Lilly dives into vaccine research with 3 biotech buyouts
Mergers and Acquisitions

Lilly dives into vaccine research with 3 biotech buyouts

Published : 27 May 2026

At a Glance
IndicationShingles
CompanyEli Lilly
Trial PhasePhase 2
CategoryCorporate & Strategic
Sub CategoryAcquisition Announced
Total Deal ValueUp to nearly $4 billion
Target CompaniesVaccine Co., Curevo, LimmaTech Biologics
Acquisition DateMay 26, 2026
Curevo Lead AssetExperimental shingles vaccine
LimmaTech Lead AssetVaccines for bacterial infections (Staphylococcus aureus)
Vaccine Co. Lead AssetPreclinical prospect for Epstein-Barr Virus
Grant RecipientVaccine Co.
Granting AgencyAdvanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H)
Grant Year2024
Lilly Acquisitions YTD10

Eli Lilly Acquires Three Vaccine Developers for Nearly $4 Billion

Eli Lilly announced agreements to acquire three privately held vaccine developers—Vaccine Co., Curevo, and LimmaTech Biologics—for a combined value of up to nearly $4 billion. This strategic move aims to establish a robust infectious disease portfolio, reflecting Lilly's deliberate shift towards disease prevention. The acquisitions include Curevo's Phase 2 shingles vaccine, LimmaTech's Phase 1 Staphylococcus aureus bacterial vaccine, and Vaccine Co.'s preclinical Epstein-Barr Virus prospect. This marks Lilly's tenth acquisition this year, leveraging cash from its successful obesity and diabetes drugs to expand into new therapeutic areas.

  • Eli Lilly is making a significant strategic pivot into infectious disease research through the acquisition of three specialized vaccine developers. This move is part of a broader initiative to build a comprehensive infectious disease portfolio, aligning with the company's stated goal of preventing diseases at their source rather than merely treating their consequences. This expansion is spearheaded by Peter Marks, the former FDA vaccine chief, now leading Lilly's infectious disease efforts.
  • The acquisitions represent a substantial investment, totaling up to nearly $4 billion across Vaccine Co., Curevo, and LimmaTech Biologics. Specifically, Vaccine Co. and Curevo purchases could be worth up to $1.55 billion and $1.5 billion respectively, while LimmaTech's acquisition could total $780 million. These deals bring diverse vaccine technologies into Lilly's pipeline, funded by the success of its obesity and diabetes drugs.
  • The acquired assets span various stages of development, from preclinical to Phase 2, addressing multiple infectious diseases. Curevo's lead asset is an experimental shingles vaccine in Phase 2, showing similar immune response but fewer side effects than standard shots. LimmaTech's lead program is a Phase 1 vaccine for Staphylococcus aureus bacterial infections. Vaccine Co. contributes a preclinical prospect for Epstein-Barr Virus, which also secured an ARPA-H grant in 2024.

Why Lilly is Targeting Shingles: Unmet Needs in Prevention

Recent evidence identifies significant gaps in shingles prevention and management that present compelling opportunities for pharmaceutical intervention. Despite available vaccines, substantial unmet needs persist across key patient populations, particularly in vaccination coverage and healthcare access.

Immunocompromised populations represent a critical underserved segment with vaccination rates as low as 3.0% among oncological patients despite clear clinical recommendations. Patients with hematological malignancies show slightly higher uptake (7.7%) compared to solid cancer patients (1.7%), but coverage remains inadequate across transplant recipients, HIV patients, and those on immunosuppressive therapies.

Older adults aged ≥50 years face substantial disease burden with lifetime HZ risk estimated at 20-30%, yet vaccination coverage remains extremely low globally — ranging from 1.93% in China's Zhejiang Province to less than 1% for live attenuated vaccine in France. This population accounts for 80% of HZ-related hospitalizations and experiences the highest complication rates.

Healthcare system implementation gaps create significant barriers including limited physician recommendations, inadequate awareness campaigns, and constrained institutional support. Cost and affordability emerge as primary obstacles, with many patients citing "unnecessary to get vaccinated" as the main reason for non-uptake among higher-income groups.

Economic burden remains substantial despite prevention opportunities with Spain recording €98.1 million in hospitalization costs (2022-2023) and Brazil projecting 359,797 HZ cases annually without vaccination. Complicated HZ cases account for over 64% of hospitalizations, highlighting the severity of inadequately prevented disease.

Geographic disparities in access and outcomes are evident across countries, with regional variations in disease burden and healthcare delivery requiring targeted interventions. Urban-rural divides particularly affect healthcare access, with older adults showing unmet outpatient needs and urban residents experiencing higher unmet inpatient care requirements.

Knowledge and awareness deficits persist among both healthcare professionals and patients, contributing to the perception of HZ as a benign condition despite severe potential complications. Educational disparities significantly impact vaccination intention, with higher education levels associated with improved coverage rates.

Curevo's Shingles Vaccine: A Closer Look at Phase 2 Data

Recent clinical research provides valuable insights into shingles vaccine development and performance across diverse patient populations. Several Phase 2 and Phase 4 studies have evaluated both safety and efficacy outcomes in immunocompromised and healthy populations.

Study Name Intervention Key Efficacy Outcomes Key Safety Outcomes
Phase 4 RCT in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases (2026) Recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV, Shingrix) - two doses, 6 weeks apart Non-inferiority demonstrated for disease activity flares up to day 84: 14% vaccine group vs 15% placebo group (difference -1.2%, p=0.0018) Adverse events after first dose: 77% vaccine vs 31% placebo; Serious adverse events: 1-2% across groups; Acceptable safety profile
Biological Aging Cohort Study (2026) Shingles vaccination (type unspecified) Significantly associated with slower epigenetic aging (b=-0.17, p=0.0001), transcriptomic aging (b=-0.19, p<0.0001), and lower composite biological aging score (b=-0.18, p=0.0002) Higher adaptive immunity scores (b=0.09, p=0.0133); Benefits most pronounced within 3 years post-vaccination
Diabetic Patient Uptake Study (2026) Herpes zoster vaccine with targeted interventions Coverage increased from 7.4% (2023) to 11.1% (2024); Higher uptake in males (12.8%) vs females (9.0%) Well-tolerated with successful implementation of population-wide vaccination program
Pediatric SLE Cohort (2025) HZ natural infection study (no vaccine intervention) HZ prevalence: 15.72%; Incidence rate: 38.40 per 100 person-years; Most common location: upper extremities (18.03%) Recurrent HZ in 16.39%; Superimposed bacterial infection in 11.48%; Risk factors: lymphopenia, lupus nephritis, immunosuppressive agents

The shingles vaccine landscape has undergone significant transformation over the past five years, primarily driven by the emergence and widespread adoption of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV/Shingrix). RZV, which consists of recombinant viral glycoprotein E and the Adjuvant System 01 (AS01B), demonstrates superior efficacy compared to its predecessor, offering greater than 90% protection against herpes zoster and associated complications in immunocompetent individuals, with efficacy persisting above 80% for 11 years. Pooled vaccine effectiveness data from post-2020 studies show RZV achieving 79.2% effectiveness against herpes zoster in adults, substantially outperforming the live-attenuated zoster vaccine (ZVL/Zostavax), which demonstrated 45.9% pooled effectiveness in the same indication.

The implementation timeline reflects this evolving landscape, with several countries transitioning their vaccination programs during this period. Australia initially added ZVL to its National Immunisation Program in November 2016, targeting adults aged 70-79 years, but subsequently introduced RZV to the market in June 2021 following its registration in 2018. Similarly, Spain implemented systematic vaccination with RZV in 2021. Real-world effectiveness data from Australia's program demonstrates tangible clinical impact, with an estimated 7,000 zoster cases prevented within two years of implementation and a steady decline in incidence among the target population, showing an estimated decrease of 2.25 cases per 1,000 person-years annually.

A critical advancement in the treatment landscape has been the expanded utility of RZV in immunocompromised populations, addressing a significant unmet medical need. As a non-live vaccine, RZV can be safely administered to immunocompromised patients who are contraindicated for ZVL, demonstrating 68-87% efficacy in severely immunocompromised individuals with excellent immunogenicity in patients receiving JAK inhibitors and corticosteroid therapy. Additionally, clinical research has established that RZV can be co-administered with routine vaccines including influenza, pneumococcal, Tdap, PCV13, and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines without compromising immunogenicity or safety profiles, with vaccine response rates remaining consistently high (95.1-99.1%) regardless of administration strategy. Despite these advances, implementation challenges persist, including suboptimal vaccine coverage, cost-effectiveness concerns for national programs, and significant vaccination disparities across demographic groups and geographic regions.

Beyond Blockbusters: Lilly's Bold Leap into Vaccines

Eli Lilly, a pharmaceutical powerhouse currently riding a wave of unprecedented success driven by its innovative diabetes and obesity therapies like tirzepatide, is making a significant strategic maneuver that signals a broader vision for its future. While the company has long been a leader in metabolic health, leveraging its deep expertise in insulin development and pioneering new GLP-1/GIP agonists, its latest move underscores a deliberate and substantial pivot towards disease prevention. This shift is evidenced by the acquisition of three privately held vaccine developers for a combined value of up to nearly $4 billion, funded directly by the robust cash flow generated from its blockbuster drugs.

This strategic expansion is not entirely new territory for Lilly, which has a historical legacy in infectious disease treatment, having developed antibiotics such as vancomycin, daptomycin, and dirithromycin to combat challenging pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus. However, these new acquisitions represent a distinct foray into prophylactic medicine. The pipeline additions include a Phase 2 shingles vaccine, a Phase 1 Staphylococcus aureus bacterial vaccine, and a preclinical Epstein-Barr Virus prospect. The Staphylococcus aureus vaccine, in particular, addresses a critical and persistent global health threat: antibiotic resistance. With existing evidence highlighting the increasing demand for new agents against resistant Gram-positive pathogens, a successful preventative vaccine could be a transformative solution, moving beyond the limitations of treatment.

While this diversification promises to build a more resilient and robust portfolio, it also comes with inherent considerations. Early-stage vaccine candidates, such as the S. aureus and EBV prospects, face significant development hurdles and high attrition rates, meaning the substantial investment carries a degree of risk. Furthermore, successfully integrating these new vaccine platforms and navigating the distinct R&D, manufacturing, and regulatory landscapes of vaccine development will require careful execution. The competitive environment for vaccines, especially for established indications like shingles, also means that any new entrant must demonstrate clear differentiation to capture market share. Nevertheless, this bold move positions Lilly to not only expand its therapeutic footprint but also to play an increasingly vital role in global public health by shifting the paradigm from managing illness to preventing it.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the primary unmet medical needs in the prevention and treatment of shingles and its complications?
Significant unmet needs persist in shingles management, particularly concerning the prevention and treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), its most debilitating complication. While effective vaccines exist, improving vaccine uptake across all eligible populations remains a challenge. Furthermore, there is a need for more effective and tolerable treatments for established PHN, as current options often provide only partial relief with notable side effects. Developing antiviral therapies that can more effectively reduce PHN incidence or severity is also an ongoing area of focus.
What novel therapeutic and prophylactic strategies are currently under investigation for shingles?
Research into shingles is exploring various innovative approaches beyond existing antivirals and vaccines. This includes the development of next-generation vaccines with improved efficacy, broader protection, or different administration routes. On the therapeutic front, novel antiviral mechanisms, immunomodulators, and targeted pain therapies for PHN are being investigated. Gene therapies and RNA-based interventions represent longer-term exploratory avenues for both prevention and treatment.
How are evolving vaccine technologies and market dynamics shaping the shingles prevention landscape?
The shingles prevention landscape is significantly influenced by advancements in vaccine technology, moving towards highly efficacious recombinant subunit vaccines. These innovations are driving increased uptake and reducing disease burden in vaccinated populations. Market dynamics are characterized by competition among existing vaccines, efforts to expand vaccination guidelines, and strategic initiatives to improve access and adherence globally. Future developments may include combination vaccines or those tailored for specific high-risk groups.
What are the key challenges in managing post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) and improving patient outcomes?
Managing post-herpetic neuralgia presents substantial challenges due to its chronic, often debilitating neuropathic pain and variable response to current treatments. A significant hurdle is the lack of therapies that consistently provide complete pain relief without considerable side effects, impacting patient quality of life. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial, yet PHN can be difficult to treat once established, necessitating multimodal approaches. Improving patient outcomes requires better predictive biomarkers, novel analgesic mechanisms, and enhanced understanding of PHN pathophysiology.

References

  1. [1] Sousa Almeida PR, Sarmento G et al.. [Vaccination of Older Adults in Portugal: Recommendations from the Geriatrics Study Group of the Portuguese Society of Internal Medicine]. Acta medica portuguesa. 2026 Mar 2. 41490687
  2. [2] Blanc JM, Jimeno-Sanz I et al.. Herpes zoster hospitalization burden in Spain during the initial period of recombinant zoster vaccine implementation. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. 2026 Dec. 41571249
  3. [3] Carter D, De La Rosa G et al.. The success of toll-like receptor 4 based vaccine adjuvants. Vaccine. 2025 Aug 13. 40570747
  4. [4] Mandecka A, Perlak K et al.. Review of Herpes Zoster Occurrence in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Treated With JAK Inhibitors. Clinical and translational science. 2026 Mar. 41748503
  5. [5] Ali SO, Dessart C et al.. Co-administration of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine with other adult vaccines: An overview. Vaccine. 2024 Mar 19. 38423814
  6. [6] Loricera J, Molina-Collada J et al.. Switching from Originator Tocilizumab to Biosimilar in Giant Cell Arteritis: Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety in a Multicenter Cohort of 38 Patients. Drugs & aging. 2026 Mar. 41714460
  7. [7] Han X, Wu C et al.. Decoding VZV's evolutionary arsenal: how Beijing strains use recombination and adaptive mutations to thrive. Virus evolution. 2025. 41078487
  8. [8] Jang EJ, Xayaheuang S et al.. Varicella zoster virus mRNA vaccine candidate induced superior cellular immunity and comparable humoral and Fc-mediated immunity compared to the licensed subunit vaccine in a mouse model. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. 2025 Dec. 40331755
  9. [9] Zarkadoulas E, Silva F et al.. Cost Effectiveness of the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Older Adults in Portugal. PharmacoEconomics - open. 2026 Mar 2. 41772293
  10. [10] Lin J, Dobbins T et al.. Impact of a national immunisation program on herpes zoster incidence in Australia. The Journal of infection. 2022 Apr. 35038437
  11. [11] Jena A, Chatterjee A et al.. Effectiveness and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2026 Feb 12. 41690364
  12. [12] Hanif S, Majeed AI et al.. M2 Genotype of Varicella zoster virus associated with Severe Herpes zoster in Pakistan. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2024 Jul. 38952536
  13. [13] Patlolla N, Yeldandi V et al.. Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards immunization among adult population in a tertiary care hospital-exploratory survey. Clinical and experimental vaccine research. 2026 Jan. 41660216
  14. [14] Merola JF, Butler DC et al.. Safety and Efficacy of Tralokinumab in Older Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Secondary Analysis. JAMA dermatology. 2023 Oct 1. 37610789
  15. [15] Guiang-Valerio AKM, Collante MTM et al.. Incidence and risk factors of herpes zoster infection in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Pediatric rheumatology online journal. 2025 Oct 30. 41168803
  16. [16] Wang M, Long C et al.. [A study on knowledge, attitude, and vaccination behavior of herpes zoster vaccine among urban residents in selected areas of China]. Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi. 2023 Jun 10. 37380410
  17. [17] Fabbri M, Cavalli G et al.. From Knowledge to Action: Enhancing Herpes Zoster Vaccine Uptake in Diabetic Patients Through Targeted Interventions. Vaccines. 2026 Feb 26. 41893747
  18. [18] Satow K, Sherer EL et al.. Herpes Zoster Induced by the Shingrix Vaccine: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus. 2026 Jan. 41769456
  19. [19] Furie RA, van Vollenhoven RF et al.. Trial of Anti-BDCA2 Antibody Litifilimab for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. The New England journal of medicine. 2022 Sep 8. 36069871
  20. [20] Wang X, Patel C et al.. Immunisation against vaccine-preventable diseases in individuals receiving immunosuppressive targeted therapies. Vaccine. 2026 Apr 11. 41780104

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts