Orion Pharma's first-patient dosing in the BICIDES Phase 1/2 study is an organizational milestone, not a clinical evidence event — and the distinction matters. ODM-216 is described only as a bispecific antibody in various advanced solid tumors; its biological targets, mechanism of immune engagement, biomarker selection strategy, and any preclinical efficacy rationale remain undisclosed. This opacity is the defining analytical constraint: without confirmed targets, no mechanistically valid peer or precedent can be identified from the available evidence base. The bispecific antibodies present in the retrieved evidence — including T-cell-redirecting agents in hematologic malignancies and receptor-blocking bispecifics in defined solid tumor populations — are flagged as superficially similar by modality only; none shares confirmed mechanism and clinical context with ODM-216, and none can serve as a clean regulatory or HTA analogy. [1] No closely comparable precedent exists. From a market access standpoint, HTA bodies have demonstrated that even bispecific antibodies with large effect sizes receive 'very low' quality ratings when evidence rests on single-arm, non-randomized designs — a dynamic directly relevant to BICIDES. The broad 'various advanced solid tumors' framing, absent a disclosed biomarker, creates downstream pressure to identify signal-bearing subpopulations before any registrational path is viable. Orion's own framing confirms this is its first biologic, introducing execution risk across manufacturing, immunogenicity assay development, and bispecific-specific pharmacology requirements. The sharpest risk is not competitive — it is that target identity, the single most consequential determinant of differentiation and regulatory pathway, remains entirely unknown.
BICIDES is a Phase 1/2 single-arm first-in-human study with no efficacy, safety, or pharmacokinetic data reported and no biological targets disclosed. Evidence tier is the lowest possible; no mechanistically matched precedent exists to anchor any probability assessment.
| Indication | various advanced solid tumors |
| Drug | ODM-216 |
| Mechanism of Action | PVRIG and PD-L1 bispecific antibody |
| Company | Orion Pharma |
| Trial Phase | Phase 1/2 |
| Trial Acronym | BICIDES |
| NCT ID | NCT07805252 |
| Category | Clinical Trial Event |
| Sub Category | Trial Initiation / First Patient In (FPI) |
| Therapeutic Area | Oncology |
| Patient Population | patients with various advanced solid tumors |
| Trial Objectives | safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy |
| Drug Class | bispecific antibody |
| R&D Center Location | Cambridge, UK |
| R&D Center Establishment Year | 2025 |
| Company Revenue (2025) | 1,890 million euros |
| Number of Employees | approximately 4,000 |
| Global R&D Presence | Finland, UK, United States |
Orion Pharma Doses First Patient in Phase 1/2 BICIDES Trial for ODM-216
Orion Pharma has announced the dosing of the first patient in its Phase 1/2 BICIDES study, evaluating ODM-216, an experimental bispecific antibody. This marks a significant milestone as ODM-216 is the company's first biologic and immuno-oncology cancer drug candidate to advance into clinical development. The trial aims to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of ODM-216 in patients with various advanced solid tumors. This move strengthens Orion's immuno-oncology pipeline and signifies an expansion of its research and development capabilities into large molecule biologics, aligning with its long-term global R&D strategy.
- The initiation of the BICIDES study with ODM-216 represents a pivotal achievement for Orion Pharma, marking its first biologic and immuno-oncology drug candidate to enter clinical development. This advancement underscores Orion's commitment to expanding its expertise beyond small chemical molecules into large molecule biologics, reinforcing its long-term global R&D strategy.
- The Phase 1/2 BICIDES study is designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of ODM-216. The trial targets patients suffering from various advanced solid tumors, aiming to assess how the experimental bispecific antibody, which simultaneously targets PVRIG and PD-L1, performs in a clinical setting.
- ODM-216 is an experimental bispecific antibody developed by Orion Pharma to activate the body's immune responses against tumors. By simultaneously targeting the PVRIG and PD-L1 pathways, it represents an innovative approach within immuno-oncology, forming a key part of Orion's growing portfolio in this critical therapeutic area.
Unpacking the BICIDES Phase 1/2 Trial Design
Several recent phase 1/2 trials have evaluated novel agents across a range of advanced solid tumor indications, spanning targeted therapies, antibody-drug conjugates, and combination immunotherapy regimens. The studies vary in design — from accelerated titration dose-escalation to multicohort open-label frameworks — and employ endpoints including ORR, PFS, OS, DLT, and MTD. The table below summarizes key design parameters and endpoints across these trials.
| Trial / Agent | Tumor Type(s) | Phase | Design | Key Endpoints | Selected Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMP776 & LMP744 (indenoisoquinolines) NCT01051635 / NCT03030417 | Advanced solid tumors & lymphomas | Phase 1 | Simon accelerated titration; IV QDx5 in 28-day cycles | MTD, safety (CTCAE), ORR (RECIST v1.1), PK/PD | MTD: LMP776 12 mg/m/day; LMP744 190 mg/m/day; 1 cPR (ORR 3%) with LMP744; no objective responses with LMP776 |
| Glecirasib (KRAS G12C inhibitor) NCT05009329 / NCT05002270 | PDAC, BTC, small intestinal, gastric, appendiceal, and other solid tumors (excluding NSCLC & CRC) | Phase 1/2 (pooled) | Open-label; oral administration; two trials with similar eligibility criteria | Primary: ORR; Secondary: PFS, OS, safety (CTCAE) | Confirmed ORR 50.9% (95% CI 36.8–64.9%); median PFS 6.9 months; median OS 10.8 months; grade ≥3 TRAEs in 27.8% |
| Sacituzumab govitecan — ASCENT-J02 NCT05101096 | mTNBC (Japanese patients) | Phase 1/2 | Phase 1: standard 3+3 dose escalation (6→10 mg/kg); Phase 2: multicohort open-label at RP2D | Phase 1: safety, DLT incidence, RP2D; Phase 2 primary: IRC-assessed ORR (RECIST v1.1); Secondary: safety | RP2D: 10 mg/kg; IRC-assessed ORR 25.0% (95% CI 12.1–42.2; P = 0.0077); median PFS 5.6 months (95% CI 3.9–NR); median OS NR |
| Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) | Advanced solid tumors (Japanese patients) | Phase 1 | Dose escalation (2 or 10 mg/kg Q2W IV); 28-day rest after cycle 1 | Safety/tolerability (CTCAE v4.0), PK/PD, immunogenicity, antitumor activity (RECIST v1.1 & irRC) | No DLTs; 80% drug-related AEs (mostly grade 1/2); partial responses in 1 NSCLC and 1 melanoma patient |
| Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab — LEAP-005 NCT03797326 | Advanced/metastatic CRC (2+ prior lines) | Phase 2 | Multicohort, open-label; Arm 1: lenvatinib 20 mg/day + pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W; Arm 2: lenvatinib 24 mg/day monotherapy | Dual primary: ORR (RECIST v1.1), safety; Secondary: DOR, PFS, OS | Arm 1 ORR 14% (95% CI 8–23), median PFS 3.4 months, OS 8.7 months; Arm 2 ORR 7% (95% CI 1–22), median PFS 3.4 months, OS 7.7 months |
| Linifanib (ABT-869) | Advanced RCC (post-sunitinib) | Phase 2 | Open-label, multicentre; oral linifanib 0.25 mg/kg/day | Primary: ORR (RECIST); Secondary: PFS, OS, TTP, safety | ORR 13.2%; median PFS 5.4 months (95% CI 3.6–6.0); median OS 14.5 months (95% CI 10.8–24.1) |
| LY2603618 + Gemcitabine | Advanced solid tumors (Japanese patients) | Phase 1 | Standard dose escalation; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² (days 1, 8, 15 per 28-day cycle) + LY2603618 170 mg or 230 mg | Primary: safety/tolerability; Secondary: PK/PD marker profiles | DLTs in 1/7 patients (cohort 1) and 2/10 patients (cohort 2); most common grade ≥3 AEs hematological; 4 patients achieved partial response |
Addressing Unmet Needs in Advanced Solid Tumors
Clinical research in advanced solid tumors has increasingly focused on populations with limited therapeutic options — including patients who have progressed on prior immunotherapy, those harboring specific oncogenic mutations, and tumor types with historically poor response to standard regimens. Across multiple disease settings, investigators are targeting molecularly defined subgroups and refractory populations to address gaps left by existing standard-of-care therapies.
Immunotherapy-refractory and immunotherapy-naive NPC patients: In advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a clear efficacy differential exists between immunotherapy-naive patients (ORR 33.3%, median PFS 10.8 months with LBL-007 plus toripalimab) and IO-treated patients (ORR 11.8%, median PFS 2.7 months), underscoring the unmet need in the post-immunotherapy relapsed setting and the opportunity to optimize first-line combination strategies.
KRAS G12C-mutant solid tumors: Adagrasib in KRAS G12C-mutant populations demonstrated a median OS of 14.74 months and median PFS of 6.80 months across 400 patients, with a DCR of 83%, yet frequent adverse events and dose modifications highlight ongoing tolerability challenges. Additionally, the high prevalence of brain metastases in KRAS G12C-positive non-small cell lung cancer has driven development of brain-penetrant KRAS G12C inhibitors, representing a distinct and underserved subpopulation.
Heavily pretreated colorectal and head and neck cancers: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have received ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy remain a high-priority unmet need; famitinib plus camrelizumab yielded an ORR of 13.6% and median OS of 10.9 months in this setting. Similarly, in relapsed/refractory advanced HNSCC following platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, sacituzumab govitecan achieved an ORR of 16% and median OS of 9.0 months, reflecting the limited options available after standard second-line treatment.
HLA-G-expressing and biomarker-selected tumor populations: JNJ-78306358, targeting HLA-G-expressing tumors (colorectal, ovarian, and renal cell carcinoma), represents an effort to exploit a tumor-selective antigen in heavily pretreated patients, though CRS-related toxicities limited dose escalation to potentially efficacious levels, with no objective responses observed and only 2 patients achieving stable disease >40 weeks.
Tissue-agnostic and molecularly defined populations: The expansion of pan-cancer biomarker-driven therapy — encompassing NTRK, BRAF V600E, RET, HER2-positive, MSI-high, and TMB-high — alongside emerging candidates such as FGFR, ALK, MET, ROS1, NRG1, PIK3CA, AKT, KRAS G12C, HER2 mutations, HER2-low/ultralow, B7-H3, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), reflects a paradigm shift toward histology-agnostic targeting, with tumor heterogeneity and lineage-specific molecular dependencies remaining key challenges to broader clinical integration.
Patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression in refractory solid tumors: Cadonilimab, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 simultaneously, has demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced cervical cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and gastric cancer, with notable efficacy even in patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression — addressing a population historically underserved by PD-1 monotherapy.
Orion Pharma's Strategic Leap into Immuno-Oncology Biologics
Orion Pharma's announcement of dosing the first patient in its Phase 1/2 BICIDES study for ODM-216 marks a pivotal moment, signaling a bold strategic pivot for a company with a notable history in drug development. Historically recognized for its success in small molecule therapies, such as the 'first-in-class' catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor entacapone for Parkinson's disease, Orion Pharma is now venturing into the complex and rapidly evolving landscape of biologics and immuno-oncology. This move represents not just an expansion of its pipeline but a fundamental shift in its research and development focus.
The decision to advance a bispecific antibody for advanced solid tumors underscores a commitment to diversifying its therapeutic portfolio. While the company has a proven track record of bringing novel therapies to market, as evidenced by entacapone's impact on Parkinson's treatment, the transition to large molecule biologics and immuno-oncology presents distinct challenges. Developing biologics requires specialized expertise in discovery, manufacturing, and clinical development, areas that differ significantly from small molecule programs. This implies a potential lack of established internal expertise and infrastructure specific to large molecules, which could lead to unforeseen development hurdles. Furthermore, the efficacy of their first immuno-oncology biologic in advanced solid tumors is entirely unproven, representing a significant clinical risk given the novelty of the approach for the company. This strategic shift also carries the risk of straining Orion Pharma's R&D resources, potentially diverting focus or capital from established programs.
This strategic evolution, however, also presents substantial opportunities. By leveraging its foundational R&D capabilities and scientific acumen, Orion Pharma aims to establish a new foothold in cancer treatment. The success of this early-phase trial will be critical in validating its expanded capabilities and determining the future trajectory of its immuno-oncology ambitions. The market will be watching closely to see if Orion Pharma can replicate its past success in a new, highly complex arena.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Geva R, Vieito M et al.. Safety and clinical activity of JNJ-78306358, a human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) x CD3 bispecific antibody, for the treatment of advanced stage solid tumors. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII. 2024 Aug 6. 39105878
- [2] Shi S, Li L et al.. Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: efficacy and safety outcomes. Journal of thoracic disease. 2025 May 30. 40529751
- [3] Landry ML, Malhotra S et al.. Discovery and Optimization of a Potent, Efficacious, and Brain-Penetrant Inhibitor of KRAS G12C. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2026 Mar 12. 41769711
- [4] Ai L, Li Q et al.. Famitinib plus camrelizumab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: Data from a multicenter, basket study. Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)). 2025 Jan 6. 39872476
- [5] Bruno DS, Hess LM et al.. Disparities in Biomarker Testing and Clinical Trial Enrollment Among Patients With Lung, Breast, or Colorectal Cancers in the United States. JCO precision oncology. 2022 Jun. 35737912
- [6] Dong MZ, Cui M et al.. Recent progress in cadonilimab research for oncology applications. Frontiers in immunology. 2025. 41613151
- [7] Doi T, Yoshino T et al.. Phase I study of LY2603618, a CHK1 inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in Japanese patients with solid tumors. Anti-cancer drugs. 2015 Nov. 26288133
- [8] Cheng Y, Zhang P et al.. Efficacy and safety of surufatinib plus toripalimab in treatment-naive, PD-L1-positive, advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and previously treated small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, multi-cohort phase II trial. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII. 2025 Feb 1. 39891720
- [9] Tannir NM, Wong YN et al.. Phase 2 trial of linifanib (ABT-869) in patients with advanced renal cell cancer after sunitinib failure. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2011 Dec. 22078932
- [10] Kim J, Kim HS et al.. Tissue-agnostic biomarkers in solid tumors: current approvals and emerging candidates. Cancer metastasis reviews. 2025 Jun 27. 40576713
- [11] Mo J, Chen J et al.. Features of tumor microenvironment in HER2-positive urothelial carcinoma and its implications for immunotherapy resistance. BMC cancer. 2026 May 18. 42151849
- [12] Victoria Ruiz I, Uboha NV et al.. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab for Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results From the Phase II LEAP-005 Study. Clinical colorectal cancer. 2026 Jun. 41763955
- [13] Day D, Ganju V et al.. First-in-human phase I study of EMB-02, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and LAG-3 in patients with advanced solid tumors. British journal of cancer. 2025 Jun. 40234667
- [14] Naito Y, Nakamura S et al.. Preliminary results from ASCENT-J02: a phase 1/2 study of sacituzumab govitecan in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. International journal of clinical oncology. 2024 Nov. 39302614
- [15] Ahmad O, Rath S et al.. Clinical Outcomes and Safety Profile of Adagrasib in KRAS G12C-Mutated Solid Tumors: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis. American journal of clinical oncology. 2026 Mar 1. 40844328
- [16] Chen G, Sun DC et al.. Anti-LAG-3 antibody LBL-007 plus anti-PD-1 antibody toripalimab in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and other solid tumors: an open-label, multicenter, phase Ib/II trial. Journal of hematology & oncology. 2025 Feb 7. 39920751
- [17] Jiang C, Ren F et al.. Using Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis to Optimize the Dosing Regimens of Fanastomig (EMB-02) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology. 2025 May. 40067130
- [18] Shimizu T, Seto T et al.. Phase 1 study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475; anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Investigational new drugs. 2016 Jun. 27000274
- [19] Li J, Deng T et al.. Efficacy and safety of glecirasib in solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutation: A pooled analysis of two phase I/II trials. Cancer communications (London, England). 2025 Nov. 41037823
- [20] O'Sullivan Coyne G, Kummar S et al.. Phase 1 studies of the indenoisoquinolines LMP776 and LMP744 in patients with solid tumors and lymphomas. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2025 May 29. 40439882
Contact Us
Address
350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901
For General Inquiry
info@pienomial.com











