Ascentage Pharma Releases Latest Clinical Data from Multiple Trials at ASCO 2026
Clinical Trial Updates

Ascentage Pharma Releases Latest Clinical Data from Multiple Trials at ASCO 2026

Published : 22 May 2026

At a Glance
IndicationChronic Myeloid Leukemia
Drugolverembatinib
Mechanism of ActionBCR-ABL inhibitor
CompanyAscentage Pharma Group International
Trial PhasePhase Ib, Phase 2, Phase 3
Trial AcronymPOLARIS-2, GLORA
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Conference NameAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting
Conference DatesMay 29 – June 2, 2026
Number of Abstracts Presented6
Key Efficacy MeasuresComplete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR), Major Molecular Response (MMR), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Complete Response (CR), Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) negativity, Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Patient Population Size42 (CP-CML), 26 (SDH-deficient GIST), 6 (SDH-deficient paraganglioma), 440 (GLORA trial)
Combination PartnerBlinatumomab, BTK inhibitor
Line of TherapySecond-line, Heavily Pretreated, Previously Treated
Regulatory ClearanceFDA and EMA-cleared
Geographic ScopeChina, Global

Ascentage Pharma Unveils Promising Clinical Data for Three Lead Candidates at ASCO 2026

Ascentage Pharma announced the presentation of six clinical abstracts at the 2026 ASCO Annual Meeting, showcasing data from its three lead drug candidates: BCR-ABL inhibitor olverembatinib, Bcl-2 inhibitor lisaftoclax, and MDM2-p53 inhibitor alrizomadlin. The presentations included rapid oral and poster sessions, highlighting promising efficacy and manageable safety profiles across various hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Key findings included high response rates for olverembatinib in CML and Ph+ BCP-ALL, preliminary antitumor activity for alrizomadlin in pediatric sarcomas, and efficacy of olverembatinib in SDH-deficient tumors. The company also provided updates on its global Phase 3 registrational trials, POLARIS-2 and GLORA.

  • Updated data for olverembatinib as second-line therapy in CP-CML showed a 91.3% complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate and a 60.9% major molecular response (MMR) rate at cycle 24 among 42 evaluable patients. Additionally, in combination with blinatumomab for R/R Ph+ BCP-ALL or CML-LBP, four out of five MRD-positive patients achieved complete response, with two achieving MRD negativity, demonstrating feasibility and a manageable safety profile.
  • A multicenter trial in China evaluated alrizomadlin as monotherapy or in combination with lisaftoclax in heavily pretreated pediatric patients with relapsed/metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), Ewing sarcoma (EWS), and other soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). The regimen showed a manageable safety profile with no DLTs, and preliminary antitumor activity, including one complete response in monotherapy and an objective response rate of 30% and disease control rate of 80% in the combination group.
  • Clinical and translational results for olverembatinib in SDH-deficient tumors revealed its efficacy in GIST and paraganglioma. Among 26 GIST patients, 23.1% achieved partial response with a median PFS of 25.7 months. For 6 paraganglioma patients, the clinical benefit rate was 66.7% with a median PFS of 8.25 months. The study also provided new insights into olverembatinib's mechanism, showing it inhibits fatty acid-promoted tumor cell migration by targeting the p38-CD36 pathway.
  • Ascentage Pharma provided updates on two global Phase 3 registrational trials in progress. The POLARIS-2 trial is evaluating olverembatinib in CP-CML patients who have received at least two prior TKIs, with a primary endpoint of MMR rate at 24 weeks. The GLORA trial is assessing lisaftoclax in combination with a BTK inhibitor for previously treated CLL/SLL patients who had suboptimal response to BTKi monotherapy, aiming to enroll approximately 440 patients across 18 countries.

Olverembatinib's Promising Efficacy in CML and Ph+ BCP-ALL

Recent studies demonstrate significant advances in CML treatment strategies, spanning novel targeted therapies, treatment optimization approaches, and resistance mechanisms. These investigations provide critical insights for both first-line and salvage therapy decisions in chronic and accelerated phase disease.

ASC4FIRST Study (2026): Evaluated asciminib 80 mg once-daily in newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP patients, demonstrating efficacy through BCR::ABL1 mRNA transcript time-course analysis for first-line treatment optimization

ASCEMBL Study (2026): Investigated asciminib in third-line or later treatment for patients with at least two prior TKI failures, showing measurable efficacy outcomes based on BCR::ABL1 transcript kinetics

ASC2ESCALATE Study (2026): Demonstrated asciminib second-line efficacy in 36 patients, with predicted major molecular response rates of 61-67% at week 48 and 70-76% at week 96 using 80 mg total daily dosing

Italian CML Network Cohort Study (2026): Compared first-line imatinib (n=840), nilotinib (n=490), and dasatinib (n=332) in 1,662 patients, showing 2-year resistance rates of 18.3%, 6.8%, and 8.4% respectively, with dasatinib demonstrating higher intolerance rates (12.4%) versus imatinib (8.5%) and nilotinib (5.2%)

Treatment-Free Remission Study (2025): Single-center cohort of 39 patients comparing three TKI cessation strategies achieved 63% sustained TFR at median 21-month follow-up, with equivalent outcomes (59-61%) across abrupt cessation, dose tapering, and upfront dose reduction approaches, and no disease progression events

Olverembatinib in Accelerated-Phase CML (2025): Demonstrated efficacy in 130 subjects failing ≥1 TKIs (91 with T315I mutation), achieving 6-year cumulative incidences of 59% major cytogenetic response and 52% major molecular response, with 81% transformation-free survival and acceptable toxicity profile

POLARIS-2: A Global Registrational Trial for Olverembatinib in CML

Recent global registrational trials for CML have focused on optimizing treatment strategies through dose modifications, molecular response maintenance, and novel targeted approaches. The most significant recent studies include the ASC4FIRST phase III trial evaluating asciminib as first-line therapy and the Italian OPTkIMA study investigating TKI dose de-escalation strategies in elderly patients.

Trial Phase Patient Population Primary Endpoint Key Design Features
ASC4FIRST (NCT04971226) III Newly diagnosed CML-CP MMR rate at week 48 1:1 randomization asciminib vs investigator-selected TKI; stratified by EUTOS risk score
OPTkIMA III 215 elderly CML patients in stable MR Ability to maintain molecular response FIXED arm (intermittent 1 month ON/OFF) vs PROGRESSIVE arm (dose de-escalation to 1/3 starting dose)
French Registry Study Population-based 507 CML patients (2006-2016) Achievement of MMR in first-line therapy Multivariate competitive risk analysis; 22% enrolled in clinical trials
Gene Expression Study Biomarker 112 patients from NCT00471497 Predictive models based on gene expression Good vs poor responder stratification; AUC = 0.76
Japanese Phase II II 54 CML-CP patients MMR at 12 months Imatinib-resistant (n=40) or intolerant (n=25) patients
Nilotinib Phase I/II I/II 280 CML-CP patients Major cytogenetic response Imatinib-resistant or intolerant patients; multiple CML phases evaluated
Dasatinib Dose-Optimization III 981 patients from 7 studies Major cytogenetic response Four dosing regimens compared; population PK analysis

Olverembatinib's Novel Mechanism and Potential in SDH-Deficient Tumors

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) represents the primary indication for olverembatinib trials beyond chronic myeloid leukemia. Clinical investigations span multiple disease settings including newly diagnosed patients, relapsed/refractory cases, and post-transplant maintenance therapy. The largest study is a single-center, single-arm phase 2 trial (NCT05594784) that enrolled 79 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL, combining olverembatinib with venetoclax and reduced-intensity chemotherapy. This trial achieved a complete molecular response rate of 62.0% at 3 months, with estimated 1-year overall survival of 93.1% and event-free survival of 89.1%. Additional studies have demonstrated particular efficacy in patients harboring the challenging T315I mutation, with overall response rates of 71.4% in overt relapsed/refractory disease and 60.0% achieving minimal residual disease flow negativity in MRD-positive patients.

The intervention models for Ph+ ALL trials encompass diverse therapeutic approaches tailored to specific patient populations and disease stages. For newly diagnosed patients, olverembatinib is administered at 40 mg daily for 28 days combined with prednisone and vindesine as induction therapy, followed by consolidation with cytarabine and methotrexate. In the relapsed/refractory setting, olverembatinib functions as monotherapy for elderly patients or in combination with agents like inotuzumab ozogamicin for patients with resistant mutations. Post-transplant maintenance represents another key intervention model, where 26 patients received olverembatinib either prophylactically (69.2%) or preemptively (30.8%) at median doses of 35 mg every other day, resulting in a hematologic relapse rate of only 7.7% and 3-year overall survival of 91.7%.

Preclinical investigations have extended olverembatinib's potential therapeutic scope to solid tumors, particularly endometrial cancer. Laboratory studies across seven endometrial cancer cell lines demonstrated significant antiproliferative effects, with cancer cells showing greater sensitivity compared to normal cells (p = 0.030). The compound significantly inhibited migration in both endometrioid (Ishikawa) and serous (ARK1) cell lines while reducing invasion in ARK1 cells. RNA sequencing analysis revealed modulation of key oncogenic pathways including ROR1/Wnt, GCN2-ATF4, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and PI3K-AKT signaling. These findings support further clinical investigation of olverembatinib in endometrial cancer, potentially in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, though no clinical trials have yet been initiated in this indication.

Ascentage Pharma's Multi-Modal Strategy Targets Resistant Cancers

Ascentage Pharma's recent ASCO presentations paint a compelling picture of a company strategically advancing a diverse pipeline of targeted therapies, particularly in areas marked by significant unmet needs and drug resistance. The spotlight on olverembatinib, a third-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor, reinforces its critical role in overcoming the challenging T315I mutation and broader TKI resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). With promising data in both adult and pediatric populations, and its inclusion in updated CML guidelines, olverembatinib is poised to become a cornerstone therapy. However, the literature suggests that, like some other potent TKIs, olverembatinib may be associated with cardiovascular toxicities, necessitating careful patient selection and dose optimization strategies, such as the 30 mg every other day regimen, to balance efficacy with tolerability. The ongoing POLARIS-2 and GLORA Phase 3 trials will be crucial in solidifying its global market position and exploring its potential in SDH-deficient tumors.

Meanwhile, lisaftoclax, a selective Bcl-2 inhibitor, is carving out a niche, particularly with its demonstrated activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients previously exposed to venetoclax. This positions it as a valuable option for patients who have exhausted other Bcl-2 inhibitor treatments, offering a new pathway for disease control. While Bcl-2 inhibitors are known for risks like neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, the observed manageable safety profile with dose ramp-up is encouraging. The synergistic potential of lisaftoclax in combination with other agents, such as homoharringtonine in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), further highlights its versatility.

Finally, alrizomadlin, an MDM2-p53 inhibitor, represents a distinct approach by restoring the tumor suppressor function of p53 in wild-type tumors. Its preliminary antitumor activity in pediatric sarcomas and other solid tumors, especially those with MDM2 amplification, addresses a critical need for novel mechanisms in these difficult-to-treat cancers. However, its efficacy is contingent on the patient's TP53 wild-type status, and clinicians must be prepared to manage significant hematologic toxicities, including thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, which are common with this class of agents. Ascentage's strategic focus on these three distinct mechanisms underscores a commitment to precision oncology, aiming to provide effective solutions for patient populations facing limited therapeutic options.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the miracle drug for CML?
The "miracle drug" for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is widely considered to be imatinib (Gleevec). This first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) revolutionized CML treatment by specifically targeting the BCR-ABL fusion protein, the oncogenic driver of the disease. Imatinib transformed CML from a rapidly fatal condition into a chronic, manageable illness for most patients, significantly improving survival rates and quality of life. Subsequent generations of TKIs have further expanded treatment options for CML patients.
What is the role of olverembatinib in the treatment landscape for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia?
Olverembatinib is a potent third-generation BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed for the treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. It is typically positioned for patients who have developed resistance or intolerance to prior TKI therapies. Its role is to provide an effective therapeutic option for those with difficult-to-treat disease, including specific mutations.
How does olverembatinib address resistance mechanisms in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia?
Olverembatinib is designed to overcome common resistance mutations in the BCR-ABL kinase domain, including the highly challenging T315I mutation. It achieves this by binding to the active site of the BCR-ABL protein, inhibiting its constitutive activity even in the presence of these mutations. This targeted action helps restore sensitivity to TKI therapy in resistant CML cells.
Which patient populations with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia may benefit from olverembatinib?
Olverembatinib is primarily indicated for adult patients with chronic phase CML who are resistant or intolerant to at least two prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This includes individuals harboring the T315I mutation, which confers resistance to most other available TKIs. Its use aims to achieve significant hematologic and cytogenetic responses in these challenging patient groups.

References

  1. [1] Ammendolia I, Mannucci C et al.. Adverse Respiratory Reactions to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Disproportionality Analysis of Spontaneous Reports from European Countries. Life (Basel, Switzerland). 2026 Jan 13. 41598268
  2. [2] Giles FJ, Cortes JE et al.. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate), a hexacyclic camptothecin, on a daily-times-five schedule in patients with advanced leukemia. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2002 Jul. 12114413
  3. [3] Liu T, Wang C et al.. Olverembatinib combined with inotuzumab ozogamicin in relapsed refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A case report. Medicine. 2024 Jul 19. 39029009
  4. [4] Abed Alhaleem M, Hussain M et al.. Recurrent Pleural Effusion in an Elderly Patient With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy. Cureus. 2025 Jun. 40656327
  5. [5] Hayashino K, Mochizuki N et al.. Cardiovascular toxicity from tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia with severe dilated cardiomyopathy. International journal of hematology. 2025 Nov. 40694315
  6. [6] Dyagil IS, Bazyka DA et al.. MUTATIONAL STATUS AND TREATMENT EFFICACY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA. Problemy radiatsiinoi medytsyny ta radiobiolohii. 2025 Dec. 41469338
  7. [7] Fassoni AC, Yong ASM et al.. Predicting treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia patients using an integrated model of tumor-immune dynamics. NPJ systems biology and applications. 2025 Oct 16. 41102232
  8. [8] Malagola M, Iurlo A et al.. Molecular response and quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with intermittent TKIs: First interim analysis of OPTkIMA study. Cancer medicine. 2021 Mar. 33594821
  9. [9] Yousaf M, Arif K et al.. TAM family kinases are potential candidate targets for therapeutic intervention in chronic myeloid leukemia. Discover oncology. 2025 Oct 21. 41117883
  10. [10] Jabbour E, Branford S et al.. Practical advice for determining the role of BCR-ABL mutations in guiding tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2011 May 1. 21509757
  11. [11] Lauseker M, Zu Eulenburg C. Analysis of cause of death: Competing risks or progressive illness-death model?. Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift. 2019 Mar. 30680772
  12. [12] Tiedemann L, Gorantla SP et al.. Association of fibronectin 1 deregulation with tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology. 2025. 41488007
  13. [13] Shvachko L, Zavelevich M et al.. ALPHA-TOCOPHEROL AND G-CSF CHANGE EXPRESSION OF GENES ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENTIATION OF K562 CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA CELLS DOWNREGULATING EMT-ASSOCIATED STEMNESS BIOMARKERS. Experimental oncology. 2025 Oct 7. 41058463
  14. [14] Xiao XH, Zhang QS et al.. Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Imatinib Resistance. Pharmaceutics. 2025 Jul 17. 40733131
  15. [15] Ding J, Li W. Case report: Olverembatinib monotherapy: the chemotherapy-free regimen for an elderly patient with relapsed Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2023. 38035030
  16. [16] Fassoni AC, Baldow C et al.. Reduced tyrosine kinase inhibitor dose is predicted to be as effective as standard dose in chronic myeloid leukemia: a simulation study based on phase III trial data. Haematologica. 2018 Nov. 29954936
  17. [17] Tian JX, Liao YX et al.. Olverembatinib and high-dose methotrexate in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: delayed methotrexate clearance and increased nephrotoxicity. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2026 May. 41739441
  18. [18] Borghi L, Galimberti S et al.. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patient's Voice About the Experience of Treatment-Free Remission Failure: Results From the Italian Sub-Study of ENESTPath Exploring the Emotional Experience of Patients During Different Phases of a Clinical Trial. Frontiers in psychology. 2019. 30842749
  19. [19] Luukkainen K, Purhonen M et al.. Deep cytomorphology identifies erythroid skewing and monocytic morphology to predict TKI sensitivity in CML patients. HemaSphere. 2026 Feb. 41694735
  20. [20] Haddad FG, Kantarjian H et al.. SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Can Be Treated with Chemotherapy-Free Regimens without Transplant. Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia. 2025 Oct. 40683769

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts