Tezepelumab Clears Phase 3 Bar in EoE, But Payer Differentiation Case Remains Unbuilt
Clinical Trial Updates

Tezepelumab Clears Phase 3 Bar in EoE, But Payer Differentiation Case Remains Unbuilt

Published : 03 Sept 2026

The Overview
Amgen and AstraZeneca announced positive top-line results from the Phase 3 CROSSING trial of TEZSPIRE® (tezepelumab-ekko) in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The trial demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements across both co-primary and all key secondary endpoints at week 24, which were sustained through week 52. The co-primary endpoints included histologic remission and the frequency and severity of dysphagia. TEZSPIRE's safety profile was consistent with its approved indications. This success in EoE, a chronic epithelial-driven inflammatory disorder affecting over 470,000 people in the U.S., supports the broad potential of TEZSPIRE.
Knolens Analysis

The CROSSING trial delivers a clean Phase 3 readout — both co-primary endpoints (histologic remission and frequency/severity of dysphagia) met with statistical significance and clinical meaningfulness at week 24, sustained through week 52 — but the announcement leaves the commercially decisive questions unanswered. [1] No mechanistic precedent for anti-TSLP therapy in EoE exists: tezepelumab would be the first TSLP-blocking agent approved in this indication, meaning regulators and HTA bodies have no directly comparable approval to anchor expectations. The closest regulatory template is dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα, Phase 3 LIBERTY EoE TREET; EU authorization January 2023, US approval May 2022), which passes the clinical-context fit test — same indication, same dual histologic-plus-dysphagia co-primary structure, same placebo-controlled Phase 3 design — but fails the mechanistic-fit test, as IL-4Rα blockade is downstream of TSLP. [2] That precedent confirms the regulatory pathway is navigable but cannot predict label scope, effect-size expectations, or HTA value ratings for a distinct upstream mechanism. On market access, the HTA record is cautionary: the French HAS (October 2022) found dupilumab did not demonstrate superior efficacy in patients who had failed both PPIs and topical corticosteroids — the population HTA bodies actually require — because LIBERTY EoE TREET was not designed to establish efficacy in that dual-failure subgroup. If CROSSING shares that enrollment limitation, the same access barrier applies. The G-BA found 'additional benefit not proven' for dupilumab in paediatric EoE (May 2025), and CADTH required a 95% price reduction for tezepelumab in asthma. No specific efficacy figures, responder rates, or comparator arm details from CROSSING are disclosed in the press release, preventing quantitative benchmarking. The sharpest risk: without enrollment criteria confirming prior corticosteroid failure and without head-to-head data against dupilumab or budesonide, the HTA differentiation case is structurally incomplete at launch. [3]

CROSSING is a Phase 3 RCT meeting both co-primary endpoints — the highest evidence tier — but no efficacy figures, comparator arm identity, enrollment criteria, or head-to-head data are disclosed, and the dupilumab HTA precedent (partial contextual fit only) shows that placebo-controlled EoE trials can fail HTA reimbursement tests when the enrolled population does not reflect the dual-failure population payers require. [4]

At a Glance
IndicationEosinophilic Esophagitis
DrugTezepelumab-ekko
Mechanism of ActionTSLP inhibitor
CompanyAmgen
Trial PhasePhase 3
Trial AcronymCROSSING
NCT IDNCT05583227
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaGastroenterology & Hepatology
Co-Primary Endpointshistologic remission, frequency and severity of dysphagia
Key Secondary Endpointshistologic remission and dysphagia symptoms at week 52, changes in endoscopic disease features (EoE-EREFS) and histologic severity and extent (EoE-HSS) at weeks 24 and 52, endoscopic response, inflammatory remission, total endoscopic remission at week 52
Patient Populationadults and adolescents aged 12-80 years with symptomatic and histologically active EoE on maintenance therapy
Patient Population Size368
Dosage Regimensubcutaneously every four weeks
Treatment Duration52 weeks
Comparatorplacebo
Collaboration PartnerAstraZeneca
Current Approved Indicationssevere asthma, inadequately controlled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP)

TEZSPIRE Achieves Positive Phase 3 Results in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Amgen and AstraZeneca announced positive top-line results from the Phase 3 CROSSING trial of TEZSPIRE® (tezepelumab-ekko) in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The trial demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements across both co-primary and all key secondary endpoints at week 24, which were sustained through week 52. The co-primary endpoints included histologic remission and the frequency and severity of dysphagia. TEZSPIRE's safety profile was consistent with its approved indications. This success in EoE, a chronic epithelial-driven inflammatory disorder affecting over 470,000 people in the U.S., supports the broad potential of TEZSPIRE.

  • TEZSPIRE achieved statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in both co-primary endpoints of the CROSSING trial: histologic remission and the frequency and severity of dysphagia. These positive effects were observed at week 24 and were sustained through week 52, indicating a durable benefit for patients struggling with the underlying inflammation and debilitating swallowing difficulties characteristic of eosinophilic esophagitis.
  • The positive results in eosinophilic esophagitis mark TEZSPIRE's efficacy in a third epithelial-driven inflammatory condition, reinforcing its broad therapeutic potential. This expands upon its existing approvals for severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. The drug's mechanism of action, targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), positions it as a foundational treatment for various inflammatory diseases driven by epithelial dysfunction.
  • The Phase 3 CROSSING trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 368 adults and adolescents (aged 12-80 years) with symptomatic and histologically active EoE who were on maintenance therapy. Patients received TEZSPIRE subcutaneously every four weeks at one of two doses. This trial design provides robust evidence for TEZSPIRE as a potential new, convenient, and effective treatment option for a patient population with significant unmet needs.

Addressing the Unmet Needs in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Despite meaningful advances in the therapeutic landscape for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), several critical gaps persist across pharmacologic, dietary, and endoscopic treatment modalities. These limitations underscore the complexity of managing a chronic, relapsing disease with heterogeneous triggers and manifestations.

  • Absence of approved pharmacologic therapies (until recently) and long-term safety data: No U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies existed for EoE for an extended period, requiring patients to be treated with medications such as inhalers or aqueous nebulizer solutions not originally formulated for this indication. While topical corticosteroids (fluticasone, budesonide) are effective and represent first-line therapy, no data on topical corticosteroid long-term safety in EoE are available. Transient cortisol suppression has been observed with budesonide, and long-term adrenal monitoring is warranted. The most common adverse effects — oropharyngeal candidiasis and Candida esophagitis — are generally manageable but require ongoing vigilance.

  • Failure to reverse fibrosis and address fibrostenotic disease: Budesonide does not reverse fibrosis, as fibrosis scores showed no significant improvement (P = 0.48) in meta-analytic data. Esophageal strictures develop as a consequence of long-lasting esophageal eosinophilia, with patient age and diagnostic delay as well-established risk factors. Persistent symptoms in fibrostenotic disease highlight the need for adjunct therapies, and esophageal dilation — while effective for symptomatic relief — has no effect on the underlying eosinophil inflammation, necessitating repeated procedures to maintain remission.

  • Complexity and burden of dietary elimination therapy: Dietary restriction therapies require a team approach involving a dietitian and an allergist, are more challenging to implement, and often require extensive allergy testing and multiple endoscopies. They are not effective when environmental allergens trigger EoE. Multiple factors — including demographics, nutritional status, social and financial support, and patient acceptance of multiple endoscopies — must be considered, and ongoing multi-disciplinary support during initiation and maintenance phases is crucial.

  • Lack of comparative studies and optimized dosing regimens: No comparative studies of topical corticosteroids versus dietary restrictions exist. Research is needed to establish the lowest most effective and safe dose of topical corticosteroids, the extent of adherence needed when eliminating foods, and less-invasive ways to monitor histologic disease activity. Future research should also optimize dosing regimens and evaluate combination strategies to maximize patient benefit while maintaining disease remission.

  • Gaps in real-world follow-up and monitoring for emerging biologics: For dupilumab — the first FDA-approved treatment for EoE — endoscopic assessment was lacking in 25.9% of real-world patients, limiting the ability to confirm histologic remission. Future research should focus on predictors of response, durability of remission beyond one year, and comparative effectiveness relative to other therapies.

Positive Phase 3 Results for TEZSPIRE in EoE

Recent clinical investigations in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have evaluated a range of interventions — from swallowed topical corticosteroids to biologic agents — across both induction and maintenance settings. The studies below represent a cross-section of recent evidence, capturing histological, symptomatic, and safety endpoints.

Study Name Intervention Key Efficacy Outcomes Key Safety Outcomes
Effectiveness and Safety of High- vs Low-Dose Swallowed Topical Steroids for Maintenance Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (2022) Swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC): low dose (≤0.5 mg/day) vs high dose (>0.5 mg/day) Histological relapse occurred in 67% of patients overall; relapse rates were 72% (low dose) vs 54% (high dose) (ns); histological relapse occurred significantly earlier with low dose STC (1.0 vs 1.8 years, P = .030); no difference in rates of or time to stricture formation Esophageal candidiasis observed in 6% of patients (5% low dose, 8% high dose, ns); no dysplasia or mucosal atrophy detected
Maintenance Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis With Swallowed Topical Steroids Alters Disease Course Over a 5-Year Follow-up Period in Adult Patients (2020) Swallowed topical corticosteroids (STCs), median dose 0.25 mg per administration Patients on STCs achieved clinical remission at 31.0% of visits vs 4.5% for those not on STCs (P <.001); histologic remission at 44.8% vs 10.1% (P <.001); complete remission at 16.1% vs 1.3% (P <.001); higher cumulative doses and longer durations associated with higher proportions of clinical and complete remission Esophageal candidiasis observed at 2.7% of visits in patients taking STCs; no dysplasia or mucosal atrophy detected
Effect of Budesonide Oral Suspension on Time to First Dysphagia Symptom Response and Dysphagia Symptom Resolution Outcomes in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (2026) Budesonide oral suspension (BOS/Eohilia) 2.0 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) Median time to first dysphagia symptom response (≥30% reduction in DSQ score from baseline) was significantly shorter for BOS- than placebo-treated patients (MPI 101-06, p = 0.0239; SHP621-301, p = 0.0156), with separation between groups at week 2; higher proportions of BOS- than placebo-treated patients achieved complete dysphagia symptom resolution at all time points; BOS-treated patients had greater improvements from baseline in the number of dysphagia-free days Not reported
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Swallowed Topical Corticosteroids in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Network Meta-Analysis (2025) Multiple STC formulations including budesonide 1 mg orodispersible tablets, budesonide from inhalation devices, and budesonide viscous suspension Budesonide 1 mg orodispersible tablets ranked highest in SUCRA for all histological remission endpoints; budesonide from inhalation devices was the only option superior to placebo in improving symptoms; budesonide viscous suspension was the only option superior to placebo in improving endoscopy No therapy was significantly associated with the risk of any adverse event; STC formulations were as safe as placebo or PPI; significant inconsistencies and small study effects were detected in multiple comparisons
Symptomatic Improvement in Adults and Adolescents With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Requires Higher Systemic Dupilumab Exposure Than Histologic Response (2025) Dupilumab 300 mg weekly (phase 3 LIBERTY EoE TREET study) A steep initial relationship then plateau was observed between higher dupilumab steady-state trough concentrations and decreased eosinophilic infiltration at week 24; a graded exposure-response relationship was observed for symptomatic improvement at week 24; patients with the highest exposures were more likely to achieve greater symptomatic benefit, independent of strictures or history of dilation Not reported

TEZSPIRE's Broad Potential in Epithelial-Driven Inflammation

Beyond eosinophilic oesophagitis, tezepelumab (tezepelumab-ekko; TEZSPIRE™) is being developed across several additional indications, each reflecting its upstream mechanism of blocking thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an epithelial cytokine central to type 2 and broader airway inflammation. The indications under active clinical development include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), and chronic spontaneous urticaria. In the context of CRSwNP specifically, tezepelumab is currently in a phase III clinical trial, building on earlier evidence that tezepelumab treatment showed benefits on sino-nasal and asthma outcomes in CRSwNP and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD).

The intervention model for the asthma programme — which forms the backbone of tezepelumab's clinical development — is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design, as exemplified by the phase 2 CASCADE study. In CASCADE, tezepelumab 210 mg is administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 28 weeks in adults aged 18–75 years with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe asthma, with the primary endpoint being change from baseline to week 28 in airway submucosal inflammatory cells from bronchoscopic biopsies. The phase 3 NAVIGATOR trial similarly employed subcutaneous administration every 4 weeks over a 52-week period in patients with uncontrolled, severe asthma receiving medium- or high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids.

The knowledge base does not have sufficient information on this aspect regarding the specific intervention models for the COPD and chronic spontaneous urticaria trials.

TEZSPIRE's EoE Success Validates TSLP, Reshapes Treatment Landscape

The recent announcement of positive Phase 3 CROSSING trial results for TEZSPIRE in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) marks a pivotal moment for patients grappling with this chronic, debilitating condition. EoE, characterized by significant inflammation and esophageal remodeling, often leads to severe dysphagia and a diminished quality of life. For many, existing treatments like proton pump inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, and even other biologics targeting eosinophils, prove insufficient, leaving a substantial unmet need.

TEZSPIRE's success across both histologic remission and symptom improvement, sustained over a year, underscores the critical role of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) in driving the inflammatory cascade in EoE. This outcome not only offers a new, targeted therapeutic option for a disease affecting hundreds of thousands but also profoundly validates the TSLP pathway as a broad therapeutic target across various type 2 inflammatory conditions. This strategic expansion beyond severe asthma positions TEZSPIRE as a versatile biologic, enhancing its market footprint and potentially setting a new standard of care for EoE, particularly for those with refractory disease.

However, as with any significant therapeutic advance, important considerations remain. While the 52-week data are encouraging, the chronic nature of EoE necessitates continued investigation into long-term efficacy and safety, especially concerning the progression of esophageal remodeling and fibrosis. Furthermore, the diverse patient population in EoE, including those who have failed multiple prior treatments, suggests that variability in patient response will be an ongoing area of focus. Understanding which patient subgroups derive the most benefit, and whether predictive biomarkers, similar to those explored in severe asthma with PAI-1 gene polymorphism, could guide treatment selection, will be crucial. The evolving competitive landscape for EoE treatments will also require careful navigation, with patient access and reimbursement playing a significant role in widespread adoption.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is tezepelumab effective in treating eosinophilic esophagitis?
Tezepelumab is not currently approved for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). While its mechanism of action targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is relevant to type 2 inflammation implicated in EoE, definitive clinical trial data establishing its efficacy for this specific indication are not yet widely published or have not led to regulatory approval.
What is the life expectancy of someone with EoE?
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is not typically associated with a reduced life expectancy. While it is a chronic inflammatory condition requiring ongoing management, its primary impact is on morbidity and quality of life rather than mortality. Patients with EoE generally have a normal lifespan.
Does Tezspire have long-term side effects?
Clinical trials and long-term extension studies for Tezspire (tezepelumab) have not identified new or unexpected long-term side effects. The most common adverse reactions observed include arthralgia, pharyngitis, and rash. A slightly higher incidence of herpes zoster infections was noted in tezepelumab-treated patients compared to placebo in the NAVIGATOR study. Ongoing post-marketing surveillance continues to monitor for any emerging safety signals with prolonged use.
What autoimmune disease is linked to EoE?
While Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated disease primarily driven by allergic inflammation, it is not typically classified as an autoimmune disease itself. However, patients with EoE have shown a higher prevalence of other immune-mediated conditions, including certain autoimmune diseases. Celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are examples of autoimmune conditions that have been observed to co-occur with EoE at a higher rate than in the general population. This suggests potential shared genetic predispositions or immune dysregulation.
What is the current research on eosinophilic esophagitis?
Current research in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is actively exploring novel therapeutic targets beyond corticosteroids and dupilumab, with ongoing trials investigating biologics that modulate IL-13, IL-15, and TSLP pathways. Significant efforts are also focused on identifying non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis, monitoring disease activity, and predicting treatment response, aiming to reduce reliance on endoscopy. Further research delves into the genetic and environmental factors contributing to EoE pathogenesis and strategies for preventing long-term complications such as fibrosis and strictures.
What are the typical results of eosinophilic esophagitis biopsies?
The hallmark finding in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) biopsies is a significant infiltration of eosinophils, typically defined as $\ge$15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/HPF) in at least one esophageal biopsy. These eosinophils often present as microabscesses or superficial layering. Additional histological features include basal zone hyperplasia, dilated intercellular spaces, and lamina propria fibrosis, reflecting chronic inflammation and epithelial remodeling.
How serious is eosinophilic esophagitis?
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a serious, chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the esophagus. Untreated, it leads to progressive esophageal dysfunction, including dysphagia, food impaction, and can result in esophageal remodeling such as strictures and fibrosis. These complications significantly impair quality of life and often necessitate endoscopic interventions, underscoring the need for timely diagnosis and ongoing management to prevent irreversible damage.
What is the FDA-approved treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis?
The FDA has approved two treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Dupilumab (Dupixent), a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-4 and IL-13, received approval in May 2022 for patients aged 12 years and older. More recently, budesonide oral suspension (Eohilia), a corticosteroid, was approved in February 2024 for patients 11 years and older.

References

  1. [1] Hoy SM. Tezepelumab: First Approval. Drugs. 2022 Mar. 35184265
  2. [2] Farhan K, Tariq MB et al.. Efficacy and safety of budesonide for eosinophilic esophagitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012). 2026 Jan. 41497095
  3. [3] Khalaf R, Ton That A et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International archives of allergy and immunology. 2026 Jul 15. 42455743
  4. [4] López Delgado DS, Narváez CA et al.. Effect of budesonide oral suspension on dysphagia and esophageal inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in immunology. 2026. 42488668
  5. [5] Anderson BT, Feinstein JA et al.. Approach and Safety of Esophageal Dilation for Treatment of Strictures in Children With Epidermolysis Bullosa. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2018 Dec. 30052567
  6. [6] von Arnim U, Malfertheiner P. Eosinophilic esophagitis--treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis with drugs: corticosteroids. Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2014. 24603395
  7. [7] Dellon ES, Katzka DA et al.. Effect of Budesonide Oral Suspension on Time to First Dysphagia Symptom Response and Dysphagia Symptom Resolution Outcomes in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2026 Mar. 41711386
  8. [8] Greuter T, Safroneeva E et al.. Maintenance Treatment Of Eosinophilic Esophagitis With Swallowed Topical Steroids Alters Disease Course Over A 5-Year Follow-up Period In Adult Patients. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2019 Feb. 29902648
  9. [9] Faria N, Costa MI et al.. Biologic Therapies for Severe Asthma: Current Insights and Future Directions. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025 May 2. 40364184
  10. [10] Ando K, Fukuda Y et al.. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab and Other Biologics in Patients with Inadequately Controlled Asthma According to Thresholds of Type 2 Inflammatory Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Cells. 2022 Feb 26. 35269440
  11. [11] Hudgens S, Evans C et al.. Psychometric validation of the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis treated with budesonide oral suspension. Journal of patient-reported outcomes. 2017. 29757322
  12. [12] Feist J, Lipari M et al.. Tezepelumab in the Treatment of Uncontrolled Severe Asthma. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 2023 Jan. 35535458
  13. [13] De Corso E, Canonica GW et al.. Dupilumab versus omalizumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and coexisting asthma (EVEREST): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, head-to-head phase 4 trial. The Lancet. Respiratory medicine. 2025 Dec. 41033334
  14. [14] Schoepfer A. Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis by dilation. Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2014. 24603396
  15. [15] Chehade M, Brown S. Elimination diets for eosinophilic esophagitis: making the best choice. Expert review of clinical immunology. 2020 Jul. 32729737
  16. [16] Russin M, Chen J et al.. Real-World Effectiveness and Use of Dupilumab in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2025 Mar 1. 39422172
  17. [17] Lucendo AJ, Molina-Infante J. Esophageal dilation in eosinophilic esophagitis: risks, benefits, and when to do it. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2018 Jul. 29846259
  18. [18] Loreto RR, Gonzalez Y et al.. A Case of Esophageal Perforation Secondary to Undiagnosed Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Cureus. 2025 Nov. 41356960
  19. [19] Tiotiu A. The current evidence regarding the efficacy of tezepelumab administered for asthma on T2-related comorbidities. Expert review of respiratory medicine. 2026 Jan. 41334919
  20. [20] Dellon ES, Kosloski MP et al.. Symptomatic Improvement in Adults and Adolescents With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Requires Higher Systemic Dupilumab Exposure Than Histologic Response. Clinical and translational gastroenterology. 2025 Jan 1. 39853721

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts