Propanc Biopharma’s CEO Forecasts New Medical Breakthroughs in the Fight Against Pancreatic Cancer Over the Next Decade
Clinical Trial Updates

Propanc Biopharma’s CEO Forecasts New Medical Breakthroughs in the Fight Against Pancreatic Cancer Over the Next Decade

Published : 21 May 2026

At a Glance
IndicationPancreatic cancer
Drugtrypsinogen and chymotrypsinogen
Mechanism of Actiontargeting and eradicating cancer stem cells through proenzyme activation
CompanyPropanc Biopharma, Inc.
Trial PhasePhase 1b
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTrial Initiation / First Patient In (FPI)
Patient Population (Phase 1b)30 – 40 advanced cancer patients suffering from solid tumors
Trial Location (Phase 1b)Australia
Regulatory DesignationOrphan Drug Designation
Regulatory Agency (ODD)US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA)
ODD Grant Year2017
Publication Journal (Compassionate Use)Scientific Reports, an online Nature journal
Dosage Form (Compassionate Use)once daily suppository
Dosage Form (Phase 1b)I.V. formulation administered once weekly
Other Companies CitedRevolution Medicines Inc., Erasca Inc.
Planned Phase 2 Indicationspancreatic and ovarian cancers

Propanc CEO Forecasts Pancreatic Cancer Breakthroughs, Details PRP Trial Plans

Propanc Biopharma's CEO, James Nathanielsz, forecasts significant medical breakthroughs in pancreatic cancer treatment over the next decade, citing recent advancements from other companies in targeting KRAS mutations and using combination therapies. These developments, showing improved overall survival and one-year survival rates, highlight the need for multi-mechanism approaches due to the disease's complex biology. Propanc's lead asset, PRP, which received Orphan Drug Designation for pancreatic cancer in 2017, has shown promising compassionate use data. The company plans to file a Clinical Trial Application in Australia later this year for a Phase 1b First-In-Human study of PRP in advanced solid tumor patients, followed by two Phase 2 studies in pancreatic and ovarian cancers.

  • The press release highlights recent progress in pancreatic cancer, including a late-stage trial targeting KRAS mutations that improved overall survival to approximately 13 months versus 7 months with standard treatment. Additionally, combination therapy approaches have increased one-year survival rates to about 42% compared to 22% with chemotherapy alone, underscoring the efficacy of addressing multiple biological mechanisms.
  • Propanc's lead product candidate, PRP, holds Orphan Drug Designation from the USFDA for pancreatic cancer since 2017. Published compassionate use data in Scientific Reports demonstrated that a once-daily suppository of PRP (trypsinogen and chymotrypsinogen) enabled 3 out of 4 terminal pancreatic cancer patients to significantly exceed life expectancy without severe side effects.
  • Propanc plans to advance PRP into further clinical trials, starting with a Phase 1b First-In-Human, Maximum Tolerated Dose study in 30-40 advanced solid tumor patients in Australia, with a Clinical Trial Application filing expected later this year. This will be followed by two Phase 2 studies, each enrolling 60 patients, to establish proof of concept for PRP in both pancreatic and ovarian cancers.

Addressing the Persistent Challenges in Pancreatic Cancer Treatment

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat, with overall 5-year survival rates persisting in the single digits at approximately 8%. The disease represents the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, with over 50,000 new cases annually and a similarly devastating mortality rate. Despite decades of research and therapeutic advances seen in other cancers, pancreatic adenocarcinoma continues to demonstrate exceptional resistance to conventional treatment modalities.

Intrinsic and acquired drug resistance represents the primary obstacle to therapeutic success, with pancreatic cancer ranking among the most chemotherapy-resistant solid tumors and exhibiting the highest rates of relapse and metastasis

Severe drug delivery barriers caused by extensive desmoplastic stroma create elevated interstitial fluid pressures, leading to vascular collapse and substantially impaired perfusion of chemotherapeutic agents to tumor sites

Limited efficacy of standard chemotherapy regimens, including gemcitabine monotherapy and newer combinations like FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, which provide only modest survival improvements while causing significant systemic toxicity

Immunotherapy resistance due to the inherently "immune-cold" tumor microenvironment, making pancreatic cancers largely refractory to checkpoint inhibitors that have revolutionized treatment in other malignancies

Advanced disease presentation in most patients, with tumors deemed surgically unresectable at diagnosis, limiting treatment options primarily to systemic chemotherapy with poor outcomes

Inadequate molecular targeting options, as current targeted therapies have failed to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements, with only erlotinib showing modest survival benefit in combination with gemcitabine

Complex tumor biology involving multiple dysregulated signaling pathways and epithelial-mesenchymal transition processes that contribute to chemoresistance and treatment failure

Propanc's Clinical Development Path for PRP in Advanced Cancers

Pancreatic cancer clinical trials have evolved significantly over the past two decades, with recent studies focusing on combination therapies and real-world effectiveness comparisons. The most notable recent trials include the NAPAN trial comparing second-line liposomal irinotecan combinations and the PARC study evaluating trimodal therapy approaches.

Trial/Study Phase Patient Population Primary Endpoint(s) Key Design Features
NAPAN (2026) I/II Second-line treatment (n=120) Progression-free survival Randomized comparison of nal-IRI+S-1 vs nal-IRI+5-FU/LV
Meta-analysis (2025) III Borderline-resectable/resectable (n=1194) Overall survival 9 RCTs analyzing neoadjuvant treatment effectiveness
Real-World Study (2024) Observational Advanced PDAC (n=1551) Overall survival, time to deterioration of HRQoL Marginal structural modeling comparing FOLFIRINOX vs GEMNAB sequences
PARC (2022) II Locally advanced PDAC (n=68) Toxicity, overall survival, secondary resection rate Trimodal therapy (cetuximab+gemcitabine+RT) with maintenance comparison
ESPAC-3 (2010) III Resected PDAC (n=1088) Overall survival 6-month adjuvant fluorouracil+folinic acid vs gemcitabine
E6201 (2009) III Metastatic/locally advanced (n=832) Overall survival Three-arm comparison: standard GEM vs GEM FDR vs GEMOX

Propanc's Bold Step in Pancreatic Cancer's Evolving Landscape

The fight against pancreatic cancer has long been one of oncology's most formidable challenges. With a historically grim prognosis and limited therapeutic options, patients and clinicians alike have eagerly awaited breakthroughs. Propanc Biopharma's recent announcement regarding its lead asset, PRP, and its planned progression into Phase 1b and Phase 2 studies, signals a new wave of therapeutic exploration in this high-unmet-need area.

For decades, gemcitabine monotherapy offered only modest benefits, but the landscape is rapidly evolving. The scientific community now recognizes the necessity of multi-pronged attacks, moving towards sophisticated combination therapies and molecularly targeted agents. This shift is driven by a deeper understanding of pancreatic cancer's complex biology, including the pervasive role of KRAS mutations and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Recent successes with KRAS G12C inhibitors and the development of agents targeting KRAS G12D, such as setidegrasib and KRB-456, demonstrate the significant potential of precision oncology. Similarly, regimens like FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine have set new benchmarks for overall survival, albeit with considerable toxicity.

Propanc's strategy with PRP, which has already secured Orphan Drug Designation for pancreatic cancer, aligns with this evolving paradigm. The company aims to leverage a multi-mechanism approach, a strategy that existing evidence suggests is crucial for overcoming the disease's inherent resistance. However, the path forward is fraught with challenges:

  • High attrition rates: Pancreatic cancer trials have a history of high failure, with many promising agents failing to demonstrate meaningful clinical benefit or acceptable toxicity, as seen with past attempts like 3-AP.

  • Intense competition: The market is increasingly crowded with both established combination regimens and novel targeted therapies, including liposomal irinotecan for second-line treatment. PRP will need to carve out a distinct value proposition.

  • Biological complexity: The disease's heterogeneity and dense stromal barrier continue to pose significant hurdles to drug delivery and efficacy, demanding robust clinical evidence.

Despite these risks, the potential for a novel agent to improve outcomes in pancreatic cancer remains immense. Propanc's expansion into ovarian cancer, another indication where combination therapies and anti-angiogenic strategies have shown promise, further underscores the company's ambition. The upcoming clinical trials for PRP will be critical in determining its place in the future treatment landscape, offering a glimmer of hope for patients facing this devastating disease.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the pancreas produce chymotrypsinogen?
The pancreas produces chymotrypsinogen, an inactive zymogen synthesized by its acinar cells. This precursor is secreted into the duodenum, where it is subsequently activated to chymotrypsin by trypsin. Chymotrypsin is a crucial protease involved in the digestion of proteins within the small intestine.
Who should avoid trypsin and chymotrypsin?
Individuals with known hypersensitivity or allergy to trypsin, chymotrypsin, or their animal-derived sources (e.g., bovine, porcine) should avoid these enzymes. Caution is advised for patients with bleeding disorders, those on anticoagulant therapy, or severe hepatic/renal impairment due to potential systemic effects. Use in pregnancy, lactation, and pediatric populations is generally not recommended due to insufficient safety data.
What are the best enzymes for pancreatic cancer?
Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is essential for managing exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), a common complication of pancreatic cancer, significantly improving patient nutrition and quality of life. While no single enzyme is a primary anti-cancer therapeutic, investigational strategies have explored enzymes like hyaluronidase (e.g., PEGPH20) to modify the tumor microenvironment and enhance drug delivery. Clinical trials for such agents have yielded mixed results, indicating their role remains investigational rather than established.
What dirty habit puts millions at risk of pancreatic cancer?
Smoking is a major modifiable risk factor for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, accounting for approximately 20-30% of all cases. This habit significantly increases an individual's lifetime risk, with a dose-dependent relationship observed between tobacco exposure and cancer development. Millions remain at risk due to continued tobacco use globally.

References

  1. [1] Blanquicett CJ, Aguirre LE. Therapeutic Advances for Pancreatic Cancer: a Slow and Challenging Feat that Continues to Evolve. Acta scientific gastrointestinal disorders. 2021 Jul. 34414366
  2. [2] Rahma OE, Duffy A et al.. Second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive analysis of published clinical trials. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2013 Aug. 23670093
  3. [3] DeVito NC, Saif MW. Advances in immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer: 2013. JOP : Journal of the pancreas. 2013 Jul 10. 23846925
  4. [4] Long J, Zhang Y et al.. Overcoming drug resistance in pancreatic cancer. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2011 Jul. 21391891
  5. [5] Weinberg BA, Yabar CS et al.. Current Standards and Novel Treatment Options for Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.). 2015 Nov. 26573060
  6. [6] Baines AT, Martin PM et al.. Current and Emerging Targeting Strategies for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. Progress in molecular biology and translational science. 2016. 27865460
  7. [7] Kuo KK, Hsiao PJ et al.. Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Tumor Suppressor Genes in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers. 2021 Aug 3. 34359820
  8. [8] Güngör C, Hofmann BT et al.. Pancreatic cancer. British journal of pharmacology. 2014 Feb. 24024905
  9. [9] Endlicher E, Troppmann M et al.. Irinotecan plus gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II study. Oncology. 2007. 18187949
  10. [10] Van Loon K, Espinoza AM et al.. Should combination chemotherapy serve as the backbone in clinical trials of advanced pancreatic cancer? A pooled analysis of phase II trials of gemcitabine-containing doublets plus bevacizumab. Pancreas. 2014 Apr. 24622062
  11. [11] Liermann J, Munter M et al.. Cetuximab, gemcitabine and radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Long-term results of the randomized controlled phase II PARC trial. Clinical and translational radiation oncology. 2022 May. 35300246
  12. [12] Infante JR, Somer BG et al.. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of trametinib, an oral MEK inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2014 Aug. 24915778
  13. [13] Kasuga A, Hamamoto Y et al.. Positive relationship between subsequent chemotherapy and overall survival in pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of postprogression survival for first-line chemotherapy. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2017 Mar. 28236000
  14. [14] Robles-Medranda C, Del Valle R et al.. Assessing EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation in unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center historic cohort study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2024 Aug. 38518978
  15. [15] Zalatnai A. Novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer treatment reviews. 2007 May. 17343986
  16. [16] Yang SH, Guo JC et al.. Association of radiotherapy with favorable prognosis in daily clinical practice for treatment of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2016 Dec. 27059987
  17. [17] Fensterer H, Schade-Brittinger C et al.. Multicenter phase II trial to investigate safety and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with cetuximab as adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer (ATIP). Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2013 Oct. 23897705
  18. [18] Gehrels AM, Pijnappel EN et al.. Second-line liposomal irinotecan plus S-1 vs. liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil in metastatic pancreatic cancer: The phase I/II randomized NAPAN trial. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2026 May 15. 41921365
  19. [19] Mukherji R, Debnath D et al.. The Role of Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.). 2022 Sep 23. 36290818
  20. [20] Saluja AK, Dudeja V et al.. Evolution of novel therapeutic options for pancreatic cancer. Current opinion in gastroenterology. 2016 Sep. 27454027

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts