TEV-408 Phase 2a Celiac Signal Is Real But Pivotal Distance Remains Vast
Clinical Trial Updates

TEV-408 Phase 2a Celiac Signal Is Real But Pivotal Distance Remains Vast

Published : 03 Sept 2026

The Overview
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. announced positive topline results from its Phase 2a study of TEV ‘408, an investigational anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibody, in adults with celiac disease. The study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating statistically significant and clinically meaningful prevention of gluten-induced intestinal damage versus placebo at week 8. TEV ‘408 was well-tolerated with no new safety signals. This outcome supports TEV ‘408's potential as a "pipeline-in-a-product" for multiple diseases, including celiac disease and vitiligo, and strengthens confidence in targeting the IL-15 pathway to reduce immune-driven intestinal damage. The study enrolled 50 adult participants on a gluten-free diet who underwent a six-week daily gluten challenge.
Knolens Analysis

The sharpest verdict: TEV-408 has produced a randomized, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept in celiac disease, but a 50-patient Phase 2a result in a controlled gluten challenge model is separated from a regulatory submission by a chasm of unresolved evidence requirements. The study met its primary endpoint — statistically significant and clinically meaningful prevention of gluten-induced intestinal damage versus placebo at week 8 — in adults on a gluten-free diet undergoing a six-week daily gluten challenge. That result is meaningful precisely because celiac disease has no approved pharmacological therapy, making any controlled positive signal in the indication noteworthy. [1] The IL-15 pathway has biological plausibility reinforced across species: a non-human primate study of anti-IL-15 antibody 04H04 demonstrated reversal of intraepithelial lymphocyte counts and villous height/crypt depth ratios to normal levels (P < 0.001), consistent with TEV-408's human Phase 2a direction. [2] The closest mechanistic competitor is ordesekimab (AMG 714/PRV-015), a fully human anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibody also in clinical development for celiac disease — same target, same indication, development stage not resolved to approval. [3] No anti-IL-15 antibody has been approved in any indication, meaning no precedent clears the mechanistic-fit bar for regulatory analogy. On market access, the payer environment for celiac disease pharmacotherapy is historically underdeveloped: as of 2008, the Netherlands did not reimburse even dietary interventions for celiac disease, and no pharmacological HTA framework exists in the available evidence. Three critical gaps define the risk: antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) characterization has not been reported for TEV-408, though the ordesekimab program established that regulators expect this analysis for the class; no validated patient-reported outcome instrument currently meets FDA stated expectations for celiac disease regulatory submissions; and the gluten challenge provocation model — controlled daily exposure in diet-adherent patients — has uncertain generalizability to real-world populations with inadvertent ongoing gluten exposure. [1][3] The sharpest risk is that Phase 3 design must simultaneously solve the PRO validation gap, the ADCC characterization requirement, and the model-to-real-world translation problem before a pivotal package can be assembled.

The Phase 2a enrolled 50 adults with a primary endpoint at week 8 in a controlled gluten challenge model. No quantitative efficacy figures, long-term data, or validated PRO endpoints are reported; no Phase 3 data exist for TEV-408 in any indication. [4]

At a Glance
IndicationCeliac disease
DrugTEV ‘408
Mechanism of ActionIL-15 inhibitor
CompanyTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Trial PhasePhase 2a
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaGastroenterology & Hepatology
Patient Population50 adult participants with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet (GFD) with minimal intestinal damage at baseline (Vh:Cd ≥2.0)
Primary Endpoint MeasureVillous height-to-crypt depth ratio (Vh:Cd)
Statistical Significance (Primary Endpoint)p<0.05
Treatment Difference (Primary Endpoint)0.45 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.84)
Secondary Endpoint MeasuresDensity of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), Celiac Disease Symptom Diary (CDSD) scores
FDA DesignationFast Track designation
Designation DateMay 2025
Funding PartnerRoyalty Pharma
Funding Agreement DateJanuary 2026
Funding AmountUp to $500 million

Teva's Anti-IL-15 Antibody Shows Positive Phase 2a Results in Celiac Disease

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. announced positive topline results from its Phase 2a study of TEV ‘408, an investigational anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibody, in adults with celiac disease. The study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating statistically significant and clinically meaningful prevention of gluten-induced intestinal damage versus placebo at week 8. TEV ‘408 was well-tolerated with no new safety signals. This outcome supports TEV ‘408's potential as a "pipeline-in-a-product" for multiple diseases, including celiac disease and vitiligo, and strengthens confidence in targeting the IL-15 pathway to reduce immune-driven intestinal damage. The study enrolled 50 adult participants on a gluten-free diet who underwent a six-week daily gluten challenge.

  • The Phase 2a study of TEV ‘408 successfully met its primary endpoint, showing statistically significant and clinically meaningful prevention of gluten-induced intestinal damage in celiac disease patients. Measured by the villous height-to-crypt depth ratio (Vh:Cd), the LS mean change from baseline was -0.43 for TEV ‘408 compared to -0.88 for placebo, resulting in a treatment difference of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.84; p<0.05). This demonstrates the drug's ability to mitigate the core pathological effect of gluten exposure.
  • Beyond the primary endpoint, TEV ‘408 also showed a favorable effect on intestinal inflammation, as indicated by a lower increase in the density of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) compared to placebo (treatment difference of -27.23, 95% CI: -39.67, -14.79). Additionally, participants treated with TEV ‘408 reported lower gastrointestinal symptom scores, assessed using the Celiac Disease Symptom Diary (CDSD), a patient-reported outcome, suggesting an improvement in daily quality of life.
  • TEV ‘408 was well-tolerated in the study, with no emerging safety signals observed to date, reinforcing its potential for further development. These positive results for celiac disease, combined with encouraging Phase 1b results in vitiligo, validate TEV ‘408 as a "pipeline-in-a-product" opportunity. The drug, which received FDA Fast Track designation for celiac disease in May 2025, targets the IL-15 pathway to address immune-driven inflammation and damage in multiple conditions.

Addressing the Unmet Needs in Celiac Disease Treatment

Despite significant advances in understanding its pathophysiology, Celiac disease (CeD) remains without a single FDA-approved pharmacological treatment, leaving patients dependent on a demanding dietary intervention with well-documented limitations. The breadth of unmet need spans from the inadequacy of the gluten-free diet (GFD) as a sole management strategy to the absence of effective options for severe disease progression.

  • No FDA-approved pharmacotherapy exists. The only recommended course to alleviate CeD-induced symptoms is abstinence from all gluten-based products. While several clinical trials are actively developing pharmacological approaches — including AT-1001 (Larazotide acetate) and IMGX-003 (Latiglutenase) — none has yet achieved regulatory approval.

  • The GFD is nutritionally inadequate and burdensome. Gluten-free products are considered of lower quality and poorer nutritional value compared to gluten-containing counterparts. The GFD is associated with micronutrient deficiencies including iron, folate, vitamin B12, vitamin D, zinc, and copper, as well as increased consumption of foods high in fat, added sugars, and total calories, raising the risk of obesity and a poor microbiome. Patients also face psychosocial burdens including anxiety, social isolation, and disordered eating.

  • Mucosal recovery on GFD is incomplete in a substantial proportion of patients. Despite adherence to a strict GFD, 25.5% of patients in one study showed persistent villous atrophy after at least 12 months. Severe mucosal damage at diagnosis (Marsh 3c lesions) and elevated anti-gliadin antibody levels were identified as independent risk factors for failure to obtain mucosal recovery. Longer time with clinical manifestations before diagnosis was also associated with worse histological outcomes.

  • Persistent symptoms occur even with mucosal recovery. Many CeD patients suffer from persistent symptoms despite a strict GFD and recovered intestinal mucosa. Low fiber intake was identified as a factor that may predispose patients to persistent symptoms, and the association between symptoms and mucosal inflammation was described as "more complicated than previously thought."

  • Refractory celiac disease (RCD) lacks standardized treatment. Approximately 5% of patients with CeD do not respond to a GFD and progress to RCD. RCD type II carries a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate through development of aggressive enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. In the German registry, overall mortality among RCD patients was 26%, with a clear dominance in RCD type II patients (47%). A wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic measures was used across patients, underscoring the absence of standardized management protocols.

  • Investigational therapies have shown limited or variable efficacy in trials. In a dose-ranging study of Larazotide acetate, the primary efficacy outcome — the urinary lactulose/mannitol (LAMA) fractional excretion ratio — was highly variable in the outpatient setting, and the difference in LAMA ratios between the Larazotide acetate and placebo groups was not statistically significant. Only some lower doses appeared to prevent the increase in gastrointestinal symptom severity induced by gluten challenge.

Positive Phase 2a Outcomes for TEV ‘408 in Celiac Disease

Several recent clinical studies have evaluated investigational therapies for celiac disease (CeD), spanning enzyme-based, permeability-modulating, and immune-tolerizing approaches. The studies below represent a cross-section of phase 2 and exploratory trial data, each targeting a distinct mechanism in CeD pathogenesis.

  • Latiglutenase (Phase 2, NCT01917630; published 2017): This double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study enrolled 494 patients with symptomatic CeD and villous atrophy (villous height:crypt depth [Vh:Cd] ratio ≤2.0), randomized to placebo or 100, 300, 450, 600, or 900 mg latiglutenase daily for 12 or 24 weeks. In the modified intent-to-treat population, there were no differences between latiglutenase and placebo groups in change from baseline in Vh:Cd ratio, intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) counts, or serologic markers (anti-tissue transglutaminase-2 and deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies). All groups had significant improvements in histologic and symptom scores, indicating no efficacy advantage over placebo.

  • Larazotide Acetate (Exploratory, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled; published 2013): This study enrolled 184 patients on a gluten-free diet (GFD), randomized to larazotide acetate (1, 4, or 8 mg three times daily) or placebo during a 6-week gluten challenge (2.7 g/day). No significant differences in lactulose-to-mannitol (LAMA) ratios were observed between larazotide acetate and placebo groups. Larazotide acetate 1 mg limited gluten-induced symptoms as measured by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (P = 0.002 vs. placebo). Mean ratio of anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA levels over baseline was 19.0 in the placebo group compared with 5.78 (P = 0.010), 3.88 (P = 0.005), and 7.72 (P = 0.025) in the larazotide acetate 1-, 4-, and 8-mg groups, respectively. Adverse event rates were similar between larazotide acetate and placebo groups.

  • TAK-101 (Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled; NCT03486990 and NCT03738475; published 2021): TAK-101 — gliadin encapsulated in negatively charged poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles — was evaluated in 33 patients with CeD who completed a 14-day gluten challenge. TAK-101 induced an 88% reduction in change from baseline in interferon-γ spot-forming units vs. placebo (2.01 vs. 17.58, P = .006). Vh:Cd deteriorated in the placebo group (-0.63, P = .002) but not in the TAK-101 group (-0.18, P = .110), although the intergroup change from baseline was not significant (P = .08). TAK-101 reduced changes in circulating α4β7CD4 (0.26 vs. 1.05, P = .032), αEβ7CD8 (0.69 vs. 3.64, P = .003), and γδ (0.15 vs. 1.59, P = .010) effector memory T cells. TAK-101 (up to 8 mg/kg) induced no clinically meaningful changes in vital signs or routine clinical laboratory evaluations, and no serious adverse events occurred.

Teva's IL-15 Success: A New Chapter for Celiac and Autoimmune Therapies

The recent positive Phase 2a results for Teva's investigational anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibody, TEV ‘408, mark a potentially pivotal moment for patients living with celiac disease. For individuals with this immune-mediated enteropathy, the only current management strategy is a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet (GFD). However, studies indicate that many patients continue to experience symptoms and even mucosal damage despite their best efforts, highlighting a significant unmet need for non-dietary therapeutic options. The success of TEV ‘408 in preventing gluten-induced intestinal damage offers a promising new avenue, validating the interleukin-15 (IL-15) pathway as a critical target in celiac pathophysiology.

This development is particularly noteworthy given the historical challenges in this space. Previous attempts at non-dietary interventions, such as latiglutenase, have not demonstrated efficacy in improving histological or symptomatic outcomes. Even another anti-IL-15 antibody, AMG 714, while showing some symptomatic amelioration, did not significantly prevent mucosal injury in a similar gluten challenge study. TEV ‘408's ability to achieve statistically significant and clinically meaningful prevention of intestinal damage suggests a potential differentiation or optimized targeting strategy. This strengthens Teva's broader 'pipeline-in-a-product' vision, as IL-15 is also implicated in other autoimmune conditions like vitiligo, where it plays a role in maintaining tissue-resident memory T cells. Targeting the IL-15/CD122 axis in vitiligo is an active area of research, with the potential for durable repigmentation.

However, the path forward is not without considerations. The current study focused on preventing damage in a gluten challenge setting, which differs from reversing established villous atrophy or managing chronic symptoms in patients already on a GFD. Future trials will need to explore TEV ‘408's efficacy in these broader patient populations. Nevertheless, the positive data provide a strong foundation for advancing TEV ‘408, potentially offering a much-needed therapeutic adjunct or alternative that could significantly improve the quality of life for celiac patients and expand treatment paradigms for autoimmune diseases.

Frequently Asked Questions

What levels are high with celiac disease?
Celiac disease is characterized by elevated levels of specific autoantibodies, primarily tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and endomysial antibodies (EMA) IgA. Deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) IgG or IgA antibodies are also frequently elevated, particularly in IgA-deficient individuals or young children. These serological markers reflect the autoimmune response to gluten ingestion and are critical for diagnosis.
What is the most promising treatment for celiac disease?
The most promising treatments for celiac disease beyond the gluten-free diet are primarily immunomodulatory therapies in various stages of clinical development. These include anti-interleukin-15 (IL-15) antibodies, such as PRV-015, which aim to block the inflammatory cascade triggered by gluten. Additionally, gluten-specific immune tolerance therapies, like TAK-101, are being investigated to re-educate the immune system and potentially allow for some gluten consumption. Other candidates include tight junction modulators and gluten-degrading enzymes, offering different mechanisms to mitigate gluten-induced damage.
How long does it take for gluten neuropathy to heal?
Healing from gluten neuropathy is highly variable, largely dependent on the extent and duration of nerve damage prior to gluten withdrawal. While some patients may report symptom improvement within months of strict adherence to a gluten-free diet, complete resolution of neurological deficits can take several years, and in some cases, damage may be irreversible. Early diagnosis and rigorous dietary compliance are crucial for preventing further progression and maximizing the potential for recovery.
What autoimmune disease is most commonly associated with celiac disease?
Autoimmune thyroid disease, particularly Hashimoto's thyroiditis, is the autoimmune condition most commonly associated with celiac disease. This comorbidity is observed in a significant percentage of celiac patients, often preceding or co-occurring with the diagnosis. Type 1 Diabetes mellitus is another highly prevalent autoimmune comorbidity frequently seen in individuals with celiac disease.
What is the typical recovery timeline for celiac disease?
Symptomatic improvement in celiac disease typically begins within weeks to a few months of initiating a strict gluten-free diet (GFD). However, complete histological recovery of the small intestinal mucosa, characterized by villous atrophy resolution, generally takes 6 months to 2 years in adults, and often more rapidly in children. Adherence to the GFD and the extent of initial mucosal damage are key determinants of the recovery timeline.
How close are they to a cure for celiac?
There is currently no cure for celiac disease; the only effective treatment remains a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet. While several therapeutic candidates are in various stages of clinical development, these primarily aim to protect against accidental gluten exposure, restore tolerance, or repair intestinal damage. A definitive cure, involving complete reversal or prevention of the autoimmune response without dietary restriction, remains a long-term research goal rather than an imminent reality.
Is there a connection between celiac disease and depression?
A significant connection exists between celiac disease and depression, with patients often experiencing higher rates of depressive symptoms and diagnoses. This link is attributed to several factors, including chronic inflammation, malabsorption leading to nutrient deficiencies (e.g., B vitamins, tryptophan), and alterations in the gut microbiome impacting the gut-brain axis. Effective management of celiac disease through a strict gluten-free diet can often alleviate depressive symptoms, underscoring the importance of screening and integrated care for affected individuals.

References

  1. [1] Kulkarni A, Patel S et al.. Current pharmacological approaches and potential future therapies for Celiac disease. European journal of pharmacology. 2021 Oct 15. 34418405
  2. [2] McCarville JL, Caminero A et al.. Pharmacological approaches in celiac disease. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2015 Dec. 26414923
  3. [3] Hrdlickova B, Mulder CJ et al.. A locus at 7p14.3 predisposes to refractory celiac disease progression from celiac disease. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2018 Aug. 29787419
  4. [4] Zammit SC, Elli L et al.. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in refractory celiac disease: a luxury or a necessity?. Annals of gastroenterology. 2021. 33654358
  5. [5] Laurikka P, Lindfors K et al.. Dietary Factors and Mucosal Immune Response in Celiac Disease Patients Having Persistent Symptoms Despite a Gluten-free Diet. Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 2019 Aug. 29505551
  6. [6] Weekley K, Gardinier D et al.. The Gluten-Free Diet for Celiac Disease. Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America. 2025 Oct. 41107011
  7. [7] Leffler DA, Kelly CP et al.. A randomized, double-blind study of larazotide acetate to prevent the activation of celiac disease during gluten challenge. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2012 Oct. 22825365
  8. [8] Weber M, Wolf N et al.. Results from the German registry for refractory celiac disease. Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie. 2021 Sep. 34507373
  9. [9] Kerbage A, Jansson-Knodell C et al.. High-Quality Nutritional and Medical Care in Celiac Disease Follow-Up. Nutrients. 2025 Nov 11. 41305581
  10. [10] Rodríguez-Martín L, Vaquero Ayala LM et al.. Assessing mucosal recovery in celiac disease - Time to diagnosis and histological severity as determining factors. Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas. 2024 Jul. 38205704
  11. [11] Nemteanu R, Danciu M et al.. Predictors of slow responsiveness and partial mucosal recovery in adult patients with celiac disease. Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench. 2023. 37554747
  12. [12] Penagini F, Dilillo D et al.. Gluten-free diet in children: an approach to a nutritionally adequate and balanced diet. Nutrients. 2013 Nov 18. 24253052
  13. [13] Kelly CP, Murray JA et al.. TAK-101 Nanoparticles Induce Gluten-Specific Tolerance in Celiac Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Gastroenterology. 2021 Jul. 33722583
  14. [14] Girbal-González M, Pérez-Cano FJ. Is There a Future Without Gluten Restrictions for Celiac Patients? Update on Current Treatments. Nutrients. 2025 Sep 15. 41010485
  15. [15] Monachesi C, Ascani M et al.. Serum IFABP Level as an Index of Mucosal Health in Celiac Disease: A Small Intestinal Morphometry Study. Clinical and translational gastroenterology. 2026 Jul 1. 42386207
  16. [16] Kelly CP, Green PH et al.. Larazotide acetate in patients with coeliac disease undergoing a gluten challenge: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2013 Jan. 23163616
  17. [17] Nasseri-Moghaddam S, Mofid A et al.. The normal range of duodenal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Archives of Iranian medicine. 2008 Mar. 18298288
  18. [18] Murray JA, Kelly CP et al.. No Difference Between Latiglutenase and Placebo in Reducing Villous Atrophy or Improving Symptoms in Patients With Symptomatic Celiac Disease. Gastroenterology. 2017 Mar. 27864127
  19. [19] Vargas MM, Artigiani Neto R et al.. Quantitative histology as a diagnostic tool for celiac disease in children and adolescents. Annals of diagnostic pathology. 2022 Dec. 36055006

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts