Rezpeg AD Maintenance Data: Phase IIb Signal Promising, But Phase III Proof Still Absent
Clinical Trial Updates

Rezpeg AD Maintenance Data: Phase IIb Signal Promising, But Phase III Proof Still Absent

Published : 06 Oct 2026

The Overview
Nektar Therapeutics presented data from the maintenance period of the Phase IIb REZOLVE-AD study for rezpegaldesleukin (rezpeg) in atopic dermatitis (AD) at EADV 2026. Patients receiving monthly or quarterly rezpeg for up to 52 weeks showed sustained disease control, with a meaningful proportion achieving 75% and 90% improvement in eczema severity and itch reduction. Full skin clearance was observed in 22% (monthly) and 18% (quarterly) of patients at week 52. The safety profile was favorable and consistent with prior studies. Nektar plans to initiate a Phase III program for rezpeg in AD and alopecia areata.
Knolens Analysis

Rezpegaldesleukin (rezpeg) exits its Phase IIb REZOLVE-AD maintenance readout with a clinically meaningful but unconfirmed signal: full skin clearance in 22% of monthly-dosed and 18% of quarterly-dosed patients at week 52, alongside sustained EASI-75 and EASI-90 responses and itch reduction over 52 weeks. These are randomized Phase IIb data — one tier below pivotal — and the absence of head-to-head comparisons against approved standards means the competitive positioning remains inferential. [1][2] Rezpeg's mechanism is distinct from every approved AD therapy: it is a regulatory T-cell (Treg) stimulator acting via IL-2 receptor agonism, designed to restore immune tolerance rather than block a specific inflammatory cytokine or JAK pathway. No approved AD agent shares this mechanism, which means no clean regulatory or clinical precedent exists. The closest structural analogy — IL-2-based immune modulation — has precedent in autoimmune settings but not in AD specifically, and no prior agent in this exact mechanism-population combination has reached approval. In the competitive landscape, Nektar faces a crowded field: dupilumab (IL-4Rα/IL-13 blockade, Phase 3 pivotal data), tralokinumab (IL-13 blockade, Phase 3 pivotal data), lebrikizumab (IL-13 blockade, Phase 3 pivotal data), upadacitinib (JAK1 inhibition, Phase 3 pivotal data), and abrocitinib (JAK1 inhibition, Phase 3 pivotal data) — all with established pivotal datasets and regulatory approvals. [3][4] Rezpeg's quarterly dosing interval is a potential differentiator if Phase III confirms durability. Payer and HTA implications are unresolved: no cost-effectiveness data, no ICER analysis, and no HTA body has evaluated rezpeg. The sharpest risk is that Phase IIb clearance rates (18–22%) may not translate to Phase III, and the mechanism's novelty, while scientifically compelling, provides no regulatory shortcut in a crowded, well-precedented indication.

REZOLVE-AD is a randomized Phase IIb study; the 22% (monthly) and 18% (quarterly) full clearance rates at week 52 are directionally meaningful but one evidence tier below the Phase 3 RCT standard required for regulatory and payer confidence in a crowded indication.

At a Glance
IndicationAtopic dermatitis
Drugrezpegaldesleukin
Mechanism of ActionTreg-selective IL-2 pathway agonist
CompanyNektar Therapeutics
Trial PhasePhase IIb
Trial AcronymREZOLVE-AD
NCT IDNCT06136741
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaImmunology
Conference NameEuropean Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) annual congress, EADV 2026
Conference LocationVienna, Austria
Conference Dates30 September and 3 October
Follow-up Duration52 weeks
Key Efficacy Measures75% and 90% improvement in EASI, reduction in itch, full skin clearance
Full Skin Clearance Rate22% (monthly), 18% (quarterly)
Dosage RegimenMonthly or quarterly
Analyst FirmWilliam Blair
Patient PopulationAtopic dermatitis patients

Nektar's Rezpeg Shows Sustained Efficacy in Atopic Dermatitis Phase IIb

Nektar Therapeutics presented data from the maintenance period of the Phase IIb REZOLVE-AD study for rezpegaldesleukin (rezpeg) in atopic dermatitis (AD) at EADV 2026. Patients receiving monthly or quarterly rezpeg for up to 52 weeks showed sustained disease control, with a meaningful proportion achieving 75% and 90% improvement in eczema severity and itch reduction. Full skin clearance was observed in 22% (monthly) and 18% (quarterly) of patients at week 52. The safety profile was favorable and consistent with prior studies. Nektar plans to initiate a Phase III program for rezpeg in AD and alopecia areata.

  • Nektar's rezpegaldesleukin (rezpeg) demonstrated sustained disease control and significant efficacy in the Phase IIb REZOLVE-AD study's maintenance period. At 52 weeks, a substantial proportion of patients achieved 75% and 90% improvement in eczema spread and severity, alongside reduced itch. Specifically, 22% of monthly-dosed patients and 18% of quarterly-dosed patients achieved full skin clearance, highlighting rezpeg's potential for long-term benefits in atopic dermatitis.
  • The safety profile of rezpeg was reported as favorable and consistent with previous studies during the maintenance period, with no new safety signals identified. This positive outcome supports Nektar's strategic decision to advance rezpeg into a Phase III program for atopic dermatitis. Additionally, the company intends to initiate a Phase III trial for rezpeg in alopecia areata early next year, expanding its potential therapeutic applications.
  • William Blair analysts noted that the EADV readout provides further evidence of rezpeg's "material durability advantage over current standard-of-care options" in AD. However, they also highlighted a potential concern regarding high levels of injection site reactions compared to placebo, which could "pose an overhang on rezpeg’s target product profile." This suggests a mixed but generally positive outlook on its competitive standing.

Nektar and Pfizer Deliver Strong Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy

Recent clinical research across biologics and JAK inhibitors has continued to expand the evidence base for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, with studies evaluating both efficacy benchmarks and comparative safety profiles. The following table summarizes key findings from several recent studies.

Study Intervention(s) Key Efficacy Outcomes Key Safety Outcomes
Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis (adolescents, aged 12–17) Dupilumab, lebrikizumab, tralokinumab Dupilumab 200/300 mg every 2 weeks showed greatest effect: EASI-75 (RR: 5.2; 95% CrI: 2.6, 12.0) and IGA 0/1 (RR: 12.0; 95% CrI: 3.3, 78.0) vs. placebo at week 16; no statistically significant differences between treatments Certainty of evidence rated low; no between-treatment safety differentiation reported
Phase III RCT subgroup analysis — dupilumab in children aged 6 months to 5 years (NCT03346434, Part B) Dupilumab 200/300 mg every 4 weeks + low-potency topical corticosteroids IGA ≤1 achieved in 14.3% (dupilumab) vs. 1.6% (placebo) (P = 0.0085); EASI-75 achieved in 46.0% vs. 6.6% (P < 0.0001); least squares mean 48.9% reduction in pruritus Overall AE incidence similar between dupilumab (66.7%) and placebo (73.8%); no dupilumab-related AEs were serious or led to discontinuation
Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis (binary efficacy outcomes, adults) Abrocitinib, upadacitinib, dupilumab, baricitinib, tralokinumab Upadacitinib 30 mg daily (OR 2.5, 95% CrI 1.3–5.0) and abrocitinib 200 mg daily (OR 1.5, 95% CrI 1.1–2.2) associated with higher odds of EASI-50 vs. dupilumab; baricitinib 2 mg (OR 0.4, 95% CrI 0.3–0.5) and tralokinumab (OR 0.4, 95% CrI 0.3–0.6) associated with lower odds vs. dupilumab; results consistent across EASI-75, EASI-90, and IGA success Not reported in this analysis
Population-based cohort study — oral JAKi vs. dupilumab (real-world, US) Upadacitinib, abrocitinib, baricitinib vs. dupilumab Not reported as a primary focus; study designed for comparative safety evaluation Oral JAKi associated with higher risks of skin/subcutaneous tissue infection (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.07–1.69), herpes simplex (HR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.03–2.61), herpes zoster (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.14–5.52), acne (HR = 2.09, 95% CI 1.54–2.84), anemia (HR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.39–2.41), neutropenia (HR = 4.02, 95% CI 1.91–8.47), thrombocytopenia (HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.08–2.89), and hyperlipidemia (HR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.09–1.92); dupilumab associated with higher risk of ophthalmic complications (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.03–2.17)
Two Phase I Randomized Trials — rademikibart (CBP-201) in healthy individuals and AD patients Rademikibart (next-generation anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody) At week 4 in AD patients: EASI improved by up to −74.4%, body surface area by −62.7%, Pruritus NRS severity by −52.8%, Pruritus NRS frequency by −54.4%, Dermatology Life Quality Index by −69.9%; efficacy responses did not plateau and were generally dose dependent Most TEAEs were mild; none were serious; two mild subcutaneous injection site reactions and one mild conjunctivitis reported

Evommune's EVO301: A Novel IL-18 Approach in Atopic Dermatitis

Research into atopic dermatitis (AD) has expanded well beyond conventional immunosuppression, with multiple novel molecular targets now under active investigation across the inflammatory, neuronal, and barrier-function axes of disease pathogenesis.

  • JAK/STAT pathway inhibition: Both topical and oral JAK inhibitors have emerged as significant therapeutic modalities. Ruxolitinib cream, a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor formulated as an oil-in-water emulsion, delivers targeted local inhibition of cytokine-driven inflammatory signaling directly to the skin. Upadacitinib, engineered for selectivity toward JAK1, has been approved for moderate-to-severe RA and is under investigation in AD and other inflammatory indications. A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network found that topical ruxolitinib users had significantly lower incidences of arterial thrombosis and tuberculosis compared to oral JAK inhibitor users, and demonstrated decreased risk of all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accidents, and venous thromboembolism compared to controls.

  • Type 2 inflammatory cytokine cascade: Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 receptor α subunit, established proof of concept for biologics in AD and is approved for moderate-to-severe or severe AD in children, adolescents, and adults. Subsequent drug development has focused on IL-4, IL-13, and their downstream JAK signaling as primary targets, with several additional monoclonal antibodies under investigation.

  • IL-31 and pruritus signaling: IL-31 and its receptor have been identified as key mediators of pruritus in AD. Elevated IL-31 levels have been reported in tissue and serum of patients with atopic dermatitis, prurigo nodularis, and psoriasis. Nemolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-31 receptor, is the only agent in this class to have successfully completed late-stage clinical studies to date.

  • TRP ion channels — TRPM3, TRPA1, and TRPV1: Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels represent an emerging neuronal target class for AD-associated itch. Sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC), found at elevated levels in the stratum corneum of AD patients, induces itch via activation of TRPM3 and TRPA1 in sensory neurons; TRPM3 and TRPA1 antagonists significantly reduced SPC-induced scratching behaviors in an AD mouse model, with TRPM3 identified as playing a critical role in spontaneous scratching. TRPV1, which affects multiple pathways involved in pruritus and skin barrier function, is also under investigation, with early trials data suggesting safety of TRPV1 antagonists, though efficacy assessment in AD remains pending.

  • IL-33 signaling pathway: IL-33, a member of the IL-1 cytokine family released by epithelial and endothelial cells in response to pro-inflammatory stimuli and cell damage, activates NF-κB signaling and induces phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK, p38, and PI3K/AKT modules. Aberrant IL-33 signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis, positioning the IL-33/IL-33R axis as a potential therapeutic target.

  • Broader T helper cell subtypes and cytokine targets: Recognizing the contributions of Th1 and Th22 cells alongside the Th2 axis, and the specific role of IL-31 in pruritus generation, the landscape of potential therapeutic targets in AD has widened considerably, with multiple systemic agents targeting these pathways currently under investigation.

Shaping the Future of Atopic Dermatitis Treatment

The atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment landscape has undergone substantial expansion beyond topical corticosteroids, driven by a growing body of phase 3 trial data and real-world evidence. Topical nonsteroid therapies — specifically the calcineurin inhibitors pimecrolimus and tacrolimus, and the PDE4 inhibitor crisaborole — established an early foundation, demonstrating efficacy in lesion clearance and symptom management with low systemic absorption and no demonstrated increase in malignancy risk across 69 clinical trials. More recently, 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, has entered the topical space; a network meta-analysis across 12 randomized controlled trials in a systemic-eligible moderate AD subgroup found no statistically significant differences between ruxolitinib cream and systemic agents — including dupilumab, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib — on IGA 0/1, EASI-75, and Itch NRS4, with point estimates numerically favoring ruxolitinib cream for IGA 0/1 and EASI-75.

In the systemic arena, dupilumab has accumulated long-term efficacy and safety data across the full age spectrum. In adolescents, 52-week open-label data showed EASI reductions of −85% ± 12% (2 mg/kg) and −84% ± 20% (4 mg/kg) from baseline, with nasopharyngitis and AD exacerbation as the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. In children aged 6 months to 5 years, a phase 3 open-label extension demonstrated that 96.6%, 79.3%, and 58.6% of patients achieved at least 50%, 75%, or 90% EASI improvement, respectively, by week 52, with 36.2% reaching IGA 0/1. Tralokinumab, an IL-13 inhibitor, has added further depth to the biologic class: pooled data from ECZTRA 1 and 2 (n = 1,596) showed progressive improvement through week 52, with EASI-75 rates rising from 37.6% to 61.8% and EASI-90 from 20.4% to 37.3% across all patients initiated on tralokinumab. Real-world data from a single-center retrospective study of 37 adults corroborated these findings, with 93% (28/30) achieving IGA 0/1 at 1 year and no adverse events reported through follow-up.

Oral JAK inhibitors — upadacitinib and abrocitinib — have emerged as high-efficacy options, particularly for severe and difficult-to-treat disease. A post hoc analysis of the phase 3 JADE COMPARE trial demonstrated that abrocitinib 200 mg achieved significantly greater IGA 0/1, EASI-75, and EASI-90 responses versus placebo (nominal p < 0.05) across all severe and/or difficult-to-treat subgroups, with time to PP-NRS4 response of 4.5–6.0 days — shorter than dupilumab (8.0–11.0 days). An open-label extension of the Heads Up trial further showed that patients switching from dupilumab to upadacitinib 30 mg experienced incremental clinical improvements within 4 weeks, including those who had not achieved adequate responses on dupilumab. However, the comparative safety profile of oral JAKi warrants careful consideration: a propensity score–matched cohort study of 938 patients per arm found significantly higher risks of herpes simplex (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.03–2.61), herpes zoster (HR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.14–5.52), acne (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.54–2.84), neutropenia (HR = 4.02, 95% CI = 1.91–8.47), and hyperlipidemia (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.09–1.92) with oral JAKi versus dupilumab. FAERS-based disproportionality analyses have further identified novel signals — including sepsis, appendicitis, and septic shock — for both upadacitinib and abrocitinib, underscoring the need for continued long-term pharmacovigilance as these agents assume a larger role in the treatment algorithm.

Rezpeg's Sustained AD Efficacy: A New Chapter for IL-2 in Autoimmunity

The recent data from Nektar Therapeutics on rezpegaldesleukin (rezpeg) in atopic dermatitis (AD) marks a significant moment for a novel therapeutic approach. The Phase IIb REZOLVE-AD study demonstrated sustained disease control over 52 weeks, with a meaningful proportion of patients achieving substantial improvements in eczema severity and itch, alongside a favorable safety profile. This sustained efficacy is particularly crucial for a chronic, debilitating condition like AD, where long-term management is paramount.

Rezpeg operates through a distinct mechanism as a regulatory T cell (Treg) pathway agonist, leveraging low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) to promote Treg expansion and restore immune tolerance. This stands apart from many existing biologics that primarily target type 2 inflammation. In a competitive landscape, where agents like dupilumab have established strong efficacy and long-term safety, rezpeg's unique mechanism could offer a differentiated option, especially for patients who may not respond optimally to current therapies.

The company's decision to advance rezpeg into Phase III for both AD and alopecia areata (AA) is strategically sound. Research indicates a clear association between AD and AA, and IL-2 therapy has shown promise across various autoimmune diseases. This dual indication strategy could broaden rezpeg's market potential and capitalize on its foundational immune-modulating properties.

However, the path forward is not without its challenges. While Phase IIb data are encouraging, a network meta-analysis of AD biologics highlighted that evidence for emerging therapies like rezpeg is currently limited to smaller trials, leading to lower certainty in comparative efficacy rankings. The upcoming Phase III program will be critical to validate these sustained benefits in a larger, more diverse patient population and to generate the extensive long-term safety data necessary for a chronic treatment. Successfully navigating these trials and demonstrating clear differentiation will be key to rezpeg's potential to reshape treatment paradigms in AD and AA.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the miracle shot for eczema?
Dupilumab (Dupixent) is widely recognized as a breakthrough injectable biologic for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. It is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13) signaling, key drivers of type 2 inflammation. This targeted mechanism significantly reduces disease severity, pruritus, and improves quality of life for many patients unresponsive to conventional therapies. Other biologics like tralokinumab and lebrikizumab also offer targeted treatment options.
Can filaggrin deficiency be corrected?
Filaggrin deficiency, particularly when genetic, is not currently correctable at the gene level in standard clinical practice. However, its downstream effects, such as impaired skin barrier function and inflammation, can be managed through emollients, topical corticosteroids, and calcineurin inhibitors. Emerging therapeutic strategies include topical agents designed to enhance filaggrin expression or provide filaggrin-like proteins to restore barrier integrity.
What is the most effective medication for atopic dermatitis?
The most effective medication for atopic dermatitis depends on disease severity and individual patient factors. For moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, systemic biologics like dupilumab and tralokinumab, and oral JAK inhibitors such as upadacitinib and abrocitinib, offer superior efficacy in achieving significant disease control. Dupilumab is often considered a first-line biologic due to its established broad efficacy and favorable safety profile. Topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors remain the cornerstone for mild-to-moderate disease and acute flares.
What is the most effective treatment for atopic dermatitis?
Treatment for atopic dermatitis is stratified by severity, with topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors serving as first-line for mild-to-moderate disease and acute flares. For moderate-to-severe cases, highly effective systemic therapies are available. These include biologics such as dupilumab and tralokinumab, which target specific cytokines, and oral JAK inhibitors like upadacitinib and abrocitinib, which modulate intracellular signaling pathways. The most effective approach is individualized, often combining topical and systemic agents to achieve sustained disease control.
What triggers atopic dermatitis?
Atopic dermatitis is triggered by a complex interplay of genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, and environmental factors. Key environmental triggers include allergens such as dust mites, pollen, pet dander, and certain foods, as well as irritants like soaps, detergents, and fragrances. These factors, combined with an impaired skin barrier function and an imbalanced skin microbiome, contribute to the characteristic inflammatory response and exacerbation of symptoms. Psychological stress can also act as a trigger, worsening disease activity.
Can atopic dermatitis be cured completely?
Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition with no known complete cure currently available. While various treatments effectively manage symptoms, reduce flare frequency, and improve skin barrier function, the underlying disease mechanisms persist. Therapeutic strategies focus on long-term disease control rather than permanent eradication.
How long will atopic dermatitis last?
Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that often begins in infancy or early childhood. While it can resolve spontaneously in some children, particularly by adolescence, it frequently persists into adulthood. Many individuals experience a relapsing-remitting course throughout their lives, characterized by periods of flares and remission. For a significant portion of patients, atopic dermatitis is a lifelong condition.

References

  1. [1] Tang Z, Mu Z et al.. Association between oral JAK-1 inhibitors and infection risks in atopic dermatitis: a retrospective analysis of the FAERS database. Frontiers in medicine. 2025. 41255603
  2. [2] Tanaka Y. A review of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. Modern rheumatology. 2020 Sep. 32530345
  3. [3] Drucker AM, Lam M et al.. Comparing binary efficacy outcomes for systemic immunomodulatory treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. The British journal of dermatology. 2024 Jan 23. 37831594
  4. [4] Wang J, White J et al.. Rademikibart (CBP-201), a next-generation monoclonal antibody targeting human IL-4Rα: Two phase I randomized trials, in healthy individuals and patients with atopic dermatitis. Clinical and translational science. 2023 Dec. 37849431
  5. [5] Li KH, Duffy EK et al.. Biologic Treatments in Adolescents With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 2026 Oct. 41635230
  6. [6] Gooderham MJ, Hong HC et al.. Network Meta-analysis of 1.5% Ruxolitinib Cream Versus Systemic Agents in the Treatment of Moderate Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology and therapy. 2025 Nov. 40906354
  7. [7] Pinto SM, Subbannayya Y et al.. A network map of IL-33 signaling pathway. Journal of cell communication and signaling. 2018 Sep. 29705949
  8. [8] Dargentolle G, Georges M et al.. [Adverse events in biologics for severe asthma]. Revue des maladies respiratoires. 2024 May. 38653607
  9. [9] Blauvelt A, Ladizinski B et al.. Efficacy and safety of switching from dupilumab to upadacitinib versus continuous upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from an open-label extension of the phase 3, randomized, controlled trial (Heads Up). Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2023 Sep. 37230366
  10. [10] Akiyama S. Optimizing Janus kinase inhibitor therapy for ulcerative colitis: a real-world perspective. Intestinal research. 2026 Apr. 41233968
  11. [11] Song DE, Rawal D et al.. Sphingosylphosphorylcholine induces itch via activation of TRPM3 and TRPA1 in mice. Biochemical pharmacology. 2025 Jul. 40274130
  12. [12] Ma C, Sun J et al.. Real-world efficacy of 2% crisaborole ointment on chronic hyperplasia lesions in 49 patients with atopic dermatitis. International journal of dermatology. 2024 Oct. 38546047
  13. [13] He Q, Xie X et al.. Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. Frontiers in immunology. 2024. 38464512
  14. [14] Benandi K, Spires A et al.. Systemic risk profiles of topical ruxolitinib and oral Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective cohort study from the TriNetX network. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2025 Oct. 40794004
  15. [15] Papier A, Strowd LC. Atopic dermatitis: a review of topical nonsteroid therapy. Drugs in context. 2018. 29632548
  16. [16] Tsai SY, Phipatanakul W et al.. Comparative safety of oral Janus kinase inhibitors versus dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: A population-based cohort study. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2024 Nov. 39097196
  17. [17] Paller AS, Siegfried EC et al.. Dupilumab Safety and Efficacy up to 1 Year in Children Aged 6 Months to 5 Years with Atopic Dermatitis: Results from a Phase 3 Open-Label Extension Study. American journal of clinical dermatology. 2024 Jul. 38743155
  18. [18] Li W. Targeting the IL-4/IL-4R Axis in Th2 Inflammatory Diseases: A Review of Clinical Efficacy and Safety. Journal of inflammation research. 2025. 41458354
  19. [19] Smith P, Yao W et al.. Developing a JAK Inhibitor for Targeted Local Delivery: Ruxolitinib Cream. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jul 8. 34371735
  20. [20] Rodriguez AO, Smith CS. Real‑World Experience of 1 Year of Tralokinumab Treatment in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Dermatology and therapy. 2025 Aug. 40459712

Contact Us

📍

Address

350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts