PROACT Enrollment Complete: LBM Preservation Thesis Unproven, Regulatory Pathway Uncharted
Clinical Trial Updates

PROACT Enrollment Complete: LBM Preservation Thesis Unproven, Regulatory Pathway Uncharted

Published : 24 Sept 2026

The Overview
Actimed Therapeutics has announced the successful completion of patient recruitment for its PROACT Study (NCT07101939), a Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The study, which enrolled over 100 obese adults, is evaluating S-pindolol benzoate (ACM 001.1) in two distinct contexts: during active semaglutide therapy to preserve lean body mass (LBM) and after semaglutide discontinuation to optimize body composition and prevent fat mass rebound. This trial aims to address a critical unmet need in obesity care by mitigating LBM loss associated with GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy and improving muscle-to-fat ratio post-treatment.
Knolens Analysis

The honest verdict is that PROACT's enrollment completion is an operational milestone, not an evidence milestone — and the two must not be conflated. Actimed Therapeutics has confirmed recruitment of over 100 obese adults into a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2a trial evaluating S-pindolol benzoate (ACM 001.1) both during active semaglutide therapy and after its discontinuation. The design is methodologically appropriate for signal detection at this stage, and the dual-context structure — addressing lean body mass loss during GLP-1 receptor agonist use and fat mass rebound after discontinuation — is strategically differentiated. However, no efficacy or safety data exist. [1] The mechanism of action of ACM 001.1 is not disclosed in available material, which forecloses any mechanistic peer or precedent comparison: no prior approval, rejection, or HTA decision in the retrieved evidence shares both ACM 001.1's undisclosed mechanism and its specific clinical context of adjunctive LBM preservation in GLP-1 RA-treated obese adults. No closely comparable precedent exists — this is not a gap to be papered over with a forced analogy. Payer precedents from CADTH (semaglutide non-reimbursement in 2022, reversed with conditions in 2025) and PBAC (sibutramine, 2008) consistently signal that body composition metrics alone are insufficient for reimbursement without functional or comorbidity outcome linkage. The SUSTAIN 8 DXA substudy (Phase 3b, randomized) quantifies the problem ACM 001.1 targets — a 2.3 kg absolute lean mass reduction over 52 weeks with semaglutide — but semaglutide's own favorable fat-to-lean ratio in that dataset raises the incremental benefit bar for any add-on. The sharpest risk is not competitive: it is that LBM preservation has never been validated as a standalone reimbursable endpoint in this population, and the regulatory evidentiary standard for this claim is undefined.

PROACT (Phase 2a, randomized, placebo-controlled, n>100) has completed recruitment but reported no results. No mechanistically matched precedent exists in retrieved evidence. The entire clinical thesis rests on data not yet in the public domain.

At a Glance
IndicationObesity
DrugS-pindolol benzoate
Mechanism of Actiontargeted anabolic catabolic transforming agent
CompanyActimed Therapeutics
Trial PhasePhase 2a
Trial AcronymPROACT Study
NCT IDNCT07101939
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryPatient Enrollment Milestone
Therapeutic AreaEndocrinology & Metabolic Diseases
Patient PopulationObese adults
Sample SizeMore than 100 patients
ComparatorPlacebo
Combination PartnerSemaglutide
Dosage10 mg or 15 mg BID
Study DesignTwo-part, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over (Arms 1 & 2), parallel group (Arm 3)
Study Period Duration20 weeks
Primary Study ObjectivePreservation of lean body mass during GLP-1RA therapy, optimization of body composition after GLP-1RA discontinuation
Press Release DateSeptember 23, 2026
Company LocationLondon, UK

Actimed Completes PROACT Phase 2a Recruitment for S-pindolol benzoate

Actimed Therapeutics has announced the successful completion of patient recruitment for its PROACT Study (NCT07101939), a Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The study, which enrolled over 100 obese adults, is evaluating S-pindolol benzoate (ACM 001.1) in two distinct contexts: during active semaglutide therapy to preserve lean body mass (LBM) and after semaglutide discontinuation to optimize body composition and prevent fat mass rebound. This trial aims to address a critical unmet need in obesity care by mitigating LBM loss associated with GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy and improving muscle-to-fat ratio post-treatment.

  • The PROACT Study is designed to tackle the significant challenge of lean body mass (LBM) loss during GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapy like semaglutide, and the unfavorable body composition changes, including fat mass rebound, that can occur after GLP-1RA discontinuation. This is particularly crucial for vulnerable patient populations such as older or frail individuals or those with co-morbidities, highlighting a critical unmet need in current obesity care.
  • The Phase 2a PROACT trial features an innovative two-part design to answer two independent questions. It evaluates S-pindolol benzoate (10 mg or 15 mg BID) in patients concurrently receiving semaglutide to assess LBM preservation, and in a separate cohort, after 20 weeks of semaglutide cessation, to determine its potential in improving the proportion of lean mass during weight regained post GLP-1RA therapy.
  • S-pindolol benzoate (ACM 001.1) is being investigated as a targeted anabolic catabolic transforming agent. Previous studies have generated promising Phase 2a proof-of-concept data in cancer cachexia patients, and early non-clinical data confirms a potential role for S-pindolol benzoate in preserving muscle mass when used in combination with a GLP-1 agonist for weight loss, positioning it to potentially optimize body composition in obese patients.

Addressing Lean Body Mass Loss in GLP-1RA Obesity Therapy

Current obesity treatment approaches face a complex set of interrelated challenges spanning biological, pharmacological, economic, and systemic dimensions. While newer agents and surgical techniques have substantially advanced the field, durable long-term outcomes remain difficult to achieve across all modalities.

  • Metabolic adaptation and weight regain: Diet-induced and intervention-induced weight loss triggers counter-regulatory physiological responses — including reductions in total daily energy expenditure that exceed predictions based on body composition changes, shifts in substrate metabolism, and compensatory alterations in gut hormone profiles (reduced anorectic hormones, increased orexigenic hormones) — that persist beyond the initial weight loss period and drive weight recidivism.

  • Loss of lean body mass: Both bariatric surgery and GLP-1 receptor agonists are associated with unintended loss of fat-free mass, particularly skeletal muscle. This compromises physical functionality, quality of life, and long-term metabolic health, with heightened concern for individuals with sarcopenic obesity or those at risk of frailty. Current weight-loss strategies often fail to adequately address the need to maintain fat-free mass.

  • Gastrointestinal adverse effects and treatment discontinuation: GI side effects — nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation — are the most frequently reported adverse events with GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, particularly during dose escalation. In a meta-analysis of semaglutide in nondiabetic adults, treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was significantly higher in the semaglutide group (RR 2.62, 95% CI: 1.70–4.03; P = .001), directly impacting adherence and long-term outcomes.

  • Access barriers — cost, insurance, and age restrictions: High costs, supply shortages, and insurance coverage gaps limit widespread implementation, particularly in low-resource settings. For pediatric populations, access to FDA-approved anti-obesity medications is further constrained by age restrictions and inconsistent insurance coverage. Bariatric surgery, despite being cost-effective in select subgroups, is utilized by only 1% of the currently eligible population in the United States, with insurance benefit design identified as a significant structural barrier.

  • Weight regain following medication discontinuation: Weight regain after stopping pharmacotherapy underscores the need for ongoing adherence and lifestyle support, reinforcing obesity's characterization as a chronic, relapsing disease rather than a condition amenable to finite treatment courses.

  • Long-term safety data gaps: For both newer pharmacological agents (including oral GLP-1 agonists and triple-receptor agonists such as retatrutide) and off-label medications used in pediatric obesity, long-term efficacy and safety data remain insufficient. Further long-term randomized trials are needed to evaluate durability of weight loss and long-term safety profiles across emerging pharmacologic agents.

  • Educational and perception gaps: Surveys of people with obesity and healthcare providers in the US identified concerns regarding long-term side effects, costs, and perceptions of anti-obesity medications that do not align with treatment of a chronic disease as persistent barriers, with educational gaps limiting shared decision-making in obesity care.

PROACT Study: A Novel Design for S-pindolol benzoate in Obesity

Recent evidence syntheses have evaluated the efficacy, safety, and comparative effectiveness of incretin-based agents — including tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, and danuglipron — across a range of trial designs in adults with overweight or obesity.

Trial / Study Design Population Key Endpoints
Meta-analysis: Tirzepatide vs. Semaglutide (12 studies) Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies; random-effects model Adults with overweight or obesity Percentage body weight change (MD -4.61%; 95% CI: -6.03, -3.20; p < 0.00001); absolute weight loss (MD -4.76 kg; 95% CI: -6.09, -3.42; p < 0.00001); proportions achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, ≥20% weight loss
OASIS 4 (ITC with STEP 1) Naïve Bucher indirect treatment comparison using two RCTs vs. placebo Adults with obesity or overweight with ≥1 weight-related complication Percentage body weight change; proportions achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, ≥20% weight loss; cardiometabolic parameters; IWQoL-Lite-CT PF; safety outcomes
Meta-analysis: Tirzepatide vs. Placebo or GLP-1 RAs (6 RCTs; n=6,266) Meta-analysis of RCTs ≥20 weeks duration; RevMan 5.4; GRADE assessment; Cochrane RoB Version 2 Adults with overweight or obesity, with or without T2DM or OHA use Mean difference in weight from baseline (5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg once-weekly doses vs. placebo and GLP-1 RAs); categorical weight loss of 5%, 10%, 15%; safety profiles
Meta-analysis: Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Non-Diabetic Obesity (4 RCTs; n=3,613) Systematic review and meta-analysis per PRISMA 2020; random-effects model Adults with overweight or obesity without T2DM Percentage body weight change from baseline (MD: -11.85%; 95% CI: -12.81 to -10.90; P < .00001); GI adverse events (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation); treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 2.62, 95% CI: 1.70-4.03; P = .001); serious adverse events
Danuglipron Phase 2a (NCT04617275) 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group Phase 2 study Adults with T2DM on metformin (n=123); adults with obesity without diabetes (n=28) Tolerability and safety; HbA1c change from baseline (-1.04% to -1.57% across danuglipron groups vs. -0.32% placebo); fasting plasma glucose change; body weight change (-1.93 to -5.38 kg danuglipron vs. -0.42 kg placebo); GI adverse events; discontinuation rates
Real-world liraglutide multicenter study (n=1,009) Retrospective observational study across 38 endocrinology units Patients with obesity (Türkiye) Achievement of ≥5% weight loss (76.4%) and ≥10% weight loss (40.9%); side effects; metabolic parameters; treatment duration as independent predictor of weight loss targets
GLP-1 RA GI Safety: NIH All of Us Cohort (n=10,328) Retrospective cross-sectional analysis; logistic regression Adults with diabetes/obesity; new GLP-1 RA users GI adverse events (abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, GI bleeding, gastroparesis, pancreatitis) across semaglutide, dulaglutide, liraglutide, and exenatide

S-pindolol Benzoate: Redefining Body Composition in Obesity Management

The remarkable efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists has transformed the landscape of obesity treatment, offering unprecedented weight loss for millions. However, this success comes with a recognized challenge: a significant proportion of the weight lost is often lean body mass, not just fat. This lean mass loss can lead to sarcopenia, a condition characterized by decreased muscle mass and strength, which is associated with adverse outcomes such as physical disability and reduced quality of life. Addressing this critical unmet need is paramount for optimizing long-term patient health.

Actimed Therapeutics' PROACT Study, evaluating S-pindolol benzoate (ACM 001.1), represents a strategic move to tackle this issue head-on. S-pindolol benzoate, a beta-blocker, has previously shown promise in preclinical models of cancer cachexia, a severe wasting syndrome, by attenuating lean mass wasting and improving cardiac function. The PROACT trial is designed with a dual approach: first, to preserve lean body mass during active semaglutide therapy, and second, to optimize body composition and prevent the common challenge of fat mass rebound after semaglutide discontinuation.

If successful, this trial could usher in a new era for obesity management, moving beyond mere weight reduction to a more holistic focus on body composition and muscle health. This could significantly enhance the value proposition of GLP-1 receptor agonists by mitigating a key side effect and improving the sustainability of treatment benefits. However, several considerations remain. The translation of efficacy from a cancer cachexia model to GLP-1 receptor agonist-induced lean mass loss in obese adults requires careful validation, as the underlying mechanisms of muscle wasting may differ. Furthermore, while some newer generation beta-blockers exhibit a neutral metabolic profile, the specific impact of S-pindolol benzoate on glucose and lipid metabolism in this patient population, especially in combination with semaglutide, warrants thorough assessment. Finally, demonstrating the long-term sustainability of improved body composition and prevention of fat mass rebound will be crucial, given the complex metabolic factors that drive weight regain. The PROACT study's results are eagerly awaited, as they hold the potential to redefine comprehensive obesity care.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does pindolol cause weight gain?
Pindolol, a non-selective beta-blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), is generally considered weight-neutral or less likely to induce weight gain compared to beta-blockers without ISA. Its partial agonist activity at beta-receptors may mitigate metabolic side effects often associated with this drug class. Clinical studies have not consistently demonstrated significant weight gain as a common adverse effect of pindolol therapy.
What is pindolol used for?
Pindolol is a non-selective beta-adrenergic blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA). It is primarily indicated for the treatment of hypertension. While historically used for angina pectoris and certain arrhythmias, its clinical application has become less common compared to newer beta-blockers.
Is pindolol a partial agonist?
Pindolol is a non-selective beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist that exhibits intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA). This ISA signifies its action as a partial agonist at both beta-1 and beta-2 adrenergic receptors. It provides some receptor stimulation while simultaneously blocking the effects of full agonists like norepinephrine.
What are the results of obesity?
Obesity is a complex chronic disease that significantly increases the risk of developing numerous comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, coronary artery disease, stroke), certain cancers, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and osteoarthritis. These associated conditions lead to substantial healthcare burdens, reduced quality of life, and increased all-cause mortality.
What are the clinical trials for obesity?
Clinical trials for obesity primarily investigate novel pharmacological agents, including GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual/triple incretin agonists, and other mechanisms targeting appetite regulation and energy expenditure. Studies also explore device-based therapies, such as endoscopic interventions and implantable devices, alongside various behavioral and lifestyle modification programs. A growing focus is on combination therapies, evaluating synergistic effects of different drug classes or integrating pharmacotherapy with digital health solutions to optimize weight loss and maintenance.
What were the results of the tirzepatide trial?
Tirzepatide trials, including the SURPASS and SURMOUNT programs, consistently demonstrated significant improvements in glycemic control and substantial body weight reduction. In type 2 diabetes, it achieved superior HbA1c reductions (often >2%) and weight loss (typically 10-12%) compared to comparators. For weight management in individuals with obesity or overweight, tirzepatide led to dose-dependent mean weight reductions of up to 22.5% from baseline. The safety profile was generally consistent with other GLP-1 receptor agonists, primarily gastrointestinal adverse events.
What are the latest research findings on obesity?
Latest research continues to expand the therapeutic landscape for obesity, with novel GLP-1 receptor agonists and multi-agonists demonstrating significant weight loss, improved cardiometabolic outcomes, and potential long-term cardiovascular benefits. Studies are also deepening our understanding of obesity's complex pathophysiology, including genetic predispositions, neurohormonal regulation, and the gut microbiome, informing the development of more targeted and personalized interventions. Further research focuses on combination therapies, real-world effectiveness, and addressing treatment disparities to improve patient access and adherence.

References

  1. [1] Binnetoğlu K. Nutrition and Patient Follow-up in Bariatric Surgery. The Eurasian journal of medicine. 2023 Dec. 39128045
  2. [2] Vallianou NG, Evangelopoulos AA et al.. Neck circumference is correlated with triglycerides and inversely related with HDL cholesterol beyond BMI and waist circumference. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2013 Jan. 23135790
  3. [3] Plotkin M, Ivkovic M et al.. Semaglutide 25 mg Oral Versus Semaglutide 2.4 mg Injectable: An Indirect Treatment Comparison of Weight Loss Outcomes. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026 Aug. 42225300
  4. [4] Faria I, Samreen S et al.. The Etiology of Reduced Muscle Mass with Surgical and Pharmacological Weight Loss and the Identification of Potential Countermeasures. Nutrients. 2024 Dec 31. 39796566
  5. [5] Takrori E, Peshin S et al.. Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects of Anti-Obesity Medications in Non-Diabetic Adults: A Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2025 Nov 5. 41303824
  6. [6] Ahn YJ, Maya J et al.. Update on Pediatric Anti-obesity Medications-Current Landscape and Approach to Prescribing. Current obesity reports. 2024 Jun. 38689134
  7. [7] Naz F, Qaiser F et al.. Effectiveness & safety of semaglutide in weight reduction in obese nondiabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2026 Jul 31. 42536519
  8. [8] Aldhaleei WA, Abegaz TM et al.. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Associated Gastrointestinal Adverse Events: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Institutes of Health All of Us Cohort. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2024 Feb 2. 38399414
  9. [9] Zufry H, Hariyanto TI. Head-to-head comparison of tirzepatide and semaglutide for weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity research & clinical practice. 2026 Mar-Apr. 41723034
  10. [10] Pereira LV, Coutinho MAP et al.. Metabolic Adaptation and Weight Regain in Obesity Treatment: The Central Role of Nutrition in the Era of Bariatric Surgery and GLP-1-Based Pharmacotherapy. Nutrients. 2026 May 28. 42280368
  11. [11] Sumithran P, Proietto J. The defence of body weight: a physiological basis for weight regain after weight loss. Clinical science (London, England : 1979). 2013 Feb. 23126426
  12. [12] Busetto L, Bettini S et al.. Mechanisms of weight regain. European journal of internal medicine. 2021 Nov. 33461826
  13. [13] Gasoyan H, Tajeu G et al.. Reasons for underutilization of bariatric surgery: The role of insurance benefit design. Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2019 Jan. 30425002
  14. [14] Khawaji A, A Jaly A et al.. Weight Loss Efficacy of Tirzepatide Compared to Placebo or GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Adults With Obesity or Overweight: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With ≥ 20 Weeks Treatment Duration. Journal of obesity. 2025. 40746703
  15. [15] Kolotkin RL, Williams VSL et al.. Validation of a new measure of quality of life in obesity trials: Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Clinical Trials Version. Clinical obesity. 2019 Jun. 30993900
  16. [16] Saxena AR, Frias JP et al.. Tolerability, safety and pharmacodynamics of oral, small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist danuglipron for type 2 diabetes: A 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 study comparing different dose-escalation schemes. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2023 Oct. 37311722
  17. [17] Fantin F, Comellato G et al.. Relationship between neck circumference, insulin resistance and arterial stiffness in overweight and obese subjects. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2017 Sep. 28728486
  18. [18] Kaplan LM, Gudzune K et al.. Perceptions of anti-obesity medications among people with obesity and healthcare providers in the US: Findings from the OBSERVE Study. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2025 Jun. 40275477
  19. [19] Monami M, Ragghianti B et al.. Positioning Incretin-Based and Next-Generation Obesity Management Medications: A Methodological Framework for a Series of Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-Analyses. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2026 Sep. 42387279
  20. [20] Kim Y, Kim KH et al.. Long-Term Outcomes of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Durability of Weight Loss, Metabolic Remission, and the Changing Treatment Landscape. Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery. 2026 Apr. 42124785

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts