IDEAL reports 75.4% versus 16.1% ALP normalization composite at Week 52 for Livdelzi versus placebo in adults with primary biliary cholangitis including ALP 1-1.67x ULN, a stratum often excluded from prior trials, supporting normalization as an achievable goal and triggering discussion with global regulators ahead of The Liver Meeting 2026 and Journal of Hepatology publication. [1] Credibility rests on RESPONSE, a Phase 3 double-blind RCT in 193 patients with 61.7% versus 20.0% composite response and 25.0% versus 0% ALP normalization, plus pruritus NRS change -3.2 versus -1.7 in moderate-severe itch, differentiating seladelpar with a label including pruritus from elafibranor and obeticholic acid labeled for PBC only. [2] Competitive context includes elafibranor 80mg daily Phase 3 ELATIVE and obeticholic acid 5-10mg daily Phase 3 POISE as second-line after ursodeoxycholic acid, plus off-label bezafibrate 400mg, with no head-to-head trials and indirect comparisons via anchored MAIC and Bayesian NMA limited by transitivity concerns and 20% placebo response. [3][1] Market access shows NICE Final Draft Guidance ta1171 positive recommendation under commercial arrangement with cost-effectiveness below threshold, contrasted with Canadian cost $85,955 per patient per year and budget impact greater than $40 million, and French ASMR V with conditional marketing authorisation of 20 February 2025 pending AFFIRM event-free survival to 156 weeks. [4][5] The sharpest gap is absence of transplant-free survival benefit and limited third-line and monotherapy data with 94% background UDCA.
Phase 3 RCT replication on ALP and pruritus supports use, but no head-to-head, no survival benefit, and conditional approval pending AFFIRM constrain confidence. [6][5]
| Indication | Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) |
| Drug | seladelpar |
| Mechanism of Action | PPAR-delta agonist |
| Company | Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
| Trial Phase | Phase 3 |
| Trial Acronym | IDEAL |
| NCT ID | NCT06060665 |
| Category | Clinical Trial Event |
| Sub Category | Topline Results Positive |
| Therapeutic Area | Gastroenterology & Hepatology |
| Primary Endpoint | ALP normalization composite endpoint defined as a composite of ALP ≤ 1.0× upper limit of normal (ULN) and a ≥ 15% decrease from baseline |
| Patient Population | Adults with PBC and ALP levels between 1-1.67× ULN, despite UDCA or with UDCA intolerance |
| Livdelzi Efficacy Rate (Week 52) | 75.4% |
| Placebo Efficacy Rate (Week 52) | 16.1% |
| Conference Name | The Liver Meeting® 2026, hosted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) |
| Presentation Dates | November 5-9, 2026 |
| Publication Journal | Journal of Hepatology |
| Study Enrollment | 96 adults |
| Follow-up Duration | 52 weeks |
| Regulatory Engagement | Global regulatory authorities |
Gilead's Livdelzi Demonstrates ALP Normalization in Phase 3 PBC Study
Gilead Sciences announced positive detailed results from its Phase 3 IDEAL study, demonstrating that Livdelzi (seladelpar) significantly improved alkaline phosphatase (ALP) normalization in adults with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). The study, which included patients with ALP levels between 1-1.67× ULN (a population often excluded from previous trials), showed that 75.4% of Livdelzi-treated participants achieved the ALP normalization composite endpoint at Week 52, compared to 16.1% on placebo. These findings support ALP normalization as an achievable treatment goal and will be discussed with global regulatory authorities. The data will be presented at The Liver Meeting® 2026 and published in the Journal of Hepatology.
- At Week 52, Livdelzi demonstrated a substantial improvement in ALP normalization, with 75.4% of participants achieving the composite endpoint (ALP ≤ 1.0× ULN and ≥ 15% decrease from baseline) compared to only 16.1% in the placebo group. This rapid and sustained response was evident after just one month of treatment, highlighting its potential for significant biochemical improvement.
- The IDEAL study uniquely evaluated Livdelzi in PBC patients with ALP levels between 1-1.67× ULN, a group typically excluded from pivotal trials. These results provide crucial evidence that seladelpar can improve biochemical response in this previously underserved population, informing individualized treatment discussions and expanding the understanding of treatment effects for a broader range of patients.
- Based on these positive Phase 3 results, Gilead Sciences plans to engage with global regulatory authorities to discuss Livdelzi's potential for approval. The detailed data will be presented at The Liver Meeting® 2026, hosted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), from November 5-9 in Denver, Colorado, and has been accepted for upcoming publication in the Journal of Hepatology.
- The safety profile of Livdelzi observed in the IDEAL study was consistent with previously reported studies, with no new safety concerns identified. The incidence of adverse events was generally similar between Livdelzi and placebo groups, and serious adverse events occurred in 3.1% of Livdelzi-treated individuals versus 12.9% in the placebo group, with none deemed related to the trial drug.
Why Patients with Sub-Optimal ALP Levels Need New Options
Recent literature in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has shifted beyond a dichotomous definition of biochemical response toward a risk-based and holistic approach integrating biochemical response, fibrosis stage, liver stiffness, and patient-reported outcomes. Therapeutic targets are increasingly individualized according to age, disease stage, symptom burden, and risk of progression, with emphasis on earlier treatment escalation in high-risk and symptomatic patients.
Patients with inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) needing early second-line therapy: UDCA remains the cornerstone of first-line therapy and improves transplant-free survival, but an important proportion show inadequate biochemical response, with suboptimal response reported in 54.2% after 1 year of UDCA and response rates of 44.44%, 41.88%, and 52.14% according to Paris II, POISE, and Barcelona criteria. Research targets earlier identification at 6 months using Toronto, Rotterdam, Paris 1 and 2, Barcelona and POISE trial criteria, and GLOBE and UK-PBC scores, with early initiation deemed appropriate in cases of UDCA intolerance or partial response following the withdrawal of obeticholic acid and availability of selective PPAR agonists, including elafibranor and seladelpar, as well as fenofibrate and bezafibrates as add-on therapy.
Patients with moderate-to-severe pruritus and associated sleep disturbance, fatigue, and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL): Pruritus affects up to 80% of patients with PBC, often worsens at night, and reduces HRQoL, with EQ-5D-5L scores lower in severe pruritus (≥7-10 NRS) (mean [SD]: 0.49 [0.28]) versus mild/moderate pruritus (0.75 [0.17]/0.76 [0.17]). Development focuses on linerixibat assessed in the Phase 2b GLIMMER trial (NCT02966834) and Phase 3 GLISTEN study (NCT04950127), and seladelpar 10 mg in the Phase 3 RESPONSE trial (NCT04620733) in patients with moderate to severe itch (NRS ≥4), severe itch (NRS ≥7) and clinically significant itch (PBC-40 itch ≥7), evaluating Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS), Sleep Interference NRS, 5-D itch scale, PBC-40, and Fatigue NRS.
Patients with high-risk and advanced disease requiring refined stratification: Populations include those with advanced PBC, high baseline liver enzymes levels with mean baseline alkaline phosphatase 2.73 ± 1.95 times the upper limit of normal (× ULN) among responders versus 5.05 ± 3.08 × ULN in non-responders, compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A), ductopenia present in 56.76% (294/518) overall and 24.83% (74/298) with early-stage disease, and non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis in 30/92 (32.6%) pre-cirrhotic patients. Management emphasizes distinguishing between "adequate" and "complete" biochemical response and integrating fibrosis stage, liver stiffness by Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE), ALBI score, and prognostic scores including GLOBE with area under the ROC curve 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.95) and 0.867, and UK-PBC with 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-0.99) and 0.899.
Patients with substantial symptom burden and comorbid psychological impact: Among patients with severe pruritus, 31% had severe depression versus 9/3% with mild/moderate pruritus, with mean EQ-5D-5L score of 0.30 in those with both severe pruritus and depression, and 54% reported severe sleep interference. Strong correlations were found between change from baseline in weekly itch and sleep NRS scores (r = 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83; 0.91]) and monthly scores (r = 0.84 [95% CI: 0.80; 0.87]), supporting meaningful improvement thresholds of ≥3 points in WI-NRS and ≥2.5 points in SI-NRS weekly scores and the importance of evaluating itch and managing depression.
Livdelzi's IDEAL Results: Efficacy and Safety in PBC
Recent studies in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) have evaluated second-line therapies in patients with inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid. These include selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists and fibrates, with efficacy assessed by composite biochemical response and alkaline phosphatase normalization.
ASSURE interim study — seladelpar 10-mg: In patients rolling over from the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-month RESPONSE study or earlier legacy seladelpar studies, the composite response rate at RESPONSE completion was 62% (79/128) with seladelpar and 20% (13/65) with placebo. After 12 months in ASSURE, response rates were 72% (21/29) in patients continuing seladelpar and 94% (15/16) in crossover seladelpar patients, with response rates of 73% (120/164) and 70% (69/99) after 12 and 24 months in legacy trial patients. No seladelpar-related serious adverse events were reported, with durable improvements in cholestatic biomarkers and pruritus with up to 2 years of treatment.
ENHANCE phase 3 study — seladelpar 5 mg and 10 mg daily: Significantly more patients receiving seladelpar met the composite biochemical response [alkaline phosphatase (ALP) < 1.67×upper limit of normal (ULN), ≥15% ALP decrease from baseline, and total bilirubin ≤ ULN] at month 3 (seladelpar 5 mg: 57.1%, 10 mg: 78.2%) versus placebo (12.5%) (p < 0.0001). ALP normalization occurred in 5.4% (p =0.08) and 27.3% (p < 0.0001) with 5 and 10 mg seladelpar versus 0% with placebo, with significant reduction in pruritus numerical rating scale and alanine aminotransferase decrease. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events.
ELATIVE phase III trial (NCT04526665) — elafibranor: At Week 52, biochemical response was achieved across all subgroups receiving elafibranor (≤ 2× upper limit of normal [ULN]: 86.7%, > 2-≤ 2.5× ULN: 80.0%, > 2.5-≤ 3× ULN: 52.0%, > 3-≤ 4× ULN: 22.2%, > 4× ULN: 18.8%), with ALP normalization only with elafibranor and mean ALP reductions consistent across subgroups (overall CfB: -38.9%).
BEZURSO phase 3 trial (NCT01654731) — bezafibrate 400 mg daily plus ursodeoxycholic acid: The primary outcome of complete biochemical response at 24 months occurred in 31% assigned to bezafibrate and in 0% assigned to placebo (difference, 31 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 10 to 50; P<0.001), with normal levels of alkaline phosphatase in 67% versus 2%. Myalgia occurred in 20% in the bezafibrate group and in 10% in the placebo group, with creatinine level increased 5% from baseline in the bezafibrate group and decreased 3% in the placebo group.
Livdelzi's Impact on Evolving PBC Treatment Goals
Primary biliary cholangitis management long consisted of a single treatment: ursodeoxycholic acid, which has been the cornerstone of PBC management, improving survival and delaying disease progression in most patients. However, up to 40% of patients demonstrate an inadequate response to UDCA, with reviews reporting approximately 30-40% with inadequate biochemical response. Patients typically are assessed after 12 months of treatment with UDCA for biochemical markers of response, although evaluation at 6 months has been proposed for patients with more severe disease or symptoms. Major studies have helped better predict disease progression and its response to treatment through the development of prognostic tools, with Barcelona, Paris-1, Paris-2, Rotterdam, Toronto and GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores most robustly validated in external populations, and the continuous models (GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores) serving as the most accurate predictive models.
Obeticholic acid (OCA), a potent farnesoid X receptor agonist, was the first second-line agent approved for patients with PBC and an inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid, showing efficacy in reducing alkaline phosphatase levels and improving liver biochemistry. In the Italian PBC Registry of 191 patients, significant median reductions of ALP (-32.3%), ALT (-31.4%), and bilirubin (-11.2%) were observed at 12 months, with response rates of 42.9% according to Poise criteria and 11% by normal range criteria. In a Southern European multicentre cohort of 120 patients, 78 patients completed at least 1 year of OCA with significant decrease in alkaline phosphatase of 81.3 U/L, ALT 22.1 U/L and bilirubin 0.12 mg/dL, and 29.5% (23 out of 78) achieved response according to the POISE criteria. Final results of the 5-year POISE long-term safety extension in 193 patients showed the response rate for the POISE primary endpoint was 63% at Month 72, with the most common treatment-emergent adverse event pruritus (70%), while treatment-induced pruritus was the leading cause of OCA discontinuation (67%) in real-world experience.
Over the past five years, the therapeutic arsenal has expanded with the arrival of selective PPAR agonists. Seladelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPAR-δ) agonist, and elafibranor, a dual PPAR-α/δ agonist, have both recently received FDA accelerated approval after demonstrating significant improvements in ALP, biochemical response rates, and pruritus relief in phase 3 trials. In the phase III ELATIVE trial (NCT04526665), 161 patients were randomized 2:1 to elafibranor 80 mg or placebo, with 64.3% (18/28) and 10.7% (3/28) achieving biochemical response and alkaline phosphatase normalization at Week 104 versus no placebo-treated patients, and sustained biochemical improvements through three years with generally well tolerated profile. Fibrates including bezafibrate, fenofibrate and ciprofibrate added to UDCA have shown substantial alkaline phosphatase reductions, with overall response rates to fibrates varying from 39 to 60% and 39-76% at 12 and 24 months, while a systematic review and meta-analysis of eight RCTs (n = 515) showed beneficial effects of PPAR agonists compared with placebo for change in ALP level (SMD = -2.81), GGT level (SMD = -1.29) and TBil level (SMD = -0.77).
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] von Maltzahn R, Mayo MJ et al.. Relationship between pruritus and sleep in participants with primary biliary cholangitis in the Phase 2b GLIMMER trial. Journal of patient-reported outcomes. 2024 Jun 12. 38862718
- [2] Montano-Loza AJ, Corpechot C. Definition and Management of Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis and an Incomplete Response to Therapy. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2021 Nov. 32629125
- [3] Alvaro D, Calvaruso V et al.. Quality Measures to Enhance the Management and Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Delphi Consensus Study. Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver. 2025 Jun. 40318123
- [4] Kowdley KV, Bowlus CL et al.. Elafibranor in primary biliary cholangitis: Two-year placebo-controlled outcomes and long-term open-label data from the ELATIVE® phase III trial. Journal of hepatology. 2026 Aug 27. 42660235
- [5] Jamal F, Elshaer A et al.. Second-Line Therapies in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Comparative Review of Obeticholic Acid, Fibrates, Seladelpar, and Elafibranor. Biomedicines. 2025 Sep 24. 41153623
- [6] Men X, Liu Y et al.. The Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Time for Personalized Medicine. Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology. 2025 Jul 12. 40646392
- [7] Cançado GGL, Couto CA et al.. Fibrates for the Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis Unresponsive to Ursodeoxycholic Acid: An Exploratory Study. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2021. 35126149
- [8] Cazzagon N, Floreani A. Primary biliary cholangitis: treatment. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2021 Mar 1. 33492001
- [9] Yu K, Li P et al.. Decreased infiltration of CD4(+) Th1 cells indicates a good response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in primary biliary cholangitis. Pathology, research and practice. 2021 Jan. 33249399
- [10] Martins A, Khakoo NS et al.. Meta-Analysis: PPAR Agonists for Pruritus and Quality of Life in Primary Biliary Cholangitis. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2026 May. 41869905
- [11] Gelhorn H, Currie BM et al.. Psychometric validation of the Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) and other patient-reported outcome measures for assessing severity and impact of pruritus in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 2025 Jul 31. 40745549
- [12] Levy C, Jones DEJ et al.. Seladelpar Improved Itch, Itch-Related Sleep Disturbance and Measures of Fatigue in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Pruritus in the Phase 3 RESPONSE Trial. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2026 Jul. 41933275
- [13] Yao Y, Xu Z et al.. Pathological features of biopsy in autoimmune liver disease: a report of 109 cases. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology. 2017. 31966767
- [14] Chwa K, Aung S et al.. The Autoimmune Gender Gap: A Rare Case of a Male Patient With Overlapping Autoimmune Hepatitis and Primary Biliary Cholangitis. Cureus. 2024 Jun. 38938909
- [15] Marenco-Flores A, Rojas Amaris N et al.. The External Validation of GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores for Predicting Ursodeoxycholic Acid Treatment Response in a Large U.S. Cohort of Primary Biliary Cholangitis Patients. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024 Aug 1. 39124763
- [16] D'Amato D, De Vincentis A et al.. Real-world experience with obeticholic acid in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology. 2021 Apr. 33681748
- [17] Hegade VS, Kendrick SF et al.. Effect of ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor GSK2330672 on pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, phase 2a study. Lancet (London, England). 2017 Mar 18. 28187915
- [18] Fiorucci S, Urbani G et al.. Obeticholic Acid and Other Farnesoid-X-Receptor (FXR) Agonists in the Treatment of Liver Disorders. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2025 Sep 22. 41011291
- [19] Tan JJ, Lytvyak E et al.. Prevalence and clinical impact of hepatic steatosis on autoimmune liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology communications. 2026 May 1. 42043878
- [20] Cortez-Pinto H, Liberal R et al.. Predictors for incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis. Data from a national registry of liver disease. United European gastroenterology journal. 2021 Jul. 34102008
Contact Us
Address
350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901
For General Inquiry
info@pienomial.com










