCLC, melanoma Various phases
Dostarlimab Anti-PD-1 ICI Multiple solid tumors Clinical trials
Cemiplimab Anti-PD-1 ICI Multiple solid tumors Clinical trials
Atezolizumab Anti-PD-L1 ICI Multiple indications Various phases
Durvalumab Anti-PD-L1 ICI Multiple indications Various phases

Unpacking the Sac-TMT Lung Cancer Trial Design and Implications

Recent lung cancer trials have employed diverse methodological approaches spanning systematic reviews, retrospective analyses, and prospective randomized controlled trials. Large-scale meta-analyses have become increasingly prevalent, with studies incorporating between 9-14 trials and encompassing 2,441-2,874 participants to evaluate targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Network meta-analyses utilizing Bayesian approaches have emerged as sophisticated tools for comparing multiple treatment modalities simultaneously, particularly in ALK-positive NSCLC where seven first-line treatments including ensartinib, brigatinib, crizotinib, lorlatinib, alectinib, ceritinib, and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy have been evaluated. Real-world evidence studies have gained prominence, with retrospective multicenter analyses examining patient cohorts ranging from 46 patients in Vietnamese hospitals to 355 patients in comparative effectiveness research studies spanning multiple years of follow-up.

Trial endpoints have demonstrated remarkable consistency across studies, with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) serving as primary efficacy measures in virtually all therapeutic areas. Objective response rate (ORR) assessed by RECIST criteria represents the third cornerstone endpoint, particularly emphasized in early-phase trials where regulatory approvals increasingly rely on single-arm phase II designs. Safety endpoints encompass comprehensive adverse event monitoring, with studies specifically tracking anemia, fatigue, elevated liver enzymes, and organ-specific toxicities including cardiac, spinal cord, and esophageal dosimetry in radiation-based interventions. Secondary endpoints have expanded to include health-related quality of life (HRQoL), one-year survival rates, central nervous system progression, and disease-free survival in adjuvant settings.

Contemporary trial designs reflect the molecular complexity of lung cancer, with patient stratification based on specific biomarkers including ALK rearrangements, KRAS mutations (particularly G12C), HER2 mutations, and PD-L1 expression levels. Real-world studies have incorporated novel prognostic markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios and eosinophil counts as stratification variables. Treatment protocols have evolved from single-agent approaches to combination strategies, exemplified by pembrolizumab plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy regimens and bevacizumab combined with chemoradiotherapy. The integration of external comparator arms and matching-adjusted indirect comparisons has enabled single-arm trials to connect with broader evidence networks, facilitating regulatory pathways while maintaining scientific rigor in efficacy assessment.

Merck's Sac-TMT: A New Cornerstone in Lung Cancer

The recent Phase 3 data for sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) in combination with Keytruda for lung cancer marks a pivotal moment in oncology, underscoring the evolving landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. The impressive 65% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death, alongside an unreached median progression-free survival compared to Keytruda alone, signals a significant therapeutic advance. This outcome reinforces the growing understanding of how antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), particularly those targeting TROP2 like sac-TMT, can synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

ADCs deliver highly potent cytotoxic payloads directly to tumor cells expressing specific targets, minimizing systemic toxicity. TROP2, a cell-surface antigen, is overexpressed in various solid tumors, including NSCLC, making it an attractive target. The literature suggests that some ADCs can induce immunogenic cell death and remodel the tumor microenvironment, potentially enhancing the efficacy of co-administered ICIs. This combination strategy, therefore, represents a sophisticated approach to cancer therapy, leveraging both targeted cytotoxicity and immune activation.

For Merck, these results are strategically vital. While Keytruda remains a dominant force, the addition of sac-TMT provides a powerful new asset, potentially establishing a new 'cornerstone' therapy that diversifies its oncology portfolio and extends its reach into new patient segments within the vast lung cancer market. This success could also catalyze further investment and research into ADC-ICI combinations across the industry, validating a promising new paradigm for drug development.

However, the path forward is not without considerations. ADCs, including TROP2-targeted agents, are associated with distinct adverse events such as myelosuppression (e.g., neutropenia), gastrointestinal toxicities (e.g., diarrhea, nausea), and potentially interstitial lung disease. Careful patient monitoring and proactive management of these toxicities will be crucial for optimal patient outcomes and broader adoption. Furthermore, the competitive landscape for TROP2-targeted ADCs is intensifying, with other agents already approved or in advanced development. Sac-TMT will need to demonstrate sustained differentiation and a favorable benefit-risk profile to carve out a significant market share. The trial's conduct in China also means that generalizability to diverse global populations will require further validation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the therapeutic rationale for combining sacituzumab tirumotecan with Keytruda in lung cancer?
Sacituzumab tirumotecan is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting Trop-2, delivering a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload directly to cancer cells. Keytruda (pembrolizumab) is an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor that enhances the body's immune response against tumors. The combination aims to leverage both direct cytotoxic effects and immune modulation, potentially overcoming resistance mechanisms and enhancing overall anti-tumor activity in lung cancer. This synergistic approach could lead to improved efficacy compared to monotherapy.
What are the potential patient populations for sacituzumab tirumotecan plus Keytruda in lung cancer?
The combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan and Keytruda is being explored across various lung cancer subtypes, particularly in advanced or metastatic settings. Potential patient populations include those with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on prior therapies, or those with specific biomarker profiles. Further research is ongoing to precisely define the optimal patient cohorts that would derive the greatest clinical benefit from this regimen.
How could the combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan and Keytruda integrate into existing lung cancer treatment paradigms?
This combination could potentially offer a novel therapeutic option for lung cancer patients, especially in settings where current treatments have limited efficacy or resistance develops. It may find a role in first-line treatment for specific patient subsets or as a subsequent line of therapy after progression on standard regimens. The integration into existing paradigms would depend on its demonstrated efficacy, safety profile, and comparative effectiveness against established standards of care.
What are the primary safety and tolerability considerations for sacituzumab tirumotecan combined with Keytruda in lung cancer?
Key safety considerations for the combination of sacituzumab tirumotecan and Keytruda include adverse events associated with both drug classes. Sacituzumab tirumotecan can cause myelosuppression, diarrhea, and nausea, while Keytruda is associated with immune-related adverse events such as pneumonitis, colitis, and endocrinopathies. Careful monitoring and proactive management of these potential toxicities are crucial for patient safety and treatment adherence.

References

  1. [1] Smyth E, Thuss-Patience PC. Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Gastro-Oesophageal Cancer. Oncology research and treatment. 2018. 29705787
  2. [2] Syal A, Meyer ML et al.. Antibody drugs conjugates in non-small cell lung cancer: current status and challenges. The oncologist. 2025 Nov 11. 41052301
  3. [3] Peters S, Camidge R et al.. Alectinib versus crizotinib in previously untreated ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: final overall survival analysis of the phase III ALEX study. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2026 Jan. 41110693
  4. [4] Paappanen V, Järvenpää H et al.. Impact of Treatment Decisions on Survival Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Real-World Study. Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)). 2025 Nov. 41027332
  5. [5] Liu XX, Lin GH et al.. A Bayesian network analysis of immunotherapy and taxane chemotherapy as second- or later-line treatments in non-small cell lung cancer. Medicine. 2022 Nov 11. 36397323
  6. [6] Kim M, Min YK et al.. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals distinct cellular factors for response to immunotherapy targeting CD73 and PD-1 in colorectal cancer. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer. 2021 Jul. 34253638
  7. [7] Sumi T, Ishigooka T et al.. PD-L1 Expression and Histopathological Features in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors After EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Resistance. Thoracic cancer. 2026 Feb. 41663093
  8. [8] Hung JJ, Wu YC et al.. Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improves the Probability of Freedom From Recurrence in Patients With Resected Stage IB Lung Adenocarcinoma. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2016 Apr. 26794883
  9. [9] Huang SH, Huang AC et al.. Front-line treatment of ceritinib improves efficacy over crizotinib for Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion NSCLC: The role of systemic progression control. Thoracic cancer. 2019 Dec. 31613427
  10. [10] Cadranel J, Cortot AB et al.. Real-life experience of ceritinib in crizotinib-pretreated ALK(+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients. ERJ open research. 2018 Jan. 29450203
  11. [11] Jimbu L, Mesaros O et al.. Is There a Place for PD-1-PD-L Blockade in Acute Myeloid Leukemia?. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2021 Mar 24. 33804850
  12. [12] Griffith A, Pratt CG et al.. Achieving Equitable Care for Racial Minority Patients With a Lung Cancer Screening Program. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2026 Apr. 40812765
  13. [13] Gadducci A, Cosio S. Pharmacological Treatment of Advanced, Persistent or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer: State of the Art and Perspectives of Clinical Research for the Special Issue "Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer". Cancers. 2021 Dec 7. 34944775
  14. [14] Chen J, Wada R et al.. Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Overall Survival in Vulnerable Platinum-Ineligible NSCLC Populations. CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology. 2026 Feb. 41699769
  15. [15] Lang Y, Yang J et al.. Immune checkpoint blockers plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a network meta-analysis and economic evaluation. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2025. 41194885
  16. [16] Yiu CH, Clarke SJ et al.. Real-World Outcomes of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Age and Sex: A National Population-Based Study in Australia. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2026 May. 41566161
  17. [17] Motzer RJ, Taylor MH et al.. Lenvatinib dose, efficacy, and safety in the treatment of multiple malignancies. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2022 Apr. 35260027
  18. [18] Tan AC, Tan SH et al.. Efficacy of targeted therapies for oncogene-driven lung cancer in early single-arm versus late phase randomized clinical trials: A comparative analysis. Cancer treatment reviews. 2022 Mar. 35134620
  19. [19] Tan T, Lin X et al.. Case report: Abolishing primary resistance to PD-1 blockade by short-term treatment of lenvatinib in a patient with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Frontiers in immunology. 2023. 36742302
  20. [20] Desilets A, Soulières D. Safety evaluation of pembrolizumab for treating recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expert opinion on drug safety. 2020 Aug. 32458764

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts