AVR-001 Oral IL-23 Gamble: Unproven Delivery Meets Entrenched Injectable Champions
Mergers and Acquisitions

AVR-001 Oral IL-23 Gamble: Unproven Delivery Meets Entrenched Injectable Champions

Published : 15 Jul 2026

At a Glance
IndicationPsoriasis
DrugAVR-001
Mechanism of ActionIL-23 inhibitor
CompanyAvere Therapeutics
Trial PhasePhase 2b
CategoryCorporate & Strategic
Sub CategoryMerger Announced
Therapeutic AreaImmunology
Deal TypeReverse Merger
New Funding Amount$320 million
Upfront Licensing Fee$120 million
Potential Milestone PaymentsUp to $2.18 billion
Licensing PartnerHansoh Pharma
Target Company (Merger)NextCure
Stock ExchangeNasdaq
Ticker SymbolAVRX
Expected Deal CloseSecond half of 2026
Dosage FrequencyOnce-weekly

Avere Therapeutics Secures Funding, Advances Oral Psoriasis Drug

Avere Therapeutics, a privately held immunology drug developer, is set to go public through a reverse merger with NextCure, announcing a transaction that will also add $320 million in new funding via a sale of shares and convertible notes led by Fairmount and Hansoh Pharma. This strategic move will enable Avere to advance AVR-001, an experimental long-acting oral psoriasis pill licensed from Hansoh. The company aims for AVR-001 to be a once-weekly oral IL-23 therapy, positioning it to compete with existing and emerging treatments like AbbVie's Skyrizi and Johnson & Johnson's Icotyde. The secured funding is expected to support the completion of Phase 2 testing and the initiation of a global Phase 3 trial for AVR-001.

  • Avere Therapeutics is undergoing a reverse merger with NextCure, a strategic transaction that will take the company public and inject $320 million in new capital. This funding, secured through a combination of share sales and convertible notes led by Fairmount and Hansoh Pharma, is crucial for advancing Avere's lead asset, AVR-001, through its next development stages and establishing its market presence.
  • The primary focus of Avere's strategy is the development of AVR-001, a long-acting oral drug for psoriasis. This experimental therapy, licensed from Hansoh, is designed to be a once-weekly IL-23 inhibitor, offering a potentially more convenient dosing regimen compared to daily oral competitors like J&J's Icotyde and injectable biologics such as Skyrizi, aiming for best-in-class convenience and competitive efficacy.
  • Avere plans to utilize the new funding to complete its ongoing Phase 2b trial for AVR-001 in the U.S., which is expected to commence in 2027, following Hansoh's initiated Phase 2b trial in Chinese patients. The capital also provides a financial runway to initiate a global Phase 3 trial for psoriasis and begin a Phase 2b trial for ulcerative colitis, indicating a broader development pipeline for the IL-23 inhibitor.

Over the past five years, the psoriasis treatment landscape has been reshaped by the emergence and real-world validation of highly targeted biologic agents, particularly IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Bimekizumab, the first monoclonal antibody to dually inhibit both IL-17A and IL-17F, has demonstrated rapid and superior efficacy compared to secukinumab, ustekinumab, and adalimumab in phase II/III trials, with 28.4% of patients achieving PASI 100 as early as week 4 in real-world studies. IL-23 inhibitors have similarly matured: risankizumab showed a mean PASI reduction from 25.49 at baseline to 0.358 by week 52 in registry data, while tildrakizumab achieved PASI75 in over 94% of patients at week 104 in a multicenter Italian study. Guselkumab produced a 94.9% mean PASI improvement at week 48 even in patients with skin of color. Beyond biologics, tapinarof cream 1% demonstrated statistically significant PASI75 responses versus vehicle in Japanese trials, and small molecule inhibitors — including RORγt and ROCK2 inhibitors — have further broadened the therapeutic armamentarium. Biosimilars for adalimumab and etanercept have also demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety profiles in both pediatric and elderly populations over 72-week follow-up periods.

Long-term real-world data have added critical nuance to the understanding of treatment durability and sequencing. Ixekizumab maintained a drug survival rate of 65.5% at 260 weeks, with PASI ≤3 achieved in 95.5% of observed patients at that timepoint; being a super-responder at week 16 was independently associated with reduced risk of discontinuation. BADBIR registry data spanning 2007–2024 confirm a secular shift in prescribing patterns, with adalimumab remaining the most frequently used first-line biologic (35%) in the later period, followed by ustekinumab (24%) and secukinumab (17%), while patients entering treatment in the 2015–2024 period presented with less severe disease and fewer comorbidities than those in earlier cohorts. Importantly, 55% of biologic-treated patients ultimately required a switch to a second-line agent, underscoring the ongoing challenge of secondary treatment failure. In multi-failure patient populations, bimekizumab demonstrated 12-month drug survival of 85.4% with no discontinuations due to lack of efficacy, suggesting utility in heavily pretreated patients. Brodalumab also showed meaningful rescue responses following IL-17A inhibitor failure, with 70% of patients achieving PASI75 and/or PASI ≤2 at week 12.

Beyond efficacy metrics, the field is increasingly focused on access disparities, special populations, and treatment personalization. In the United States, advanced therapy utilization remained below 17% across all states between 2015 and 2019, with rural patients facing profound access barriers — 75% sought care outside their local area, and dermatologist access ratios were markedly lower than those for internal medicine or family practice physicians. In elderly patients (≥65 years), real-world evidence from Czech, Turkish, and Polish cohorts confirms generally comparable biologic efficacy to younger adults, though drug survival was lower — particularly with adalimumab — and comorbidity burden, including latent tuberculosis and anti-HBc positivity, was substantially higher. A newly characterized "flip-flop phenomenon," identified across 17 centers in six countries, highlights the immunological complexity of biologic therapy: 68.2% of affected patients developed eczematous features while being treated for psoriasis under IL-17 or IL-23 inhibitors, while 31.8% developed psoriasiform disease during type 2 inflammation biologics, predominantly dupilumab. JAK inhibitors have emerged as the most frequently employed strategy for managing these phenotypic switches in both directions, reflecting a growing recognition that precision immunological profiling will be essential to optimizing outcomes in this evolving landscape.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can psoriasis be cured permanently?
Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune disease for which there is currently no permanent cure. Existing treatments aim to manage symptoms, reduce inflammation, and control disease progression, often achieving long-term remission. While ongoing research explores novel therapeutic targets and gene therapies, these are not yet available to provide a definitive cure.
What are the current challenges and emerging therapeutic trends in psoriasis management?
Psoriasis management continues to face challenges related to long-term efficacy, safety profiles of systemic therapies, and patient adherence. Emerging trends focus on targeted biologics and small molecules that modulate specific immune pathways, aiming for higher clearance rates and improved quality of life. Personalized medicine approaches, including biomarker identification, are also gaining traction to optimize treatment selection.
What are the key considerations for evaluating novel therapeutic targets in psoriasis drug development?
Evaluating novel therapeutic targets in psoriasis requires assessing their potential to address unmet needs, such as improving sustained response rates or reducing comorbidities. Key considerations include the target's role in psoriasis pathogenesis, its specificity to minimize off-target effects, and the potential for a differentiated safety and efficacy profile compared to existing standards of care. Market access and patient convenience are also crucial factors for commercial viability.
What factors drive the strategic value of innovative therapies for moderate-to-severe psoriasis?
The strategic value of innovative psoriasis therapies is driven by their ability to offer superior efficacy, particularly in achieving high levels of skin clearance, and a favorable long-term safety profile. Differentiation in mechanism of action, convenience of administration, and potential for treating specific patient populations or comorbidities also contribute significantly. Addressing persistent unmet needs and demonstrating cost-effectiveness further enhances their market attractiveness and strategic importance.

References

  1. [1] Seigel L, Shoaib S et al.. Health disparities in psoriasis: geographic barriers to access in the United States. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2024 Dec. 38914420
  2. [2] Alexis A, McMichael A et al.. The Impact of Post-inflammatory Pigment Alteration After Psoriasis: Novel Data from the VISIBLE Study. Dermatology and therapy. 2026 Apr. 41770445
  3. [3] Maul JT, Ak M et al.. Tildrakizumab Treatment for Psoriasis in Real-world Practice: An Analysis from the Swiss Registry (SDNTT). Acta dermato-venereologica. 2024 Nov 27. 39601368
  4. [4] Mastorino L, Susca S et al.. Risankizumab shows high efficacy and maintenance in improvement of response until week 52. Dermatologic therapy. 2022 May. 35156278
  5. [5] Mastorino L, Dapavo P et al.. Drug survival, effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab for moderate-to-severe psoriasis up to 5 years. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2024 Mar. 38147467
  6. [6] Fratton Z, Bighetti S et al.. Real-World Experience of Bimekizumab in a Cohort of 109 Patients Over 48 Weeks and Identification of Predictive Factors for an Early Super Response and Risk of Adverse Events. Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.). 2025. 40242569
  7. [7] Alabas OA, Evans I et al.. Evaluating changes in baseline characteristics and drug-utilization pattern in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: findings from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR) cohort. Clinical and experimental dermatology. 2025 Sep 25. 40402160
  8. [8] Megna M, Fornaro L et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Anti-TNF Biosimilars for Psoriasis in Pediatric and Geriatric Populations: A 72-Week Real-Life Study. Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.). 2022. 35844291
  9. [9] Bondare-Ansberga V, Grigorjeva A. Real-World Use of Biologic Therapy in Elderly Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2026 May 8. 42195163
  10. [10] Gordon KB, Reich K et al.. Disease activity and treatment efficacy using patient-level Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores from tildrakizumab phase 3 clinical trials. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2022 Feb. 32349565
  11. [11] Torres T, Valenti M et al.. Treatment-associated phenotype switching between psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2026 May 14. 42132049
  12. [12] Roccuzzo G, Gherardi E et al.. Immunotherapy in cutaneous melanoma and biologics in psoriatic disease: similarities and differences from a clinical multidisciplinary perspective. Expert opinion on biological therapy. 2024 Mar. 38421218
  13. [13] Zhao Z, Mu Z et al.. Efficacy, drug survival, safety and metabolic parameters of ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in China: A two-year real-world study. International immunopharmacology. 2024 Dec 25. 39467347
  14. [14] Ali Z, Matthews R et al.. Bimekizumab: a dual IL-17A and IL-17F inhibitor for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Expert review of clinical immunology. 2021 Oct. 34384327
  15. [15] Campione E, Lambiase S et al.. A Real-Life Study on the Use of Tildrakizumab in Psoriatic Patients. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2023 Mar 31. 37111283
  16. [16] Orsini D, Megna M et al.. Efficacy and Safety of bimekizumab in elderly patients: real-world multicenter retrospective study - IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis). The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2024 Dec. 39164008
  17. [17] Brunasso A. Nail Psoriasis Improvement During Tildrakizumab Therapy: A Real-Life Experience. Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD. 2022 Aug 1. 35946963
  18. [18] Trovato E, Bianchelli T et al.. Effectiveness of Tildrakizumab 200 mg in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Multicenter Real-World Study Analyzing Patient Outcomes by Weight, PASI, BMI, and Previous Therapies. Dermatology and therapy. 2025 Jul. 40413278
  19. [19] Parashar AK, Saini K et al.. A Review on Current Challenges and Emerging Therapies in Psoriasis Management. Reviews on recent clinical trials. 2025 Sep 19. 40990270
  20. [20] Sobotkova T, Hugo J et al.. Efficacy, Safety, and Drug Survival During the First Year of Biologic Therapy for Psoriasis in Elderly Versus Younger Patients. International journal of dermatology. 2025 Aug. 40272042

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts