| Indication | relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia |
| Drug | Annamycin |
| Company | Moleculin Biotech, Inc. |
| Trial Phase | Phase 2/3 |
| Trial Acronym | MIRACLE |
| Category | Clinical Trial Event |
| Sub Category | Topline Results Positive |
| Therapeutic Area | Hematology |
| Patient Population Size | 45 patients |
| Trial Part | Part A |
| Combination Partner | cytarabine |
| Trial Design | adaptive design, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled |
| Regulatory Agency | FDA |
| Previous Study | Phase 1B/2 study (MB-106) |
| Other Pipeline Drugs | WP1066, WP1122 |
| Event Date | July 06, 2026 |
Moleculin CEO Discusses Positive Preliminary MIRACLE Trial Results
Moleculin Biotech's CEO, Walter Klemp, participated in a Virtual Investor "What This Means" segment to discuss positive preliminary unblinded efficacy results from the first 45 patients in Part A of the pivotal Phase 2/3 MIRACLE trial. This trial evaluates Annamycin, in combination with cytarabine (AnnAraC), for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). Klemp highlighted early efficacy trends observed across both Annamycin treatment arms and discussed the commercial opportunity, including insights from recent market research on the potential addressable market for Annamycin if approved.
- Moleculin Biotech's CEO, Walter Klemp, presented positive preliminary unblinded efficacy results from the initial 45 patients in Part A of the pivotal Phase 2/3 MIRACLE trial. The discussion, part of a Virtual Investor segment, focused on early efficacy trends observed across both Annamycin treatment arms for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML).
- The MIRACLE trial (MB-108) is a pivotal, adaptive design, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2/3 study. It evaluates Annamycin in combination with cytarabine (AnnAraC) for R/R AML. Annamycin, the company's lead program, is an anthracycline designed to overcome multidrug resistance and avoid cardiotoxicity, a common issue with existing treatments.
- Following a successful Phase 1B/2 study (MB-106) and input from the FDA, Moleculin believes the development pathway for Annamycin in AML is substantially de-risked. The company also conducted market research, which provided insights into the potential addressable market for Annamycin, underscoring its commercial opportunity if approved.
- Beyond Annamycin, Moleculin is advancing other therapeutic candidates. These include WP1066, an Immune/Transcription Modulator targeting brain tumors, pancreatic, and other cancers, and WP1122, an antimetabolite for pathogenic viruses and certain cancer indications, demonstrating a diverse pipeline addressing hard-to-treat conditions.
Addressing the Challenges in Relapsed/Refractory AML Treatment
Relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML remains one of the most therapeutically challenging malignancies, characterized by poor long-term outcomes across most patient subgroups. High relapse rates, intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms, and the biological heterogeneity of the disease collectively limit the effectiveness of current standard-of-care approaches.
High relapse rates and poor long-term survival persist even after achievement of complete remission with intensive induction therapy, with outcomes particularly dismal in patients over 60 years of age, who frequently present with unfavorable cytogenetics, P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression, and functional drug efflux.
Intrinsic chemotherapy resistance affects the majority of AML patients at initial diagnosis, often driven by MDR-1 gene expression encoding P-gp-mediated drug efflux; at relapse, additional transporter proteins — including lung-resistance protein (LRP) and MDR-associated protein (MRP) — are expressed at higher frequency, further compounding therapeutic failure. Patients with P-gp-positive secondary AML and unfavorable cytogenetics have reported complete remission rates as low as 12%.
TP53-mutated AML presents a distinct and unresolved clinical challenge: while hypomethylating agent/venetoclax-based regimens yield improved initial responses, remissions are generally short-lived and overall survival remains poor, underscoring the urgent need for more effective therapeutic strategies in this molecular subset.
Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), including azacitidine and decitabine, offer therapeutic access for patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, but long-term outcomes remain largely unsatisfactory, with relapse and therapeutic resistance continuing to limit their utility even in combination with venetoclax.
Barriers to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) — the only potentially curative option for many R/R AML patients — include persistent or relapsed disease at the time of transplant eligibility assessment, as well as patient-related factors such as fitness and preference, restricting its applicability to a limited proportion of the R/R population.
Immunotherapeutic approaches remain constrained by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and a scarcity of validated, leukemia-specific immunotherapeutic targets, limiting the clinical translation of immune-based strategies that have shown success in other hematologic malignancies.
Preliminary Efficacy from the MIRACLE Trial in R/R AML
Recent clinical investigations in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML have evaluated a range of targeted and combination strategies, with data emerging across IDH inhibition, BCL-2–based regimens, FLT3-directed therapy, and novel epigenetic combinations. The studies below represent key recent evidence informing treatment decision-making in this high-unmet-need setting.
| Study Name | Intervention | Patient Population | Key Efficacy Outcomes | Key Safety Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (Study 2102-HEM-101 vs. AG120-C-001) | Olutasidenib vs. ivosidenib (IDH1 inhibitors) | R/R IDH1-mutated AML | CR rates comparable (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.61–2.08); median CR+CRh duration significantly longer with olutasidenib (difference: 9.84 months, 95% CI 3.24–22.28); OS HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.53–1.07), numerically favoring olutasidenib (non-significant) | Not separately reported in comparative analysis |
| Venetoclax + Azacitidine (AZA/VEN) in AML transformed from MDS | Venetoclax plus azacitidine | AML transformed from MDS post-azacitidine monotherapy (n=13) | ORR 38.5%; median OS 10.7 months; median EFS 8.9 months; significantly superior to chemotherapy, azacitidine monotherapy, and best supportive care (p=0.000023 for OS; p=0.026 for EFS) | Not specifically detailed |
| CLAD-LDAC-Venetoclax (Retrospective) | Cladribine 5 mg/m²/day ×5d + LDAC 20 mg SC BID ×10d + venetoclax 100 mg/day (with azole antifungal) | R/R AML, all venetoclax-pretreated (n=14) | ORR 57%; CR 29%; CRi 21%; median EFS 2 months; median OS 5.2 months; limited response durability noted | Increased infection rates, particularly in secondary AML |
| Retrospective Analysis – Azacitidine + Lisaftoclax | Azacitidine 75 mg/m² (Days 1–7) + lisaftoclax 200–600 mg orally (Days 1–10/14), 28-day cycles | R/R AML (n=9) and MDS with increased blasts (n=8) | AML: CR rate 55.6%; 60.0% of responders MRD-negative; median time to CR: 1 month. MDS-IB: CR rate 62.5%; 40.0% of CR patients MRD-negative | Grade 3–4: thrombocytopenia/leukopenia (58.8%), lymphopenia (47.1%), febrile neutropenia (35.3%); no treatment-related deaths; median OS 1.9 months (median follow-up 2.1 months) |
| Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial (Bortezomib + Sorafenib + Decitabine) | Sequential bortezomib + sorafenib followed by decitabine (targeting miR-29b upregulation) | 15 patients total: 11 newly diagnosed, 4 R/R AML | ORR 33.3% across newly diagnosed and R/R patients; ≥2-fold miR-29b increase in 2/6 evaluable patients at highest dose level; miR-29b changes did not consistently correlate with clinical response | Generally well tolerated; most frequent grade ≥3 AEs: hypertension and febrile neutropenia |
| FLT3 Inhibitors Network Meta-Analysis (20 RCTs; n=6,128) | Gilteritinib, midostaurin, quizartinib (vs. control) | AML patients across trials (search through December 17, 2025) | Gilteritinib: CR rate OR 1.75 (95% CI 1.16–2.66); OS HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.49–0.99). Midostaurin: CR rate OR 1.31 (95% CI 1.07–1.60). Quizartinib: OS HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.54–0.98) | Significantly higher rates of neutropenia, anemia, elevated ALT/AST, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and dyspnea vs. control (P<0.05) across experimental arms |
Positioning Annamycin in the R/R AML Treatment Landscape
The R/R AML treatment landscape encompasses a heterogeneous range of approaches — from hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based regimens to targeted agents and salvage chemotherapy — with outcomes varying substantially by regimen, patient fitness, and molecular profile. Published data consistently demonstrate that no single standard-of-care regimen dominates in the R/R setting, underscoring the persistent unmet need for more efficacious therapies. The comparisons below synthesize efficacy and safety data across key regimens evaluated in clinical studies.
| Therapy | Setting | Key Efficacy Data | Notable Safety Signals | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venetoclax + Azacitidine (VEN-HMA) | Newly diagnosed / R/R AML | ORR 82.2%; CRi rate 33.3%; MRD negativity 65.5%; median OS 11.0 months; 1-year OS 55.0% | 30-day mortality 4.44% (numerically lowest among comparators) | Comparative cohort study (2026) |
| HMA + Low-Intensity Induction Chemo (HMA-LIIC) | Newly diagnosed / R/R AML | ORR 39.4%; CRi rate 10.5%; MRD negativity 18.8%; median OS 7.2 months; 1-year OS 35.0% | 30-day mortality 7.97% | Comparative cohort study (2026) |
| Low-Intensity Induction Chemo alone (LIIC) | Newly diagnosed / R/R AML | ORR 54.7%; CRi rate 11.3%; MRD negativity 41.7%; median OS 10.1 months; 1-year OS 47.9% | 30-day mortality 17.0% (highest among comparators) | Comparative cohort study (2026) |
| Fixed-time HMA-VEN (treatment discontinuation) | Elderly AML, CR after 6 months | 6/7 patients remained in continuous remission for 7–50 months post-discontinuation; 5/7 achieved mutation clearance to <1% VAF | One FLT3-ITD relapse at 14 months; re-achieved remission upon resumption | Case series (2026) |
| Azacitidine monotherapy | Elderly / R/R AML | ORR 45% (ITT), 65% (IWG-evaluable); OS 18.9 vs. 6.0 months with hematologic improvement (P=0.0015); CR 32% in Israeli cohort; OS at 12/24 months: 54.5%/16% | Infectious episodes 6% per course; major bleeding 18%; well-tolerated in outpatient setting | Registry data (2015); multicenter retrospective (2017) |
| Azacitidine vs. Decitabine (network meta-analysis) | Elderly AML | Azacitidine reduced mortality vs. CCR (RR=0.90, 95% CI 0.83–0.97); decitabine not significant (RR=0.97); azacitidine superior to decitabine (RR=0.83, 95% CI 0.77–0.90); azacitidine higher CR rate (RR=1.66 vs. decitabine, low-certainty evidence) | — | Network meta-analysis of 3 RCTs, n=1,086 (2022) |
| Azacitidine + Nivolumab | R/R AML | Response rate 33%; encouraging median EFS and OS vs. historical azacitidine-based cohort | Acceptable safety profile; effector CD4+ polyfunctional T-cell subsets associated with response | Phase 2, n=16 (2021) |
| AZA/VEN in MDS-transformed AML | Post-AZA monotherapy failure | ORR 38.5% vs. 20.0% (chemo) vs. 6.7% (modified AZA); median OS 10.7 vs. 3.2 vs. 3.8 vs. 1.7 months (BSC) (p=0.000023); median EFS 8.9 months (p=0.026) | — | Retrospective study, n=13 (2025) |
| Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) + daunorubicin/cytarabine | Newly diagnosed CD33+ AML | EFS 13.6 vs. 8.8 months (chemo alone) [HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.51–0.91] | Hemorrhage, prolonged thrombocytopenia, veno-occlusive disease more frequent vs. chemo alone | Randomized trial, n=271 (FDA approval 2017) |
| Gemtuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy | Newly diagnosed AML (non-curative intent) | Median OS 4.9 vs. 3.6 months (BSC) [HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.90] | Adverse events comparable to BSC arm | Randomized trial, n=237 |
| Alvocidib (DSP-2033) + cytarabine/mitoxantrone (ACM) | R/R AML | CR/CRi rate 66.7%; median CR duration 13.6 months | No dose-limiting toxicities; diarrhea 100%; hematologic events common | Phase I, n=6 in ACM arm (2022) |
| Alvocidib + cytarabine/daunorubicin (A+7+3) | Newly diagnosed AML | CR/CRi rate 75% | Tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities | Phase I, n=4 (2022) |
| Etoposide + Mitoxantrone (EM) salvage | R/R non-M3 AML | CR rate 41.5%; PR 12.2%; median OS 6 months; 36-month OS 15% overall vs. 71.4% in HSCT recipients vs. 8.3% without HSCT (P=0.001) | — | Retrospective, n=41 of 449 (2026) |
| Lenalidomide + MEC | R/R AML | MTD established at 50 mg/day (days 1–10); 30-day mortality 6%; 60-day mortality 13% | Delayed count recovery necessitated protocol amendment; tolerable at recommended phase 2 dose | Phase I (2018) |
| Erlotinib monotherapy | R/R AML | CR rate 3%; >50% blast reduction 7%; median OS 14 weeks; median EFS 5 weeks; 90% discontinued due to progression | Fatigue 34%, diarrhea 34%, nausea 28%, rash 24% | Pilot phase II, n=29 (2019) |
| Ruxolitinib + hydroxyurea (personalized approach) | Refractory ETV6-MECOM+ AML | Disease control and improved quality of life in a patient ineligible for intensive chemotherapy or alloSCT | Tolerable profile in palliative setting | Single case, pre-clinical HTS-guided (2024) |
| Donor Lymphocyte Transfusion (DLT) | Relapsed AML post-alloSCT | Complete molecular remissions in CML; repeated successes in relapsing AML, MDS, myeloma; rare responses in ALL; outcomes improved with low-dose cytarabine, GM-CSF, and G-CSF-mobilized cells | GVHD observed (less than expected); myelosuppression in CML patients | Multicenter studies, Europe/USA (2003 onwards) |
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Yu Z, Li S et al.. Venetoclax combined with azacitidine in elderly acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospective comparison of 14-day vs 28-day dosing regimens. Medicine. 2025 Aug 15. 40826699
- [2] Watts JM, Wang ES et al.. Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Olutasidenib and Ivosidenib in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Advances in therapy. 2026 Apr. 41762374
- [3] Li YR, Shen X et al.. Synergizing hypomethylating agents with off-the-shelf CD70-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-engineered natural killer T cells for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2026 May. 41888396
- [4] Powles RL, Selby PJ et al.. The nature of remission in acute myeloblastic leukaemia. Lancet (London, England). 1979 Sep 29. 90762
- [5] Luo C, Jiang Y et al.. Superior Efficacy and Deep Molecular Remission with Venetoclax Plus Hypomethylating Agent in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Real-World Comparative Cohort Study. Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications. 2026. 42109308
- [6] Kropp EM, Li Q. Mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Experimental hematology. 2022 Jul. 35417742
- [7] Greiner J, Götz M et al.. Increasing Role of Targeted Immunotherapies in the Treatment of AML. International journal of molecular sciences. 2022 Mar 18. 35328721
- [8] Buccisano F, Palmieri R et al.. Measurable residual disease as an actionable biomarker in acute myeloid leukemia. Ready or not?. Current opinion in oncology. 2025 Nov 1. 41029966
- [9] Šustková Z, Čulen M et al.. [New Drugs in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Elderly]. Klinicka onkologie : casopis Ceske a Slovenske onkologicke spolecnosti. 2017 Summer. 28612615
- [10] Benton C, Grunwald MR et al.. Co-management strategies for acute myeloid leukemia patients in the community setting. Frontiers in oncology. 2022. 36578924
- [11] Asiri A. Differentiation therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia: molecular basis, clinical progress, and future perspectives. Frontiers in medicine. 2026. 42232986
- [12] Marques-Piubelli ML, Kumar B et al.. Increased expression of CD70 in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia after hypomethylating agents. Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology. 2024 Nov. 38388965
- [13] DeAngelo DJ, Brunner AM et al.. A phase I study of lenalidomide plus chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine for the reinduction of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. American journal of hematology. 2018 Feb. 29119643
- [14] Zhang S, Wang H et al.. Alpha-enolase promotes progression of acute myeloid leukemia via MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Blood science (Baltimore, Md.). 2025 Sep. 40791934
- [15] Huang J, Wu Y et al.. Long-term effects of multidisciplinary team recommendations on adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Bioscience trends. 2026 Mar 4. 41656103
- [16] Salter B, Ge S et al.. Efficacy of hypomethylating agents in combination with venetoclax in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Leukemia research. 2026 Jun. 41980466
- [17] Georgi JA, Röllig C et al.. Relapse following FLT3 inhibitor cessation in FLT3-ITD-positive AML: lessons from two clinical cases. Annals of hematology. 2026 Feb 4. 41636849
- [18] Gediga MHE, Middeke JM et al.. [Novel Strategies to Treat Acute Myeloid Leukemia]. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946). 2023 Apr. 36990117
- [19] Jeurkar C, King L et al.. Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Review. Cancers. 2026 Feb 18. 41749912
- [20] Abou Dalle I, Cortes JE et al.. A Pilot Phase II Study of Erlotinib for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Acta haematologica. 2018. 30071517

















