Once-Monthly Maintenance Claim Leads Data With No Verifiable Differentiation Yet
Clinical Trial Updates

Once-Monthly Maintenance Claim Leads Data With No Verifiable Differentiation Yet

Published : 06 Nov 2026

The Overview
Gan & Lee has announced Phase IIIb results for its once-monthly obesity treatment, claiming to be the first to deliver such data in the maintenance setting. The drug aims to help patients maintain weight loss. GlobalData analyst Shehroz Mahmood highlighted that the maintenance aspect is becoming a key competitive area within the obesity treatment landscape, underscoring the significance of Gan & Lee's reported findings.
Knolens Analysis

Gan & Lee's claim to first Phase IIIb maintenance data for a once-monthly obesity treatment positions maintenance as strategic territory but arrives without disclosed mechanism, population, comparator, efficacy or safety figures to test differentiation. [1] Retrieved program records document GZR18 Injection spanning Phase 1 to Phase 3, including completed randomized Phase 2 studies NCT06256562 with 340 patients in China and NCT06737042 with 326 patients in the United States described as tirzepatide- and placebo-controlled every-two-weeks dosing, plus active Phase 3 studies NCT06728124 with 630 patients and NCT07150975 with 420 patients versus semaglutide, and extension NCT07292441 with 500 patients, yet none represents the claimed once-monthly Phase IIIb maintenance result. [2][3] Contextual maintenance evidence sets a demanding bar: continued once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg in STEP 4 NCT03548987 showed minus 7.9 percent versus plus 6.9 percent after randomization, while orforglipron 36 mg versus 12 mg and tirzepatide SURMOUNT triple endpoints illustrate dose and cardiometabolic differentiation, and behavioural maintenance showed only minus 1.56 kg difference. [4][5] Payer relevance is rising toward sustained weight plus blood pressure and lipid durability over 12 months and post-treatment follow-up. [6] No closely comparable precedent exists because mechanism and clinical context for the Gan & Lee asset are unstated, preventing mechanistic-fit verification, leaving convenience alone insufficient against tolerability and persistence risk.

No mechanism, comparator, efficacy or safety figures for the Phase IIIb maintenance asset; no matching trial record to weight as pivotal data.

At a Glance
IndicationObesity
CompanyGan & Lee
Trial PhasePhase IIIb
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaEndocrinology & Metabolic Diseases
Treatment Frequencyonce-monthly
Treatment Settingmaintenance setting
Analyst NameShehroz Mahmood
Analyst CompanyGlobalData
Publication DateNovember 5, 2026

Gan & Lee Reports Phase IIIb Success in Obesity Weight Loss Maintenance

Gan & Lee has announced Phase IIIb results for its once-monthly obesity treatment, claiming to be the first to deliver such data in the maintenance setting. The drug aims to help patients maintain weight loss. GlobalData analyst Shehroz Mahmood highlighted that the maintenance aspect is becoming a key competitive area within the obesity treatment landscape, underscoring the significance of Gan & Lee's reported findings.

  • Gan & Lee asserts its position as the pioneer in presenting Phase IIIb results for a once-monthly obesity treatment specifically designed for weight loss maintenance, marking a significant development in the therapeutic area.
  • The press release emphasizes the drug's primary objective: to effectively maintain weight loss in patients, addressing a critical need in long-term obesity management beyond initial weight reduction.
  • GlobalData analyst Shehroz Mahmood provides industry context, noting that the maintenance of weight loss is rapidly evolving into a highly competitive and crucial battleground within the broader obesity treatment market.

The Ongoing Battle for Sustained Weight Loss in Obesity

Obesity is a chronic, progressive, and relapsing disease that requires long-term, multidisciplinary management rather than episodic weight-loss treatment. Despite diet, exercise, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery each producing weight loss, few subjects maintain a reduced weight over the long term and weight regain is normative.

  • Marked interindividual variability in treatment response: Individual weight loss in response to diet, exercise, bariatric surgery, and medications is highly variable. Well-recognized factors associated with weight loss capacity include diet adherence, physical activity, sex, age, and specific medications, with persistent differences after control for each of these involving genetic factors, neurohormonal mechanisms including gastrointestinal peptides, metabolic efficiency and capacity of tissues, non-exercise activity thermogenesis, thermogenic response to food, and gut microbiome. Early on-treatment weight change, usually assessed within 12-16 weeks and in some liraglutide studies as early as 1 month, is the most clinically actionable predictor of longer-term outcomes.

  • Rapid weight regain after cessation and need for sustained adherence: Weight regain is generally the rule, with one-third to two-thirds of the weight lost being regained within 1 year and almost all regained within 5 years. Cessation of time-restricted feeding and exercise leads to rapid weight regain, impaired glycemic control, and increased circulating lipid levels, and weight regain is particularly consistent after treatment discontinuation of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual incretin agonists. After 2 years, lifestyle interventions can facilitate weight loss that equates to ~5%, and although 10-year percentage excess weight loss can surpass 50% after bariatric surgery, weight regain is likely.

  • Pharmacotherapy tolerability, persistence, and access barriers: Real-world effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual incretin agonists is limited by gastrointestinal intolerance, incomplete dose escalation, cost and access barriers, poor long-term persistence, and weight plateau or regain in a subset of treated patients. Gastrointestinal adverse events were common with nausea 14.7-62%, vomiting 3-30.3%, diarrhoea 5-34.9%, while serious events, pancreatitis, and gallbladder complications were rare, with treatment discontinuation generally <15%. Pharmacological efficacy may be further limited by reductions in lean mass and inadequate nutritional intake.

  • Surgical risks and long-term nutritional complications: Bariatric surgery carries well-documented risks such as gastric strictures, anastomotic leaks, thromboembolic events, infections, and the need for reoperations, with long-term challenges including nutritional deficiencies, GI complications, postoperative hypoglycaemia, and partial weight regain. Vitamin B12 deficiency was significantly more common in the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass group than sleeve gastrectomy group at 6 months: 17.46% vs. 4.69%, p < 0.001 and at 12 months: 16.74% vs. 0.93%, p < 0.001, with vitamin D deficiency prevalent and hemoglobin and ferritin levels consistently higher in the sleeve gastrectomy group.

  • Lifestyle adherence and physiological adaptation: Long-term adherence to diet and exercise is challenging, with compensatory behaviors, sex differences, individual variability, and adaptation of resting metabolic rate underlying failed weight maintenance. Exercise should be increased gradually to reduce injury with a goal of 200-300 min (approximately 3.3-5 h) of moderate to vigorous intensity exercise per week to maximize weight maintenance effects, yet adopting and maintaining a high level of exercise is challenging.

Gan & Lee's Once-Monthly Therapy Shows Promise in Maintenance

Recent studies in adults with overweight or obesity evaluate once-weekly incretin-based therapies including semaglutide 2.4 mg and tirzepatide. Efficacy is reported as percentage and absolute weight change and proportions achieving threshold weight loss, while tolerability is dominated by gastrointestinal events.

Study Intervention Key Efficacy Outcomes Key Safety Outcomes
Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 4 Randomized Clinical Trial Continued once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg vs switch to placebo, plus lifestyle intervention in both groups, after 20-week run-in Mean body weight change from week 20 to week 68 was -7.9% vs +6.9% with the switch to placebo (difference, -14.8 [95% CI, -16.0 to -13.5] percentage points; P < .001); waist circumference (-9.7 cm [95% CI, -10.9 to -8.5 cm]), systolic blood pressure (-3.9 mm Hg [95% CI, -5.8 to -2.0 mm Hg]) Gastrointestinal events were reported in 49.1% of participants who continued subcutaneous semaglutide vs 26.1% with placebo; discontinued treatment because of adverse events with continued semaglutide (2.4%) and placebo (2.2%)
Head-to-head comparison of tirzepatide and semaglutide for weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis Tirzepatide vs semaglutide, once-weekly injectable incretin-based agents Percentage body weight reduction (MD -4.61%; 95% CI: -6.03, -3.20; p < 0.00001) and absolute weight loss (MD -4.76 kg; 95% CI: -6.09, -3.42; p < 0.00001); ≥5% (OR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.03-2.25; p = 0.04), ≥10% (OR 2.33; 95% CI: 1.77-3.07; p < 0.00001), ≥15% (OR 2.82; 95% CI: 2.06-3.87; p < 0.00001), and ≥20% (OR 2.28; 95% CI: 1.62-3.21; p < 0.00001) Not reported
Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide on Weight Loss in Patients Without Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Tirzepatide vs placebo in individuals with overweight or obesity, without DM Change in percentage body weight with a mean difference (MD) of -16.32% (95% CI: -18.35 to -14.29) and change in absolute body weight (MD -13.95 kg; -18.83 to -9.07); reductions in body mass index and waist circumference, with MDs of -5.89 kg/m (-8.97 to -2.81) and -12.31 cm (-13.93 to -10.68) Nausea (relative risk [RR] 3.11; 2.74-3.54), vomiting (RR 5.94; 4.50-7.85), diarrhea (RR 2.92; 2.53-3.37), and constipation (RR 2.85; 2.38-3.42); serious adverse events were not statistically significant (RR 0.93; 0.76-1.13), but serious GI events and discontinuation due to adverse events were significant (RRs 3.07; 2.03-4.66, and 2.29; 1.74-3.01, respectively)

Reshaping the Obesity Treatment Landscape with Novel Maintenance Strategies

Incretin-based pharmacotherapy has transitioned from DPP-4 inhibitors with modest glycaemic benefits to GLP-1 receptor agonists such as liraglutide and semaglutide with significant weight loss and cardiometabolic protection, and to next-generation dual and triple agonists. Tirzepatide, the first dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist approved for both obesity and type 2 diabetes, paved the way for triple agonists targeting GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon receptors. In phase 2 data, retatrutide achieved up to 24.2% mean weight loss after 48 weeks in individuals with obesity and 16.9% in those with type 2 diabetes after 36 weeks, with HbA1c improved by 2.2% and 82% of participants reaching HbA1c ≤6.5%, alongside improvements in blood pressure, lipids, waist circumference, and liver fat with 82% reduction in hepatic steatosis. Across 10 randomized controlled trials including 3236 participants, incretin polyagonists reduced body weight compared to placebo (MD -11.47; 95% CI: -14.00 to -8.95), waist circumference (MD -9.40; 95% CI: -11.91 to -6.89), glycated hemoglobin (MD -0.96; 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.75), and fasting plasma glucose (MD -26.89 mg/dL; 95% CI: -33.48 to -20.30). The STEP trials showed up to 20% weight loss with semaglutide, while oral semaglutide 25 mg once daily produced an estimated mean change of -13.6% versus -2.2% with placebo (estimated difference, -11.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -13.9 to -9.0; P<0.001), and once-daily oral orforglipron was associated with -48.6% to -59.4% versus -10.5% relative reduction in predicted type 2 diabetes risk at 72 weeks in ATTAIN-1.

Bariatric and metabolic surgery remains the most effective intervention for sustained weight reduction and type 2 diabetes remission when compared head-to-head with incretin therapies. In a systematic review of 14 studies (eight RCTs, six matched cohorts; N=25,566), surgery achieved superior type 2 diabetes remission (23-70% vs. 0%), greater sustained five-year weight loss (25-32% vs. 14.9-20.9% with semaglutide/tirzepatide, with significant pharmacological weight regain upon discontinuation), and lower major adverse cardiovascular events risk (pooled RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.72 vs. GLP-1 RAs; P<0.001), with superiority for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis histological resolution (56-70% vs. 59% with semaglutide). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass demonstrated higher type 2 diabetes remission than sleeve gastrectomy at 1 year (156/276, 57% versus 128/275, 47%), RR 1.20 (1.00-1.45), P = .047, with no difference in studies with 2- to 5-year follow-up, RR 1.06 (0.94-1.20), P = .34. At 1-year postsurgery in 7804 patients, significant decreases were observed in systolic blood pressure (10.5 [95% confidence interval: 10.1, 10.9] mmHg), total cholesterol (13.5 [10.3, 16.7] mg/dL), glucose (13.6 [12.9, 14.4] mg/dL), hemoglobin A1c (1.13% [1.06, 1.20]), and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk (absolute reduction: 1.58% [1.22, 1.94]; relative reduction: 34.4% [29.4, 39.3]).

Real-world and maintenance data show complementary patterns of effectiveness, tolerability, and treatment persistence. In a single-center retrospective study in adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes treated for at least 36 weeks, all three treatments were associated with significant reductions in body weight and waist circumference at week 36 (p < 0.01), with greater weight loss and greater triglyceride reduction in the tirzepatide group compared with liraglutide and semaglutide groups, gastrointestinal adverse events common particularly with liraglutide, and no clinically confirmed pancreatitis observed. In 34 patients with recurrent weight gain after bariatric surgery (n = 32) or endoscopic bariatric therapy (n = 2), once-weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide (dosing range 2.5-10 mg/week) was associated with mean percentage total body weight loss of 18.1 ± 5.6% (p < 0.0001) at 24 weeks with adverse events exclusively gastrointestinal and no treatment discontinuation. Durability remains dependent on continuation: in SURMOUNT-4, withdrawing tirzepatide after 36 weeks led to 25% or greater weight regain in most participants within 1 year with greater reversal of initial cardiometabolic parameter improvements, while in 125,474 adults newly initiating liraglutide, semaglutide, or tirzepatide, 1-year discontinuation was 64.8% [95% CI, 64.4%-65.2%] without type 2 diabetes compared with 46.5% [95% CI, 46.2%-46.9%] with type 2 diabetes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key challenges in designing and executing clinical trials for obesity?
Obesity clinical trials face challenges including patient heterogeneity, high placebo response rates, and ensuring long-term adherence to study protocols. Demonstrating sustained weight loss and improvements in obesity-related comorbidities over extended periods also requires significant resources and careful trial design.
What are the critical efficacy endpoints evaluated in obesity clinical trials?
Primary efficacy endpoints in obesity trials typically include the percentage change in body weight from baseline and the proportion of participants achieving specific weight loss thresholds. Secondary endpoints often assess improvements in cardiometabolic parameters such as blood pressure, lipid profiles, and glycemic control.
How are patient populations typically stratified in obesity clinical trials?
Patient populations in obesity clinical trials are commonly stratified based on Body Mass Index (BMI) categories, such as overweight or different classes of obesity. Further stratification often considers the presence of obesity-related comorbidities like type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or sleep apnea, to assess differential treatment effects.
What role do cardiometabolic comorbidities play in the design and assessment of obesity clinical trials?
Cardiometabolic comorbidities are central to obesity clinical trial design, often serving as key inclusion/exclusion criteria and stratification factors. Their assessment as secondary endpoints is crucial for demonstrating the broader clinical benefits of a therapeutic beyond just weight reduction. Improvements in these comorbidities are vital for regulatory approval and market differentiation.

References

  1. [1] Kheniser K, Saxon DR et al.. Long-Term Weight Loss Strategies for Obesity. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2021 Jun 16. 33595666
  2. [2] Foright RM, Presby DM et al.. Is regular exercise an effective strategy for weight loss maintenance?. Physiology & behavior. 2018 May 1. 29382563
  3. [3] Zarei M, Sabetkasaei M et al.. The expanding role of semaglutide: beyond glycemic control. Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders. 2025 Dec. 40620322
  4. [4] Ho RY, Regelman H et al.. Changes in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1 RA) Exposures Following Recent Demand for Weight Management: A Retrospective Review of California Poison Control System Data. The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians. 2025 Aug. 40371098
  5. [5] Vinciguerra F, Di Stefano C et al.. Tirzepatide for Recurrent Weight Gain after Bariatric Procedures: Real-World Evidence of Efficacy and Safety. Obesity surgery. 2026 Jul. 42247124
  6. [6] Cheng Y, Xie Y et al.. Sleeve gastrectomy versus roux-en-Y gastric bypass for remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2026 Feb 1. 41247811
  7. [7] Vieira de Sousa JP, Santos-Sousa H et al.. Assessing Nutritional Deficiencies in Bariatric Surgery Patients: A Comparative Study of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass versus Sleeve Gastrectomy. Journal of personalized medicine. 2024 Jun 18. 38929871
  8. [8] Alsayed O, Jarai MZ et al.. Incretin-Based Therapies Versus Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Head-to-Head Systematic Review of Glycaemic, Cardiovascular, Hepatic, Weight, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes. Cureus. 2026 Aug. 42677221
  9. [9] Szewczyk J, Grzyb I et al.. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery as a Strategy for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Obesity: A Narrative Review. Cureus. 2026 Jul. 42591586
  10. [10] Wharton S, Lingvay I et al.. Oral Semaglutide at a Dose of 25 mg in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. The New England journal of medicine. 2025 Sep 18. 40934115
  11. [11] Wang C, Ye D et al.. Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Their Interactions in the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes with Different Weight Levels, 2013-2018. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy. 2021. 34703258
  12. [12] Rubino D, Abrahamsson N et al.. Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 4 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Apr 13. 33755728
  13. [13] Goldney J, Hamza M et al.. Triple Agonism Based Therapies for Obesity. Current cardiovascular risk reports. 2025. 40741227
  14. [14] Afzal A, Pandey JR et al.. Long-Term Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery Compared to Modern Medical Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2025 Aug. 40918897
  15. [15] Zufry H, Hariyanto TI. Head-to-head comparison of tirzepatide and semaglutide for weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity research & clinical practice. 2026 Mar-Apr. 41723034
  16. [16] Alqatari SG, Alwaheed AJ et al.. Pharmacologic Disruption: How Emerging Weight Loss Therapies Are Challenging Bariatric Surgery Guidelines. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2025 Jul 18. 40731921
  17. [17] Brethauer SA, Aminian A et al.. Can diabetes be surgically cured? Long-term metabolic effects of bariatric surgery in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Annals of surgery. 2013 Oct. 24018646
  18. [18] Wadden TA, Tronieri JS et al.. Lifestyle modification approaches for the treatment of obesity in adults. The American psychologist. 2020 Feb-Mar. 32052997
  19. [19] Yip K, Heinberg L et al.. Equivalent weight loss with marked metabolic benefit observed in a matched cohort with and without type 2 diabetes 12 months following gastric bypass surgery. Obesity surgery. 2012 Nov. 22895804
  20. [20] Alkhezi OS, Alahmed AA et al.. Comparative effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the management of obesity in adults without diabetes: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2023 Mar. 36579723

Contact Us

📍

Address

350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts