Ascentage Pharma Presents Updated Clinical Data for Olverembatinib as Second-Line Therapy in CML-CP at ASCO 2026
Clinical Trial Updates

Ascentage Pharma Presents Updated Clinical Data for Olverembatinib as Second-Line Therapy in CML-CP at ASCO 2026

Published : 31 May 2026

At a Glance
IndicationChronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP)
DrugOlverembatinib
Mechanism of ActionBCR-ABL1 inhibitor
CompanyAscentage Pharma Group International
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Conference Name2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting
Presentation TypeRapid oral presentation
Complete Cytogenetic Response Rate (CCyR)91.3% at cycle 24
Major Molecular Response Rate (MMR)60.9% at cycle 24
Patient PopulationPatients with CML-CP, second-line therapy, failed first-line TKI therapy, without T315I mutation
Study DesignSingle-arm, multicenter, open-label study
Study GeographyChina
China Approval StatusApproved for TKI-resistant CML-CP/AP with T315I mutation, and CML-CP resistant/intolerant to first- and second-generation TKIs, covered by NRDL
Commercialization Partner (China)Innovent Biologics
Licensing PartnerTakeda (exclusive option agreement for global rights outside Greater China)

Ascentage Pharma's Olverembatinib Shows Deepening Responses in CML-CP

Ascentage Pharma announced updated efficacy and safety data for olverembatinib as a second-line therapy in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) at the 2026 ASCO Annual Meeting. The data, from a single-arm, multicenter, open-label study in China, showed that at cycle 24, patients achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate of 91.3% and a major molecular response (MMR) rate of 60.9%. Responses deepened over time, and olverembatinib maintained a stable and manageable safety profile with no new signals, further supporting its potential as a second-line treatment for CML-CP patients who failed first-line TKI therapy without the T315I mutation.

  • Olverembatinib demonstrated significant and progressively deepening anti-tumor activity in CML-CP patients. At cycle 24, the complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate reached 91.3%, and the major molecular response (MMR) rate was 60.9%. These high response rates were also observed in patients previously treated with second-generation TKIs, indicating strong efficacy over longer treatment durations.
  • The drug maintained a stable and manageable safety profile during long-term treatment, with no new safety signals identified. The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 89.4%, predominantly low-grade events such as skin hyperpigmentation, hyperuricemia, and increased creatine phosphokinase. Any observed grade ≥3 hematologic toxicities were recoverable with supportive treatment.
  • The updated, more mature and encouraging results further support olverembatinib's role as a promising second-line treatment option for patients with CML-CP who have failed first-line TKI therapy and do not harbor the T315I mutation. These findings provide stronger evidence for clinical practice and contribute to optimizing treatment pathways for CML patients.

Olverembatinib's Durable Efficacy and Safety in Second-Line CML-CP

Recent clinical studies in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) have provided important insights into treatment outcomes across multiple therapeutic approaches. These studies encompass both established and emerging interventions, offering valuable data on efficacy and safety profiles for various patient populations.

ASC4FIRST Trial (2025-2026) evaluated asciminib versus investigator-selected TKIs in newly diagnosed CML-CP, demonstrating superior major molecular response (MMR) rates at week 96: 74.1% with asciminib versus 52.0% with comparator TKIs (treatment difference 22.4%; P<0.001), with favorable safety profile including lower discontinuation rates due to adverse events compared to second-generation TKIs

Italian Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (2025) analyzed 1,433 CML patients comparing frontline imatinib versus second-generation TKIs, showing faster molecular responses with second-generation TKIs within the first 6 months (subhazard ratio 1.31; 95% CI 1.15-1.50) but similar 5-year overall survival rates of 88% between treatment groups

Generic TKI Study from North Eastern India (2026) prospectively evaluated 85 newly diagnosed CML-CP patients treated with generic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, achieving complete hematological response in 94.11% of patients with BCR-ABL levels falling to 0.1% by 12 months in 60% of cases, while demonstrating manageable toxicity profile with neutropenia in 8.2% and edema in 14.1% of patients

UK Multi-disciplinary TFR Programme (2025) assessed treatment-free remission outcomes in 37 patients over median follow-up of 37 months, achieving overall success rate of 70.3% with all patients who failed treatment-free remission successfully regaining disease control upon medication restart

Addressing Unmet Needs in TKI-Resistant CML-CP

Despite significant advances with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), several critical challenges continue to limit optimal outcomes in CML-CP treatment. These limitations span from biological resistance mechanisms to practical clinical and economic considerations that affect both patients and healthcare systems.

TKI resistance and intolerance - A significant proportion of patients do not achieve optimal response or develop resistance to TKI treatment, with nearly one-fifth of patients experiencing intolerance or resistance to imatinib specifically

ABL kinase domain mutations - Mutations in the ABL kinase domain are extensively implicated in TKI resistance pathogenesis, detected in approximately 31% of resistant patients, with the T315I mutation presenting particular challenges as second-generation TKIs remain ineffective against this variant

Treatment-free remission failures - Leukemic stem cells often persist and expand in approximately half of patients attempting TKI discontinuation, with myelofibrosis presence at diagnosis serving as a significant predictor of treatment-free remission failure

Non-optimal treatment patterns - Nearly 25% of patients experience non-optimal treatment due to early treatment modifications or poor adherence, resulting in 80% more inpatient admissions and $13,551 additional per-patient-per-year medical costs

Disease eradication limitations - Current therapies are not curative despite dramatic outcome improvements, with resistance mechanisms and BCR-ABL1-independent leukemia stem cell persistence preventing complete disease elimination

Quality of life and adherence challenges - Even low-grade chronic side effects adversely affect patient quality of life and treatment adherence, which is essential for successful outcomes, while prolonged survival increases demands for ongoing patient education and adverse event management

Treatment selection complexity - No controlled studies guide second-line therapy decisions, requiring individualized approaches based on leukemic cell characterization, patient comorbidities, and TKI safety profiles, with cardiovascular complications occurring in 4-6% of patients depending on the specific TKI used

Olverembatinib's Expanding Pipeline Beyond CML-CP

Beyond its established use in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia, olverembatinib has demonstrated activity across multiple hematologic malignancies, particularly those harboring BCR::ABL1 mutations including the challenging T315I resistance mutation. The drug has shown particular promise in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia and accelerated-phase CML, with studies encompassing both pediatric and adult populations.

Indication Study Design Key Intervention Details Primary Outcomes
Accelerated-Phase CML (CML-AP) Phase 1/2, single-arm, open-label (NCT03883100) Phase 1: 11 dose cohorts (1-60 mg) every other day in 28-day cycles; Phase 2: RP2D 40 mg alternate days 3-year cumulative incidences: MCyR 47.4%, CCyR 47.4%, MMR 44.7% (n=38)
Newly Diagnosed Ph+ ALL Frontline induction therapy 40 mg daily × 28 days + prednisone + vindesine, followed by consolidation with cytarabine/methotrexate 100% CR with complete cytogenetic response; 85% achieved CMR within 3 months (n=20)
Relapsed/Refractory Ph+ ALL Single-arm studies Monotherapy or combination with chemotherapy/immunotherapy 92.5% achieved CR/CRi by day 28, 75.0% MRD negativity (n=40)
MRD-Positive Ph+ ALL Treatment of persistent disease Olverembatinib-based regimens 60.0% achieved MRD flow negativity, 47.1% complete molecular remission (n=17)
Pediatric Relapsed Ph+ ALL Compassionate use/case series Median dose 600 mg cumulative over median 70 days CR with MRD <0.01% in 4/5 evaluable patients (n=6)
Post-Transplant Maintenance Maintenance therapy post allo-HCT Median 35 mg every other day for median 12.5 months, initiated 2.5 months post-transplant 7.7% hematologic relapse rate; 3-year OS 91.7%, RFS 79.1% (n=26)
CML Blast Phase (CML-BP) Advanced disease study 40 mg alternate days in combination protocols 63.2% achieved CR/CRi by day 28, 26.3% complete cytogenetic response (n=19)
Endometrial Cancer Preclinical evaluation 0.1-1 μM doses in cell line studies Inhibited proliferation in all 7 EC cell lines; altered ROR1/Wnt, EMT, PI3K-AKT pathways

Olverembatinib's Broadened Horizon in Second-Line CML-CP

Olverembatinib's latest data presentation at ASCO 2026 marks a pivotal moment for its potential role in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Historically, this third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been lauded for its potent activity against the challenging T315I gatekeeper mutation, a known driver of resistance to many first- and second-generation TKIs. However, these new results, demonstrating a remarkable 91.3% complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and 60.9% major molecular response (MMR) at cycle 24 in second-line CML-CP patients without the T315I mutation, significantly broaden its therapeutic horizon.

This robust efficacy, coupled with a stable and manageable safety profile, positions olverembatinib as a compelling option for a wider segment of patients who have failed initial TKI therapy. In a landscape where patients often face resistance or intolerance to existing treatments, a new, highly effective, and well-tolerated agent is crucial for improving long-term outcomes and quality of life. The CML treatment paradigm is dynamic, with several potent TKIs available, including other third-generation agents like ponatinib and asciminib. Olverembatinib's performance in this non-T315I population suggests it could carve out a significant niche, offering a differentiated profile.

However, strategic considerations must account for the study's design as a single-arm, open-label trial conducted in China. While promising, these results will need validation in broader, potentially randomized, international studies to fully establish its comparative efficacy and safety against current standards of care. Furthermore, while the safety profile is manageable, long-term data on specific adverse events and their impact on patient adherence will be vital. The competitive environment also means continuous innovation and differentiation will be key to sustained market success. Nevertheless, these data underscore olverembatinib's potential to become a cornerstone therapy for a broader range of CML patients.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the standard of care for CML?
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML). First-line treatment typically involves a TKI such as imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib, selected based on patient risk stratification and comorbidities. These agents effectively target the BCR-ABL fusion protein, leading to high rates of hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular responses. Continued TKI therapy is crucial for maintaining disease control, with treatment-free remission being an option for select patients achieving deep and sustained molecular responses.
How is the chronic phase of CML treated?
The chronic phase of CML is primarily treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs), which target the BCR-ABL fusion protein. First-generation TKIs like imatinib, along with second- and third-generation agents such as nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib, are selected based on patient risk stratification, tolerability, and molecular response. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a curative option, typically reserved for patients who fail multiple TKI therapies or have high-risk disease progression.
What are the phases of CML CP?
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) progresses through three distinct phases: chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), and blast phase (BP). The chronic phase is the initial and longest phase, characterized by stable disease and good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with typically less than 10-15% blasts in the blood or bone marrow.
What is CML CP in medical terms?
CML CP refers to Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in its Chronic Phase. CML is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by the Philadelphia chromosome and the *BCR-ABL1* fusion gene. The Chronic Phase is the initial and most stable stage of the disease, defined by less than 10% blasts in the peripheral blood and bone marrow, and is typically highly responsive to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

References

  1. [1] Bollmann PW, Giglio AD. Chronic myeloid leukemia: past, present, future. Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2011 Jun. 26760823
  2. [2] Molica M, Noguera NI et al.. Treatment free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia: Lights and shadows. Hematology reports. 2020 Sep 21. 33042501
  3. [3] Li X, Zhang J et al.. Olverembatinib Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed Philadelphia-Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia. 2023 Sep. 37301632
  4. [4] Jiang Q, Li Z et al.. Olverembatinib (HQP1351), a well-tolerated and effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with T315I-mutated chronic myeloid leukemia: results of an open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 trial. Journal of hematology & oncology. 2022 Aug 18. 35982483
  5. [5] Sánchez-Sosa S, Stuckey R et al.. TKI Use and Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Evidence from a Regional Cohort Study in the Canary Islands. Hematology reports. 2025 Aug 4. 40863184
  6. [6] Choudhuri A, Bhattacharyya J et al.. Response Assessment of Generic Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A Prospective Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in North Eastern India. Cureus. 2025 Dec. 41523565
  7. [7] Huang TJ, Wu Y et al.. [Secondary treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase: a case series and literature review]. Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi. 2026 Jan 14. 41663188
  8. [8] Scalzulli E, Carmosino I et al.. Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Later Lines: The Role of Ponatinib and New Compounds. Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia. 2023 Jun. 37029061
  9. [9] Schmidlechner L, Nagel I et al.. BTK acts as a modulator of the response to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. Oncology letters. 2024 Sep. 39021736
  10. [10] Abed Alhaleem M, Hussain M et al.. Recurrent Pleural Effusion in an Elderly Patient With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy. Cureus. 2025 Jun. 40656327
  11. [11] Bao M, Zhang XS et al.. Efficacy, safety and predictive biomarker of third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors with azacitidine in myeloid blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2025 Nov 15. 41199590
  12. [12] Bruzzese A, Vigna E et al.. Treatment-Free Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Revisiting the "W" Questions. European journal of haematology. 2025 Sep. 40550748
  13. [13] Jiang X, Zhou M et al.. Efficacy and safety of the third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor Olverembatinib in relapsed and persistent minimal residual disease positive Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Frontiers in medicine. 2025. 41114036
  14. [14] Bisen A, Claxton DF. Tyrosine kinase targeted treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia and other myeloproliferative neoplasms. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2013. 23288640
  15. [15] Fava C, Rege-Cambrin G et al.. Observational study of chronic myeloid leukemia Italian patients who discontinued tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical practice. Haematologica. 2019 Aug. 30819917
  16. [16] Ashaq MS, Zhou Q et al.. Novel targeted therapies in chronic myeloid leukemia. Pharmaceutical science advances. 2024 Dec. 41550150
  17. [17] Bourne G, Diebold K et al.. Real-World Evidence of Treatment-Free Remission Strategies and Outcomes in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers. 2025 Jun 26. 40647447
  18. [18] Al-Husein BA, Bani-Ahmad MA et al.. YM155 Restores the Effect of Imatinib in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Cell Lines. Current cancer drug targets. 2025 Oct 27. 41147276
  19. [19] Sakaida E. [What is the best treatment for chronic-phase CML?]. [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology. 2021. 34497187
  20. [20] Haddad FG, Jabbour EJ et al.. BCR::ABL1 Mutational Profiling in US Patients With Chronic-phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia on Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. 2026 Mar-Apr. 41778234

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts