The dose-escalation start for vopimetostat plus ERAS-0015 in MTAP-deleted PDAC and MTAP-deleted/RAS-mutant NSCLC is a mechanism-exploration step, not a comparative efficacy signal. [1] No maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetic or antitumor activity results exist for this specific combination, with trial NCT07897734 listed as NOT_YET_RECRUITING with enrollment 188. [1] The nearest RAS-half peer, daraxonrasib, is a pan-RAS (ON) tri-complex molecular glue with Phase 3 RCT validation in second-line metastatic PDAC showing median overall survival 13.2 versus 6.6 months with hazard ratio 0.40, plus Phase 1-II ORR 29% with median PFS 8.1 months and median OS 15.6 months, but it was monotherapy in RAS-mutated disease, not a PRMT5 combination in MTAP-deleted disease, so it cannot carry pivotal weight for this asset. [2] Competitive density is high with ERAS-0015 first-in-human NCT06983743 enrolling 600, LY4066434 PAN-KRAS Phase 1 enrolling 750, and AZD0022 enrolling 430. [3][4] Payer reality is a chemotherapy ceiling exemplified by NAPOLI-1 median OS 6.2 months and PFS 3.1 months and a requirement for comprehensive NGS to find 10-18% NSCLC and 22-30.2% PDAC MTAP-loss fractions. [5] Regulatory advancement will require randomized PFS per blinded central review and OS versus investigator-choice chemotherapy, and open-label single-arm activity alone will not establish benefit-risk. [2]
Phase 1/2 MTD objective only with no efficacy, safety or PK results; nearest peers are preclinical or mechanistically distinct and cannot carry pivotal weight. [6]
| Indication | MTAP-deleted pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
| Drug | vopimetostat and ERAS-0015 |
| Mechanism of Action | PRMT5 inhibitor and pan-RAS molecular glue |
| Company | Tango Therapeutics, Inc. |
| Trial Phase | Phase 1/2 |
| NCT ID | NCT07897734 |
| Category | Clinical Trial Event |
| Sub Category | Trial Initiation / First Patient In (FPI) |
| Therapeutic Area | Oncology |
| Collaborating Company | Erasca, Inc. |
| Patient Population | MTAP-deleted pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, MTAP-deleted/RAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer |
| Study Sponsor | Tango Therapeutics |
| Study Design | open-label, multicenter dose-escalation and expansion trial |
| Primary Objective (Dose-Escalation) | determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination regimen |
| Secondary Objectives | assessment of antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability |
| Vopimetostat Administration | oral, once-daily |
| ERAS-0015 Profile | oral, highly potent pan-RAS molecular glue |
| ERAS-0015 Monotherapy Trial | AURORAS-1 Phase 1 trial |
| Announcement Date | Nov 04, 2026 |
Tango and Erasca Initiate Phase 1/2 Study for Vopimetostat and ERAS-0015 Combination
Tango Therapeutics and Erasca have announced the initiation of a Phase 1/2 open-label, multicenter study for their oral PRMT5 inhibitor, vopimetostat, in combination with the pan-RAS molecular glue, ERAS-0015. This study is enrolling patients with MTAP-deleted pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and MTAP-deleted/RAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective of the dose-escalation portion is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination, with secondary objectives including assessment of antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. This collaboration aims to explore the synergistic potential of co-targeting PRMT5 and RAS pathways in these difficult-to-treat cancers.
- Strategic Combination Therapy: The Phase 1/2 study evaluates vopimetostat, an investigational PRMT5 inhibitor, in combination with ERAS-0015, a pan-RAS molecular glue. This dual-targeted approach is designed to create a complementary inhibition of both PRMT5 and RAS pathways, aiming for deeper and more durable responses in patients with MTAP-deleted and RAS-mutant cancers.
- Targeted Patient Population: The trial specifically targets patients with MTAP-deleted pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and MTAP-deleted/RAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This focus leverages the understanding of genetic vulnerabilities in these cancers, where MTAP deletion is associated with PRMT5 inhibition sensitivity and RAS mutations drive cancer growth.
- Clinical Rationale and Prior Data: The initiation is supported by encouraging clinical activity, durability, and tolerability observed with vopimetostat in combination with RAS inhibition in previous studies. ERAS-0015 has also shown favorable safety, tolerability, and confirmed/unconfirmed partial responses in its AURORAS-1 Phase 1 trial, reinforcing the potential synergy of this combination.
The Unmet Need in MTAP-Deleted Pancreatic and Lung Cancers
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a formidable clinical challenge with dismal long-term outcomes, and fewer than 15% of pancreatic cancer patients survive 5 years. Approximately ~22% of PDAC are MTAP-del, frequently occurring as CDKN2A/MTAP co-deletion, underscoring the need for more effective therapies.
Dismal prognosis and limited durable options: PDAC contains an extensive stroma that modulates response to therapy, contributing to the dismal prognosis associated with this cancer, with 5-year survival consistently below 10% and only modest gains from conventional chemotherapy after first-line failure.
Resistance limits PRMT5 inhibitor efficacy: Next-generation protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitors show promising clinical results in a subset of PDACs with co-deletion of CDKN2A and MTAP, but resistance limits their efficacy, with compensatory spliceosomal reprogramming and upregulation of RNA-binding proteins, including RNA-binding protein 39 (RBM39), contributing to adaptation to PRMT5 inhibition.
Single-agent activity is insufficient and combinations are required: Effective cancer treatment typically requires therapeutic combinations to improve response rates and defeat emergent resistant clones, and strategies to maximize therapeutic efficacy of PRMT5 inhibitors remain undefined; KRAS inhibitors have demonstrated initial signs of clinical efficacy but considering currently documented response rates and resistance development, additional targeted therapies are needed.
Toxicity of earlier PRMT5 inhibitors: The MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor BMS-986504 demonstrated activity in MTAP-del patients without the toxicity associated with previous PRMT5 inhibitors, highlighting toxicity as a limitation of earlier agents.
Co-Targeting PRMT5 and Pan-RAS: A Synergistic Approach
Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is a synthetic lethal target in MTAP-deleted (MTAP-del) cancers, with approximately 22% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) reported as MTAP-del. The MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor BMS-986504 suppressed PRMT5 function and cell growth in MTAP-del cells and xenograft models, and CRISPR/Cas9 loss-of-function screens implicated co-targeting KRAS as a combination strategy. Concurrent inhibition of PRMT5 and KRASG12C/D enhanced and prolonged suppression of PDAC growth. PRMT5 inhibition disrupted RNA splicing of genes essential for PDAC growth, and while PRMT5 and KRAS regulated distinct transcriptomes, they converged on pathways governing cancer cell growth and expression of PDAC-essential genes. In parallel, paralog and single gene targeting CRISPR screening showed loss of several genes, including members of the MAPK pathway, sensitized to PRMT5 inhibition, with chemical inhibition using KRAS, MEK, ERK, and RAF inhibitors synergizing with PRMT5 inhibition to kill CDKN2A/MTAP-null, RAS-active tumors. MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitors combined with either KRAS or RAF inhibitors led to complete responses in vivo, and cell lines resistant to KRAS inhibition were not resistant to MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitors and vice versa, suggesting non-cross-reactive mechanisms of resistance.
A second axis of investigation exploits PRMT5 inhibition-induced defects in DNA damage response. Pharmacologic inhibition of PRMT5 markedly reduces ATM levels across multiple PDAC cell lines, resulting in a functional ATM-deficient state that rewires signaling and increases reliance on the ATR-CHK1 pathway for survival. Combined PRMT5 and CHK1 inhibition showed synergistic suppression of PDAC growth, accompanied by enhanced Caspase 3/7 activation, Annexin V staining, and DNA damage accumulation, with RNA-seq demonstrating downregulation of cell-cycle and DNA repair genes along with upregulation of cell death pathways. In subcutaneous xenografts, the combination substantially reduced tumor volume, prolonged median survival, and did not adversely affect body weight, with treated tumors showing reduced ATM and Ki67 with elevated γH2A.X. Separately, in vivo CRISPR screening in an orthotopic patient-derived xenograft model identified PRMT5 as a synthetic lethality combinatorial target with gemcitabine, where genetic depletion and pharmacologic inhibition showed loss of PRMT5 activity synergistically enhances gemcitabine cytotoxicity due to accumulation of excessive DNA damage, RPA depletion and impaired homology-directed DNA repair activity, creating conditional lethality and synergistic reduction of PDAC tumors in vivo.
A third approach targets adaptive spliceosomal reprogramming following PRMT5 inhibition. Comprehensive molecular profiling demonstrated that PRMT5 inhibitors induce upregulation of RNA-binding proteins, including RNA-binding protein 39 (RBM39). Combining PRMT5 inhibition with indisulam-mediated RBM39 degradation yielded synergistic activity in cellular model systems, significantly enhanced apoptotic cell death and suppressed tumor outgrowth in resistance assays compared to single-agent treatments. Multi-omics analysis revealed concomitant suppression of DNA repair and metabolic pathways, supporting spliceosomal rewiring as a candidate adaptive response and nominating RBM39 as a candidate therapeutic vulnerability for dual targeting of the splicing machinery.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Fumet JD, Limagne E et al.. Precision medicine phase II study evaluating the efficacy of a double immunotherapy by durvalumab and tremelimumab combined with olaparib in patients with solid cancers and carriers of homologous recombination repair genes mutation in response or stable after olaparib treatment. BMC cancer. 2020 Aug 10. 32778095
- [2] Ji Y, Liu X et al.. Use of ratiometrically designed nanocarrier targeting CDK4/6 and autophagy pathways for effective pancreatic cancer treatment. Nature communications. 2020 Aug 25. 32843618
- [3] Peters ML, Tseng JF et al.. Genetic Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Prevention and Treatment. Clinical therapeutics. 2016 Jul. 27041411
- [4] Yu S, Doyle LA et al.. The diagnostic utility of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase immunohistochemistry for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in FNA and small biopsy specimens. Cancer cytopathology. 2024 Feb. 38054349
- [5] Mortoglou M, Miralles F et al.. Inhibiting CDK4/6 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via microRNA-21. European journal of cell biology. 2023 Jun. 37105116
- [6] Hendifar AE, Larson BK et al.. Pancreatic cancer 'mismatch' in Lynch syndrome. BMJ open gastroenterology. 2019. 31275582
- [7] Wei X, Yang J et al.. Targeted CRISPR screening identifies PRMT5 as synthetic lethality combinatorial target with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2020 Nov 10. 33097661
- [8] Han M, Lee E et al.. Real-World Prevalence and Structural Validation of the Canonical 9p21 MTAP-CDKN2A/B Deletion in Non-NSCLC Solid Tumors. Cancers. 2026 Mar 10. 41899498
- [9] Lloyd EG, Jihad M et al.. SMAD4 and KRAS Status Shapes Cancer Cell-Stromal Cross-Talk and Therapeutic Response in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer research. 2025 Apr 15. 39841099
- [10] Feng M, Jiao Q et al.. The interaction between UBR7 and PRMT5 drives PDAC resistance to gemcitabine by regulating glycolysis and immune microenvironment. Cell death & disease. 2024 Oct 18. 39424627
- [11] Hoang T, Tsang ES. Advances in Novel Targeted Therapies for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer. 2025 Jan 6. 39762686
- [12] Kumarasamy V, Vail P et al.. Functional Determinants of Cell Cycle Plasticity and Sensitivity to CDK4/6 Inhibition. Cancer research. 2021 Mar 1. 33323381
- [13] Schneider C, Spielmann V et al.. PRMT5 inhibitors: Therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer. Translational oncology. 2025 May. 40157258
- [14] Sasaki K, Takano S et al.. C4b-binding protein α-chain enhances antitumor immunity by facilitating the accumulation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR. 2021 Jun 24. 34167573
- [15] Lee MKC, Grimmond SM et al.. PRMT5: An Emerging Target for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancers. 2021 Oct 13. 34680285
- [16] Drizyte-Miller K, Engstrom LD et al.. Combination of the MTA-Cooperative PRMT5 Inhibitor BMS-986504 and KRAS Inhibitors Is an Effective Treatment Strategy for MTAP-Deleted KRAS-Mutant Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer research. 2025 Sep 15. 40694535
- [17] Biankin AV, Waddell N et al.. Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes. Nature. 2012 Nov 15. 23103869
- [18] Peng L, Liang Y et al.. Nanomedicine breakthroughs overcoming pancreatic cancer drug resistance through precision nano-interventions. Nanoscale advances. 2025 Sep 24. 40880605
- [19] Scheithauer W, Ramanathan RK et al.. Dose modification and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: phase III MPACT trial. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2016 Jun. 27284481
- [20] Olaoba OT, Ligali FC et al.. Of immune checkpoint maladies and remedies: The throwing of jabs in the oncogenic ring of PDAC. Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer. 2021 Jan. 33232723
Contact Us
Address
350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901
For General Inquiry
info@pienomial.com










