Roche’s fenebrutinib significantly reduced relapses versus standard of care to approximately one every 17 years in RMS
Clinical Trial Updates

Roche’s fenebrutinib significantly reduced relapses versus standard of care to approximately one every 17 years in RMS

Published : 22 Apr 2026

At a Glance
IndicationRelapsing Multiple Sclerosis
DrugFenebrutinib
Mechanism of ActionBTK inhibitor
CompanyRoche
Trial PhasePhase III
Trial AcronymFENhance 1, FENhance 2
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Primary EndpointAnnualised Relapse Rate (ARR)
Secondary EndpointsTotal T1-gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesions, Total new and/or enlarging T2-weighted MRI lesions, Time to onset of 12-week composite confirmed disability progression (cCDP12), Time to onset of 24-week composite confirmed disability progression (cCDP24)
Comparator DrugTeriflunomide
ARR Reduction FENhance 151.1% (p<0.001)
ARR Reduction FENhance 258.5% (p<0.0001)
T1-Gd+ Lesion Reduction FENhance 170.7% (p<0.0001)
T1-Gd+ Lesion Reduction FENhance 277.6% (p<0.0001)
New/Enlarging T2 Lesion Reduction FENhance 176.0% (p<0.0001)
New/Enlarging T2 Lesion Reduction FENhance 282.5% (p<0.0001)
cCDP12 Risk Reduction FENhance 120% (HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.63-1.02)
cCDP12 Risk Reduction FENhance 213% (HR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.69-1.11)
Patient Population Size1,497
Follow-up DurationAt least 96 weeks
Conference Name2026 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Annual Meeting
Conference LocationChicago
Regulatory Submission StatusData will be submitted to regulatory authorities
Other Indication MentionedPrimary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS)

Roche's Fenebrutinib Significantly Reduces Relapses in RMS Phase 3 Trials

Roche announced positive Phase III FENhance 1 and 2 study results for fenebrutinib in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). The investigational non-covalent BTK inhibitor met its primary endpoint, significantly reducing the annualised relapse rate (ARR) by 51.1% in FENhance 1 and 58.5% in FENhance 2 compared to teriflunomide over 96 weeks. This translates to patients experiencing approximately one relapse every 17 years. Fenebrutinib also showed significant reductions in brain lesion activity and positive trends in reducing disability progression. The data supports fenebrutinib's potential as a high-efficacy oral treatment for RMS, with regulatory submissions planned for both RMS and PPMS data.

  • Fenebrutinib demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing relapses, achieving a 51.1% reduction in ARR in FENhance 1 (p<0.001) and 58.5% in FENhance 2 (p<0.0001) compared to teriflunomide. This translates to a substantial improvement, with patients experiencing approximately one relapse every 17 years, significantly extending relapse-free periods for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.
  • The studies showed fenebrutinib significantly reduced markers of active inflammation (new T1-Gd+ lesions) by 70.7% and 77.6% and chronic disease burden (new/enlarging T2 lesions) by 76.0% and 82.5% in FENhance 1 and 2, respectively (all p<0.0001). Additionally, positive trends were observed in reducing 12-week composite confirmed disability progression (cCDP12) by 20% and 13%.
  • Fenebrutinib exhibited a safety profile with liver enzyme elevations and infection rates comparable to teriflunomide. While an imbalance in fatalities was noted (7 in fenebrutinib vs 1 in teriflunomide), the overall data, including previous positive results in PPMS, positions fenebrutinib as a potential first-in-class, high-efficacy oral BTK inhibitor for both RMS and PPMS, with regulatory submissions anticipated.

Fenebrutinib's Superiority in Reducing RMS Relapses and Lesions

Recent clinical studies have demonstrated fenebrutinib's remarkable efficacy in controlling disease activity in relapsing multiple sclerosis. The FENopta phase 2 trial, a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study conducted across 18 centers in six countries, evaluated fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily versus placebo in 109 patients with relapsing MS. The study achieved its primary endpoint with a striking 69% relative reduction in new T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions at weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared to placebo (0.077 versus 0.245, p=0.0022). This BTK inhibitor demonstrated sustained efficacy during the open-label extension, with an unadjusted annualised relapse rate of only 0.04 through week 48, and 96% of patients remaining relapse-free.

The safety profile of fenebrutinib proved favorable throughout the study period. The most commonly reported adverse events in the fenebrutinib group included hepatic enzyme elevations (6% versus 0% placebo), headache (4% versus 3% placebo), and nasopharyngitis (3% versus 0% placebo). Notably, no serious adverse events or deaths occurred during the 12-week double-blind period, establishing fenebrutinib as a well-tolerated therapeutic option for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

These results position fenebrutinib as a promising oral therapy that delivers superior lesion reduction compared to placebo while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. The sustained low relapse rates observed during the extension phase further support its potential as an effective disease-modifying treatment for relapsing MS patients, with the convenience of oral administration offering advantages over intravenous therapies.

Fenebrutinib's Unique BTK Inhibition for MS

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors represent a promising novel therapeutic class for relapsing multiple sclerosis, targeting both B cells and microglia with dual immunomodulatory effects and central nervous system penetration. Fenebrutinib, a highly selective, noncovalent, reversible BTK inhibitor, demonstrated significant efficacy in the phase 2 FENopta trial conducted across 18 centers in Europe and North America. In this randomized controlled study of 109 patients, fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily achieved a 69% relative reduction in new T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions compared to placebo (p=0.0022), with sustained effects through the open-label extension where 96% of patients remained relapse-free at week 48. The safety profile was favorable, with hepatic enzyme elevations, headache, and nasopharyngitis as the most common adverse events, and no serious adverse events or deaths reported.

Other emerging BTK inhibitors show similar promise, with tolebrutinib demonstrating dose-dependent efficacy in reducing gadolinium-enhancing and T2 lesions at optimal doses of 60 mg daily, while evobrutinib showed dose-dependent decreases in serum neurofilament light levels and relapse rates with twice-daily dosing. Meta-analysis data comparing BTK inhibitors to teriflunomide across four randomized controlled trials involving 4,136 participants revealed that BTK inhibitors reduced the risk of 3-month confirmed disability worsening (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67-0.97) while maintaining comparable annualized relapse rates and serious adverse event profiles.

Ninjurin-1 (nerve injury-induced protein 1) has emerged as a novel therapeutic target, identified as a key mediator of immune activation and CNS infiltration in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis models of relapsing-remitting MS. This adhesion molecule is markedly upregulated on CNS-infiltrating myeloid cells during disease progression, with Ninjurin-1+ myeloid cells displaying dual functionality as both adhesion molecules and inflammatory activation markers. These cells demonstrate increased antigen presentation, cytokine production, and transcriptional enrichment for genes regulating adhesion, migration, and innate immune signaling. Therapeutic blockade of Ninjurin-1 significantly reduced clinical severity, CNS immune infiltration, and demyelination in preclinical models, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target for myeloid-driven neuroinflammation in relapsing-remitting MS.

Assessing Fenebrutinib's Safety and Tolerability Profile

Published safety and tolerability data for fenebrutinib across multiple indications demonstrates a generally favorable profile compared to other BTK inhibitors. Clinical studies spanning rheumatoid arthritis, chronic spontaneous urticaria, systemic lupus erythematosus, and multiple sclerosis provide evidence of acceptable tolerability, though some dose-dependent hepatic effects have been observed.

Most common adverse events include nausea, headache, anemia, and upper respiratory tract infections, with an overall safety profile consistent with existing immunomodulatory therapies for rheumatoid arthritis

Hepatic safety considerations emerged in chronic spontaneous urticaria trials, where asymptomatic, reversible grade 2 and 3 liver transaminase elevations occurred in patients receiving fenebrutinib 150 mg daily and 200 mg twice daily (2 patients in each group)

Cardiovascular safety profile appears favorable, with cardiac safety studies in multiple sclerosis patients showing both therapeutic (400 mg) and supratherapeutic (700 mg) doses had no clinically meaningful impact on QT interval and maximum observed ΔQTcF values of 5.3 ms and 8.2 ms respectively

Notable absence of bleeding complications distinguishes fenebrutinib from irreversible BTK inhibitors like ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and tirabrutinib, with no bleeding events reported across clinical trials

Drug interaction safety was demonstrated in combination with methotrexate, where fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily plus methotrexate 7.5 mg showed no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions and was well tolerated in healthy subjects

Dose-dependent tolerability patterns were observed in systemic lupus erythematosus studies, where serious adverse events occurred more frequently with fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily compared to 150 mg once daily or placebo

Addressing Persistent Unmet Needs in Relapsing MS

Recent literature identifies several critical areas where relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) treatment remains inadequate despite therapeutic advances. While current disease-modifying therapies effectively reduce relapse frequency, significant gaps persist in addressing disease progression, neurodegeneration, and long-term outcomes. The field is actively targeting specific patient populations and therapeutic challenges that represent the most pressing unmet medical needs.

Progressive disease components remain inadequately addressed, as current DMTs rarely stop long-term progression or repair neurological damage, with relapse-independent progression continuing despite reduced inflammatory activity

Long-term efficacy and safety data beyond two years is insufficient for chronic disease management, creating uncertainty about decades-long treatment strategies and optimal therapeutic duration

Neurodegeneration and brain atrophy persist even with effective anti-inflammatory treatments, particularly in secondary progressive MS patients who show higher baseline atrophy rates (61.1% vs 25.0% in RRMS patients)

Treatment-naïve patients represent a critical target population (59.7% of real-world cohorts), with early initiation of high-efficacy DMTs showing significant clinical impact on long-term disability outcomes

Patients requiring treatment switches due to breakthrough disease activity or safety/tolerability issues need optimized sequencing strategies, as treatment effectiveness decreases with later therapy lines

Resource-poor settings lack access to approved therapies, necessitating research into off-label alternatives like rituximab biosimilars, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil despite regulatory and payer barriers

Patient-relevant outcomes including quality of life, cognitive status, and sex/gender-specific treatment effects require greater research focus beyond traditional clinical measures

A New Oral Frontier in Multiple Sclerosis Therapy

The recent positive Phase III results for fenebrutinib mark a significant moment in the treatment landscape for multiple sclerosis, particularly for patients with relapsing forms. The investigational non-covalent BTK inhibitor demonstrated a substantial reduction in annualised relapse rates, exceeding 50% compared to an active comparator, alongside improvements in brain lesion activity and positive trends in reducing disability progression. This robust efficacy, coupled with its oral administration, positions fenebrutinib as a potentially transformative option, offering both convenience and potent disease control. The planned regulatory submissions for both relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) underscore a strategic ambition to address a broad spectrum of patient needs, potentially establishing fenebrutinib as a foundational therapy across the disease continuum. This broad applicability could significantly enhance its market penetration and impact.

However, as with any novel therapeutic agent, a comprehensive understanding of its long-term safety profile will be paramount. While the current data highlights efficacy, the broader literature on novel therapies in other indications suggests the importance of vigilance for rare, severe adverse events. For instance, therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) have been observed as a rare complication with other novel agents, characterized by specific cytogenetic aberrations such as complex karyotypes, del7q/-7, and del5q/-5, and molecular alterations like TP53 mutations. The latency period for such complications can extend over several years, with some cases emerging within two years, emphasizing the need for sustained, long-term safety surveillance in the post-marketing phase. This vigilance is crucial to fully characterize the benefit-risk profile in a real-world setting.

The successful development of fenebrutinib could also have broader implications for the BTK inhibitor class, further validating its potential in neuroinflammatory conditions. This success may spur additional research and development efforts into similar mechanisms, potentially expanding the therapeutic arsenal for multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases. As the pharmaceutical industry continues to innovate, balancing high efficacy with a favorable safety profile remains a critical challenge, and ongoing monitoring will be essential to fully characterize fenebrutinib's role in patient care and its long-term impact on the MS treatment paradigm.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is fenebrutinib better than ocrevus?
Fenebrutinib is an investigational oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, whereas Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) is an approved anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody for multiple sclerosis. Direct comparative superiority of fenebrutinib over Ocrevus has not been established in head-to-head trials. Fenebrutinib's ongoing Phase 3 trials aim to demonstrate its efficacy and safety, potentially offering an alternative mechanism of action and administration route for MS patients.
Is fenebrutinib associated with MS or multiple sclerosis?
Fenebrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, is currently under investigation in clinical trials for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. It is being evaluated in Phase 3 studies for both relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). Therefore, fenebrutinib is associated with MS as an investigational therapeutic agent.
What is fenebrutinib's mechanism of action in relapsing multiple sclerosis?
Fenebrutinib is an oral, reversible, non-covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Its mechanism involves blocking BTK, a crucial enzyme in B-cell receptor signaling and Fc receptor pathways in myeloid cells. This inhibition aims to modulate both B-cell and myeloid cell activity, which are implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. By targeting these immune cells, fenebrutinib seeks to reduce inflammation and neurodegeneration characteristic of RMS.
What is the therapeutic potential of fenebrutinib for relapsing multiple sclerosis?
As an oral BTK inhibitor, fenebrutinib offers a novel approach to treating relapsing multiple sclerosis by targeting both B-cell and myeloid cell-mediated inflammation. Its potential lies in providing a convenient, disease-modifying therapy that could offer efficacy across various aspects of MS pathology, including reducing relapse rates and potentially slowing disability progression. The reversible and non-covalent binding profile may also contribute to a differentiated safety and tolerability profile. This mechanism could address both peripheral and central nervous system inflammation, a key advantage in MS treatment.

References

  1. [1] Zivlaei N, Asani DC et al.. Virus-specific antibody responses in multiple sclerosis patients treated with Ocrevus. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2025 Jul 15. 40398376
  2. [2] Ziccardi S, Marastoni D et al.. Real-world effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study integrating clinical, cognitive, and MRI outcomes. Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. 2026. 41958532
  3. [3] Sandgren S, Novakova L et al.. The effect of alemtuzumab on neurodegeneration in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A five-year prospective mono-center study. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2024 Nov. 39293124
  4. [4] Kamal DT, Sayed SK et al.. Effects of disease-modifying drugs on serum neurofilament light chain, chitinase-3-like-1 protein levels, and selected plasmacytoid dendritic cell biomarkers in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. African journal of laboratory medicine. 2026. 41647932
  5. [5] Thompson C, Annett A et al.. Dual Role of Ninjurin-1 in Myeloid Cell Adhesion and Inflammation in Relapse-Remitting EAE. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2026 Jan 26. 41659419
  6. [6] Isenberg D, Furie R et al.. Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamic Effects of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Fenebrutinib (GDC-0853) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.). 2021 Oct. 34042314
  7. [7] Langer-Gould A, Sotirchos ES et al.. Rituximab for Multiple Sclerosis: Hiding in Plain Sight. Neurology. 2024 Jan 23. 38165314
  8. [8] Tešija K, Krbot Skorić M et al.. Real-world effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: A multicenter cohort study. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2026 Mar. 41579713
  9. [9] Montague T, Cheung E et al.. Real-world safety and effectiveness of ofatumumab in multiple sclerosis: A clinic-based study in Australia. Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. 2026 Jan-Mar. 41743884
  10. [10] Rodriguez de Antonio LA, García-Castañón I et al.. Breaking the assumption: Disease-modifying therapy efficacy and relapse severity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2025 Dec. 41038139
  11. [11] An J, Wang X et al.. Multimodal MRI Assessment of neuroprotective effects of Ofatumumab on brain structure, function, and clinical correlates in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Frontiers in neurology. 2026. 41798819
  12. [12] Mamardashvili G, Botchorishvili N et al.. Development of Seborrheic Keratosis and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection Following Four Months of Fingolimod Treatment in a Patient With Multiple Sclerosis: A Report of a Rare Case. Cureus. 2025 May. 40486406
  13. [13] Cree BAC, Fox E et al.. Five Years of Ublituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: ULTIMATE I and II Open-Label Extension Study. JAMA neurology. 2026 Apr 1. 41697690
  14. [14] Preziosa P, Brescia Morra V et al.. Efficacy and safety of ublituximab for relapsing multiple sclerosis patients: current evidence and expert opinion. Journal of neurology. 2025 Oct 17. 41107611
  15. [15] Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Ridley B et al.. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2024 Jan 4. 38174776
  16. [16] Ciubotaru A, Grosu C et al.. Systematic Review of Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Comparator-Stratified Analysis of Relapse and Disability Outcomes. Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland). 2026 Feb 27. 41892831
  17. [17] Jones NS, Winter H et al.. Absence of Pharmacokinetic Interactions between the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Fenebrutinib and Methotrexate. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2019 Oct. 31371481
  18. [18] Ghosh N, Wang R et al.. Impact of ibrutinib dose adjustment on TTNT in first-line CLL/SLL: a real-world analysis using target trial emulation. Blood neoplasia. 2024 Sep. 40453061
  19. [19] Mohamed Fathy Kamal O, Ojeda-Hernández DD et al.. Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives from Clinical Studies-A Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics. 2025 Dec 25. 41599137
  20. [20] Hua LH, Brown B et al.. Switch from intravenous anti-CD20 therapy to subcutaneous ofatumumab in patients with relapsing MS: results from the OLIKOS study. Journal of neurology. 2025 Oct 24. 41196386

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts