| Indication | Myeloproliferative neoplasms |
| Drug | AJ1-11095 |
| Mechanism of Action | JAK2 inhibitor |
| Company | Eli Lilly |
| Trial Phase | Phase 1 |
| Category | Corporate & Strategic |
| Sub Category | Acquisition Announced |
| Deal Value | up to $2.3 billion |
| Acquiring Company | Eli Lilly |
| Target Company | Ajax Therapeutics |
| Asset Acquired | AJ1-11095 |
| Deal Type | Acquisition |
| Milestone Payments | Undisclosed upfront payment, clinical and regulatory milestone payments |
| Review Designation | Orphan drug status |
| Regulatory Agency | FDA |
| Patient Population | Patients with myelofibrosis who have previously been treated with an approved JAK2 inhibitor |
| Comparator Drug | Incyte’s Jakafi |
| JAK2 Binding Conformation | Type II (AJ1-11095), Type I (current therapies) |
| Founding Partner | Schrödinger |
| Founding Strategic Investor | Eli Lilly |
| Series C Investment | $95 million in 2024 |
| Previous Acquisitions by Lilly | CrossBridge Bio, Kelonia Therapeutics |
Eli Lilly Acquires Ajax Therapeutics for Up to $2.3B
Eli Lilly is acquiring Ajax Therapeutics for up to $2.3 billion, marking its third oncology deal in three weeks. The acquisition focuses on Ajax's lead program, AJ1-11095, a next-generation JAK2 inhibitor. This oral candidate is designed to treat myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera, by offering a unique binding mechanism. AJ1-11095 is currently in a Phase 1 trial for myelofibrosis patients previously treated with a JAK2 inhibitor and has secured FDA orphan drug status, aiming to provide more durable disease control than current therapies.
- Eli Lilly is acquiring Ajax Therapeutics for a potential sum of up to $2.3 billion, which includes an undisclosed upfront payment and subsequent clinical and regulatory milestone payments. This strategic move is part of Lilly's recent aggressive expansion in oncology, marking its third cancer-related acquisition in as many weeks, following deals for CrossBridge Bio and Kelonia Therapeutics.
- The core of the acquisition is Ajax's lead program, AJ1-11095, a clinical-stage, once-daily oral JAK2 inhibitor. This asset is specifically developed to treat myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), such as myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera, by offering a unique mode of binding JAK2 (type II conformation) that is expected to provide more durable disease control compared to existing type I JAK2 inhibitors like Incyte’s Jakafi.
- AJ1-11095 is currently undergoing a Phase 1 trial in patients with myelofibrosis who have previously received an approved JAK2 inhibitor. Ajax anticipates releasing proof-of-concept data from this trial later in the year. The drug has also been granted FDA orphan drug status, highlighting its potential to address unmet needs in these rare blood cancers and accelerate its development pathway.
AJ1-11095: A Novel Approach to JAK2 Inhibition in MPNs
Recent research has identified several promising therapeutic targets beyond traditional JAK2 inhibition for myeloproliferative neoplasms. ULK1 kinase has emerged as a particularly compelling target, with 2025 studies demonstrating its essential role in MPN pathophysiology downstream of hyperactive JAK2 signaling. Genetic or pharmacological targeting of ULK1 substantially delays disease development in JAK2-mutant MPN models, reducing early stage erythroid progenitors, hemoglobin levels, and spleen size. Additionally, novel macrocyclic JAK2 inhibitors have been developed to address limitations of current therapies, with lead compounds showing potent JAK2 inhibition (IC₅₀ = 54.70 nM), excellent bioavailability (54.8%), and effective downregulation of p-STAT3 and p-STAT5 pathways.
The immune microenvironment has become a focal point for therapeutic intervention, with researchers targeting pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-2, IFN-α, IL-23, and TNF-α that drive pathogenic Th17 cell polarization. CALR-mutated MPNs present unique immunotherapeutic opportunities through anti-CALR antibodies and T-cell receptor-mediated therapies targeting the mutant protein. The tumor microenvironment is further being addressed through CXCR1/2 antagonists targeting GRO-α signaling, anti-TGF-β agents for fibrosis reduction, and immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting exhausted PD-1+ T cells that reflect impaired immune surveillance.
Innovative technological approaches are expanding the therapeutic landscape, including mitochondria-targeted antioxidants to address mitochondrial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species production, and RNA-exosome complex modulation targeting JAK2V617F ssDNA release and DNA-sensing pathways like cGAS-STING and TLR9. Advanced delivery systems through nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery, gene editing technologies, and RNA-based therapies are under development. Notable clinical progress includes OB756, a selective JAK2 inhibitor achieving 22% complete hematologic response rates and 50% achieving ≥35% spleen volume reduction in phase 2 trials, and combination approaches pairing JAK inhibitors with BCL-XL inhibitors to overcome treatment resistance.
Addressing Unmet Needs in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Treatment
Current treatment approaches for myeloproliferative neoplasms face significant limitations that prevent optimal patient outcomes. While JAK inhibitors represent a major advance in MPN management, they address only a subset of disease manifestations and fail to provide curative therapy for most patients. These challenges necessitate continued development of novel therapeutic strategies.
• Limited molecular response with JAK inhibitors - Despite being standard of care for myelofibrosis, only a minority of patients achieve significant molecular-level responses with JAK inhibitor therapy, and additional agents are necessary for patients who do not respond to the one FDA-approved JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor
• Absence of curative medical therapy - The cure of myelofibrosis remains an unmet clinical need, as identification of molecular lesions has not yet translated into treatments that can modify the natural history of the disease, with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation being the only potentially curative option limited to patients with compatible donors and appropriate age/functional status
• Significant treatment-related toxicity - Interferon-α2 use is limited by inflammation-mediated toxicity leading to discontinuation in 10-30% of patients, while ruxolitinib toxicity primarily affects erythropoiesis and thrombocytopoiesis requiring careful dose management
• JAK inhibitor-specific limitations - Janus kinase inhibitors have inherent disadvantages including toxicity, resistance development, withdrawal phenomenon, non-reversal of bone marrow histology, and inability to eradicate the disease clone, with off-target effects from clinically relevant dosing contributing to both efficacy and toxicity
• Incomplete disease control in polycythemia vera - Current treatment for polycythemia vera is limited and primarily targets thrombosis risk rather than addressing underlying disease mechanisms, with opportunities remaining to improve efficacy and decrease risk of disease progression
• Need for dual targeting approaches - Achieving cure will likely require targeting both the malignant stem cell clone and its supportive microenvironment, as current single-agent approaches fail to address the complex pathophysiology of these disorders
Lilly's Bold Move to Redefine JAK2 Inhibition in MPNs
Eli Lilly's recent acquisition of Ajax Therapeutics, highlighted by the lead program AJ1-11095, signals a significant strategic maneuver within the oncology space, particularly in the realm of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The discovery of the JAK2 V617F mutation revolutionized the understanding and treatment of MPNs, leading to the development of JAK2 inhibitors like ruxolitinib. These agents have profoundly improved patient quality of life by reducing splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, and even extending overall survival in intermediate- to high-risk myelofibrosis patients.
However, the journey with JAK inhibitors has revealed persistent challenges. Many patients experience resistance or intolerance over time, with a substantial proportion discontinuing therapy within a few years. A critical limitation is the common occurrence of cytopenias, such as anemia, which can be exacerbated by JAK inhibitors and significantly impact patient management. Furthermore, current JAK inhibitors, while effective symptomatically, do not typically eradicate the malignant clone or fundamentally alter the disease's progression.
AJ1-11095, described as a next-generation JAK2 inhibitor with a unique binding mechanism, aims to address these unmet needs. Its focus on previously treated myelofibrosis patients suggests a strategic intent to provide a more durable and potentially safer therapeutic option where existing treatments fall short. The literature indicates that Type II JAK2 inhibitors, which bind differently, may overcome resistance observed with Type I inhibitors like ruxolitinib, offering a promising avenue for improved efficacy. Lilly's move, bolstered by orphan drug status for AJ1-11095, could accelerate its development and market access, positioning the company to capture a high-value segment of the MPN market.
Yet, the path forward is not without its complexities. As an early-stage asset, AJ1-11095 must demonstrate a superior clinical profile in terms of durability, safety, and impact on cytopenias compared to a rapidly evolving competitive landscape. Other novel agents, including different JAK inhibitors (e.g., momelotinib for anemia, pacritinib for thrombocytopenia) and non-JAK inhibitor combinations, are also advancing, creating a crowded field. Ultimately, while AJ1-11095 holds promise for more durable disease control, the fundamental challenge of eradicating the malignant clone in MPNs remains, suggesting that combination therapies may be the eventual key to truly modifying the natural course of these diseases.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Mesa RA. Ruxolitinib, a selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms and psoriasis. IDrugs : the investigational drugs journal. 2010 Jun. 20506062
- [2] Huang J, Li R et al.. Efficacy and safety of OB756 (a novel selective JAK2 inhibitor) for essential thrombocythemia in patients intolerant of or resistant to hydroxyurea or intolerant of interferon: A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study. Cancer. 2025 Oct 15. 41060136
- [3] Sharma A, Buxi G et al.. JAK2-positive Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Indian journal of pathology & microbiology. 2011 Jan-Mar. 21393891
- [4] Okikiolu J, Woodley C et al.. Real world experience with ropeginterferon alpha-2b (Besremi) in essential thrombocythaemia and polycythaemia vera following exposure to pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys). Leukemia research reports. 2023. 36590864
- [5] Loscocco GG, Gangat N et al.. Mutation profiling of chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: improving clinical-molecular prognostic models. Expert review of molecular diagnostics. 2025 Nov. 41074259
- [6] Abosabie SAS, Boye-Doe A et al.. Thrombo-inflammatory endothelial signatures in JAK2 -mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2026 Feb 17. 41756992
- [7] Padrnos L, Mesa R. Novel agents for the treatment of polycythemia vera: an insight into preclinical research and early phase clinical trials. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2020 Aug. 32552220
- [8] Constantinescu SN, Vainchenker W et al.. Next-generation JAK inhibitors in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2026 Mar 19. 41511882
- [9] Todor SB, Mihaila RG. Cytokine Landscapes, Immune Dysregulation, and Treatment Perspectives in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Narrative Review. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025 Sep 8. 40944087
- [10] Ellis MH, Barbui T et al.. Polycythemia vera. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2026 Mar 28. 41902804
- [11] Christen M, Kaderli D et al.. Real-World Retrospective Report on the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Molecular Responses to Ropeginterferon-α2b in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025 Dec 24. 41517377
- [12] Pavithran K, Pande SB. Janus kinase inhibitors: jackpot or potluck?. Oncology reviews. 2012 Mar 5. 25992203
- [13] Green MR, Newton MD et al.. Off-Target Effects of BCR-ABL and JAK2 Inhibitors. American journal of clinical oncology. 2016 Feb. 24351780
- [14] Bauer M, Vaxevanis C et al.. Association of the composition of the bone marrow tumor microenvironment in BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms with IFN-γ signaling and driver mutations. Leukemia. 2025 Oct. 40764668
- [15] Rosenthal A, Mesa RA. Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2014 Jun. 24766055
- [16] Bellani V, Mora B et al.. CALR-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2025 Jul. 39960832
- [17] Ferrelli A, Mian S et al.. Mesenchymal stromal cells from JAK2 (V617F) myeloproliferative neoplasms support healthy and malignant hematopoiesis in a humanized scaffold model in vivo. HemaSphere. 2025 Aug. 40862221
- [18] Mikkelsen SU, Kjaer L et al.. Safety and efficacy of combination therapy of interferon-α2 and ruxolitinib in polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis. Cancer medicine. 2018 Aug. 29932310
- [19] Zhao G, Guo J et al.. New Binding Sites for JAK2 Inhibition in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Structural Insights, Therapeutic Potential, and Future Directions. ChemMedChem. 2026 Mar 27. 41913678
- [20] Saleiro D, Wen JQ et al.. Loss of Function Mouse Models Reveal a Novel Regulatory Function for ULK1 in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Molecular and cellular biology. 2025. 40697155




















