Second TYK2 Posts Deep Week-16 Clearance But Faces Payer Least-Cost Trap
Clinical Trial Updates

Second TYK2 Posts Deep Week-16 Clearance But Faces Payer Least-Cost Trap

Published : 04 Nov 2026

The Overview
InventisBio's tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, nomelcitinib, has achieved positive results in a pivotal China-based Phase III study (NCT07130604) for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The trial, involving 391 patients, met its primary endpoint with over 70% of patients on nomelcitinib achieving at least a 90% improvement in psoriasis area and severity at week 16. Additionally, over 80% were deemed 'clear' or 'almost clear' by Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) versus placebo, demonstrating rapid response and a favorable safety profile. This success positions nomelcitinib in an increasingly competitive psoriasis market, with InventisBio also conducting a head-to-head Phase III trial against BMS' Sotyktu and a Phase II trial in the US.
Knolens Analysis

InventisBio's nomelcitinib met its China pivotal NCT07130604 primary at week 16 in 391 patients with over 70% achieving at least 90% improvement and over 80% rated clear or almost clear by Physician's Global Assessment versus placebo, a higher clearance bar than the PASI 75 and static Physician Global Assessment 0 or 1 co-primaries that supported deucravacitinib. [1][2] The signal gains credibility because deucravacitinib, an oral selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor dosed 6 mg once daily, already proved the pathway in POETYK-PSO-1 with 666 patients and POETYK-PSO-2 with 1020 patients, with PASI 75 of 58.4% and 53.0% and PASI 90 of 27.0% to 35.5% at week 16 versus placebo and apremilast 30 mg twice daily. [2] InventisBio is running a head-to-head Phase III against BMS Sotyktu and a Phase II in the US, directly anticipating active-comparator expectations set by icotrokinra ADVANCE programs using deucravacitinib as control. [3] Payer precedent is restrictive: NICE TA907 of 28 June 2023 limited deucravacitinib to fourth-line PASI 10 or more and DLQI more than 10 after ciclosporin, methotrexate and phototherapy failure with PASI 50 and PASI 75 stopping rules, CADTH recommended do not reimburse after finding dominance by adalimumab with 5,512 dollars incremental costs and 0.027 fewer QALYs, and G-BA found additional benefit not proven versus biologics. [1][2] China-only placebo data without 24-week durability, long-term extension, or detailed safety cannot support broad filing and leaves premium pricing exposed to least-expensive-option selection.

NCT07130604 Phase 3 RCT met week-16 PASI 90-level and PGA endpoints in 391 patients versus placebo, but without active-comparator, durability or detailed safety to match POETYK precedent. [4][2]

At a Glance
Indicationmoderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis
Drugnomelcitinib
Mechanism of ActionTYK2 inhibitor
CompanyInventisBio
Trial PhasePhase III
NCT IDNCT07130604
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaImmunology
Patient Population Size391
Primary Endpoint AchievementOver 70% of patients achieved at least a 90% improvement in psoriasis area and severity at week 16
PGA Response RateOver 80% of patients achieved 'clear' or 'almost clear' of psoriasis by Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA)
Trial LocationChina, US
Primary Endpoint Follow-up16 weeks
Plaque Psoriasis Market Forecast$30.1 billion by 2030
Comparator Drug (Future Trial)Sotyktu (deucravacitinib)
Key Competitor DrugsSkyrizi (risankizumab), Cosentyx (secukinumab), Stelara (ustekinumab), Icotyde (icotrokinra), zasocitinib, envudeucitinib

InventisBio's Nomelcitinib Achieves Phase III Success in Psoriasis

InventisBio's tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, nomelcitinib, has achieved positive results in a pivotal China-based Phase III study (NCT07130604) for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The trial, involving 391 patients, met its primary endpoint with over 70% of patients on nomelcitinib achieving at least a 90% improvement in psoriasis area and severity at week 16. Additionally, over 80% were deemed 'clear' or 'almost clear' by Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) versus placebo, demonstrating rapid response and a favorable safety profile. This success positions nomelcitinib in an increasingly competitive psoriasis market, with InventisBio also conducting a head-to-head Phase III trial against BMS' Sotyktu and a Phase II trial in the US.

  • Nomelcitinib demonstrated significant efficacy in its primary endpoint, with over 70% of patients across both treatment groups achieving at least a 90% improvement in the area and severity of their psoriasis at week 16. Furthermore, a significantly higher percentage (>80%) of patients taking the drug were rated 'clear' or 'almost clear' of psoriasis by researchers using the Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) compared to placebo.
  • The JH2-selective TYK2 inhibitor exhibited a rapid onset of action, showing significant improvements in psoriasis severity and symptoms as early as week four. Importantly, the drug was found to be safe and tolerable, with researchers identifying no new safety signals associated with its use in the studied patient population.
  • InventisBio is strategically advancing nomelcitinib in a highly competitive psoriasis market, which is projected to reach $30.1 billion by 2030. Following this positive data, the company is awaiting results from a second China-based Phase III trial comparing nomelcitinib head-to-head with Bristol Myers Squibb’s marketed TYK2 inhibitor, Sotyktu (deucravacitinib), and is also conducting a Phase II psoriasis trial in the US.

Nomelcitinib's Pivotal Phase III Outcomes in Plaque Psoriasis

The Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an international, prospective, non-interventional study comparing biologic classes in moderate-to-severe psoriasis, with effectiveness assessed by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 and PASI100 response rates and durability defined as achieving therapeutic response at week 12 and its maintenance at months 6, 12, 18 and 24. Patients treated with anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics had significantly higher odds of achieving PASI100 and PASI90 compared to those treated with anti-IL-12/23 and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α biologics. At 24 months, ixekizumab (IXE) showed greater PASI100 and PASI90 response rates compared to adalimumab (ADA) and ustekinumab (UST), with adjusted odds ratios of 1.9 and 2.3 for PASI100 and 2.0 and 2.5 for PASI90, respectively, and IXE-treated patients exhibited higher durability rates for PASI100 and PASI90 compared to ADA, UST, secukinumab (SEC), tildrakizumab (TILD) and guselkumab (GUS), with adjusted odds ratios (non-responder imputation [NRI]) between 1.7 and 4.3 (PASI100) and 1.6 and 4.2 (PASI90), while being similar to risankizumab (RIS).

Long-term guselkumab efficacy was evaluated in pooled post hoc analyses of the pivotal Phase 3 VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies, in which patients were randomized to guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks, placebo with week 16 crossover to guselkumab, or adalimumab with week 52 crossover to guselkumab or week 28-76 randomized withdrawal/re-treatment, followed by open-label guselkumab through week 252. At all assessment timepoints from weeks 100-252, Investigator's Global Assessment of cleared/minimal (IGA 0/1) and PASI 90 responses were similar by baseline PASI <20 vs ≥20 (IGA 0/1: 82.0%-85.4% vs 81.1%-81.4%; PASI 90: 78.6%-81.1% vs 81.4%-83.8%), IGA=3 vs =4, body surface area (BSA; <20% vs ≥20%), prior phototherapy, prior nonbiologic use, and prior biologic use. Complementary real-world data come from PERSIST, a prospective, non-interventional, German multicentre study of guselkumab, in which mean PASI score decreased from 16.4 at baseline to 3.0 by Week 28 and to 2.4 by W52, the proportion achieving absolute PASI score of ≤1 increased from 1.3% at baseline to 50.8% at W28 and to 58.4% by W52, mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score decreased from 13.7 to 2.8 by W28 and to 2.4 by W52, cumulative probability of drug survival was 92.4% at W52, and no new safety signals were observed.

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, was evaluated in the global phase 3 trial POETYK PSO-1 (NCT03624127), with a reported subgroup analysis of Japanese patients (N=66) randomized to deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily (n=32), placebo (n=17), or apremilast 30 mg twice daily (n=17). The proportion achieving ≥75% reduction from baseline in PASI (PASI 75) was numerically higher with deucravacitinib versus placebo and apremilast at Week 16 (78.1% vs. 11.8% and 23.5%, respectively) and versus apremilast at Week 24 (78.1% vs. 29.4%), and static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1) was 75.0% vs. 11.8% and 35.3% at Week 16 and 75.0% vs. 29.4% at Week 24, with response rates maintained through 52 weeks. Incidence rates for adverse events per 100 person-years (PY) were comparable across groups through Week 52 (deucravacitinib, 336.8/100 PY; placebo, 321.0/100 PY; apremilast, 358.6/100 PY), with nasopharyngitis as the most frequently reported adverse event with deucravacitinib.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the mechanism of action of nomelcitinib in treating plaque psoriasis?
Nomelcitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. It selectively targets specific JAK pathways involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases like psoriasis. By modulating these intracellular signaling pathways, nomelcitinib aims to reduce the inflammatory cascade that drives psoriatic lesions.
Which patient populations might benefit most from nomelcitinib for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis?
Nomelcitinib is being developed for adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy. It may be particularly relevant for patients who have not achieved adequate control with conventional systemic treatments or biologics, or those seeking an oral treatment option. Its profile could offer an alternative for individuals requiring effective disease management.
What are the expected efficacy outcomes for nomelcitinib in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis?
Nomelcitinib is anticipated to demonstrate significant improvements in skin clearance, as measured by established clinical endpoints such as PASI scores. Patients can expect reductions in erythema, induration, and desquamation, leading to overall disease control. The goal is to provide sustained clinical responses and improve patients' quality of life.
What are the primary safety and tolerability considerations associated with nomelcitinib for plaque psoriasis?
As with other JAK inhibitors, potential safety considerations for nomelcitinib include risks of infection, hematologic abnormalities, and cardiovascular events. Close monitoring of laboratory parameters and patient symptoms is typically recommended during treatment. The overall tolerability profile is a key factor in its clinical utility.

References

  1. [1] Paller AS, Seyger MMB et al.. Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Up to 108 Weeks of Ixekizumab in Pediatric Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: The IXORA-PEDS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA dermatology. 2022 May 1. 35416908
  2. [2] Travaglini M, Maul JT et al.. Effectiveness of Biologics, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Clinical Photography in a Subset of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Week 12 Results from the Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO). Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2023. 37881205
  3. [3] Griffiths CE, Girolomoni G. Does p40-targeted therapy represent a significant evolution in the management of plaque psoriasis?. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2012 Aug. 22758911
  4. [4] Pinter A, Brnabic A et al.. Comparative Effectiveness and Durability of Biologics Through 24 Months for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Results from the International, Observational Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO). Dermatology and therapy. 2025 Oct. 40699538
  5. [5] Blauvelt A, Muram TM et al.. Improvements in psoriasis within different body regions vary over time following treatment with ixekizumab. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2018 May. 28792259
  6. [6] Gerdes S, Asadullah K et al.. Real-world evidence from the non-interventional, prospective, German multicentre PERSIST study of patients with psoriasis after 1 year of treatment with guselkumab. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2022 Sep. 35569014
  7. [7] Ghaffar F, Hassan A et al.. A Rare Case of Blastomycosis in a Psoriasis Patient Treated With Ustekinumab (Stelara). Clinical case reports. 2025 Oct. 41040820
  8. [8] Chatzimichail G, Günther J et al.. Drug survival of secukinumab, ustekinumab, and certolizumab pegol in psoriasis: a 2-year, monocentric, retrospective study. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2022 May. 33430676
  9. [9] Imafuku S, Tada Y et al.. Efficacy and safety of the selective TYK2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, global phase 3 trial. The Journal of dermatology. 2023 May. 36882942
  10. [10] Deodhar A, Gottlieb AB et al.. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet (London, England). 2018 Jun 2. 29893222
  11. [11] Dodero-Anillo JM, Fernandez-Pujol-Marzo M et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Real-World Evidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026 May 11. 42194652
  12. [12] Pinter A, Eyerich K et al.. Association of disease duration and PASI response rates at week 12 in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis receiving biologics in the real-world psoriasis study of health outcomes (PSoHO). The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2024 Dec. 38797734
  13. [13] Herranz-Pinto P, Alonso-Pacheco ML et al.. Real-world Performance of a New Strategy for Off-Label Use of Guselkumab in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Super-Responder Patients as the Epitome of Efficacy and Optimisation. Clinical drug investigation. 2023 Jul. 37402097
  14. [14] Jin JQ, Spencer RK et al.. Clinical Utility of Deucravacitinib for the Management of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Therapeutics and clinical risk management. 2023. 37223005
  15. [15] Pinter A, Puig L et al.. Comparative effectiveness of biologics in clinical practice: week 12 primary outcomes from an international observational psoriasis study of health outcomes (PSoHO). Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2022 Nov. 35766124
  16. [16] B Gordon K, F Merola J et al.. Guselkumab Efficacy by Psoriasis Disease Severity and Treatment History: VOYAGE 1 and 2 Post Hoc Analyses. Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD. 2025 Feb 1. 39913230
  17. [17] Carrera CG, Dapavo P et al.. PACE study: real-life Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 100 response with biological agents in moderate-severe psoriasis. The Journal of dermatological treatment. 2018 Aug. 29058948
  18. [18] Wang J, Li P. Baseline Clinical and Metabolic Predictors of 52-Week Durability of Secukinumab Response in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2026. 41799428
  19. [19] Lebwohl M, Song EJ et al.. Real-world Evidence of Brodalumab Safety for the Treatment of Psoriasis. Journal of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. 2025 Oct 24. 41142137
  20. [20] Mease PJ, Hatemi G et al.. Apremilast Long-Term Safety Up to 5 Years from 15 Pooled Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Behçet's Syndrome. American journal of clinical dermatology. 2023 Sep. 37316690

Contact Us

📍

Address

350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts