Ascentage Pharma Presents Data on Olverembatinib in CML-LBP and Ph+ BCP-ALL at ASCO 2026
Clinical Trial Updates

Ascentage Pharma Presents Data on Olverembatinib in CML-LBP and Ph+ BCP-ALL at ASCO 2026

Published : 31 May 2026

At a Glance
Indicationlymphoid blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia
Drugolverembatinib and blinatumomab
Mechanism of ActionBCR-ABL inhibitor and bispecific T-cell engager antibody
CompanyAscentage Pharma Group International
Trial PhasePhase Ib
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Conference Name2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting
Presentation TypeRapid Oral Presentation
Abstract Number6513
Patient Population SizeUp to 12 patients
Complete Response Rate (CR/CRi)91% (10/11)
BCR::ABL1 Negativity Rate67% (8/12)
MRD Negativity Rate80% (8/10)
Adverse Events SeverityGrade 1-2
First AuthorElias Jabbour, MD
Regulatory Status (US)Under investigation, not yet approved by US FDA

Ascentage Pharma Presents Encouraging Phase Ib Data for Olverembatinib Combo at ASCO 2026

Ascentage Pharma announced encouraging results from a Phase Ib study evaluating olverembatinib in combination with blinatumomab for patients with lymphoid blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-LBP) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ BCP-ALL). Presented at the 2026 ASCO Annual Meeting, this marks the first international disclosure of the combination. The regimen demonstrated strong clinical activity, including high rates of complete response (91%) and minimal residual disease (MRD) clearance (80%), alongside a generally well-tolerated safety profile consistent with individual agents. These findings highlight its potential as a novel, chemotherapy-free strategy for these difficult-to-treat hematologic malignancies.

  • The Phase Ib study showcased significant efficacy, with 91% (10/11) of patients achieving complete response (CR) or complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). Additionally, deep molecular responses were observed, with 67% (8/12) achieving BCR::ABL1 negativity by PCR (≤0.01%) and 80% (8/10) achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity by flow cytometry (≤0.01%) in this challenging patient population.
  • The combination regimen of olverembatinib and blinatumomab demonstrated a manageable safety profile. Most adverse events (AEs) reported were mild, classified as Grade 1-2, and were consistent with the known toxicities of each agent when administered individually. This suggests that the combination therapy does not introduce unexpected or severe safety concerns, supporting its potential for broader clinical application.
  • This rapid oral presentation at ASCO 2026 represents the first international validation of olverembatinib combined with immunotherapy for CML-LBP and relapsed/refractory Ph+ BCP-ALL. These diseases are recognized as among the most difficult-to-treat BCR-ABL-driven hematologic malignancies, often associated with terminal stages, poor prognoses, and limited treatment options, underscoring the potential of this novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic approach.

Addressing Unmet Needs in CML-LBP and Ph+ BCP-ALL

Lymphoid blast crisis represents a critical unmet medical need in chronic myeloid leukemia, with patients experiencing an average overall survival of less than one year despite current therapeutic advances. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors demonstrate significantly reduced efficacy in blast crisis compared to chronic phase CML, where survival rates approach those of the general population.

Treatment-free remission failures - Nine out of eleven reported blast crisis cases during TFR presented as lymphoid blast crisis, with additional gene mutations frequently observed including SETD2 frameshift mutations in patients who experienced sudden transformation after 21 months in TFR without prior molecular loss

Long-term monitoring strategies - Implementation of extended surveillance protocols following TKI discontinuation is essential due to potential late-onset blast crisis, with systematic genetic studies needed to understand mechanisms and develop predictive biomarkers

Early disease progression detection - No universal molecular biomarkers currently exist to identify CML patients at risk of blast crisis transformation, limiting ability to implement timely therapeutic interventions to delay or prevent progression

Advanced phase treatment optimization - Patients diagnosed in blast crisis show significantly higher likelihood of not achieving complete/partial hematologic response, emphasizing the need for transplantation before disease progression and improved treatment protocols for advanced disease

Novel therapeutic targets - Recent research has identified PABPC1 as a driver of blast crisis progression and ARDAP derivatives as potential tubulin inhibitors that may overcome broad TKI resistance in relapsed/refractory patients

Genetic assessment integration - Earlier recognition of end-phase disease through comprehensive genetic evaluation may improve clinical outcomes, particularly for patients with T315I mutations requiring third-generation TKIs or alternative therapeutic approaches

Olverembatinib's Expanding Pipeline in Hematologic Malignancies

Olverembatinib and blinatumomab are being investigated across multiple hematologic malignancies beyond lymphoid blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Both agents demonstrate broad therapeutic potential in various phases of leukemia and lymphoma, with distinct intervention models tailored to their mechanisms of action.

Agent Indication Trial Phase Intervention Model Key Details
Olverembatinib TKI-resistant CML-CP Phase 1/2 Single-arm, open-label 40 mg orally every other day, 28-day cycles (NCT03883087)
Olverembatinib TKI-resistant CML-AP Phase 1/2 Single-arm, open-label 40 mg orally every other day, 28-day cycles (NCT03883100)
Olverembatinib R/R Ph+ ALL Real-world study Combination therapy Olverembatinib-based regimens in 40 patients
Blinatumomab R/R B-precursor ALL Phase 2/3 Single-arm and randomized Continuous IV infusion; FDA approved 2014
Blinatumomab MRD-positive B-ALL Phase 2/3 Single-arm FDA approved March 2018 for adults and children
Blinatumomab R/R B-NHL Phase 1 Dose-escalation 76 patients enrolled 2004-2011 (NCT00274742)
Blinatumomab Ph+ ALL Phase 2/3 Combination therapy Chemotherapy-free regimens with TKIs
Blinatumomab Newly diagnosed ALL Phase 2/3 Combination therapy With inotuzumab ozogamicin

Paving a Chemotherapy-Free Path in Advanced Ph+ Leukemias

The recent disclosure of positive Phase Ib data for Ascentage Pharma's olverembatinib in combination with blinatumomab marks a potentially transformative moment for patients battling lymphoid blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-LBP) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ BCP-ALL). These are aggressive forms of leukemia where treatment options are often limited, and prognoses remain poor. While tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved outcomes in CML, the emergence of resistance, particularly due to specific BCR-ABL1 mutations like T315I, continues to pose a substantial clinical hurdle. Olverembatinib, a third-generation TKI, has already demonstrated robust activity against such resistant mutations.

The strategic combination with blinatumomab, an established immunotherapy, offers a compelling chemotherapy-free strategy. This approach is highly attractive, as it aims to circumvent the severe toxicities and complications associated with conventional intensive chemotherapy regimens, which can significantly impact a patient's quality of life and long-term health. The reported high rates of complete response and minimal residual disease (MRD) clearance are particularly encouraging, as deep molecular responses are strongly associated with improved long-term survival and the potential for eventual treatment-free remission.

However, it is crucial to consider that these are early-phase results. While promising, the findings from a Phase Ib study, typically involving a small patient cohort, require validation in larger, later-phase clinical trials to definitively establish efficacy and long-term safety. The long-term safety profile of this combination, including potential cumulative toxicities or novel adverse events, will need careful monitoring, as patient adherence to TKI therapy is paramount for successful outcomes. Furthermore, despite the potency of olverembatinib against known resistance mutations, the inherent adaptability of advanced leukemias means that the emergence of new BCR-ABL1 mutations or BCR-ABL1-independent resistance mechanisms remains a persistent risk that could challenge long-term disease control. Nevertheless, this combination represents a significant step forward, offering a targeted, less toxic, and highly effective potential new standard for these challenging hematologic malignancies.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is lymphoid blast phase CML treated?
Treatment for lymphoid blast phase CML (LBP-CML) typically involves intensive chemotherapy regimens, often mirroring those used for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). These regimens are combined with a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to target the underlying Philadelphia chromosome. The primary goal is to achieve remission, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for eligible patients, which offers the best long-term survival.
What happens if my CML is in blast phase?
CML in blast phase signifies a transformation to acute leukemia, most commonly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or, less frequently, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This indicates aggressive disease progression with a significantly poorer prognosis compared to the chronic or accelerated phases. Management typically involves intensive chemotherapy regimens similar to those used for de novo acute leukemia, with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation considered for eligible patients who achieve remission.
What are the primary therapeutic challenges in lymphoid blast phase CML?
Lymphoid blast phase CML represents a highly aggressive transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia, characterized by rapid disease progression and poor prognosis. Treatment is complicated by the emergence of drug resistance, particularly to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and the need for therapies that can effectively target the blast cells while minimizing toxicity. Achieving durable remissions and improving overall survival remains a significant challenge.
What novel therapeutic approaches are being explored for lymphoid blast phase CML?
Novel therapeutic approaches for lymphoid blast phase CML often involve combination strategies to overcome resistance and target distinct pathways. These include next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors with broader activity against resistant mutations, as well as immunotherapies like bispecific T-cell engagers. The goal is to induce deeper and more durable molecular responses, potentially bridging to allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

References

  1. [1] Nägele V, Zugmaier G et al.. Relationship of T- and B-cell kinetics to clinical response in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with blinatumomab. Experimental hematology. 2021 Aug. 34228983
  2. [2] Malik-Chaudhry HK, Prabhakar K et al.. TNB-486 induces potent tumor cell cytotoxicity coupled with low cytokine release in preclinical models of B-NHL. mAbs. 2021 Jan-Dec. 33818299
  3. [3] Chen M, Tang G et al.. Persistent monosomy 7 in Philadelphia chromosome-negative cells without disease progression over nearly two decades of follow-up in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer genetics. 2026 Apr. 41579782
  4. [4] Saha S, Yadav S et al.. Predictors of Response to Imatinib Therapy and Long-Term Outcomes in Paediatric and Adolescent Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia. Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.). 2026 Jan. 41496461
  5. [5] Ribera JM, Ferrer A et al.. Profile of blinatumomab and its potential in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. OncoTargets and therapy. 2015. 26170691
  6. [6] Gu M, Xia Y et al.. The effectiveness of blinatumomab in clearing measurable residual disease in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients detected by next-generation sequencing. Cancer medicine. 2023 Dec. 38063317
  7. [7] Sun C, Xu X et al.. Selective translational control by PABPC1 phase separation regulates blast crisis and therapy resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nature cell biology. 2025 Apr. 40102686
  8. [8] Alanazi N, Siyal A et al.. Clinical Validation of the Somatic FANCD2 Mutation (c.2022-5C>T) as a Novel Molecular Biomarker for Early Disease Progression in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Case-Control Study. Hematology reports. 2024 Jul 8. 39051418
  9. [9] Short NJ, Kantarjian H. Using immunotherapy and novel trial designs to optimise front-line therapy in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: breaking with the traditions of the past. The Lancet. Haematology. 2023 May. 37003279
  10. [10] Wen Z, Liu Z et al.. Olverembatinib (HQP1351)-based therapy in adults with relapsed or refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase: results from a real-world study. Frontiers in immunology. 2025. 40438114
  11. [11] Goebeler ME, Bargou R. Blinatumomab: a CD19/CD3 bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) with unique anti-tumor efficacy. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2016 May. 27050240
  12. [12] Minnema MC, Yin X et al.. Outcomes of patients aged ≥26 years with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in ZUMA-3 and historical trials. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2024 Oct. 38785408
  13. [13] Sigmund AM, Sahasrabudhe KD et al.. Evaluating Blinatumomab for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory ALL: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy. Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy. 2020. 33173373
  14. [14] Shouse G. Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: The magic is T-cell redirection. Blood reviews. 2025 Jan. 39617677
  15. [15] Ali S, Moreau A et al.. Blinatumomab for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: The First Bispecific T-Cell Engager Antibody to Be Approved by the EMA for Minimal Residual Disease. The oncologist. 2020 Apr. 32297447
  16. [16] Li X, Zhang J et al.. Olverembatinib Treatment in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed Philadelphia-Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia. 2023 Sep. 37301632
  17. [17] Huguet F, Tavitian S. Emerging biological therapies to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Expert opinion on emerging drugs. 2017 Mar. 27820973
  18. [18] Ito D, Feng C et al.. Health Care Resource Utilization and Total Costs of Care for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the United States: A Retrospective Claims Analysis. Clinical therapeutics. 2024 Jan. 37981560
  19. [19] Topp MS, Gökbuget N et al.. Safety and activity of blinatumomab for adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. The Lancet. Oncology. 2015 Jan. 25524800
  20. [20] Dufner V, Sayehli CM et al.. Long-term outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with blinatumomab. Blood advances. 2019 Aug 27. 31451445

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts