Sanofi’s decision to discontinue development of itepekimab and amlitelimab is a data-driven move that correctly prioritizes capital allocation, even if it means abandoning assets with isolated positive signals. The case for halting the itepekimab program in COPD is particularly clear: its Phase 2a trial (NCT03546907) missed its primary endpoint on exacerbation reduction in the overall population (RR 0.81, p=0.13). [1] Advancing a costly Phase 3 program based solely on a prespecified subgroup signal in former smokers (RR 0.58) represented a significant regulatory and commercial gamble. [1] Similarly, amlitelimab's path in atopic dermatitis was clouded by inconsistent Phase 2 data, including an inverted dose-response in its Phase 2a study. Committing to Phase 3 would have been a high-risk challenge against Sanofi’s own market leader, Dupixent, and emerging JAK inhibitors like abrocitinib and upadacitinib, which network meta-analyses suggest may offer superior efficacy. [2][3] This strategic pivot, while resulting in a €952 million impairment, frees resources to defend Dupixent by addressing its own evidence gaps, such as the severe underrepresentation of older adults (4% in trials) and the lack of long-term head-to-head data. The decision aligns with the common portfolio management precedent of not pursuing high-risk, subgroup-defined programs after a primary endpoint failure in a broader population.
Itepekimab missed its primary endpoint in the overall COPD population (p=0.13), with a signal only in a subgroup. [1] Amlitelimab showed an inconsistent and inverted dose-response across Phase 2 studies, elevating Phase 3 risk. [4]
| Indication | Atopic Dermatitis |
| Drug | amlitelimab |
| Company | Sanofi |
| Trial Phase | Phase 3 |
| Category | Clinical Trial Event |
| Sub Category | Trial Halted / Terminated |
| Therapeutic Area | Immunology |
| CEO | Belén Garijo |
| Impairment Loss | €952 million ($1.1 billion) |
| Q2 Net Sales | €11.6 billion ($13.3 billion) |
| Dupixent Q2 Sales | €5.2 billion ($6 billion) |
| Dupixent Patent Cliff Year | 2031 |
| 2026 Sales Guidance | Around 10% growth at constant currencies |
| Discontinued Assets | amlitelimab (atopic dermatitis trials), itepekimab, balinatunfib |
| Quarter Reported | Q2 2026 |
Sanofi CEO Refocuses Pipeline Strategy
Sanofi's new CEO, Belén Garijo, is implementing a rigorous portfolio prioritization initiative to ensure more judicious decisions for late-stage development. This strategy emphasizes a "realistic view" of asset potential and data-driven choices to justify significant capital commitments for Phase 3 advancement. This strategic shift follows recent pipeline adjustments, including the discontinuation of most amlitelimab atopic dermatitis trials, itepekimab for COPD, and balinatunfib for psoriasis, resulting in a €952 million ($1.1 billion) impairment loss. Despite these changes, Sanofi reported strong Q2 2026 financial results, with net sales increasing 17.8% to €11.6 billion, largely driven by Dupixent, and subsequently raised its full-year 2026 sales guidance.
- Sanofi's new CEO, Belén Garijo, is instituting a "very rigorous portfolio prioritization process" to critically evaluate late-stage assets. The goal is to adopt a more "realistic view" of potential, ensuring that only candidates with robust Phase 1b or Phase 2 data, justifying substantial capital investment, progress to Phase 3. This strategic shift aims to optimize the pipeline's risk profile and long-term value creation, moving away from a target-number approach for discontinuations towards scientific merit.
- The company recently announced the discontinuation of most clinical studies for amlitelimab in atopic dermatitis, retaining only a celiac disease study. Additionally, Sanofi ceased development of the IL-33 blocker itepekimab, which showed mixed Phase 3 data in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the oral TNFR inhibitor balinatunfib, which failed to significantly ease psoriasis severity in a Phase 2 trial. These pipeline adjustments led to a significant €952 million ($1.1 billion) impairment loss recorded in the second quarter.
- Sanofi reported a strong financial performance for Q2 2026, with net sales increasing by 17.8% year-on-year to €11.6 billion ($13.3 billion). This growth was significantly propelled by Dupixent, which saw sales surge 37.6% to nearly €5.2 billion ($6 billion), accounting for approximately half of the company's Q2 revenue. Following this performance, Sanofi raised its 2026 sales guidance, now expecting around 10% growth at constant currencies, up from its previous high-single-digit projection, despite the anticipated Dupixent patent cliff in 2031.
Amlitelimab's Remaining Clinical Focus Beyond Atopic Dermatitis
Beyond atopic dermatitis, amlitelimab's development program extends into rheumatology with a focus on systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). The anti-OX40L monoclonal antibody is a key investigational agent in the CONQUEST trial (NCT06195072), which is notably the first platform clinical trial to be conducted in the rheumatology field.
The CONQUEST study is a Phase 2b, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled platform trial. Its intervention model is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of multiple investigational products, including amlitelimab, against a placebo for early active SSc-ILD.
The primary objective is to evaluate the change from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC, in mL) at Week 52. Key secondary objectives include assessing changes in lung involvement via high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), dyspnoea, and overall treatment response using the revised composite response index in diffuse systemic sclerosis (rCRISS).
Amlitelimab (also known as SAR445229 and KY1005) is described as a nondepleting anti-OX40 ligand monoclonal antibody. Its inclusion in the trial is supported by a strong scientific rationale for its potential to modify underlying disease processes in systemic sclerosis.
Sponsored by the Scleroderma Research Foundation, this global trial began recruitment on April 15, 2024. The study plans to enroll patients across more than 150 centers in over 25 countries.
Addressing Persistent Unmet Needs in Atopic Dermatitis Treatment
Despite recent therapeutic advances for atopic dermatitis (AD), significant unmet needs persist for specific patient populations. Research over the last three years has increasingly focused on characterizing these underserved groups and refining treatment strategies for those with high disease burden, significant comorbidities, or involvement of difficult-to-treat body areas.
Severe and Refractory Disease: A key focus is on patients with severe, refractory AD, who often show inadequate symptom control with topical therapies and require potent systemic options. This population includes individuals with co-occurring conditions like hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) who may demonstrate a limited response to existing biologics, highlighting the need for novel strategies such as JAK inhibitors.
High-Burden Anatomical Locations: Patients with AD affecting high-burden areas—specifically the head, neck, hands, and genitals—are increasingly recognized as a distinct, difficult-to-treat subgroup. This presentation is associated with greater overall disease severity and warrants closer monitoring and earlier consideration of advanced systemic therapy.
Pediatric and Adolescent Patients: Younger patients with moderate-to-severe AD face a high burden of symptoms, including intense itch and significant psychosocial impacts such as anxiety and embarrassment. Unmet needs in this group also include improved diagnostic approaches to differentiate severe AD from conditions with similar presentations, like hyper-IgE syndrome (HIES), particularly in children with serum IgE levels exceeding 2000 IU/mL.
Systemic Inflammatory and Comorbidity Burden: There is a growing emphasis on managing patients with multiple type 2 inflammatory comorbidities, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, and refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). This approach targets the interconnected, systemic nature of atopic conditions and addresses patients who may have a partial or no response to existing treatments for their comorbidities.
Standardization and Cost-Effectiveness: A critical need exists for standardized definitions of treatment response and inadequate response, particularly for topical corticosteroids, to reduce heterogeneity in clinical practice and improve clinical trial design. This is coupled with a demand for more long-term efficacy and safety evidence, better integration of patient-reported outcomes, and the development of cost-effective systemic treatments for the large population of adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe disease.
Other Therapies Targeting Amlitelimab's Mechanism in Atopic Dermatitis
Amlitelimab, a fully human nondepleting monoclonal antibody targeting OX40 ligand on antigen-presenting cells, is one of three OX40-OX40L inhibitors currently under phase II evaluation for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Rocatinlimab and telazorlimab share this same mechanism of action, though detailed intervention model data for these two agents were not available in the reviewed literature. Amlitelimab's trial design, by contrast, is well characterized and outlined below.
| Drug | Mechanism of Action | Trial Phase | Intervention Model | Enrollment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amlitelimab | Fully human nondepleting mAb targeting OX40 ligand on APCs | Phase 2b (NCT05131477) | 2-part, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Part 1: 1:1:1:1:1 randomization to subcutaneous amlitelimab (250 mg + 500 mg loading dose, 250 mg, 125 mg, or 62.5 mg) every 4 weeks, or placebo, for 24 weeks. Part 2: Clinical responders reallocated 3:1 to discontinue amlitelimab or continue prior dose regimen for 28 weeks. Primary endpoint: % change in EASI from baseline to week 16. Total duration: 52 weeks | 390 (Part 1); 190 (Part 2) |
| Rocatinlimab | OX40-OX40L inhibitor | Phase II | Not specified | Not specified |
| Telazorlimab | OX40-OX40L inhibitor | Phase II | Not specified | Not specified |
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Khanna D, Evnin LB et al.. Design of CONQUEST, a novel, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 2b platform clinical trial to investigate new treatments for patients with early active systemic sclerosis with interstitial lung disease. Journal of scleroderma and related disorders. 2025 Jun. 39544897
- [2] Cai W, Fu L et al.. Efficacy and Safety of All Monoclonal Antibodies in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2025 Dec. 41346302
- [3] Reich A, Blauvelt A et al.. A Post Hoc Analysis of Atopic Dermatitis of the Head and Neck and Other Body Regions from the Amlitelimab STREAM-AD Phase 2b Study. Dermatology and therapy. 2026 Jan. 41359216
- [4] Hughes M, McMahan ZH et al.. Advancing drug development for systemic sclerosis by prioritizing findings from human genetic association studies. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2026 Mar 5. 41689177
- [5] Gupta AK, Steriopoulos J et al.. OX40/OX40L modulation: A target for regulating T cells in cutaneous inflammatory disorders. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2026 Apr 11. 41964298
- [6] Sood S, Devani AR et al.. OX40 Ligand Inhibitors for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Review of Phase II Clinical Trial Data. Skin therapy letter. 2025 Nov. 41370848
- [7] Zuberbier T, Abuzakouk M et al.. The definition of response and inadequate response to topical corticosteroid treatment in atopic dermatitis and related skin inflammatory diseases: A GA(2)LEN ADCARE statement paper. The World Allergy Organization journal. 2026 May. 42028244
- [8] Gouia I, Joulain F et al.. Epidemiology of Childhood Asthma in the UK. Journal of asthma and allergy. 2024. 39588158
- [9] Rønnstad ATM, Nielsen ML et al.. Epidemiology of Adult Atopic Dermatitis in High-Burden Skin Areas: Results From a Cross-Sectional Patient Survey. Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug. 2026 Feb 3. 41634925
- [10] Castagnoli R, Pecoraro L et al.. Non-syndromic hyper-IgE in children: A practical approach. The World Allergy Organization journal. 2026 Mar. 41798765
- [11] Grindley R, Houde L et al.. Tralokinumab as a cost-saving treatment option for adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis enrolled in US health insurance plans: a budget impact analysis. Journal of comparative effectiveness research. 2026 Jul. 42262262
- [12] Martora F, Megna M et al.. Real-World Experience with Upadacitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Dual-Center Case Series. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2026. 41909532
- [13] Smiley K, Galli L et al.. Clinical characteristics, type 2 comorbidities, and treatment responses in pediatric and adult chronic spontaneous urticaria: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. Allergy and asthma proceedings. 2026 May 1. 42050840
- [14] Parchão A, Monteiro C et al.. Herpes Zoster in Patients Treated with JAK Inhibitors for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Incidence, Associated Factors and Vaccination Uptake in a Real-World Cohort. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026 May 13. 42194695
- [15] Eichenfield LF, Shi VY et al.. Patient-Reported Impact of Atopic Dermatitis on Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Disease: Results of a Real-World, Cross-Sectional Survey. Pediatric dermatology. 2025 May-Jun. 40254467
- [16] Kawana Y, Suga H et al.. Roles of OX40 and OX40 Ligand in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021 Nov 22. 34830466
- [17] Weidinger S, Blauvelt A et al.. Phase 2b randomized clinical trial of amlitelimab, an anti-OX40 ligand antibody, in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2025 Apr. 39522654
Contact Us
Address
One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850
For General Inquiry
info@pienomial.com

















